Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Protected areas of Borneo fail to protect forest landscapes with high habitat connectivity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Throughout the world, previously extensive areas of natural habitats have been degraded and fragmented, and improving habitat connectivity may help the long-term persistence of species, and their ability to adapt to climate changes. We focused on Borneo, where many remaining areas of tropical forest are highly fragmented, and we assessed the extent to which Protected Areas (PAs) protect highly-connected forest sites. We analysed remotely-sensed land cover data (0.86 km2 grid cell resolution) using ‘Zonation’ reserve design software, and we ranked grid cells (rank 0–1) according to forest extent and connectivity. PAs currently cover 9% of Borneo, but <20% of highly-connected cells (i.e. cells with Zonation ranks ≥0.9) lie within PAs. Approximately 65% of highly-connected cells were located above 400 m elevation, although >60% of Borneo’s total land area lies below 200 m and only 15% of highly-connected cells occurred in these low elevation areas. These findings were relatively insensitive to assumptions about species’ dispersal ability (within the range 1–20 km; representing relatively mobile animal species). The percentage of highly-connected grid cells within PAs could rise from <20 to >50% under proposed new PAs (including the ‘Heart of Borneo’ project), although many other highly-connected sites will remain unprotected. On-going land-use changes mean that existing PAs in lowland areas are likely to become increasingly isolated within inhospitable agricultural landscapes, and improving connectivity through reforestation and rehabilitation of degraded forest may be required to maintain the conservation value of these PAs in future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashton PS (2008) Changing values of Malaysian forests: the challenge of biodiversity and its sustainable management. J Trop For Sci 20:282–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton PS (2010) Conservation of Borneo biodiversity: do small lowland parks have a role, or are big inland sanctuaries sufficient? Brunei as an example. Biodivers Conserv 19:343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck J, Schwanghart W, Chey VK, Holloway JD (2011) Predicting geometrid moth diversity in the Heart of Borneo. Insect Conserv Diver. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00119.x

  • Beier P, Noss RF (1998) Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conserv Biol 12:1241–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedick S, Hill JK, Mustaffa N, Chey VK, Maryati M, Searle JB, Schilthuizen M, Hamer KC (2006) Impacts of rain forest fragmentation on butterflies in northern Borneo: species richness, turnover and the value of small fragments. J Appl Ecol 43:967–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedick S, Hill JK, Hamer KC, Mustaffa N, Chey VK, Maryati M (2007a) Butterfly dispersal and longevity in unlogged and selectively logged forest. Sepilok Bull 6:25–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedick S, White TA, Searle JB, Hamer KC, Mustaffa N, Chey VK, Mohamed M, Schilthuizen M, Hill JK (2007b) Impacts of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity in a tropical forest butterfly on Borneo. J Trop Ecol 23:623–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry NJ, Phillips OL, Lewis SL, Hill JK, Edwards DP, Tawatao NB, Ahmed N, Magintan D, Chey VK, Maryati M, Ong RC, Hamer KC (2010) The value of logged tropical forests: lessons from northern Borneo. Biodivers Conserv 19:985–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brook BW, Tonkyn DW, Q’Grady JJ, Frankham R (2002) Contribution of inbreeding to extinction risk in threatened species. Conserv Ecol 6:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL (2003) Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore. Nature 424:420–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll C, Dunk JR, Moilanen A (2010) Optimizing resiliency of reserve networks to climate change: multispecies conservation planning in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Global Change Biol 16:891–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen I, Shiu H, Benedick S, Holloway JD, Chey VK, Barlow HS, Hill JK, Thomas CD (2009) Elevation increases in moth assemblages over 42 years on a tropical mountain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1479–1483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen I, Hill JK, Shiu H-J, Holloway JD, Benedick S, Chey VK, Barlow HS, Thomas CD (2011) Asymmetric upper and lower boundary shifts of tropical moths over four decades of climate warming. Global Ecol Biogeogr 20:34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK, Brehm G, Cardelus CL, Gilman AC, Longino JT (2008) Global warming, elevational range shifts, and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics. Science 322:258–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curran LM, Trigg SN, McDonald AK, Astiani D, Hardiono YM, Siregar P, Caniago I, Kasischke E (2004) Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo. Science 303:1000–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards DP, Hodgson JA, Hamer KC, Mitchell SL, Ahmad AH, Cornell SJ, Wilcove DS (2010) Wildlife-friendly oil palm plantations fail to protect biodiversity effectively. Conserv Lett 3:236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards DP, Larsen TH, Docherty TDS, Ansell FA, Hsu WW, Derhe MA, Hamer KC, Wilcove DS (2011) Degraded lands worth protecting: the biological importance of Southeast Asia’s repeatedly logged forests. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzherbert EB, Struebig MJ, Morel A, Danielsen F, Brühl CA, Donald PF, Phalan B (2008) How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends Ecol Evol 23:538–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franco AMA, Anderson BJ, Roy DB, Gillings S, Fox R, Moilanen A, Thomas CD (2009) Surrogacy and persistence in reserve selection: landscape prioritization for multiple taxa in Britain. J Appl Ecol 46:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs HK, Ruesch AS, Achard F, Clayton MK, Holmgren P, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2010) Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:16732–16737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green RE, Cornell SJ, Scharlemann JPW, Balmford A (2005) Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307:550–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah L (2010) A global conservation system for climate-change adaptation. Conserv Biol 24:70–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MC, Stehman SV, Potapov PV (2010) Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:8650–8655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1999) Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos 77:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller NE, Zavaleta ES (2009) Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biol Conserv 142:14–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickling R, Roy DB, Hill JK, Thomas CD (2006) The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Global Change Biol 12:450–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JK, Collingham YC, Thomas CD, Blakeley DS, Fox R, Moss D, Huntley B (2001) Impacts of landscape structure on butterfly range expansion. Ecol Lett 4:313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson JA, Thomas CD, Wintle BA, Moilanen A (2009) Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: back to basics. J Appl Ecol 46:964–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson JA, Moilanen A, Wintle BA, Thomas CD (2011) Habitat area, quality and connectivity: striking the balance for efficient conservation. J Appl Ecol 48:148–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson JA, Thomas CD, Cinderby S, Cambridge H, Evans P, Hill JK (in press) Habitat recreation strategies for promoting adaptation of species to climate change. Conserv Lett

  • Koh LP, Wilcove DS (2008) Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? Conserv Lett 1:60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C, Cameron A, Moilanen A, Phillips SJ, Thomas CD, Beentje H, Dransfield J, Fisher BL, Glaw F, Good TC, Harper GJ, Hijmans RJ, Lees DC, Louis E, Nussbaum RA, Raxworthy CJ, Razafimpahanana A, Schatz GE, Vences M, Vieites DR, Wright PC, Zjhra ML (2008) Aligning conservation priorities across taxa in Madagascar with high-resolution planning tools. Science 320:222–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1988) Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455–1460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtomaki J, Tomppo E, Kuokkanen P, Hanski I, Moilanen A (2009) Applying spatial conservation prioritization software and high-resolution GIS data to a national-scale study in forest conservation. For Ecol Manag 258:2439–2449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1963) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • McMorrow J, Talip MA (2001) Decline of forest area in Sabah, Malaysia: relationship to state policies, land code and land capability. Global Environ Change 11:217–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A (2007) Landscape zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: unifying reserve selection strategies. Biol Conserv 134:571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Kujala H (2008) Zonation: spatial conservation planning framework and software. User manual. Metapopulation Research Group, Finland. www.helsinki.fi/bioscience/ConsPlan

  • Moilanen A, Wintle BA (2006) Uncertainty analysis favours selection of spatially aggregated reserve structures. Biol Conserv 129:427–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Franco AMA, Early R, Fox R, Wintle B, Thomas CD (2005) Prioritising multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 272:1885–1891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris RJ (2010) Anthropogenic impacts on tropical forest biodiversity: a network structure and ecosystem functioning perspective. Philos Trans Roy Soc B 365:3709–3718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny V, Basset Y, Miller SE, Weiblen GD, Bremer B, Cizek L, Drozd P (2002) Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature 416:841–844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pescott MJ, Durst PB, Leslie RN (2010) Forest law enforcement and governance: progress in Asia and the Pacific. FAO, Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • RSPO (2006) Round table on sustainable oil palm (RSPO): principles and criteria for sustainable palm oil production. http://www.rspo.org

  • Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392:491–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt CB, Burgess ND, Coad L, Belokurov A, Besançon C, Boisrobert L, Campbell A, Fish L, Gliddon D, Humphries K, Kapos V, Loucks C, Lysenko I, Miles L, Mills C, Minnemeyer S, Pistorius T, Ravilious C, Steininger M, Winkel G (2009) Global analysis of the protection status of the world’s forests. Biol Conserv 142:2122–2130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Clements R, Wanger TC, Hill JK, Hamer KC, Clough Y, Tscharntke T, Posa MRC, Lee TM (2010) Conserving Southeast Asian forest biodiversity in human-modified landscapes. Biol Conserv 143:2375–2384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J, Lopez L, Nunez P, Rao M, Shahabuddin G, Orihuela G, Riveros M, Ascanio R, Adler GH, Lambert TD, Balbas L (2001) Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294:1923–1926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JR, Moilanen AJ, Vesk PA, Bennett AF, Mac Nally R (2009) Where and when to revegetate: a quantitative method for scheduling landscape reconstruction. Ecol Appl 19:817–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vos CC, Berry P, Opdam P, Baveco H, Nijhof B, O’Hanley J, Bell C, Kuipers H (2008) Adapting landscapes to climate change: examples of climate-proof ecosystem networks and priority adaptation zones. J Appl Ecol 45:1722–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS, Hill JK, Thomas JA, Asher J, Fox R, Huntley B, Roy DB, Telfer MG, Jeffcoate S, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Willis SG, Greatorex-Davies JN, Moss D, Thomas CD (2001) Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414:65–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright SJ (2005) Tropical forests in a changing environment. Trends Ecol Evol 20:553–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WWF (2005) Heart of Borneo: three countries, one conservation vision. Workshop Brunei Darussalam. 5th–6th April 2005 (http://wwf.panda.org/)

Download references

Acknowledgments

SP received funding from UKPopnet (NERC), and JKH and CJM received funding from the UK Darwin Initiative (Defra). We thank Atte Moilanen for advice on using Zonation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane K. Hill.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 379 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Proctor, S., McClean, C.J. & Hill, J.K. Protected areas of Borneo fail to protect forest landscapes with high habitat connectivity. Biodivers Conserv 20, 2693–2704 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0099-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0099-8

Keywords

Navigation