Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An assessment of the use of volunteers for terrestrial invertebrate biodiversity surveys

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Species’ distributions, assemblage patterns and the processes influencing these are poorly understood, and urgently require study. Use of volunteers to collect data is becoming increasingly common in biodiversity research. We assess the effectiveness of volunteers sampling terrestrial savanna invertebrates in comparison to experienced researchers, and examine the potential contribution of volunteers to terrestrial invertebrate surveys. There were relatively few differences in the diversity sampled by 54 Earthwatch Institute volunteers when compared to expert researchers. The major difference was in the results from the less spatially constrained method, where experience (microhabitat selection) most affected results, and experienced researchers performed better both quantitatively (more species sampled) and qualitatively (more unique and rare species). For the more constrained and less subjective methods, our training enabled the volunteers to quickly equal the experienced experts. Volunteers’ experience in invertebrate research influenced both the researchers’ perceptions of volunteers’ capacity and the actual performance of the volunteers. This suggests that appropriate training for the methods used can help to improve volunteers’ success with the sampling. We demonstrated that volunteers collect valid data; for the most part they sample invertebrates as effectively as a trained researcher, and that using volunteers has enormous direct benefits in terms of volume of work accomplished. For invertebrate studies using volunteers, we recommend that the subjectivity of the method be minimised, that experience is compensated for by increasing volunteer effort (two volunteers = one researcher), and that there is close management of volunteers in the field to ensure ongoing data quality. Volunteers provide a valuable resource to researchers carrying out biodiversity surveys, but using volunteers to carry out a scientifically sound project is not an easy option, and should only be implemented when volunteers would make a meaningful contribution and enable an otherwise impossible project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brooks T, da Fonseca G, Rodrigues A (2004) Species, data, and conservation planning. Conserv Biol 18:1682–1688. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00457.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess N, Mwasumbi L, Hawthorne W, Dickinson A, Doggett R (1992) Preliminary assessment of the distribution, status and biological importance of coastal forests in Tanzania. Biol Conserv 62:205–218. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(92)91048-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke K, Gorley R (2001) PRIMER v5: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke K, Warwick R (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins JA (2007) The role of UK-based conservation tourism operators. Tour Manage 28:1020–1030. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2006.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwall W, Dulvy N (1996) An evaluation of the suitability of non-specialist volunteer researchers for coral reef fish surveys. Mafia Island, Tanzania—a case study. Biol Conserv 78:223–231. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(95)00147-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fore L, Paulsen K, O’Laughlin K (2001) Assessing the performance of volunteers in monitoring streams. Freshw Biol 46:109–123. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00640.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Smith J, Evans S (2003) The value of marine ecological data collected by volunteers. Biol Conserv 113:199–213. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00373-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K (1994) Rarity. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour J, Saunders D (1995) Earthwatch: an international network in support of research on nature conservation. In: Saunders D, Craig J, Mattiske E (eds) Nature conservation. Beatty, Surrey, pp 627–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffredo S, Piccinetti C, Zaccanti F (2004) Volunteers in marine conservation monitoring: a study of the distribution of seahorses carried out in collaboration with recreational scuba divers. Conserv Biol 18:1492–1503. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00015.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr J (1990) Avian survival rates and the extinction process on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Conserv Biol 4:387–391. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00313.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert S (1993) Values and perceptions of invertebrates. Conserv Biol 7:845–855. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740845.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGehee NG (2002) Alternative tourism and social movements. Ann Tourism Res 29:124–143. doi:10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00027-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumby P, Harborne A, Raines P, Ridley J (1995) A critical-assessment of data derived from coral cay conservation volunteers. Bull Mar Sci 56:737–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newman C, Buesching C, Macdonald D (2003) Validating mammalian monitoring methods and assessing the performance of volunteers in wildlife conservation—“Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodies?”. Biol Conserv 113:189–197. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00374-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Wilson C, McCullum C, Huang R, Dwen P, Flack J et al (1997) Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. Bioscience 47:747–757. doi:10.2307/1313097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponder W, Lunney D (eds) (1999) The other 99%. The conservation and biodiversity of invertebrates. Transactions of the Royal Society of New South Wales, Mosman, p 462

    Google Scholar 

  • Puky M (2006) A new, volunteer-based, cost effective method for zoological mapping: the photo identification of freshwater crayfish (Crustacea: Decapoda) species and the importance of volunteers in crayfish research. Bull Fr Peche Piscicult 380–81:927–936. doi:10.1051/kmae:2006032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slotow R, Hamer M (2000) Biodiversity research in South Africa: comments on current trends and methods. S Afr J Sci 96:222–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward D, Larivière M (2004) Terrestrial invertebrate surveys and rapid biodiversity assessment in New Zealand: lessons from Australia. N Z J Ecol 28:151–159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to all Earthwatch volunteers, field assistants and students for their time and effort in the field and in the laboratory. Funding was provided by the Earthwatch Institute and the National Research Foundation via a grant to MH. Conservation Corporation and particularly K. Pretorius, is thanked for accommodation and logistical support in Phinda. KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife and the Greater St. Lucia Wetland Park Authority are thanked for permission to work in Mkhuze and False Bay. We also thank KZN Wildlife staff for logistical support, and the Inland Invertebrate Initiative (UKZN) and Natal Museum for additional support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob Slotow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lovell, S., Hamer, M., Slotow, R. et al. An assessment of the use of volunteers for terrestrial invertebrate biodiversity surveys. Biodivers Conserv 18, 3295–3307 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9642-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9642-2

Keywords

Navigation