Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A rapid and cost-effective tool for managing habitats of the European Natura 2000 network: a case study in the Italian Alps

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Habitats” Directive 92/43/EEC is the pivotal European law for building a continental network of sites of community importance (SCIs) for nature conservation. Article 6 of such directive underlines the importance of biodiversity conservation through the realization of proper management plans. As a result, such plans are increasingly common. A management plan based on intensive field studies and monitoring activities requires time and financial resources, which are generally limited. The aim of this paper is to offer a rapid, cost-effective and scientifically based decision tool aimed to achieve GIS-based conservation strategies for habitats of EU interest within SCIs and, in general, within protected areas. As a case study, we considered species-rich Nardus grasslands (threatened by natural reconversion and intensive cattle grazing), and transition mires (threatened by pasturing and human disturbance) in a SCI in the Alps. Through a multi-criteria evaluation, we selected indicators and weights based upon our knowledge of the study area. As a result, we were able to: (a) quantify the level of existing threats, (b) suggest urgent conservation strategies, and (c) suggest future monitoring activities. Since the study area is representative of many protected areas in the Alps and the conservation topics under evaluation are frequent threats impacting habitats of EU interest, our decision model might be transferable to further areas given proper adaptation of weights to the intensity and the frequency of current threats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SCI:

Site of community importance

EU:

European Union

H-6230:

European Union habitat 6230—species-rich Nardus grasslands on siliceous substrates in mountain areas (and submountain areas in Continental Europe)

H-7140:

European Union habitat 7140—transition mires and quaking bogs

References

  • Bakker ES, Olff H (2003) Impact of different-sized herbivores on recruitment opportunities for subordinate herbs in grasslands. J Veg Sci 14:465–474. doi:10.1658/1100-9233(2003)014[0465:IODHOR]2.0.CO;2

    Google Scholar 

  • Balram S, Dragićević S, Meredith T (2004) A collaborative GIS method for integrating local and technical knowledge in establishing biodiversity conservation priorities. Biodivers Conserv 13:1195–1208. doi:10.1023/B:BIOC.0000018152.11643.9c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beinat E, Nijkamp P (eds) (1998) Multicriteria analysis for land-use management. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi C (ed) (2003) Ecological information in Italy. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio, Società Botanica Italiana

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleher B, Uster D, Bergsdorf T (2006) Assessment of threat status and management effectiveness in Kakamega Forest, Kenya. Biodivers Conserv 15:1159–1177. doi:10.1007/s10531-004-3509-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley RC (2000) Tourism in the most fragile environments. Tour Recreat Res 25:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman P (2007) Conservation grazing of semi-natural habitats. Technical Note 586, The Scottish Agricultural College

  • Dale VH, Beyeler SC (2001) Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol Indic 1:3–10. doi:10.1016/S1470-160X(01)00003-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1988) Vegetation ecology of central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003a) LIFE FOCUS / LIFE for Natura 2000: 10 years implementing the regulation. Luxenbourg, 108 pp

  • European Commission (2003b) Interpretation manual of European Union Habitats. Technical report, Luxembourg

  • European Commission (2007) Natura 2000. DG ENV nature newsletter 23, Luxembourg, 16 pp

  • Gerdol R, Tomaselli M (1997) Vegetation of wetlands in the dolomites. Dissertationes Botanicae, Band 281

  • Grabherr G, Mucina L (eds) (1993) Die Planzengesellschaften Österreichs. Gustav Fisher Velag, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Honey M (1999) Ecotourism and sustainable development: who owns paradise?. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries HC, Bourgeron PS, Reynolds KM (2008) Suitability for conservation as a criterion in regional conservation network selection. Biodivers Conserv 17:467–492. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9245-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen R (1994) Multiobjective Decision support for environmental management. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell PL, Güsewell S, Berry NR et al (2005) Vegetation patterns maintained by cattle grazing on a degraded mountain pasture. Bot Helv 115:109–124. doi:10.1007/s00035-005-0727-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler F, Gillet F, Gobat J-M et al (2004) Seasonal vegetation changes in mountain pastures due to simulated effects of cattle grazing. J Veg Sci 15:143–150. doi:10.1658/1100-9233(2004)015[0143:SVCIMP]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler F, Gillet F, Gobat J-M et al (2006) Effect of cattle activities on gap colonization in mountain pastures. Folia Geobot 41:289–304. doi:10.1007/BF02904943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence A, van Rijsoort J (2002) How should a participatory biodiversity assessment be conducted? In: UNEP World Conservation and Monitoring Centre (ed) Biodiversity assessment and monitoring. Guidance for practitioners. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardy Region (2000) Carta delle malghe della Regione Lombardia. Regione Lombardia, CD Rom

    Google Scholar 

  • Margoluis R, Salafsky N (1998) Measures of success: designing, managing and monitoring conservation and development projects. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy L, Grabherr G, Körner C et al (eds) (2003) Alpine biodiversity in Europe. Ecol Stud 167, Springer, Heidelberg

  • Olff H, Ritchie ME (1998) Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:261–265. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01364-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasche F, Armand M, Gouaux P et al (2004) Are meadows with high ecological and patrimonial value endangered by heathland invasion in the French central Pyrenees? Biol Conserv 118:101–108. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellerin S, Huot J, Côté SD (2006) Long term effects of deer browsing and trampling on the vegetation of peatlands. Biol Conserv 128:316–326. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power DJ, Sharda R (2007) Model-driven decision support systems: concepts and research directions. Decis Support Syst 43:1044–1061. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proulx M, Mazumder A (1998) Reversal of grazing impact on plant species richness in nutrient-poor vs. nutrient-rich ecosystems. Ecology 79(8):2581–2592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pykälä J (2004) Cattle grazing increases plant species richness of most species trait groups in mesic semi-natural grasslands. Plant Ecol 175:217–226. doi:10.1007/s11258-005-0015-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon PJ, Armstrong DP, Maloney RF (2007) Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conserv Biol 21(2):303–312. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00627.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Rijsoort J, Jinfeng Z (2005) Partecipatory resource monitoring as a means for promoting social change in Yunnan, China. Biodivers Conserv 14:2543–2573. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-8377-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wilgen BW (1996) Management of the natural ecosystems of the Cape Peninsula: current status and future prospects. Biodivers Conserv 5:671–684. doi:10.1007/BF00137614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogd H (1983) Multi-criteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood L, Dragicevic S (2007) GIS-based multicriteria evaluation and fuzzy sets to identify priority sites for marine protection. Biodivers Conserv 16:2539–2558. doi:10.1007/s10531-006-9035-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziliotto U, Scotton M, Da Ronch F (2004) I pascoli alpini: aspetti ecologici e vegetazionali. Quaderni SoZooAlp, pp 11–26

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the University of Pavia (Italy). The authors wish to thank an anonymous reviewer for his useful comments, and Dr. Duccio Rocchini (University of Siena), Dr. Fabio Attorre (University of Rome “La Sapienza”) and Dr. Valeria Dominione (University of Pavia) for their constructive suggestions on an earlier draft of the manuscript. We are grateful to Dr. Julie Crawford (Mancos, Colorado, USA) for linguistic revision of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rossi Graziano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graziano, R., Gilberto, P. & Alessandro, F. A rapid and cost-effective tool for managing habitats of the European Natura 2000 network: a case study in the Italian Alps. Biodivers Conserv 18, 1375–1388 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9459-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9459-4

Keywords

Navigation