Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implications of location specific data and their usefulness in conservation planning: an example from Indian Himalayan Region (IHR)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study evaluated the usefulness of collection of location specific data for assessing patterns of species diversity and endemism based on a dataset for the 10 temperate flowering plant families from the Indian Himalaya Region. Analysis was based on 818 grid cells (15 × 15′) representing throughout the Indian Himalayan Region (IHR). Based on the existing information on diverse aspects of the selected plant families four indices, i.e., species richness, weighted endemism, 1–4 cell endemism and corrected weighted endemism were developed and mapped for selected plant families. Analysis revealed that endemism is significantly (P < 0.001) correlated with species richness (1–4 cell endemic index: r = 0.85; weighted endemism; r = 0.58). On the basis of four different indices, potential areas have been identified for conservation. Data of each indices have been overlaid to each other for identification and prioritization of endemic rich areas in the Indian Himalayan Region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aswal BS, Mehrotra BN (1994) Flora of Lahul-Spiti. (A Cold desert in North–West Himalayas). Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun

    Google Scholar 

  • Babu CR (1977) Herbaceous flora of Dehra Dun. CSIR, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Morre JL, Brooks T, Burgess N, Hansen LA, Williams P et al (2001) Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science 291:2616–2619. doi:10.1126/science.291.5513.2616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G, Brown JH (1995) Global pattern of mammalian diversity, endemism and endangerment. Conserv Biol 9:559–568. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09030559.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury HJ, Wadhwa BM (1984) Flora of Himachal Pradesh, vols 1–3. Botanical Survey of India, Howrah

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp MD, Laffan S, Linder HP, Monro A (2001) Endemism in the Australian flora. J Biogeogr 28:183–198. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00524.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis SD, Haywood VH, Hamilton AC (1994) Centres of plant diversity: a guide and strategy for their conservation. World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF) and IUCN-World Conservation Union, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar U, Kachroo P (1983) Alpine flora of Kashmir Himalaya. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar U, Samant SS (1993) Endemic plant diversity in the Indian Himalaya I. Ranunculaceae Paeoniaceae. J Biogeogr 20:659–668. doi:10.2307/2845521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Quinn RM, Blackburn TM, Eversham BC (1998) Species—range size distribution in Britain. Ecography 21:361–370. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00401.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur RD (1999) Flora of District Garhwal, NorthWest Himalaya (with ethnobotanical notes). Transmedia, Srinagar

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RK (1968) Flora Nainitalensis. Navayug Traders, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara H, Stearn WT, Williams HJ (1978) An enumeration of flowering plants of Nepal, vol I. British Museum Natural History, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara H, Williams HJ (1979) An enumeration of the flowering plants of Nepal, vol II. British Museum Natural History, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress WJ, Heyer WR, Acevedo P, Coddington J, Cole D, Erwin TL et al (1998) Amazonian biodiversity: assessing conservation priorities with taxonomic data. Biodivers Conserv 7:1577–1587. doi:10.1023/A:1008889803319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder HP (2001) Plant diversity and endemism in Sub-Saharan tropical Africa. J Biogeogr 28:169–182. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00527.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett JC, Rudd S, Taplin J, Moller CF (2000) Patterns of plant diversity in Africa South of the Sahara and their implications for conservation management. Biodivers Conserv 9:37–46. doi:10.1023/A:1008956529695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew KM (1981) Flowering plants of Kurseong. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews WS, Wyk AEV, Bredenkamp GJ (1993) Endemic flora of the North-Eastern Transvaal Escarpment, South Africa. Biol Conserv 63:83–94. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(93)90077-E

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Thomsen JB, da Fonseca GAB, Olivieri S (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 12:516–520. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003516.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, de Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity and hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair NC (1977) Flora of Bashahr Himalayas. International Biosciences Publishers, Hissar and Madras

    Google Scholar 

  • Naithani BD (1984–1985) Flora of Chamoli, vols 1 and 2, Botanical Survey of India, Howrah

  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC et al (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the worlds: a new map of life in earth. Bioscience 51:933–938. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey PC (1985) Flora of Almora district. PhD thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital

  • Rana TS, Dutt B, Rao RR (2000) Biodiversity in the alpine Himalaya: strategies for conservation and eco development. Gynodaya Prakashan, Nainital, pp 29–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers WA, Panwar HS (1988) Planning a wildlife protected area network in India, vols 1 and 2. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler M, Honorio E, Janove CJ, Reynel C (2007) Implications of collection patterns of botanical specimens on their usefulness for conservation planning: an example of two neotropical plant families (Moraceae and Myristicaceae) in Peru. Biodivers Conserv 16:659–677. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-3373-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilkenkin BY, Chikatunov VI (1998) Co-occurrence of species with various geographical ranges and correlation between area size and number of species in geographical scale. J Biogeogr 25:275–284. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.252193.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams PH, Prance GT, Humphries CJ, Edwards KS (1996) Promise and problems in applying quantitative complementary areas for representing the diversity of some neotropical plants (Families Dichapetalaceae, Lecythidaceae, Caryocaraceae, Chrysobalanaceae and Proteaceae). Biol J Linn Soc 58:125–157

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank to the Director of the Institute for providing facilities and encouragement. GM thanks to colleagues in the Conservation of Biological Diversity core group for their help and support. Mr. K. S. Gaira is thanked for help with the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gayatri Mahar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahar, G., Dhar, U., Rawal, R.S. et al. Implications of location specific data and their usefulness in conservation planning: an example from Indian Himalayan Region (IHR). Biodivers Conserv 18, 1273–1286 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9450-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9450-0

Keywords

Navigation