Abstract
Naming, listing and measuring human-induced threats in protected areas are crucial in conservation. Here, we defined a check-list of direct threats in a Mediterranean remnant wetland (central Italy), managed as nature reserve, grouping them according to a taxonomically-oriented nomenclature. We assessed three regime parameters (scope, severity, and magnitude) applying an experience-based method, then comparing the assessments obtained from two different level of expertise: a panel of independent people, upper level “university students” in an applied ecology class; and a panel of “experts” as nature reserve biologists and managers. Despite observing a significant correlation among values assigned from students and experts for each regime parameter, students underestimated the scope of feral dogs, the severity of fires and the magnitude of feral dogs and water stress. Considering only the magnitude values (sum of scope and severity), students assigned the higher values to alien species, antropophilous species, aircraft, and pollution, while the experts assigned the higher values to antropophilous species, aircraft, alien species, and water stress. In an order of priority, there was an agreement between students and experts with a coincidence for three threats out of four. We suppose that a panel of students with a short academic training could be useful to a get a first order of priority in regard to a set of local selected threats, with much similarity to the assessment obtained from a panel of experts. When threat metrics are difficult to compare, experience-based approach obtained from technicians trained ad hoc (“students”) could be useful to define priorities for management strategies in nature reserves, but data obtained should be examined critically. Indeed, students may assign higher scores to regime parameters of threats more readily identified and perceivable, underestimating the threats with an inconstant regime, localized in time and space, mobile, or cryptic. If experience-based methods are used to define scale of priorities, these issues need to be considered.
References
Amori G, Battisti C, Capizzi D (2006) Mammiferi. In: Battisti C (ed) Biodiversità, gestione, conservazione di un’area umida del litorale tirrenico. Gangemi editore, Provincia di Roma, Assessorato alle politiche agricole e dell’ambiente, Roma, pp 325–326
Battisti C (ed) (2006) Biodiversità, gestione, conservazione di un’area umida del litorale tirrenico: la Palude di Torre Flavia. Provincia di Roma, Gangemi editore, Roma
Battisti C, Sorace A (2006) Uccelli: check-list aggiornata a novembre 2005. In: Battisti C (ed) Biodiversità, gestione, conservazione di un’area umida del litorale tirrenico. Gangemi editore, Provincia di Roma, Assessorato alle politiche agricole e dell’ambiente, Roma, pp 255–269
Battisti C, Aglitti A, Sorace A et al (2006) Water level and its effect on the breeding bird community in a remnant wetland in Central Italy. Ekològia (Bratislava) 25:252–263
Benassi G, Battisti C, Luiselli L (2007) Area effect on bird species richness of an archipelago of wetland fragments of Central Italy. Community Ecol 8:229–237
BirdLife International (2004) Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 12, BirdLife International, Cambridge
Blondel J, Aronson J (1999) Biology and wildlife of the Mediterranean region. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bulgarini F, Petrella S, Teofili C (2006) Biodiversity Vision dell’Ecoregione Mediterraneo Centrale. WWF Italia – Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca, Roma
Celauro D (2006) Pesci: dati preliminari. In: Battisti C (ed) Biodiversità, gestione, conservazione di un’area umida del litorale tirrenico. Gangemi editore, Provincia di Roma, Assessorato alle politiche agricole e dell’ambiente, Roma, pp 234–239
Cole DN (1994) The wilderness threats matrix: a framework assessing impacts. Res. Pap. INT-475. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden UT
Farina A, Johnson A, Turner S et al (2003) “Full” world versus “Empty” world paradigm at the time of globalisation. Ecol Econ 45:11–18
Gibbs JP (1993) Importance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetland-associated animals. Wetlands 13:25–31
Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GJ (2003) EcoSim: null models software for ecology. Aquired Intelligence Inc., New York
Groom MJ, Meffe GK, Carroll CR (2006) Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer associates Inc., Sunderland
Heath M, Borggreve C, Peet N (2000) European bird populations. Estimates and trends. BirdLife Conservation Series, 10. BirdLife International, Cambridge
Hess GR, King TJ (2002) Planning open spaces for wildlife. I. Selecting focal species using a Delphi survey approach. Landsc Urban Plan 58:25–40
Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF (1992) Disturbance, diversity and invasions: implications for conservations. Conserv Biol 6:324–337
IUCN – CMP (The World Conservation Union – Conservation Measures Partnership) (2006) Unified classification of direct threats. Version 1.0
Lehtinen RM, Galatowitsch M, Tester JR (1999) Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibians assemblages. Wetlands 19:1–12
Linstone HA, Turoff M (eds) (1975) The Delphi method: technique and applications. Addison-Wesley, New York
Olson DM, Direnstein E (1998) The Global 200: a representation approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv Biol 12:505–515
Paracuellos M (2006) Relationship of songbird occupation with habitat configuration and bird abundance in patchy reed beds. Ardea 94:87–98
Pitzalis M, Bologna MA (2006) Anfibi e rettili. In: Battisti C (ed) Biodiversità, gestione, conservazione di un’area umida del litorale tirrenico. Gangemi editore – Provincia di Roma, Assessorato alle politiche agricole e dell’ambiente, Roma, pp 240–254
Salafsky N, Salzer D, Ervin J et al (2003) Conventions for defining, naming, measuring, combining, and mapping threats in conservation. An initial proposal for a standard system. Draft version, 1.12.2003. Available from www.conservationmeasures.org/CMP/IUCN/Site_Page. Cited 1 Oct 2007
Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR (1998) Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conserv Biol 12:1129–1133
Soulé ME (1986) Conservation biology. The science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland
SPSS Inc. (2003) SPSS for Windows – Release 13.0 (1 Sep 2004), Leadtools (c), Lead Technologies Inc
Sutherland WJ (2000) The conservation handbook. Blackwell Science, Massachussets
TNC-WWF (The Nature Conservancy World Wide Fund for Nature) (2006) CAP – Conservation Action Planning, USA. Available from http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/cbdgateway/resources. Cited 1 Oct 2007
Tucker GM, Heath MF (1994) Birds in Europe: their conservation status. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 3, BirdLife International, Cambridge
White PS, Pickett STA (1985) Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: an introduction. In: Pickett STA, White PS (eds) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 3–13
Acknowledgements
This study has been performed as a part of the activities of the Environmental Service – Province of Rome, that manages Torre Flavia wetland Natural Monument protected area. We acknowledge the members of the panel of experts (C. Battisti, naturalist, manager responsible of the nature reserve, Dept. of Rome, Environmental Service; F. Causarano, biologist, University of Rome III; S. Ceccobelli, biologist, University of Rome III; V. Della Bella, biologist, PhD, National Institute of the Health, Rome; R. Malavasi, biologist, University of Rome III; E. Rizzo, biologist, University of Rome III; A. Sorace, naturalist, PhD; National Institute of the Health, Rome; C. Galimberti, E. De Angelis and N. Trucchia, Rangers in TFNM, Dept. of Rome, Environmental Service) and the students in Applied Ecology, Biological Sciences, University of Rome III (academic year 2005-2006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Battisti, C., Luiselli, L., Pantano, D. et al. On threats analysis approach applied to a Mediterranean remnant wetland: Is the assessment of human-induced threats related to different level of expertise of respondents?. Biodivers Conserv 17, 1529–1542 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9360-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9360-1