Abstract
Different environmental factors act as driving forces of diversity at different scales of analysis; and also the effect of one environmental factor changes as the scale of analysis changes. Most studies rely on multiple regression models, and such models tend to mix-up the effect of all factors and assume that factors effects are additive. We believe that the effect of environment on diversity should be characterized by a hierarchical structure with coarse scale factors, like geographical tropics to poles gradients, defining the envelope of possible diversity conditions, and other more local factors, like habitat structure, being responsible for the fine tuning of diversity. This structure is most efficiently modeled with regression trees. We show that for six habitat types in Greek protected areas regression tree models were able to describe plant species richness based upon environmental factors considerably more efficiently than multiple regression models. More importantly when the models were extrapolated to other sites in Greece, outside their domain, the differences between the predictive ability of the two approaches was magnified. The tree models picked up important ecological characteristics, and a hierarchical structure that used coarse scale factors, like latitude and longitude, for the coarse scale estimate of alpha diversity, and finer scale factors like fragmentation, for the fine-tuning of the estimation. Therefore, we advocate that the regression tree methodology is most appropriate for modeling the relationship between diversity and environmental factors, and the use of the classical regression approaches might be misleading.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakker ES, Ritchie ME, Olff H et al. (2006) Herbivore impact on grassland plant diversity depends on habitat productivity and herbivore size. Ecol Letters 9:780–788
Bhattarai KR, Vetaas OR (2003) Variation in plant species richness of different life forms along a subtropical elevation gradient in the Himalayas, East Nepal. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:327–340
Bruun HH, Moen J, Angerbjorn A (2003) Environmental correlates of meso-scale plant species richness in the province of Harjedalen, Sweden. Biodiv Conserv 12:2025–2041
Ferrier S (2002) Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? Syst Biol 51:331–363
Gillman LN, Wright SD (2006) The influence of productivity on the species richness of plants: a critical assessment. Ecology 87:1234–1243
Grytnes JA, Birks HJB, Peglar SM (1999) Plant species richness in Fennoscandia: evaluating the relative importance of climate and history. Nordic J Bot 19:489–503
Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Virkkala R et al. (2004) Effects of habitat cover, landscape structure and spatial variables on the abundance of birds in an agricultural-forest mosaic. J Appl Ecol 41:824–835
Heylen O, Hermy M, Schrevens E (2005) Determinants of cryptogamic epiphyte diversity in a river Valley (Flanders). Biol Conserv 126:371–382
Hortal J, Garcia-Pereira P, Garcia-Barros E (2004) Butterfly species richness in Mainland Portugal: predictive models of geographic distribution patterns. Ecography 27:68–82
Kivinen S, Luoto M, Kuussaari M et al. (2006) Multi-species richness of boreal agricultural landscapes: effects of climate, biotope, soil and geographical location. J Biogeogr 33:862–875
Koleff P, Lennon JJ, Gaston KJ (2003) Are there latitudinal gradients in species turnover? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:483–498
Lee PF, Ding TS, Hsu FH et al. (2004) Breeding bird species richness in Taiwan: distribution on gradients of elevation, primary productivity and urbanization. J Biogeogr 31:307–314
Lobo JM, Castro I Moreno JC (2001) Spatial and environmental determinants of vascular plant species richness distribution in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Biol J Linn S 73:233–253
Luoto M, Virkkala R, Heikkinen RK et al. (2004) Predicting bird species richness using remote sensing in Boreal agricultural-forest mosaics. Ecol Appl 14:1946–1962
Mcgarigal K, Mccomb WC (1995) Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon coast range. Ecol Monogr 65:235–260
Metzger JP (2000) Tree functional group richness and landscape structure in a Brazilian tropical fragmented landscape. Ecol Appl 10:1147–1161
Moody A, Meentemeyer RK (2001) Environmental factors influencing spatial patterns of shrub diversity in Chaparral, Santa Ynez Mountains, California. J Veg Sci 12:41–52
Moser D, Dullinger S, Englisch T et al. (2005) Environmental determinants of vascular plant species richness in the Austrian Alps. J Biogeogr 32:1117–1127
Moser D, Zechmeister HG, Plutzar C et al. (2002) Landscape patch shape complexity as an effective measure for plant species richness in rural landscapes. Landsc Ecol 17:657–669
Orme CDL, Davies RG, Burgess M et al. (2005) Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436:1016–1019
Pausas JG, Carreras J, Ferre A et al. (2003) Coarse-scale plant species richness in relation to environmental heterogeneity. J Veg Sci 14:661–668
Rahbek C (1997) The relationship among area, elevation, and regional species richness in neotropical birds. Am Nat 149:875–902
Rathert D, White D, Sifneos JC et al. (1999) Environmental correlates of species richness for native freshwater fish in Oregon, USA. J Biogeogr 26:257–273
Sanchez-Gonzalez A, Lopez-Mata L (2005) Plant species richness and diversity along an altitudinal gradient in the Sierra Nevada, Mexico. Div Distri 11:567–575
Williams JW, Seabloom EW, Slayback D et al. (2005) Anthropogenic impacts upon plant species richness and net primary productivity in California. Ecol Lett 8:127–137
Wohlgemuth T (1998) Modelling floristic species richness on a regional scale: a case study in Switzerland. Biodiv Conserv 7:159–177
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kallimanis, A.S., Ragia, V., Sgardelis, S.P. et al. Using regression trees to predict alpha diversity based upon geographical and habitat characteristics. Biodivers Conserv 16, 3863–3876 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9186-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9186-2