Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using regression trees to predict alpha diversity based upon geographical and habitat characteristics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different environmental factors act as driving forces of diversity at different scales of analysis; and also the effect of one environmental factor changes as the scale of analysis changes. Most studies rely on multiple regression models, and such models tend to mix-up the effect of all factors and assume that factors effects are additive. We believe that the effect of environment on diversity should be characterized by a hierarchical structure with coarse scale factors, like geographical tropics to poles gradients, defining the envelope of possible diversity conditions, and other more local factors, like habitat structure, being responsible for the fine tuning of diversity. This structure is most efficiently modeled with regression trees. We show that for six habitat types in Greek protected areas regression tree models were able to describe plant species richness based upon environmental factors considerably more efficiently than multiple regression models. More importantly when the models were extrapolated to other sites in Greece, outside their domain, the differences between the predictive ability of the two approaches was magnified. The tree models picked up important ecological characteristics, and a hierarchical structure that used coarse scale factors, like latitude and longitude, for the coarse scale estimate of alpha diversity, and finer scale factors like fragmentation, for the fine-tuning of the estimation. Therefore, we advocate that the regression tree methodology is most appropriate for modeling the relationship between diversity and environmental factors, and the use of the classical regression approaches might be misleading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakker ES, Ritchie ME, Olff H et al. (2006) Herbivore impact on grassland plant diversity depends on habitat productivity and herbivore size. Ecol Letters 9:780–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai KR, Vetaas OR (2003) Variation in plant species richness of different life forms along a subtropical elevation gradient in the Himalayas, East Nepal. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:327–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruun HH, Moen J, Angerbjorn A (2003) Environmental correlates of meso-scale plant species richness in the province of Harjedalen, Sweden. Biodiv Conserv 12:2025–2041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier S (2002) Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? Syst Biol 51:331–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillman LN, Wright SD (2006) The influence of productivity on the species richness of plants: a critical assessment. Ecology 87:1234–1243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grytnes JA, Birks HJB, Peglar SM (1999) Plant species richness in Fennoscandia: evaluating the relative importance of climate and history. Nordic J Bot 19:489–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Virkkala R et al. (2004) Effects of habitat cover, landscape structure and spatial variables on the abundance of birds in an agricultural-forest mosaic. J Appl Ecol 41:824–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heylen O, Hermy M, Schrevens E (2005) Determinants of cryptogamic epiphyte diversity in a river Valley (Flanders). Biol Conserv 126:371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hortal J, Garcia-Pereira P, Garcia-Barros E (2004) Butterfly species richness in Mainland Portugal: predictive models of geographic distribution patterns. Ecography 27:68–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivinen S, Luoto M, Kuussaari M et al. (2006) Multi-species richness of boreal agricultural landscapes: effects of climate, biotope, soil and geographical location. J Biogeogr 33:862–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koleff P, Lennon JJ, Gaston KJ (2003) Are there latitudinal gradients in species turnover? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:483–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee PF, Ding TS, Hsu FH et al. (2004) Breeding bird species richness in Taiwan: distribution on gradients of elevation, primary productivity and urbanization. J Biogeogr 31:307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo JM, Castro I Moreno JC (2001) Spatial and environmental determinants of vascular plant species richness distribution in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Biol J Linn S 73:233–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoto M, Virkkala R, Heikkinen RK et al. (2004) Predicting bird species richness using remote sensing in Boreal agricultural-forest mosaics. Ecol Appl 14:1946–1962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcgarigal K, Mccomb WC (1995) Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon coast range. Ecol Monogr 65:235–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger JP (2000) Tree functional group richness and landscape structure in a Brazilian tropical fragmented landscape. Ecol Appl 10:1147–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody A, Meentemeyer RK (2001) Environmental factors influencing spatial patterns of shrub diversity in Chaparral, Santa Ynez Mountains, California. J Veg Sci 12:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser D, Dullinger S, Englisch T et al. (2005) Environmental determinants of vascular plant species richness in the Austrian Alps. J Biogeogr 32:1117–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser D, Zechmeister HG, Plutzar C et al. (2002) Landscape patch shape complexity as an effective measure for plant species richness in rural landscapes. Landsc Ecol 17:657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orme CDL, Davies RG, Burgess M et al. (2005) Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436:1016–1019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pausas JG, Carreras J, Ferre A et al. (2003) Coarse-scale plant species richness in relation to environmental heterogeneity. J Veg Sci 14:661–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahbek C (1997) The relationship among area, elevation, and regional species richness in neotropical birds. Am Nat 149:875–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathert D, White D, Sifneos JC et al. (1999) Environmental correlates of species richness for native freshwater fish in Oregon, USA. J Biogeogr 26:257–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Gonzalez A, Lopez-Mata L (2005) Plant species richness and diversity along an altitudinal gradient in the Sierra Nevada, Mexico. Div Distri 11:567–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JW, Seabloom EW, Slayback D et al. (2005) Anthropogenic impacts upon plant species richness and net primary productivity in California. Ecol Lett 8:127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgemuth T (1998) Modelling floristic species richness on a regional scale: a case study in Switzerland. Biodiv Conserv 7:159–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Athanasios S. Kallimanis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kallimanis, A.S., Ragia, V., Sgardelis, S.P. et al. Using regression trees to predict alpha diversity based upon geographical and habitat characteristics. Biodivers Conserv 16, 3863–3876 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9186-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9186-2

Keywords

Navigation