Abstract
The conservation of Himalayan forests is big concern in view of global agenda. Many studies in this endeavor reported that the rate of forests degradation is posing a severe threat to the landscape and existing biodiversity in the Himalayas. Currently there many conservation approaches exists and of them four are widely recognized (1) Conservation through traditional religious beliefs “traditional conserved forests” (TCF); (2) Conservation through governmental planning and schemes “government conserved forests” (GCF); (3) Conservation through creation of protected areas (PAF); and (4) Conservation through community efforts “community conserved forests” (CCF). Our hypothesis in this direction says that all the conservation approaches lead to same results concerning to forest conservation. To testify our hypothesis we have studied the forests of each conservation regimes and evaluated them based on the identified indicators. We have done empirical studies and following the cloud-free satellite data were used for last three decades (such as Multi-Spectral Scanner, Linear Imaging and Self Scanning, and Enhanced Thematic Mapper ) to study a change in vegetation dynamics of the mountain forests in multi-temporal dimension. Our research concluded that community conservation approach have greater significance for biodiversity conservation and management in the Himalayan region. Here we support the model of CCF for forest ecosystem conservation, alongside the sustainable livelihood of the mountain societies. But every conservation regimes has its own importance in viewpoint of the particular objectives. Therefore, we suggests advancement and revision of PAF and GCF however, some elements of CCF can be introduced in TCF for making up it more sound in view of rapid socio-economic and cultural changes taking place in the communities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandyopadhyay S, Soumya HB, Shah PJ (2005) Community stewardship and management. Beyond NEP 2004: Institutions, incentives and communities. Centre for Civil Society, New Delhi, India. http://www.ccsindia.org/ccsindia/pdf/forests_briefing_paper.pdf. Cited 10 Sept 2006
Bawa K, Rose J, Ganeshaiah KN et al (2002) Assessing biodiversity from space: an example from the Western Ghats, India. Conserv Ecol 6:http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss2/art7. Cited 5 Sep 2006
Berkes F (2004) Rethinking community based conservation. Conserv Biol 18:621–630
Bernues A, Riedel JL, Asensio MA, Blanco M, Sanz A, Revilla R, Casasus I (2005) An integrated approach to studying the role of grazing livestock systems in the conservation of rangelands in a protected natural park (Sierra de Guara, Spain). Livest Prod Sci 96:75–85
Bhandari BS (2003) Blue pine (Pinus wallichiana) forest stands of Garhwal Himalaya: composition, population structure and diversity. J Trop For Sci 15:26–36
Bhandari BS, Tiwari SC (1997) Dominance and diversity along an altitudinal gradient in a montane forest of Garhwal Himalaya. Proc Indian Nat Sci Acad B 64:437–446
Bhandari BS, Mehta JP, Nautiyal BP, Tiwari SC (1997) Structure of chir-pine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) community along an altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalayas. Int J Ecol and Environ Sci 23:67–74
Birth GS, McVey GR (1968) Measuring color of growing turf with a reflectance spectrometer. Agron J 60:640–645
Brandt JS, Townsend PA (2006) Land use–land cover conversion, regeneration and degradation in the high elevation Bolvian Andes. Landsc Ecol 21:607–623
Colchester M (1997) Salvaging nature: indigenous people and protected areas. In: Chimire KB, Pimbert MP (eds) Social change and conservation. Earthscan, London, pp 97–130
Collins S, Knapp A, Briggs J, Blair J (1998) Modulation of diversity by grazing and mowing in native tall grass prairie. Science 280:745–747
Cottam G, Curtis JT (1956) The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37:451–460
Friedl MA, Brodley CE (1997) Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 61:399–409
Heute AR (1988) A soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sens Environ 25:295–309
Heute AF, Liu HQ (1994) An error and sensitivity analysis of the atmospheric- and solid-collecting variants of the normalized difference vegetation index for the MODISEOS. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 32:897–905
Hjortso CN, Steffen S, Finn H (2006) Applying multi-criteria decision-making to protected areas and buffer zone management: a case study in the Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. J For Econ 12:91–108
Jaccard P (1912) The distribution of the flora of the alpine zone. New Phytol 11:48–50
Khan ML, Tripathi RS (1989) Effects of stump diameter, stump height and sprout density of the sprout growth of four tree species in burnt and unburnt forest plots. Acta Oecol 10:303–316
Khumbongmayum AD, Khan M, Tripathi RS (2006) Biodiversity conservation in sacred groves of Manipur, northeast India: population structure and regeneration status of woody species. Biodivers Conserv 15:2439–2456
Komo K, Vacharangkura T, Tiyanon S, Viriyabuncha C et al (2002) Plant species diversity in tropical planted forests and implication for restoration of forest ecosystems in Sakaerat, Northeastern Thailand. Japn Agric Res Q 36:111–118
Kothari A, Pathak N, Anuradha RV et al (eds) (1998) Communities and Conservation: natural resource management in South and Central Asia. Sage Publications, New Delhi
Kothari A, Suri S, Singh N (1995) People and protected areas: rethinking conservation in India. Ecology 25:188–194
Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW (2004) Remote sensing and image interpretation, 5th edn. Wiley, New York
Lu D, Mausel P, Brondizio E, Moran E (2004) Relationship between forest stand parameters and Landsat TM spectral responses in the Brazilian Amazon Basin. For Ecol Manage 198:149–167
Lymburner L, Beggs PJ, Jacobson CR (2000) Estimation of canopy-average surface-specific leaf area using Landsat TM data. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 66:183–191
Maikhuri RK, Nautiyal S, Rao KS, et al (2000) Analysis and resolution of protected area—people conflicts in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. Environ Conserv 27:43–53
Maikhuri RK, Nautiyal S, Rao KS, Saxena KG (2001) Conservation policy and people conflicts: a case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (a World heritage site), India. For Policy Econ 2:355–365
Nautiyal S (1998) Ecosystem function of buffer zone villages of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve. Ph.D. thesis, H.N.B. Garhwal University Srinagar, Garhwal, p 227
Nautiyal S, Kaechele H (2006) Traditional crop diversity needs institutional and policy support for their conservation and sustainable land use development in Himalayas of India. http://web.fu-berlin.de/ffu/akumwelt/bc2006. Cited 3 Dec 2006
Nautiyal S, Kaechele H (2007) Adverse impact of pasture abandonment in Himalayas of India: testing efficiency of a natural resource management plan (NRMP). Environ Impact Assess Rev 27:109–125
Nayak SNV, Swamy HR, Nagaraj BC, et al (2000) Farmers’ attitude towards sustainable management of Soppina Betta forests in Sringeri area of the Western Ghats, South India. For Ecol Manage 132:223–241
Negi CS (2005) Socio-cultural and ethnobotanical value of a sacred forest, Thal Ke Dhar, central Himalaya. Indian J Tradit Knowl 4:190–198
Pandit MK, Sodhi NS, Koh LP, et al (2006) Unreported yet massive deforestation driving loss of endemic biodiversity in Indian Himalaya. Biodivers Conserv DOI 10.1007/s10531-006-9038-5
Quincey DJ, Luckman A, Hessel R et al (2006) Fine-resolution remote sensing and modelling of Himalayan catchment sustainability. Remote Sen Envron DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.021
Ralhan PK, Saxena AK, Singh JS (1982) Analysis of forest vegetation at and around Nainital in Kumaun Himalaya. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 48:121–137
Ramakrishnan PS (1996) Conserving the sacred: from species to landscapes. Nat Resour 32:11–19
Ramakrishnan PS (2000) Biodiversity, land use and traditional ecological knowledge: the context. In: Ramakrishnan PS, Chandrashekara UM, Elouard C et al (eds) Mountain biodiversity, land use dynamics, and traditional ecological knowledge. Oxford & IBH Publication, India (P) Ltd, New Delhi, pp 3–13
Ramphal S (1993) How protected area can meet society’s needs: the social economic and political issues. In: Barzetti V (ed) Parks and progress. IUCN, Cambridge, pp 1–33
Rao PB (1988) Effects of environmental factors on germination and seedling growth in Quercus floribunda and Cupressus torulosa, tree species of Central Himalaya. Ann Bot 61:531–540
Rao KS, Pant R (2001) Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a typical micro watershed in the mid elevation zone of Central Himalaya, India. Agric, Ecosyst Environ 86:113–123
Rao KS, Nautiyal S, Maikhuri RK, Saxena KG (2000) Reserve management vs. people in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (NDBR), India: an analysis of conflicts. Mt Res Dev 20:320–323
Rawal RS, Dhar U (2001) Protected area network in Indian Himalayan region: Need for recognizing values of low profile protected areas. Curr Sci 81:175–183
Rawal RS, Pandey B, Dhar U (2003) Himalayan forest database—Thinking beyond dominants. Curr Sci 84:990–994
Rook AJ, Tallowin RB (2003) Grazing and pasture management for biodiversity benefit. Anim Res 52:181–189
Rouse JW, Haas RH, Scell JA, et al (1974) Monitoring the vernal advancement of retrogradiation of Natural Vegetation, NASA/GSFC, Type III, Greenbelt, p 371
Saikia A (2006) The hand of god: delineating sacred groves and their conservation status in India’s far east. survival of the commons: mounting challenges and new realities,” the eleventh conference of the international association for the study of common property, Bali, Indonesia
Sandstrom P, Pahlen TG, Edenius L, et al (2003) Conflicts resolution by participatory management: Remote sensing and GIS as tool for communicating land-use needs for Reindeer herding in Northern Sweden. AMBIO 23:557–567
Saxena AK, Singh JS (1982) A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest communities of a part of Kumaon Himalaya. Vegetario 50:3–32
Saxena AK, Singh JS (1984) Tree population structure of certain Himalayan forest association and implications concerning their future composition. Vegetario 58:61–69
Schroeder B, Seppelt R (2006) Analysis of pattern-process interactions based on landscape models-Overview, general concepts, and methodological issues. Ecol Model DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.036
Singh JS, Chaturvedi OP, Rawat YS (1984) Replacement of oak forest with pine in the Himalaya affects the nitrogen cycle. Nature 311:54–56
Singh JS, Rawat YS Garkoti SC (1997) Failure of brown oak (Q. semicarpifolia) to regenerate in Central Himalaya: a case of environmental semisurprise. Curr Sci 73:371–374
Singh TP, Singh S, Roy PS (2002) Vegetation mapping and characterization in west Siang District of Arunachal Pradesh, India-a satellite remote sensing-based approach. Curr Sci 83:1221–1230
Sinha B, Maikhuri RK (1998) Conservation through ‘Socio-cultural—religious Practice’ in Garhwal Himalaya: A case study of Hariyali sacred site. In: Ramakrishnan PS, Saxena KG, Chandrashekara UM (eds) Conserving the sacred for biodiversity management. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., Ltd, New Delhi, pp 289–299
Sternberg M, Gutman M, Perevolotsky A et al (2000) Vegetation response to grazing management in a Mediterranean herbaceous community: a functional group approach. J Appl Ecol 37:224–237
Tekle K, Hedlund L (2000) Land cover changes between 1958 and 1986 in Kalu district, Southern Wello, Ethiopia. Mt Res Dev 20:42–51
Vega-Garcia C, Chuvieco E (2006) Applying local measures of spatial heterogeneity to Landsat-TM images for predicting wildfire occurrence in Mediterranean landscape. Landsc Ecol 21:595–605
Wakeel A, Rao KS, Maikhuri RK, et al (2005) Forest management and land use/cover changes in a typical micro watershed in the mid elevation zone of central Himalaya, India. For Ecol Manage 213:229–242
Walker RE, Stoms DM, Estes JE, Cayocca KD (1992) Relationship between biological diversity and multi-temporal vegetation index data in California. ASPRS ACSM Albuquerque, New Mexico, 3–7 March 1992, pp 562–571
Wang Y, Moskovits DK (2001) Tracking fragmentation of natural communities and changes in land cover: applications of Landsat data for conservation in an urban landscape (Chicago wilderness). Conserv Biol 15:835–843
Welden CW, Hewett SW, Hubbell SP, et al (1991) Sapling survival, growth and recruitment—relationship to canopy height in a neotropical forest. Ecology 72:35–50
Zhang B, Valentine I, Kemp PD (2005) A decision tree approach modelling functional group abundance in a pasture ecosystem. Agric Ecosyst Environ 110:279–288
Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to Prof. David Hawksworth and reviewers for comments and suggestions on earlier drafts. Sunil Nautiyal extends sincere thanks to Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for award of the fellowship and to Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for financial support for the purchase of remote sensing data. Opinions expressed here are of the authors and not of the organization with which they are affiliated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9315-y
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nautiyal, S., Kaechele, H. Conserving the Himalayan forests: approaches and implications of different conservation regimes. Biodivers Conserv 16, 3737–3754 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9178-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9178-2