Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inventoring the fungi of Panama

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Records of fungi in Panama scattered in literature are presented in a preliminary annotated checklist which is published in Panama. It includes 1807 species and subspecific taxa in 646 genera. The data allow to trace more than 100 years of history of mycology in Panama, presented here for the first time. The species richness is analyzed numerically with respect to the systematic position of the species and their ecology. Considering the numbers of records for different regions of Panama, a comparison with numbers of species published for some other neotropical countries, as well as recent experience collecting fungi in Panama, the incompleteness of the checklist is evident. Values of relative species richness of different systematic groups in Panama compared to values of the same groups as known worldwide, show that our knowledge is fragmentary in Panama especially for Agaricales, Uredinales, and some groups of microfungi. We are still in the pioneer phase of mycological investigation in Panama.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barthlott W, Lauer W, Placke A (1996) Global distribution of species diversity in vascular plants: towards a world map of phytodiversity. Erdkunde 50:317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bermúdez MM, Sánchez GJ (2000) Identificación de vacíos de información botánica en Centroamérica. WWF, Museo Nacional de Costa Rica, Turrialba, Costa Rica

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon PF, Hawksworth DL (1995) 14. The diversity of fungi associated with vascular plants: the known, the unknown and the need to bridge the knowledge gap. Adv Plant Pathol 11:277–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correa M, Galdames C, de Stapf MS (2004) Catálogo de las plantas vasculares de Panamá. Quebecor World Bogotá, Colombia

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva M, Minter DW (1995) Fungi from Brazil recorded by Batista and co-workers. Mycol Papers 169:1–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RWG (1970) Fungus flora of Venezuela and adjacent countries. Kew Bulletin add. Series 3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont KP, Buriticá P, Forero E (1978) Los hongos de Colombia – I. Introducción. Caldasia 57:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer JD (1973) Henri Pittierȁ9s botanical activity in Panama. Taxon 22:557–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etayo J (1997) Aportación al catálogo de líquenes epifilos y hongos liquenícolas de Coiba (Panamá). In: Castroviejo S (ed) Flora y Fauna del Parque Nacional de Coiba (Panamá). Inventario preliminar, AECI, Madrid, pp 205–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrow WM (1954) Tropical soil fungi. Mycologia 46:632–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1996) 4: Species richness: measure and measurement. In: Gaston KJ (ed) Biodiversity, a biology of numbers and difference. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, pp 77–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SG (2002) Evolutionary ecology of plant diseases in natural ecosystems. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:13–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SG, Hubbell SP (1996) Plant diseases and the conservation of tropical forests. Bioscience 46:98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán G (1998) Inventorying the fungi of Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 7:369–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL (1993) Chapter 16. The tropical fungal biota: census, pertinence, prophylaxis, and prognosis. In: Isaac S, Frankland JC, Watling R, Whalley JS (eds) Aspects of tropical mycology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 265–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL (1997) Fungi and international biodiversity initiatives. Biodivers Conserv 6:661–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL (1998) The consequences of plant extinctions for their dependent biotas: an overlooked aspect of conservation science. In: Peng C-I, Lowry PP (eds) Rare, threatened, and endangered floras of Asia and the Pacific rim. Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica Monograph Series No. 16, Taipei, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL (2001) The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1.5 million species estimate revisited. Mycol Res 105:1422–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL (2003) Monitoring and safeguarding fungal resources worldwide: the need for an international collaborative MycoAction Plan. Fungal Divers 13:29–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL (2004) Fungal diversity and its implications for genetic resource collections. Stud Mycol 50:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL (2005) Dothidea hymeniicola: an overlooked Endococcus species on Lobaria in Central America. Herzogia 18:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckadon-Moreno S (2004) Naturalists on the isthmus of Panama: a hundred years of natural history on the biological bridge of the Americas. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde KD (ed) (1997) Biodiversity of tropical microfungi. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde KD, Hawksworth DL (1997) 2. Measuring and monitoring the biodiversity of microfungi. In: Hyde KD (ed) Biodiversity of tropical microfungi. Hng Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp 11–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Iturriaga T, Páez I, Sanabria N, Holmquist O, Bracamonte L, Urbina H (2000) Estado actual de conocimiento de la micobiota en Venezuela. Documentos Técnicos de la Estrategia Nacional de Diversidad Biológica, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JC, Stalpers JA (2001) Ainsworth & Bisbyȁ9s dictionary of the fungi. CABI Bioscience, CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE, Lawton JH (1996) 11: Does biodiversity matter? Evaluating the case for conserving species. In: Gaston KJ (ed) Biodiversity, a biology of numbers and difference. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, pp 283–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Kursar TA, Capson TL, Coley PD, Corley DG, Gupta MB, Harrison LA, Ortega-Barría E, Windsor DM (1999) Ecologically guided bioprospecting in Panama. Pharmaceut Biol 37(Suppl):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire JU, Crandall BS (1967) Survey of insect pests and plant diseases of selected food crops of Mexico, Central America and Panama. International Agricultural Development Service, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture

  • Minter DW, Rodríguez Hernández M, Mena Portales JM (2001) Fungi of the Caribbean, an annotated checklist. PDMS Publ., Isleworth, Middlesex

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida FH (1989) Review of mycological studies in the neotropics. In: Campbell DG, Hammond HD (eds) Floristic inventory of tropical countries: the status of plant systematics, collections, and vegetation, plus recommendations for the future. The New York Botanical Garden, New York, pp 494–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepenbring M (2001) Smut fungi (Ustilaginomycetes and Microbotryales, Basidiomycota) in Panama. Revista Biol Trop 49:411–428

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piepenbring M (2004) 3.2.1. Fungi. In: Ibisch PL, Mérida G (eds) Biodiversity: the richness of Bolivia, state of knowledge and conservation. Editorial FAN, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia, pp 89–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepenbring M (2005) Sphaerophragmium pulchrum, a new species of rust fungi from Panama. Mycol Prog 4:161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piepenbring M (2006) Checklist of fungi in Panama, preliminary version. Natura Revista Científica y Humanística de la Universidad Autónoma de Chiriquí, Panama, vol. 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Pointing SB, Hyde KD (eds) (2001) Bio-exploitation of filamentous fungi. Fungal Diversity Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner ADM (1995) Fungi, a vital component of ecosystem function in woodland. In: Allsopp D, Colwell RR, Hawksworth DL (eds) Microbial diversity and ecosystem function. CAB International, Oxon, pp 231–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Justavino D, Piepenbring M (2004) Meliolaceae of Panama. Poster of the joined congress of the DGfM and the GML, Friedrichroda, Germany, 28 September – 1 October 2004, p 50

  • Rossman AY, Miller DR (1996) Systematics solves problems in agriculture and forestry. Ann Mo Bot Gar 83:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivas RG, Hyde KD (1997) 4. Biodiversity of plant pathogenic fungi in the tropics. In: Hyde KD (ed) Biodiversity of tropical microfungi. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp 47–56 + plates 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipman HJM, Aptroot A (2001) Where are the missing lichens? Mycol Res 105:1433–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stork NE, Samways MJ (1995) 7. Inventorying and monitoring. In: Heywood VH, Watson RT (eds) Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 453–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Watling R (1997) Pulling the threads together: habitat diversity. Biodivers Conserv 6:753–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildman HG (1997) 3. Potential of tropical microfungi within the pharmaceutical industry. In: Hyde KD (ed) Biodiversity of tropical microfungi. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp 29–46

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For the elaboration of the checklist, numerous colleagues and students collaborated at the University of Frankfurt, at the Universidad Autónoma de Chiriquí (UNACHI), at the Universidad de Panamá, the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, and at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (see acknowledgements in Piepenbring 2006). For the present publication, I received help in Panama by J. Torres and O. Cáceres (UNACHI) as well as G. Gilbert, S. Heckadon-Moreno, and M. Correa (STRI and University of Panama). R. Kirschner, G. Kost, G. Hagedorn, G. Gilbert, W. Gams, and C. Obrebo are thanked for interesting discussions, publications, and communication of unpublished results. M. Stadler is thanked for a critical look at the Panamanian Xylariales. R. Kirschner helped to improve the text of the manuscript and to identify fungi. Helpful suggestions and information by D. Hawksworth are gratefully acknowledged.

This investigation has been carried out in the context of the University Partnership between the UNACHI, in David, Chiriquí, Panamá, and the J.W. Goethe University of Frankfurt am Main, Germany, supported by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). It forms part of a research project supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meike Piepenbring.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piepenbring, M. Inventoring the fungi of Panama. Biodivers Conserv 16, 73–84 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9051-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9051-8

Keywords

Navigation