Abstract
The value of conifer-dominated plantation forestry for heathland carabids is examined, in Breckland, eastern England. Historically dominated by heathland habitats supporting scarce species of restricted distribution within the UK, approximately 47% of Breckland was afforested in the early 20th century. The carabid fauna of this forest, previously little known, was sampled by intensive pitfall trapping, and results compared to samples from heathland and arable. The results affirm that Breckland supports many range-restricted carabid beetles, including scarce species restricted to lowland heathland or sandy habitats. Approximately half of the heathland-associated species, and also half of the Nationally Scarce carabid species recorded in Breckland, were found within the forest landscape. Carabid species composition differed between closed-canopy forest, heathland and arable, while open forest habitats (clear-felled stands, young restocked stands, and track margins) contained a diverse fauna with elements from all habitats. The proportion of heathland-associated species was significantly greater in open forest habitats than in closed-canopy forest and was similar to that of heathland assemblages. Wing morphology did not differ between heathland species solely recorded from heathland and those also recorded in the forest. Nationally Scarce species from the forest had a wider UK distribution than those recorded only from heathland. Our study shows that, within conifer forest planted in lowland heathland areas, open habitats provided by trackway networks and clear-felling management can have significant value for the conservation of open-ground carabids, including species of conservation importance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
(2003). The energetic equivalence rule rejected because of a potentially common sampling error: evidence from carabid beetles. Oikos 101: 367–375
(1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27: 325–349
(2001). The effect of a complex land use history on the restoration possibilities of heathland in central Belgium. Belg. J. Bot. 134: 29–40
(1995). Carabid beetle communities as indicators of conservation potential in upland forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 79: 63–77
(2001). Primer v5. PRIMER-E Ltd., Plymouth
(1937). Breckland Wilds. W. Heffer and Sons Ltd., Cambridge
(1995). The effectiveness of five land management regimes on the regeneration of grassland heath in the Norfolk Breck, as indicated by the carabid (ground beetle) fauna. Forest Enterprise, Brandon, UK
(1973). Breckland Forest Soils, Special Soil Survey 7. The Soil Survey of England and Wales, Harpenden
(1993). Associations between forest type and invertebrates – ground beetle community patterns in a natural oakwood and juxtaposed conifer plantations. Forestry 66: 37–50
(1998). Ground beetles (ColeopteraCarabidae) on set-aside fields in the Campine region and their importance for nature conservation in Flanders (Belgium). Biodivers. Conserv. 7: 1485–1493
(1997). A study of the ground beetles (Carabidae) of Corsican pine plantations in Thetford ForestEastern England. Entomologist 116: 15–23
(1991). Historical clues to conservation. New Sci. 1751: 40–43
(1992). The ecological changes of Breckland grass heaths and the consequences of management. J. Appl. Ecol. 29: 402–413
(2003). The processes of species colonisation in wooded landscapes: a review of principles. In: (eds) The Restoration of Wooded Landscapes, pp 25–36. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh
(2003). Invertebrate Site Register for Norfolk Breckland and South Norfolk. 94 Part 1. English Nature, Peterborough
(2004). Breckland Forest SSSI Site Management Statement. English Nature, Bury St. Edmunds
(1979). The Wild Birds Directive 79/409/EEC. European Community, Brussels
(1992). The Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC. European Community, Brussels
(1994). Conservation value of roadside verges for stenotopic heathland Carabidae – corridors or refugia. Biodivers. Conserv. 3: 538–545
(2005). Plant population and community dynamics in a forest landscape. University of East Anglia, Norwich
(1993). Lowland Heathland: The Extent of Habitat Change English Nature Series No. 12. English Nature, Peterborough
(1998). The UK Forestry Standard: The Government′s Approach to Sustainable Forestry. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh
(1992). A report on the beetles, woodliceharvestmen and spiders recorded from experimental plots at Weeting Heath NNR during the years 1989–1991. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough
(2000). A twenty-year comparison of epigeic spider communities (Araneae) of Danish coastal heath habitats. J. Arachnol. 28: 90–96
(2005). Causes of rarity in bumblebees. Biol. Conserv. 122: 1–8
(1988). Seed banks at six open and afforested heathland sites in southern Sweden. J. Appl. Ecol. 25: 297–306
(1994). Forestry and the boreal fauna – matching management with natural forest dynamics. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31: 187–202
(1994). Variation in the distribution of carabid beetles in cereal field headlands. University of East Anglia, Norwich
(2001). Distribution of carabid beetles (ColeopteraCarabidae) across a boreal forest-clearcut ecotone. Conserv. Biol. 15: 370–377
(2005). Population densities and habitat associations of introduced muntjac Muntiacus reevesi and native roe deer Capreolus capreolus in a lowland pine forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 215: 224–238
(2002). Carabid beetles: their ecology, survival and use in agroecosystems. In: (eds) The Agroecology of Carabid Beetles, pp 1–40. Intercept, Andover
(1999). Relationships between insect diversity and habitat characteristics in plantation forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 113: 11–21
(1992). A Review of the Scarce and Threatened Coleoptera of Great Britain, Part 1. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough
(2001). Carabid beetle communities associated with coniferous plantations in Britain: the influence of siteground vegetation and stand structure. For. Ecol. Manage. 148: 271–286
(1993). Integrating biodiversity into forest management planning and decision-making. For. Ecol. Manage. 61: 1–15
(2002a). Alternative harvesting methods and boreal carabid beetles (ColeopteraCarabidae). For. Ecol. Manage. 167: 103–121
(2002b). The forest road network – a landscape element affecting the distribution of boreal carabid beetles. In: (eds) How to Protect or What We Know about Carabid Beetles, pp 287–299. Warsaw Agricultural University Press, Warsaw
(2002). Boreal carabid-beetle (ColeopteraCarabidae) assemblages along the clear-cut originated succession gradient. Biodivers. Conserv. 11: 1269–1288
(1994). Ecological Change in Breckland. English Nature-Norfolk Team, Norwich
Lin Y.-C. 2004. Spatio-temporal dynamics of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a mosaic forested landscape. Ph.D. Thesis, University of East AngliaNorwich.
(2005). Are pitfalls biased? A comparison of carabid composition from pitfall trapping and hand searching in forest habitats. Br. J. Entomol. Nat. Hist. 18: 17–25
(1974). Handbooks for the Identification of British insects – ColeopteraCarabidae. Royal Entomological Society of London, London
(1998). Provisional Atlas of the Ground Beetles (ColeopteraCarabidae) of Britain. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Huntingdon
Luff M.L. and Duff A. 2002. The Checklist of Carabidae in the Coleopterist. http://www. coleopterist.org.uk/. last update: 2-28-2002.
(2003). Diversity and composition of carabids during a forestry cycle. Biodivers. Conserv. 12: 73–85
(1997). Invertebrates and boreal forest management. Conserv. Biol. 11: 601–610
(1993). Effects of clear-cut harvesting on boreal ground-beetle assemblages (ColeopteraCarabidae) in western Canada. Conserv. Biol. 7: 551–561
(1976). Heathlands of Western Europe. Council of Europe, Strasbourg
(1905). Map heliozincographed from 2500 plans. Ordnance Survey Office, Southampton
Pearce D. and Willis K. 2003. Economic analysis of forestry policy in England. Final report for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and H.M. Treasury. CJC Consulting, Oxford.
(2002). The potential for lowland heath regeneration following plantation removal. Biol. Conserv. 108: 247–258
(1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225
(1991). British Plant Communities, Vol. 2. Mires and Heaths. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
(1992). British Plant Communities, Vol. 3. Grasslands and Montane Communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
(1986). The Asaphidion (Col.: Carabidae) species occurring in Great Britain and Ireland. Proc. Trans. Br. Entomol. Nat. Hist. Soc. 19: 17–21
(1996). Standards for biodiversity: a proposal based on biodiversity standards for forest plantations. Biodivers. Conserv. 5: 447–459
(1994). Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps – the madness and the method. Can. Entomol. 126: 881–894
(1996). Northern forestry and carabids: The case for concern about old-growth species. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 33: 173–184
(1991). Heathmoorland and mountains. In: (eds) Habitat Conservation for Insects – A Neglected Green Issue, pp 133–150. The Amateur Entomologists' Society, Brentwood
(1996). The Breckland Archaeological Survey: A Characterisation of the Archaeological and Historic Landscape of the Breckland Environmentally Sensitive Area. Suffolk County Council, Bury St. Edmunds
(1995). Invertebrate recording on Suffolk Breckland Sites of Special Scientific Interest during 1993 and 1994. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon
(1996). Ecology and conservation of heathland Carabidae in eastern England. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 33: 133–138
(2000). De Nederlandse Loopkevers, Verspreiding en Oecologie (Coleoptera: Carabidae) – Nederlande Fauna 3. National Natuurhistorisch MuseumNaturalis KNNV Uitgeverij and EIS-Nederland, Leiden
(1994). Corridor function of a road verge for dispersal of stenotopic heathland ground beetles Carabidae. Biol. Conserv. 69: 339–349
(1999). UK Biodiversity Group Tranche 2 Action Plans – Volume VI: Terrestrial and Freshwater Species and Habitats. English Nature, Peterborough
(2004). The importance of former land use in determining successful re-creation of lowland heath in southern England. Biol. Conserv. 116: 289–303
(1940). Studies in the ecology of Breckland. IV. The grass-heath. J. Ecol. 28: 42–70
(1989). Studies on the invertebrate fauna of fragmented heathland in Dorset, UK and the implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 47: 153–165
(1980). An ecological survey of heathlands in the Poole Basin, DorsetEngland in 1978. Biol. Conserv. 17: 281–296
(1995). Breckland Coleoptera. In: (eds) Thetford Forest Park: the Ecology of a Pine Forest, pp 92–102. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, YC., James, R. & Dolman, P.M. Conservation of Heathland Ground Beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae): The Value of Lowland Coniferous Plantations. Biodivers Conserv 16, 1337–1358 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6231-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6231-x