Abstract
The utilisation of two metre field margins by butterflies was studied at three farms in Essex, south east England between 1997 and 2000. The aim of the study was to establish whether field margins, as set up and managed under Countryside Stewardship Scheme guidelines, were beneficial to common farmland butterflies. Thirteen two metre margins (total length 4478 m) and three sections with no margin (total length 656 m) were monitored over the 4 year period using the transect method. Significantly more Maniola jurtina, Thymelicus sylvestris and Thymelicus lineola were seen on the two metre margins than on the control sections, but there was a significant reduction in abundance of Thymelicus sylvestris, Thymelicus lineola and Ochlodes venata on the margins over the 4 year study period. Only the abundance of Pyronia tithonus increased significantly on the two metre margins over that period.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anon. 1995. Biodiversity: The UK Steering Group Report, Volume 1: Meeting the Rio Challenge. HMSO, London.
Asher J., Warren M., Fox R., Harding P., Jeffcoate G. and Jeffcoate S. (2001). The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Barr C., Howard D., Bunce R., Gillespie M. and Hallam C. 1991. Changes in Hedgerows in Britain Between 1984 and 1990. Grange-Over-Sands: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.
Bullock J. (1996). Plants. In: Sutherland, W.J. (eds) Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook, pp 111–137. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Buys J.C. (1995). Kansen voor natuur bij braaklegging van perceelranden. In: Rotteveel, A.J.W. and Heemsbergen, H. (eds) Akkerranden in Nederland, pp 43–51. Werkgroep akkerranden, Wageningen
Buys J.C., Oosterveld E.B. and Ellenbroek P.M. 1996. Kansen voor natuur bij braaklegging II: verslag van een tweejarig praktijkonderzoek. (No CLM 253–1996). Centrum voor Landbouw en Milieu.
Campbell L.H., Avery M.I., Donald P., Evans A.D., Green R.E. and Wilson J.D. (1997). A Review of the Indirect Effects of Pesticide on Birds. JNCC, Peterborough
Carreck N.L., Williams I.H. and Oakley J.N. (1999). Enhancing farmland for insect pollinators using flower mixtures. In: Boatman, N.D., Davies, D.H.K., Chaney, K., Feber, R., and Sparks, T.H. (eds) Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy, pp 101–108. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne
Tamis W.L.M. (1995). Effecten van akkerranden beheer op de biodiversiteit van insecten fauna. In: Rotteveel, A.J.W. and Heemsbergen, H. (eds) Akkerranden in Nederland, pp 89–95. Werkgroep akkerranden, Wageningen
Dover J.W. (1994). Arable field margins: factors affecting butterfly distribution and abundance. In: Boatman, N. (eds) BCPC Monograph no 58, Field Margins: Integrating Agriculture and Conservation, pp 109–116. British Crop Protection Council, Warwick
Dover J.W. (1997). Conservation headlands: effects on butterfly distribution and behaviour. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 63: 31–49
Dover J.W. 1999. Butterflies and field margins. In: Boatman N.D., Davies D.H.K., Chaney K., Feber R., de Snoo G.R. and Sparks T.H. (eds) Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, management and policy. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbournepp. 109–116
Dover J. and Sparks T. (2000). A review of the ecology of butterflies in British hedgerows. J. Environ. Manage. 60: 51–63
Dover J.H., Sparks T.H. and Greatorex-Davies J.N. (1997). The importance of shelter for butterflies in open landscapes. J. Insect Conserv. 1: 89–97
Dowdswell W.H. (1987). Hedgerows and Verges. Allen and Unwin, London
Dunn O.J. (1964). Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6: 241–252
Feber R.H., Smith H. and MacDonald D.W. (1996). The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 1191–1205
Field R.G. 2002. A Study of Butterflies on Farmland. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Essex, Colchester.
Heath J., Pollard E. and Thomas J.A. (1984). Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Viking, Harmandsworth
Hill J.K., Thomas C.D. and Huntley B. (1999). Climate and habitat availability determine 20th century changes in a butterfly’s range margin. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 266: 1197–1206
Kirkham F.W., Sherwood A.J., Oakley J.N. and Fielder A.G. 1999. Botanical composition and invertebrate populations in sown grass and wildflower margins. In: Boatman N.D., Davies D.H.K., Chaney K., Feber R., de Snoo G.R. and Sparks T.H. (eds) Aspects of Applied Biology 54, Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp. 291–298.
Marshall E.J.P. 1998. Guidelines for the Siting, Establishment and Management of Arable Field Margins, Beetle Banks, Cereal Conservation Headlands and Wildlife Seed Mixtures. Issue No. 2. LACK, Long Ashton.
Meek B., Loxton D., Sparks T., Pywell R., Pickett H. and Nowakowski M. (2002). The effects of arable field margin composition on invertebrate biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 106: 256–271
Murphy D.D., Launer A.E. and Ehrlich P.R. (1983). The role of adult feeding in egg production and population dynamics of the checkerspot butterfly (Euphydrayas editha). Oecologica 56: 257–263
Pollard E. (1977). A method for assessing the abundance of butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 12: 115–134
Pollard E. and Yates T. (1993). Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman and Hall, London
Smallshire D. and Cooke A.I. 1999. Field margins in UK agri-environmental schemes. In: Boatman N.D., Davies D.H.K., Chaney K., Feber R., de Snoo G.R. and Sparks T.H. (eds), Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, management and policy. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp. 19–28
Smith H., Feber R.E., Johnson P.J., McCallum K., Jensen S.P., Younes M. and MacDonald D.W. (1993). The Conservation Management of Arable Field Margins. English Nature, Peterborough
Thomas J.A. 1984. The conservation of butterflies in temperate countries: past efforts and lessons for the future. In: The Biology of Butterflies. Sypm. of the Royal Entomological Society of London 11, pp. 333–353.
Thomas J.A., Telfer M.G., Roy D.B., Preston C.D., Greenwood J.J.D., Asher J., Fox R., Clark R.T. and Lawton J.H. (2004). Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303: 1879–1881
Watt W.B., Hoch P.C. and Mills S.G. (1974). Nectar resource use by Colias butterflies. Oecologia 14: 353–374
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Field, R.G., Gardiner, T., Mason, C.F. et al. Agri-environment schemes and butterflies: the utilisation of two metre arable field margins. Biodivers Conserv 16, 465–474 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6202-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6202-2