Abstract
Wildlife management policies are often based on expert perceptions of the ecological importance of certain species and poorly informed perceptions of how public attitudes toward management are formed. Little is known about why preferences vary greatly and how this affects support for management actions. This paper explores preferences for a range of wildlife species among a sample of the rural population adjacent to Serengeti National Park in Tanzania. We also examine the degree of acceptance for alternative management interventions when potentially dangerous animals pose different levels of problems to human beings, and the extent to which these attitudes are related to species preferences. Gender has a significant effect on species preferences. Men like most species better than women. Age has no significant effect, but level of education affects preference level for some species. Species preferences have a positive effect on support for management intervention when dangerous animals cause small or moderate problems to humans, i.e. there is a higher degree of acceptance of problems caused by animals that are well liked. In situations where human life is threatened, species preferences have no effect on preferred management actions. Appreciation of animals is a combination of functional, consumptive and cultural dimensions, and there is no simple link between species preferences and attitudes toward management actions. The local context and concrete experience with wildlife encounters is more important for shaping normative beliefs like attitudes towards management actions than global wildlife attitudes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrindell W.A. (2000). Phobic dimensions: IV. The structure of animal fears. Behav. Res. Therapy 38: 509–530
Barnes R.F.W. (1996). The conflict between humans and elephants in the central African forests. Mammal Rev. 26: 67–80
Bjerke T. and Bevanger K. (2002). Frykt for hoggorm – hva betyr kjønn, alder og erfaring? (Fear of the adder Vipera berus – the significance of sex, ageand experience.) (In Norwegian, English summary). Fauna 55: 7–13
Bjerke T. and Thrane C. 2003. Self-reported fear of spiders across demographic groups in Norway. Fauna norvegica 23: 9–13.
Bjerke T. and Østdahl T. 2004. Animal-related attitudes and activities in an urban population. Anthrozoös. 17(2): 109–129
Bjerke T., Ødegårdstuen T.S. and Kaltenborn B.P. (1998). Attitudes toward animals among Norwegian children and adolescents: species preferences. Anthrozoös 11: 227–235
Bjerke T., Skogen K. and Kaltenborn B.P. (2002). Nordmenns holdnninger til store rovpatte-dyr. (Attitudes toward large carnivores in Norway. In Norwegian, English summary). NINA Oppdragsmelding 768, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway
Bowen-Jones E. and Entwistle A. (2002). Identifying appropriate flagship species: the importance of culture and local contexts. Oryx 36: 189–195
Bureau of statistics. 1992. Population census. Regional Profile Mara. Unpubl. Report. President's OfficePlanning Commission, Dar es SalaamTanzania293 pp.
De Boer W.F. and Baquete D.S. (1998). Natural resource usecrop damage and attitudes ofrural people in the vicinity of the Maputo Elephant ReserveMozambique. Environm. Conserv. 25: 208–218
Davey G.C.L. (1994). Self-reported fears to common indigenous animals in an adult UK population: the role of disgust sensitivity. Brit. J. Psychol. 85: 541–554
Durrheim D.N. and Leggat P.A. (1999). Risk to tourists posed by wild animals in South Africa. J. Travel Med. 6: 172–179
East M.L. and Hofer H. 2000. The impact of bush-meat hunting on non-target species: commuting spotted hyenas, Crocuta crocutain the Serengeti. African Wildlife Management in the New Millenium Conference. College of African Wildlife Management, Mweka, Tanzania 13–15 December 2000.
Entwistle A.C. and Stephenson P.J. (2000). Small mammals and the conservation agenda. In: Entwistle, A. and Dunstone, N. (eds) Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity. Has the Panda had its Day?, pp 119–139. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Ericsson G. and Heberlein T.A. (2002). Attityder til varg och vargjakt I Sverige. (Attitudes toward wolves and hunting in Sweden. In Swedish). Swedish Agricultural University, Uppsala, Sweden
Galaty J.R. (1998). The Maasai ornithorium: tropic flights of avian imagination in Africa. Ethnology 37: 227–238
Gillingham S. and Lee P.C. (1999). The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environm. Conserv. 26: 218–228
Heinen J.T. and Low B.S. (1992). Human behavioural ecology and environmental conservation. Environm. Conserv. 19: 105–116
Hill C.M. (1998). Conflicting attitudes toward elephants around the Budongo Forest ReserveUganda. Environm. Conserv. 25: 244–250
Kaltenborn B.P. and Bjerke T. (submitted) Living with problem animals – self-reported fear of potentially dangerous species in the Serengeti region, Tanzania. Submitted to Human Dimensions of Wildlife.
Kellert S.R. (1996). The Value of Life. Biological Diversity and Human Society. Island Press, Washington, D.C
Kellert S.R. and Berry J.K. (1987). Attitudes, knowledgeand behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Soc. Bull. 15: 363–371
Kellert S.R. and Westervelt M.O. 1983. Children's attitudes, knowledge and behaviors toward animals. Government Printing Office, report no. 024-010-00641-2. 202 pp.
Kellert S.R. and Wilson E.O. (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Kleiven J., Bjerke T. and Kaltenborn B.P. 2004. Factors influencing the social acceptability of large carnivore behaviours. Biodiv. Conserv. 13: 1647–1658.
Kuriyan R. (2002). Linking local perceptions of elephants and conservation: samburu pastoralists in Northern Kenya. Soc. Nat. Resour. 15: 949–957
Linnell J.D.C., Swenson J.E. and Andersen R. (2000). Conservation of biodiversity in Scandinavian boreal forests: large carnivores as flagships, umbrellas, indicators, or keystones?. Biodiv. Conserv. 9: 857–868
Naughton-Treves L. (1997). Farming the forest edge: vulnerable places and people around Kibale National Park, Uganda. The Geograph. Rev. 87: 27–46
Nyahongo J.W. 2003. The impact of humans on the carnivore population in the Western Serengeti Ecosystem. Thesis submitted for Master of Science, University of Dar es Salaam.
O’Connell-Rodwell C.E., Rodwell T., Rice M. and Hart L.A. (2000). Living with the modern conservation paradigm: Can agricultural communities co-exist with elephants? A five-year case study in East CapriviNamibia. Biol. Conserv. 93: 381–391
Osborn F.V. and Parker G.E. (2003). Towards an integrated approach for reducing the conflict between elephants and people: a review of current research. Oryx 37: 80–84
Parry D. and Campbell B. (1992). Attitudes of rural communities to animal wildlife and its utilization in Chobe Enclave and Mababe Depression, Botswana. Environm. Conserv. 19: 245–252
Rusca G. and Tonucci F. (1992). Development of the concept of living and animal in the child. Eur. J. Psychol. Edu. 7: 151–176
Sinclair A.R.E. and Arcese P.(eds) 1995. Serengeti II. Dynamics, Managementand Conservation of an Ecosystem. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 665 pp.
Zinn H.C., Manfredo M.J., Vaske J.J. and Wittmann K. (1998). Using normative beliefs to determine the acceptability of wildlife management actions. Soc. Nat. Resour. 11: 649–662
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaltenborn, B.P., Bjerke, T., Nyahongo, J.W. et al. Animal Preferences and Acceptability of Wildlife Management Actions around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Biodivers Conserv 15, 4633–4649 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6196-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6196-9