Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Are Water Beetles Good Indicators of Biodiversity in Mediterranean Aquatic Ecosystems? The Case of the Segura River Basin (SE Spain)

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Water beetles were examined for use as potential biodiversity indicators in continental aquatic ecosystems in a semiarid Mediterranean region, the Segura river basin (SE Spain). The indicator value of water beetles was investigated by examining the degree to which their species richness patterns was correlated with other groups (Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Mollusca, Heteroptera and Ephemeroptera), and the efficiency of water beetle area networks (selected by complementarity) in conserving overall groups richness. The species richness patterns of Coleoptera, Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera were significantly correlated with the Remaining Richness value (RR), defined as the total number of species found at a site (of all six groups examined) minus the number of species belonging to the considered indicator group. Area networks for Coleoptera selected by complementarity represented the highest RR percentage (84.46%) and contained more than 78% species of each group. Furthermore, water beetles meet most of the criteria proposed in the literature for choosing biodiversity indicator taxa. In our study, the correlation values and the percentage of species represented by family, genus and species complementary networks were similar and we suggest that the higher taxa of water beetles (genera or families) can be used as biodiversity surrogates for cost-effective practical surveys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abellán P., Sánchez-Fernández D., Velasco J. and Millán A. (2005). Assessing conservation priorities for insects: status of water beetles in southeast Spain. Biol. Conserv. 121: 79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abellán P., Sánchez-Fernández D., Velasco J. and Millán A. in press. Conservation of freshwater biodiversity: a comparison of different area selection methods. Biodiv. Conserv.

  • Baldi A. (2003). Using higher taxa as surrogates of species richness:a study based on 3700 ColeopteraDipteraand Acari species in Central-Hungarian reserves. Basic Appl. Ecol. 4: 589–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonada N., Zamora-Muñoz C., Rieradevall M. and Prat N. (2004). Trichoptera (Insecta) collected in Mediterranean river basins of the Iberian Peninsula: taxonomic remarks and notes on ecology. Graellsia 60: 41–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Bournaud M., Richoux P. and Usseglio-Polaterra P. (1992). An approach to the synthesis of qualitative ecological information from aquatic coleoptera communities. Reg. Rivers: Res. Manage. 7: 165–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Briers R.A. and Biggs J. (2003). Indicator taxa for the conservation of pond invertebrate diversity. Aquat. Conserv.: Marine Freshwater Ecosyst. 13: 323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks T., Balmford A., Burgess N., Fjeldså J., Hansen L.A., Moore J., Rahbek C. and Williams P. (2001). Toward a blueprint for conservation in Africa. Bioscience 51(8): 613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro T.M. and O’Doherty G. (1999). On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 13: 805–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cellot B., Dole-Olivier M.J., Bornette G. and Pautou G. (1994). Temporal and spatial environmental variability in the Upper Rhône river and its floodplain. Freshwater Biol. 31: 311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis J.A., Rolls S.W. and Balla S.A. 1987. The role of the Odonata and aquatic Coleoptera as indicators of environmental quality in wetlands. In: Majer J.D.(eds) The Role of in Invertebrates Conservation and Biological Survey. Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land Management, pp. 31–42.

  • Duelli P. and Obrist M.K. (2003). Biodiversity indicators: the choice of values and measures. Agri. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith D.P. and Walker P.A. (1996). How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of areas?: on hotspots, complementarity and pattern-based approaches. Biodiv. Lett. 3: 18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster G.N. and Eyre M.D. (1992). Classification and ranking of water beetle communities. UK Nature Conservation No 1. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster G.N., Foster A.P., Eyre M.D. and Bilton D.T. (1990). Classification of water beetle assemblages in arable fenland and ranking of sites in relation to conservation value. Freshwater Biol. 22: 343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez R. 1988. Los Moluscos (Gastropoda y Bivalvia) de las aguas epicontinentales de la Cuenca del Río Segura (S.E. de España). Ph. D. Thesis, University of Murcia.

  • Halffter G., Moreno C.E. and Pineda E.O. 2001Manual para evaluación de la biodiversidad en Reservas de la Biosfera. MandT – Manuales y Tesis Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (SEA), Vol. 2. Zaragoza.

  • Heino J. (2002). Concordance of species richness patterns among multiple freshwater taxa: a regional perspective. Biodiv. Conserv. 11: 137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J., Paavola R., Virtanen R. and Muotka T. (2005). Searching for biodiversity indicators in running waters: do bryophytes, macroinvertebrates, and fish show congruent diversity patterns?. Biodiv. Conserv. 14: 415–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard P.C., Viskanic P., Davenport T.R.B., Kigenyi F.W., Baltzer M., Dickinson C.J., Lwanga J.S., Matthews R.A. and Balmford A. (1998). Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394: 472–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries C.J., Williams P.H. and Vane-Wright R.I. (1995). Measuring biodiversity value for conservation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston M.A. (1994). Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species in Changing Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries M. (1988). Do water beetle communities reflect the wider freshwater community?. A trial run. Newslett. Balfour-Browne Club 42: 14–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Kati V., Devillers P., Dufrêne M., Legakis A., Vokou D. and Lebrun Ph. (2004). Testing the value of six taxonomic groups as biodiversity indicators at a local scale. Conserv. Biol. 18: 667–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr J.T., Sugar A. and Packer L. (2000). Indicator taxarapid biodiversity assessmentand nestedness in an endangered ecosystem. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1726–1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick J.B. (1983). An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biol. Conserv. 25: 127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules C.R. and Pressey R.L. (2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Margules C.R., Pressey R.L. and Williams PH. (2002). Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation. J. Biosci. 27(2): 309–326

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch M.A. (1998). The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biol. Rev. 73: 181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Médail F. and Quézel P. (1997). Hot-spots analysis for conservation of plant biodiversity in the Mediterranean basin. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden 84: 112–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millán A., Velasco J., Montes C. and Nieser N. 1988. Heterópteros acuáticos (Guerromorpha & Nepomorpha) de la cuenca del Río Segura. SE. de España. Anales de Biología, 15: 33–47.

  • Millán A., Velasco J., Vidal–Abarca M.R., Suárez M.L. and Ramírez–Díaz L. 1996. Distribución espacial de los Adephaga acuáticos (Coleoptera) en la cuenca del río Segura (SE de la Península Ibérica). Limnetica 12(2): 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno J.L., Millán A., Suárez M.L., Vidal-Abarca M.R. and Velasco J. (1997). Aquatic Coleoptera and Heteroptera assemblages in waterbodies from ephemeral coastal streams (“ramblas”) of south-eastern Spain. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 141: 93–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore J.L., Balmford A., Brooks T., Burgess N.D., Hansen L.A., Rahbek C. and Williams P.H. (2003). Performance of sub-Saharan vertebrates as indicator groups for identifying priority areas for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 17: 207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., Da Fonseca G.A.B. and Kent J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noss R.F. (1990). Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol. 4: 355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola R., Muotka T., Virtanen R., Heino J. and Kreivi P. (2003). Are biological classifications of headwater streams concordant across diverse taxonomic groups?. Freshwater Biol. 48: 1912–1923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panzer R., Stillwaught D., Gnaedinger R. and Derkovitz G. (1995). Prevalence of remnant dependence among the prairie and savanna in habiting insects of the Chicago region. Nat. Areas J. 15: 140–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Paszkowski C.A. and Tonn W.M. (2000). Community concordance between the fish and aquatic birds of lakes in northern Alberta: the relative importance of environmental and biotic factors. Freshwater Biol. 43: 421–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson D.L. (1994). Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Series B 345: 75–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson D.L. and Cassola F. (1992). World-wide species richness patterns of Tiger Beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): indicator taxon for biodiversity and conservation studies. Conserv. Biol. 6(3): 376–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B. and van Jaarsveld A.S. (2000). Assessment techniques for biodiversity surrogates. SA J. Sci. 96: 406–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribera I. (2000). Biogeography and conservation of Iberian water beetles. Biol. Conserv. 92: 131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribera I. and Foster G. (1993). Uso de Coleópteros acuáticos como indicadores biológicos (Coleoptera). Elytron 6: 61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribera I., Hernando C. and Aguilera P. (1998). An Annotated checklist of the Iberian water beetles (Coleoptera). Zapateri 8: 43–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Richoux P. (1994). Theoretical habitat templets, species traits and species richness: aquatic Coleoptera in the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain. Freshwater Biol. 31: 377–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlen G. and Ekestubbe K. (2001). Identification of dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators of general species richness in boreal forest lakes. Biodiv. Conserv. 10: 673–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Fernández D., Abellán P., Velasco J. and Millán A. (2004a). Selecting areas to protect the biodiversity of aquatic ecosystems in a semiarid Mediterranean region. Aquat. Conserv.: Marine Freshwater Ecosyst. 14: 465–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Fernández D., Abellán P., Velasco J. and Millán A. (2004b). Áreas prioritarias de conservación en la Cuenca del Río Segura utilizando los coleópteros acuáticos como indicadores. Limnética 23(3–4): 29–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauberer N., Zulka K.P., Abensperg-Traun M., Berg H.M., Bieringer G., Milasowszky N., Moser D., Plutzar C., Pollheimer M., Storch C., Trostl R., Zechmeister H. and Grabherr G. (2004). Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria. Biol. Conserv. 117: 181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su J.C., Debinski D.M., Kajubauskas M.E. and Kindscher K. (2004). Beyond species richness: community similarity as a measure of cross-taxon congruence for coarse filter conservation. Conserv. Biol. 18(1): 167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ubero-Pascal N.A. 1996. Estudio faunístico de los Órdenes Ephemeroptera y Plecoptera (Insecta) de la Cuenca del Río Segura (S.E. de la Península Ibérica). Ph.D. thesis, University of Murcia.

  • Vane-Wright R.I., Humphries C.J. and Williams P.H. (1991). What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55: 235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villaseñor J.L., Ibarra-Manríquez G., Meave J.A. and Ortíz E. (2004). Higher taxa as surrogates of plant biodiversity in a megadiverse country. Conserv. Biol. 19(1): 232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox B.A. (1984). Mc.Neely, J.A. and Miller, R. (eds) National Parks: Conservation and Development, pp 639–647. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. (1996). Measuring biodiversity value. World Conserv. 1: 12–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. and Gaston K.J. (1994). Measuring more of biodiversity: can higher taxon richness predict wholesale species richness?. Biol. Conserv. 67: 211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P., Gibbons D.W., Margules C.R., Rebelo A., Humphries C.J. and Pressey R.L. (1996). A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots and complementary areas for conservation diversity of British birds. Conserv. Biol. 10(1): 155–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H., Gaston K.J. and Humphries C.J. (1997). Mapping biodiversity value worldwide: combining higher-taxon richness from different groups. Proc. Roy. Soc. Biol. Sci. 264: 141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Hydrology, University of Murcia, Campus of Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain

    David Sánchez-Fernández, Pedro Abellán, Andrés Mellado, Josefa Velasco & Andrés Millán

Authors
  1. David Sánchez-Fernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pedro Abellán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrés Mellado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Josefa Velasco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrés Millán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Sánchez-Fernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sánchez-Fernández, D., Abellán, P., Mellado, A. et al. Are Water Beetles Good Indicators of Biodiversity in Mediterranean Aquatic Ecosystems? The Case of the Segura River Basin (SE Spain). Biodivers Conserv 15, 4507–4520 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-5101-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-5101-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation