Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biodiversity of floodplain forests in Europe and eastern North America: A comparative study of the Rhine and Mississippi Valleys

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the mechanisms driving biodiversity in floodplain forests with a comparison of the composition and dynamics in the warm-temperate floodplain forests of the lower Mississippi Valley and the cool-temperate floodplain forests of the lower Wisconsin and Rhine River Valleys. We employ data from original research, as well as from the literature. We compare species, genus, and family diversity across regions with respect to species richness, numbers of species per family and genus, and a similarity index. We examine these results within a historical context, as well as with respect to river-floodplain dynamics. We also compare productivity data and successional stages for each region. We find a lower species, genus, and family richness in the cool-temperate forests of the Rhine compared to the cool-temperate forests of the Wisconsin, a probable result of the lack of available refugia for Rhine species in times of glacial expansion. We find the highest richness in the lower Mississippi Valley, likely a result of climatic factors and the availability of refugia in this region. In each of the regions, floodplain forests are more diverse than their upland counterparts, demonstrating the role of river-floodplain dynamics in maintaining species diversity. Each region maintains a high and relatively similar level of productivity in the floodplain forests. They also experience similar stages of succession, although succession becomes more complex in the warm-temperate forests of the Lower Mississippi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold C., Schnitzler A. and Douard A. 2002. Conservation and reintroduction of rare forest species: an example from wild grapevine (Vitis vinifera BSP, sylvestris). In: Dynamics and Conservation of Genetic Diversity in Forest Ecosystems. DYGEN, Strasbourg, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes W.J. 1985. Population dynamics of woody plants on a river island. Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 647–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes W.J. 1997. Vegetation dynamics on the floodplain of the lower Chippewa River in Wisconsin. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Club 124: 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia L.L., Minchin P.R. and Pritchett D.W. 2002. Sixteen years of old-field succession and re-establishment of a bottomland hardwood forest in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Wetlands 22: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell D.T. 1974. Studies on the ecology of a streamside forest: composition and distribution of vegetation beneath the tree canopy. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 101: 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun E.L. 1950. Deciduous Forests of Eastern North America. Blakston Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbiener R. 1970. Un exemple de type forestier exceptionnel pour l’Europe occidentale: la forêt du lit majeur du Rhin au niveau du fossé rhénan (Fraxino-Ulmetum, Oberd. 53). Intérêt écologique et biogéographique. Comparaison è d’autres forêts thermophiles. Vegetatio 20: 97–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam G. and Curtis J.T. 1956. The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37: 451–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis J.T. 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dister E. 1984. Bemerkungen zur Ökologie und soziologischen Stellung der Auenwälder am nördlichen Oberrhein (hessische Rheinaue). In: Les foréts alluviales. Cramer, Vaduz, Liechtenstein, pp. 343–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn C.P. 1986. Shrub layer response to death of Ulmus americana in southeastern Wisconsin lowland forests. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 113: 142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans S.K. 1970. The vegetation of islands on the Wisconsin River. M.S. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre F. 1980. Forest Cover Types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineschi S., Anzider M., Cafasso D., Cozzolino S., Garfi G., Pastorelli R., Salvini D., Taurchini D. and Vendramin G.G. 2002. Molecular markers reveal a strong genetic differentiation between two European relic tree species: Zelkova abelicea (Lam.) Boissier and Z. sicula Di Pasquale, Garfì and Quézel (Ulmaceae). Conservation Genetics 3: 145–153.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finley R. 1976. Original Vegetative Cover of Wisconsin. North Central Forest Experiment Station, US Forest Service, St. Paul, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follieri M., Magri D. and Sadori L. 1986. Late Pleistocene Zelkova extinctions in central Italy. The New Phytologist 103: 209–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton M. 1987. The vegetation and development of young island surfaces in the Lower Wisconsin River. M.S. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges J. 1995. The Southern Bottomland Hardwood Region and Brown Loam Bluffs Subregion. In: Barrett J. (ed) Regional Silviculture of the United States. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 227–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosner J.F. and Minckler L.S. 1963. Bottomland hardwood forests of southern Illinois - regeneration and succession. Ecology 44: 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R.L. and Little E.L. 1967. Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of the Bluff Experimental Forest, Warren County, Mississippi. US Forest Service research paper 26, US Forest Service, New Orleans, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellison R., Young M., Brahan R. and Jones E. 1998. Major alluvial floodplains. In: Conner W. (ed) Southern Forested Wetlands: Ecology and Management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 291–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson M. and Klaas E. 1998. Floodplain forest losses and changes in forest community composition and structure in the Upper Mississippi River: a wildlife habitat at risk. Natural Areas Journal 18: 138–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski T.T. 2002. Physiological-ecological impacts of flooding on riparian forest ecosystems. Wetlands 22: 550–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham R. and Ricklefs R. 1993. Continental comparisons of temperate-zone tree species diversity. In: Schluter R.R.a.D. (ed) Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographic Perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 294–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • LindstromS. and YoungJ. 2002. Madison climate trends reflected in changed ‘normal’ statistics. http://www.aos.wisc.edu/~sco/02press1.html.

  • McKnight J., Hook D., Langdon O. and Johnson R. 1981. Flood tolerance and related characteristics of trees of the bottomland forests of the Southern United States. In: Benforado J. (ed) Wetlands of Bottomland Hardwood Forests. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 29–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menges E.S. and Waller D.M. 1983. Plant strategies in relation to elevation and light in floodplain herbs. The American Naturalist 122: 454–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk C.D. 1967. Tree species diversity in the Eastern deciduous forest with particular reference to north central Florida. The American Naturalist 101: 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorfer E. 1992. Teil IV, Wälder und Gebüsche. In: Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften, G. Fischer, Jena, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker G. and Merritt C. 1995. The Central Region. In: Barrett J. (ed) Regional Silviculture of the United States. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 129–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascale G., di Garfi G. and Quézel P. 1992. Sur la présence d’un Zelkova (Ulmaceae) nouveau en Sicile sud-orientale. Biocosme Mésogéen 8: 401–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planchais N. 1972. Apports de l’analyse pollinique à la connaissance de l’extension de la vigne au quaternaire. Naturalisa Monspeliensis 23–24: 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli E., Maugeri G. and d’Urso A. 1974. La Celtis tourneforti Lam. sull’Etna. Archivio Botanico e Biogeographico Italiana 4: 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons A., Suc J.P., Reille M. and Combourieu-Nebout N. 1995. The history of dryness in regions with a mediterranean climate. In: Castri F.d. (ed) Time Scales of Biological Responses to Water Constraints. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam J., Furnival G.M. and McKnight J.S. 1960. Management and Inventory of Southern Hardwoods. Report number 181. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson P.A., Weaver G.T. and Cavanaugh J.A. 1978. Vegetation and tree species patterns near the Northern terminus of the Southern Floodplain Forest. Ecological Monographs 48: 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler A. 1994. European alluvial hardwood forests of large floodplains. Journal of Biogeography 21: 604–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler A. 1995a. Community ecology of arboreal lianas in gallery forests of the Rhine valley, France. Acta Oecologia 16: 219–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler A. 1995b. Successional status of trees in gallery forest along the river Rhine. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler A. 1996. Comparison of landscape diversity in forests of the upper Rhine and the middle Loire floodplains (France). Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 743–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharitz R.R. and Mitsch W.J. 1993. Southern Floodplain Forests. In: Echternacht A. (ed) Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States: Lowland Terrestrial Communities. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 311–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelford V. 1954. Some lower Mississippi Valley floodplain biotic communities; their age, and elevation. Ecology 35: 126–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks R. 1995. Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains. Bioscience 45: 168–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suc J.P. 1989. Distribution latitudinale et étagement des associations végétales au Cénozoíque supérieur dans l’aire ouest méditerranéenne. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 8: 541–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tralau H. 1963. Asiatic Dicotyledonous affinities in the Cenozoic flora of Europe. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 9: 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall D.P. and Darwin S.P. 1999. Vegetation and elevational gradients within a Bottomland Hardwood forest of southeastern Louisiana. American Midland Naturalist 142: 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward J.V., Tockner K. and Schiemer F. 1999. Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regulated Rivers - Research and Management 15: 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware G.H. 1955. A phytosociological study of lowland hardwood forests in southern Wisconsin. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • WatsonL. and DallwitzM. 2000. The Families of Flowering Plants: Descriptions, Illustrations, Identification, and Information Retrieval. http://biodiversity.uno.edu/delta/angio/.

  • Wendelberger E. 1970. Die Auwälder der Donau bei Wallsee. Vegetatio 7: 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman J. 1982. A study of the composition, successional relationships, and floristics of Mississippi River Floodplain Forests in Parts of Washington, Bolivar, and Sharkey Counties, Mississippi. Ph.D. Dissertation. Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brack W. Hale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schnitzler, A., Hale, B.W. & Alsum, E. Biodiversity of floodplain forests in Europe and eastern North America: A comparative study of the Rhine and Mississippi Valleys. Biodivers Conserv 14, 97–117 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-4056-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-4056-2

Key words

Navigation