Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Forest use and vertical stratification in fruit-feeding butterflies of Sulawesi, Indonesia: impacts for conservation

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protected forest areas of Sulawesi are gradually being replaced by intensively used agroforestry systems and farmland, especially in lowland and sub-montane regions. Studies on the impact of these man-induced changes on biodiversity are of urgent conservation concern. We compared the fruit-feeding butterfly assemblage of a natural hill forest to that of a disturbed hill forest, representing a mosaic of old secondary forest and recently abandoned or active subsistence farms. Overall, species richness seemed highest in the disturbed site, but both abundance and diversity of endemic butterflies were significantly higher in the natural forest. Although the butterfly assemblage showed a clear vertical structure in the natural forest, vertical stratification was no longer pronounced at the disturbed site. Comparative studies based on diversity estimates from ground samples should consider not only the scale at which sampling is carried out and influences from nearby habitat patches in the surrounding landscape mosaic, but also possible behavioural changes in stratified species after forest modification. This study shows that higher overall species richness does not imply higher species distinctiveness, and indicates that the contribution of land-use systems to global biodiversity should be evaluated with caution, even when relatively high species richness estimates are found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aoki T., Yamaguchi S. and Uemura Y. 1982. Satyridae, Libytheidae. In: Tsukada E. (ed) Butterflies of the South East Asian Islands 3. Plapac, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basset Y., Aberlenc H.-P., Barrios H., Curletti F., Bérenger J.-M., Vesco J.-P. et al. 2001. Stratification and diel activity of arthropods in a lowland rainforest in Gabon. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 72: 585–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beccaloni G.W. 1997. Vertical stratification of ithomiine butterfly (Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae) mimicry complexes: the relationship between adult flight height and larval host-plant height. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 62: 313–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck J. and Schulze C.H. 2000. Diversity of fruit-feeding butterflies (Nymphalidae) along a gradient of tropical rainforest succession in Borneo with some remarks on the problem of ‘pseudoreplicates’. Transactions of the Lepidopterological Society of Japan 51: 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birket-Smith J. 1956. Remarks on the environment. Bulletin de l’ Institut francçais d’Afrique noire A 18: 569–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birket-Smith J. 1960. Lepidoptera III. Bulletin de l’ Institut francçais d’Afrique noire A 22: 1259–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau W.S. 1980. The effect of environmental disturbance on a tropical butterfly population. Ecology 61: 313–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourliére F. 1989. Mammalian species richness in tropical rainforests. In: Harnelin-Vivien M.J. and Bourlière F. (eds) Vertebrates in Complex Tropical Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, London, Paris, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman D.M.J.S., Woinarski P.O., Sands D.P.A., Wells A. and McShane V.J. 1990. Slash-and-burn agriculture in the wet coastal lowlands of Papua New Guinea: response of birds, butterflies and reptiles. Journal of Biogeography 17: 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower A.V.Z. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera) inferred from partial sequences of the wingless gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 267: 1201–1211.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown K.S. 1991. Conservation of Neotropical environments: insects as indicators. In: Collins N.M. and Thomas J.A. (eds) The Conservation of Insects and Their Habitats. 15th Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London, September 1989. Academic Press, London, pp. 405–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown Jr. K.S. 1997. Diversity, disturbance, and sustainable use of Neotropical forests: insects as indicators for conservation monitoring. Journal of Insect Conservation 1: 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brühl C.A., Gunsalam G. and Linsenmaier K.E. 1998. Stratification of ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in a primary rain forest in Sabah, Borneo. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14: 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bynum D.Z. 1999. Assessment and monitoring of anthropogenic disturbance in Lore Lindu National Park, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Tropical Biodiversity 6: 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chey V.K., Holloway J.D. and Speight M.R. 1997. Diversity of moths in forest plantations and natural forests in Sabah. Bulletin of Entomological Research 87: 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins N.M., Sayer J.A. and Whitmore T.C. 1991. The Conservation Atlas of Tropical Forests: Asia and the Pacific. Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell R.K. 2000. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 6.0b1. User’s Guide and application published at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu estimates.

  • Colwell R.K. and Coddington J.A. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 345: 101–118.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell R.K. and Coddington J.A. 1995. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. In: Hawksworth D.L. (ed) (4th edition by Eliot J.N.) Biodiversity Measurement and Estimation. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet A.S. and Pendlebury H.M. 1992. In: Eliot J.N. (ed.) The Butterflies of the Malay Peninsula, 4th edn. Malayan Nature Society, Kuala Lumpur.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Abrera B. 1985. Nymphalidae, Satyridae and Amathusiidae. In: D’Abrera B. (ed) Butterflies of the Oriental Region II. Hill House Publishers, Ferny Creek, Australia, pp. 245–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis D.E. 1944. A comparison of mosquitos captured with avial bait at different vegetation levels. Animal Behaviour 26: 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A.J. and Sutton S.L. 1998. The effects of rainforest canopy loss on arboreal dung beetles in Borneo: implications for the measurement of biodiversity in derived tropical ecosystems. Diversity and Distributions 4: 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVries P.J. 1987. The Butterflies of Costa Rica and Their Natural History (Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae). Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries P.J. 1988. Stratification of fruit-feeding nymphalid butterflies in a Costa Rican rainforest. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 26: 98–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries P.J. and Walla T.R. 2001. Species diversity and community structure in neotropical fruit-feeding butterflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 74: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVries P.J., Murray D. and Lande R. 1997. Species diversity in vertical, horizontal, and temporal dimensions of a fruit-feeding butterfly community in an Ecuadorian rainforest. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 62: 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVries P.J., Walla T.R. and Greeney H.F. 1999. Species diversity in spatial and temporal dimensions of fruit-feeding butterflies from two Ecuadorian rainforests. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68: 333–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermon H. 2002. The butterfly community of a managed West African rainforest: patterns of habitat specificity, diversity, stratification and movement. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Göttingen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermon H., Waltert M., Larsen T.B., Dall’Asta U. and Mühlenberg M. 2000. Effects of forest management on diversity and abundance of fruit-feeding nymphalid butterflies in south-eastern Coôte d’Ivoire. Journal of Insect Conservation 4: 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fermon H., Schulze C.H., Waltert M. and Mühlenberg M. 2001. The butterfly community of the Noyau Central, Lama Forest (Republic of Benin), with notes on its ecological composition and geographic distribution. African Entomology 9: 177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermon H., Waltert M. and Mühlenberg M. 2003. Movement and vertical stratification in tropical fruit feeding butterflies. Journal of Insect Conservation 7: 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitas A.V.L. and Brown Jr. K.S. 2004. Phylogeny of the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera). Systematic Biology 53: 363–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FWI GWF 2002. The State of the Forest: Indonesia. Forest Watch Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia and Global Forest Watch, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazoul J. 2002. Impact of logging on the richness and diversity of forest butterflies in a tropical dry forest in Thailand. Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 521–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer K.C. and Hill J.K. 2000. Scale-dependent effects of habitat disturbance on species richness in tropical forests. Conservation Biology 14: 1435–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer K.C., Hill J.K., Lace L.A. and Langan A.M. 1997. Ecological and biogeographical effects of forest disturbance on tropical butterflies of Sumba, Indonesia. Journal of Biogeography 24: 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill J.K. 1999. Butterfly spatial distribution and habitat requirements in a tropical forest: impacts of selective logging. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 564–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill J.K. and Hamer K.C. 1998. Using species abundance models as indicators of habitat disturbance in tropical forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 458–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill J.K., Kramer K.C., Lace L.A. and Banham W.M.T. 1995. Effects of selective logging on tropical forest butterflies on Buru, Indonesia. Journal of Applied Ecology 32: 754–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill J.K., Hamer K.C., Tangah J. and Dawood M. 2001. Ecology of tropical butterflies in rainforest gaps. Oecologia 128: 294–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway J.D. 1987. Lepidoptera patterns involving Sulawesi: what do they indicate of past geography? In: Whitmore T.C. (ed) Biogeographical Evolution of the Malay Archipelago. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway J.D. 1990. Sulawesi biogeography — discussion and summing up. In: Knight W.J. and Holloway J.D. (eds) Insects and the Rainforests of South-East Asia (Wallacea). The Royal Entomological Society of London, London, pp. 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway J.D. and Jardine N. 1968. Two approaches to zoogeography: a study based on the distribution of butterflies, birds and bats in the Indo-Australian area. Proceedings of the Linnean Society, London 179: 153–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway J.D., Kirk-Spriggs A.H. and Khen C.V. 1992. The response of some rain forest insect groups to logging and conversion to plantation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 335: 425–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway J.D., Kibby G. and Peggie D. 2001. The Families of Malesian Moths and Butterflies. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6: 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes D. 2000. Deforestation in Indonesia: A Review of the Situation in Sumatra, Kalimantan and Sulawesi. World Bank, Jakarta, Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intachat J. and Holloway J.D. 2000. Is there stratification in diversity or preferred flight height of geometroid moths in Malaysian lowland tropical forest? Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1417–1439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson T.H.E. 1961. Entomological studies from a high tower in Mpanga Forest, Uganda. IX Observations on Lepidoptera (Rhopalocera). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society London 113: 346–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein A.-M., Steffan-Dewenter I. and Tscharntke T. 2002a. Predator-prey ratios on cocoa along a land-use gradient in Indonesia. Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 683–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein A.-M., Steffan-Dewenter I., Buchori D. and Tscharntke T. 2002b. Effects of land-use intensity in tropical agroforestry systems on coffee flower-visiting and trap-nesting bees and wasps. Conservation Biology 16: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs C.J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper and Row Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C. 1992. Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecological Applications 2: 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C. 1994. Biological inventory using target taxa: a case study of the butterflies of Madagascar. Ecological Applications 4: 407–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen T.B. 1999. Butterflies of West Africa — Origins, Natural History, Diversity and Conservation. Larsen CD-ROM. torben.larsen@hotmail.com, Manila.

  • Lawton J.H., Bignell D.E., Bolton B., Bloemers G.F., Eggleton P., Hammond P.M. et al. 1998. Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391: 72–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis O.T. 2001. Effects of experimental selective logging on tropical butterflies. Conservation Biology 15: 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy T.E., Bierregaard Jr. R.O. and Rylands A.B. 1986. Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. In: Soulé M.E. (ed) Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 257–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien T.G. and Kinnaird M.F. 2000. Differential vulnerability of large birds and mammals to hunting in North Sulawesi, and the outlook for the future. In: Robinson J.G. and Bennett E.L. (eds) Hunting for Sustainability in Tropical Forest. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgis C. 1975. Mimicry in neotropical butterflies. American Scientist 63: 522–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson G.S., Ackery P.R., Kitching I.J., Beccaloni G.W. and Hernandez L.M. 2001. Hostplants of the Moth and Butterfly Caterpillars of the Oriental Region. Southdene, Kuala Lumpur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum B., O’Brien T.G., Kinnaird M.F. and Supriatna J. 1998. Population densities of Sulawesi black macaques (Macaca nigra) on Bacan and Sulawesi, Indonesia: effects of habitat disturbance and hunting. American Journal of Primatology 44: 89–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rydon A.H.B. 1964. Notes on the use of butterfly traps in East Africa. Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 18: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze C.H. and Fiedler K. 1998. Habitat preference and flight activity of Morphinae butterflies in a Bornean rainforest, with a note on sound production by adult Zeuxidia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Malayan Nature Journal 52: 191–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze C.H., Linsenmaier K.E. and Fiedler K. 2001. Understorey versus canopy: patterns of vertical stratification and diversity among Lepidoptera in a Bornean rain forest. Plant Ecology 153: 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze C.H., Steffan-Dewenter I. and Tscharntke T. 2004a. Effects of land use on butterfly communities at the rain forest margin: a case study from central Sulawesi. In: Gerold G., Guhardja E. and Fremerey M. (eds), Land Use, Nature Conservation and the Stability of Rainforest Margins in Southeast Asia. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 281–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze C.H., Waltert M., Kessler P.J.A., Pitopang R., Shahabuddin, Veddeler D. et al. 2004b. Biodiversity indicator groups of tropical land-use systems: comparing plants, birds and insects. Ecological Applications 14: 1321–1333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow H.R., Sisk T.D., Ehrlich P.R. and Murphy D.D. 1994. Techniques and guidelines for monitoring neotropical butterflies. Conservation Biology 8: 800–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer K., Novotný V., Tonner M. and Lepš J. 1993. Habitat preferences, distribution and seasonality of the butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) in a montane tropical rain forest, Vietnam. Journal of Biogeography 20: 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer K., Jaroš J., Havelka J. and Lepš J. 1997. Effects of small-scale disturbance on butterfly communities of an Indochinese montane rainforest. Biological Conservation 80: 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statsoft 1999. Statistica for Windows 5.5. Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton S.L. 1979. The vertical distribution of flying insects in the lowland rainforest of Brunei: preliminary report. Brunei Museum Journal 4: 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton S.L. 1983. The spatial distribution of flying insects in tropical rainforests. In: Sutton S.L., Whitmore T.C. and Chadwick A.C. (eds) Tropical Rain Forest: Ecology and Management. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton S.L. 1989. The spatial distribution of flying insects. In: Sutton S.L. (ed) Tropical Rain Forest Ecosystems. Biogeographical and Ecological Studies. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton S.L., Ash C.P.J. and Grundy A. 1983. The vertical stratification of flying insects in lowland rainforests of Panama, Papua New-Guinea and Brunei. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 78: 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanabe S. 2002. Between-forest variation in vertical stratification of drosophilid populations. Ecological Entomology 27: 720–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J. 1980. Vertical stratification of a neotropical forest bird community. In: Symposium on Habitat Utilisation. Proceedings of the 17th International Ornithological Congress, pp. 1005–1012.

  • Thomas C.D. 1991. Habitat use and geographic ranges of butterflies from the wet lowlands of Costa Rica. Biological Conservation 55: 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsukada E. 1991. Nymphalidae (2). In: Tsukada E. (ed) Butterflies of the South East Asian Islands 5. Plapac, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsukada E., Nishiyama Y. and Kaneko M. 1985. Nymphalidae (1). In: Tsukada E. (ed) Butterflies of the South East Asian Islands 4. Plapac, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright R.I. 1991. Transcending the Wallace Line: do the western edges of the Australian Region and the Australian Plate coincide? Australian Systematic Botany 4: 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright R.I. 2003. Evidence and identity in butterfly systematics. In: Boggs C.L., Watt W.B. and Ehrlich P.R. (eds) Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight: Butterflies as Model Systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 477–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright R.I. and Peggie D. 1994. The butterflies of Northern and Central Maluku: diversity, endemism, biogeography and conservation priorities. Tropical Biodiversity 2: 212–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright R.I. and de Jong R. 2003. The Butterflies of Sulawesi: Annotated Checklist for a Critical Island Fauna. Leiden: Zoologische Verhandelingen 343: 3–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright R.I. and Fermon H. 2003. Taxonomy and identification of Lohora Moore (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae), the Sulawesi bush-browns. Invertebrate Taxonomy 17: 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright R.I., Humphries C.J. and Williams P.H. 1991. What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55: 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltert M., Langkau M., Maertens M., Härtel M., Erasmi S. and Mühlenberg M. 2004. Predicting losses of bird species from deforestation in Central Sulawesi. In: Gerold G., Fremerey M. and Guhardja E. (eds) Land Use, Nature Conservation and the Stability of Rain Forest Margins in Southeast Asia. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 327–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watling D. 1983. Ornithological notes from Sulawesi. Emu 83: 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt A.D., Stork N.E., Eggleton P., Srivastava D.S., Bolton B., Larsen T.B. et al. 1997a. Impact of forest loss and regeneration on insect abundance and diversity. In: Watt A.D., Hunter M. and Stork N.E. (eds) Forest and Insects. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt A.D., Stork N.E., McBeath C. and Lawson G.L. 1997b. Impact of forest management on insect abundance and damage in a lowland tropical forest in southern Cameroon. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 985–998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore T.C. 1993. Tropische Regenwälder. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten A.J., Mustafa M. and Henderson G.S. 1988. The Ecology of Sulawesi. Gadjah Mada University Press, Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten A.J., Mustafa M. and Henderson G.S. 2002. The Ecology of Sulawesi. 2nd edn. The Ecology of Indonesia Series 4. Periplus Editions, Jakarta, Indonesia, pp. 1–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. 2001. Complementarity. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity 1. Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp. 813–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willott S.J. 1999. The effects of selective logging on the distribution of moths in a Bornean rain forest. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 354: 1783–1790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willott S.J., Lim D.C., Compton S.G. and Sutton S.L. 2000. Effects of selective logging on the butterflies of a bornean rainforest. Conservation Biology 14: 1055–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H. 1978. Seasonal fluctuations in rainfall, food and abundance of tropical insects. Journal of Animal Ecology 47: 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H. 1987. Altitude, habitat and tropical insect diversity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 30: 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood B. and Gillman M.P. 1998. The effects of disturbance on forest butterflies using two methods of sampling in Trinidad. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 597–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank 2001. Indonesia: Environment and Natural Resource Management in a Time of Transition. The World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heleen Fermon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fermon, H., Waltert, M., Vane-Wright, R. et al. Forest use and vertical stratification in fruit-feeding butterflies of Sulawesi, Indonesia: impacts for conservation. Biodivers Conserv 14, 333–350 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-5354-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-5354-9

Navigation