Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Connectivity, Probabilities and Persistence: Comparing Reserve Selection Strategies

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reserve selection methods are often based on information on species’ occurrence. This can be presence–absence data, or probabilities of occurrence estimated with species distribution models. However, the effect of the choice of distribution model on the outcome of a reserve selection method has been ignored. Here we test a range of species distribution models with three different reserve selection methods. The distribution models had different combinations of variables related to habitat quality and connectivity (which incorporates the effect of spatial habitat configuration on species occurrence). The reserve selection methods included (i) a minimum set approach without spatial considerations; (ii) a clustering reserve selection method; and (iii) a dynamic approach where probabilities of occurrence are re-evaluated according to the spatial pattern of selected sites. The sets of selected reserves were assessed by re-computing species probability of occurrence in reserves using the best probability model and assuming loss of non-selected habitat. The results show that particular choices of distribution model and selection method may lead to reserves that overestimate the achieved target; in other words, species may seem to be represented but the reserve network may actually not be able to support them in the long-term. Instead, the use of models that incorporated connectivity as a variable resulted in the selection of aggregated reserves with higher potential for species long-term persistence. As reserve design aims at the long-term protection of species, it is important to be aware of the uncertainties related to model and method choice and their implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • M.B. Araújo P.H. Williams (2000) ArticleTitleSelecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data Biol. Conserv. 96 331–345 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00074-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.B. Araújo P.H. Williams A. Turner (2002) ArticleTitleA sequential approach to minimise threats within selected conservation areas Biodiversity Conserv. 11 1011–1024

    Google Scholar 

  • M.P. Austin R.B. Cunningham P.M. Fleeming (1984) ArticleTitleNew approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures Vegetatio 55 11–27 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00039976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.A. Briers (2002) ArticleTitleIncorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures Biol. Conserv. 103 77–83 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00123-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Cabeza (2003) ArticleTitleHabitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve design Ecol. Lett. 6 665–672 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00475.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Cabeza A. Moilanen (2001) ArticleTitleDesign of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 242–248 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02125-5 Occurrence Handle11301153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • M. Cabeza A. Moilanen (2003) ArticleTitleSite selection algorithms and habitat loss Conserv. Biol. 17 1402–1413 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01421.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Cabeza M.B. Araújo R.J. Wilson C.D. Thomas M.J.R. Cowley A. Moilanen (2004a) ArticleTitleCombining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design J. Appl. Ecol. 41 252–262 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00905.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabeza M., Moilanen A. and Possingham H.P. 2004b. Metapopulation dynamics and reserve network design. In: Hanski I. and Gaggiotti O. (eds), Metapopulation Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution, Academic Press.

  • B. Csuti S. Polasky P.H. Williams R.L. Pressey J.D. Camm M. Kershaw A.R. Kiester B. Downs R. Hamilton M. Huso K. Sahr (1997) ArticleTitleA comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon Biol. Conserv. 80 83–97 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00068-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Debinski R.D. Holt (2000) ArticleTitleA survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments Conserv. Biol. 14 342–355 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98081.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.G. D’Eon S.M. Glenn I. Parfitt M. Fortin (2002) ArticleTitleLandscape connectivity as a function of scale and organism vagility in a real forested landscape Conserv. Ecol. 6 10

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Elith (2000) Quantitative methods for modeling species habitat: comparative performance and an application to Australian plants S. Ferson M. Burgman (Eds) Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology Springer New York 39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Elith M.A. Burgman H.M. Regan (2002) ArticleTitleMapping epistemic uncertainties and vague concepts in predictions of species distribution Ecol. Model. 157 313–329 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00202-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Ferrier G. Watson J. Pearce M. Drielsma (2002) ArticleTitleExtended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. I. Species-level modelling Biodiversity Conserv. 11 2275–2307

    Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Fielding J.F. Bell (1997) ArticleTitleA review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models Environ. Conserv. 24 38–49

    Google Scholar 

  • K.J. Gaston R.L. Pressey C.R. Margules (2002) ArticleTitlePersistence and vulnerability: retaining biodiversity in the landscape and in protected areas J. Biosci. 27 361–384 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vit1SnsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12177535

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • C. Grashof-Bokdam (1997) ArticleTitleForest species in an agricultural landscape in the Netherlands: effects of habitat fragmentation J. Vegetat. Sci. 8 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Hanley B.J. McNeil (1982) ArticleTitleThe meaning and use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve Radiology 143 29–36 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi2C2M7oslc%3D Occurrence Handle7063747

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • I. Hanski (1994) ArticleTitleA practical model of metapopulation dynamics J. Anim. Ecol. 63 151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Hanski (1999) Metapopulation Ecology Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • C.E. Heijnis A.T. Lombard R.M. Cowling P.G. Desmet (1999) ArticleTitlePicking up the pieces: a biosphere reserve framework for a fragmented landscape – the coastal lowlands of the Western CapeSouth Africa Biodiversity Conserv. 8 471–496

    Google Scholar 

  • P.C. Howard P. Viskanic T.R.B. Davenport F.W. Kigenyi M. Baltzer C.J. Dickinson J.S. Lwanga R.A. Matthews A. Balmford (1998) ArticleTitleComplementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda Nature 394 472–475 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXltVGrtLs%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J.B. Kirkpatrick (1983) ArticleTitleAn iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania Biol. Conserv. 25 127–134 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(83)90056-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Legendre M.R.T. Dale M. Fortin J. Gurevitch M. Hohn D. Myers (2002) ArticleTitleThe consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys Ecography 25 601–615 Occurrence Handle10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250508.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Manel H.C. Williams S.J. Ormerod (2001) ArticleTitleEvaluating presence–absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence J. Appl. Ecol. 38 921–931 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00647.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Margules I.D. Cresswell A.O. Nicholls (1994) A scientific basis for establishing networks of protected areas P.L. Forey C.J. Humphries R.I. Vane-Wright (Eds) Systematics and Conservation Evaluation Oxford University Press Oxford 327–350

    Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Margules A.O. Nicholls R.L. Pressey (1988) ArticleTitleSelecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity Biol. Conserv. 43 63–76 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(88)90078-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Margules R.L. Pressey P.H. Williams (2002) ArticleTitleRepresenting biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation J. Biosci. 27 309–326 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vit1Sguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12177531

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Margules J.L. Stein (1989) ArticleTitlePatterns in the distributions of species and the selection of nature reserves an example from eucalyptus forests in south-eastern New South Wales Australia Biol. Conserv. 50 219–238

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Moilanen M. Cabeza (2002) ArticleTitleSingle-species dynamic site selection Ecol. Appl. 12 913–926

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Moilanen M. Nieminen (2002) ArticleTitleSimple connectivity measures in spatial ecology Ecology 83 1131–1145

    Google Scholar 

  • D.J. Nalle J.L. Arthur J. Sessions (2002) ArticleTitleDesigning compact and contiguous reserve networks with a hybrid heuristic algorithm Forest Sci. 48 59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • A.O. Nicholls (1998) Integrating population abundancedynamics and distribution into broad-scale priority setting G. Mace A. Balmford J.R. Ginsberg (Eds) Conservation in A Changing World Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • A.O. Nicholls C.R. Margules (1993) ArticleTitleAn upgraded reserve selection algorithm Biol. Conserv. 64 165–169 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(93)90654-J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.E. Osborne J.C. Alonso R.G. Bryant (2001) ArticleTitleModelling landscape-scale habitat use using GIS and remote sensing: a case study with great bustards J. Appl. Ecol. 38 458–472 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00604.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Pearce S. Ferrier (2000) ArticleTitleEvaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression Ecol. Model. 133 225–245 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00322-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H.P. Possingham I. Ball S. Andelman (2000) Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve network S. Ferson M. Burgman (Eds) Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology Springer New York 291–306

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Pouwels M.J.S.M. Reijnen J.T.R. Kalkhoven J. Dirksen (2002) Ecoprofielen voor soortanalyses van ruimtelijke samenhang met LARCH. Alterra rapport 493, Alterra Research Instituut voor de Groene Ruimte Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Pressey C.J. Humphries C.R. Margules R.I. Vane-Wright P.H. Williams (1993) ArticleTitleBeyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection Trends Ecol. Evol. 8 124–128 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0169-5347(93)90023-I

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team 2003. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

  • H.M. Regan M. Colyvan M.A. Burgman (2002) ArticleTitleA taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology Ecol. Appl. 12 618–628

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Reijnen R. Jochem M. Jong ParticleDe M. Heer ParticleDe H. Sierdsema (2001) Larch Vogels Nationaal. Een expertsysteem voor het beoordelen van de ruimtelijke samenhang en de duurzaamheid van broedvogelpopulaties in Nederland Research Instituut voor de Groene Ruimte Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • A.S.L. Rodrigues R.D. Gregory K.J. Gaston (2000) ArticleTitleRobustness of reserve selection procedures under temporal species turnover Proc. Roy. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 267 49–55 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jsVCisA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • N.H. Schumaker (1996) ArticleTitleUsing landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity Ecology 77 1210–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Swets (1988) ArticleTitleMeasuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems Science 240 1285–1293 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieB3srptVM%3D Occurrence Handle3287615

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • C.J.F. Ter Braak C.W.N. Looman (1986) ArticleTitleWeighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model Vegetatio 65 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Langevelde ParticleVan (2000) ArticleTitleScale of habitat connectivity and colonization in fragmented nuthatch populations Ecography 23 614–622

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Langevelde ParticleVan A. Schotman F. Claassen G. Sparenburg (2000) ArticleTitleCompeting land use in the reserve site selection problem Landscape Ecol. 15 243–256

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Verboom R. Foppen P. Chardon P. Opdam P. Luttikhuizen (2001) ArticleTitleIntroducing the key patch approach for habitat networks with persistent populations: an example for marshland birds Biol. Conserv. 100 89–101 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00210-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.M. Virolainen T. Virola J. Suhonen M. Kuitunen A. Lammi P. Siikamäki (1999) ArticleTitleSelecting networks of nature reserves: methods do affect the long-term outcome Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 266 1141–1146

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelonderzoek Nederland SOVON 2002. Atlas van de Nederlandse broedvogels 1998–2000, Nederlandse fauna 5. Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis, KNNV Uitgeverij & European Invertebrate Survey, Nederland, Leiden.

  • P.H. Williams (1998) Key sites for conservation: area-selection methods for biodiversity G. Mace A. Balmford J.R. Ginsberg (Eds) Conservation in A Changing World Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • P.H. Williams M.B. Araújo (2000) ArticleTitleUsing probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation Proc. Roy. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 267 1959–1966 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzjvVaitA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • P.H. Williams M.B. Araújo (2002) ArticleTitleApples, oranges, and probabilities: Integrating multiple factors into biodiversity conservation with consistency Environ. Model. Assess. 7 139–151

    Google Scholar 

  • B.A. Wintle M. McCarthy K.P. Parris M.A. Burgman (2004) ArticleTitlePrecision and bias of methods for estimating point survey detection probabilities Ecol. Appl. 14 703–712

    Google Scholar 

  • K. With R.H. Gardner M.G. Turner (1997) ArticleTitleLandscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments Oikos 78 151–169

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Woodroffe J.R. Ginsberg (1998) ArticleTitleEdge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas Science 280 2126–2128 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.280.5372.2126 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXkt1Glu7g%3D Occurrence Handle9641920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, Viikinkaari 1, FIN-00014, Finland

    Astrid J. A. van Teeffelen, Mar Cabeza & Atte Moilanen

Authors
  1. Astrid J. A. van Teeffelen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mar Cabeza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Atte Moilanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Astrid J. A. van Teeffelen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Teeffelen, A.J.A., Cabeza, M. & Moilanen, A. Connectivity, Probabilities and Persistence: Comparing Reserve Selection Strategies. Biodivers Conserv 15, 899–919 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-2933-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-2933-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation