Abstract
The people of Manipur, a state in northeast India, follow ancestral worship and animism in the form of deity worship, with the central focus on worship in forest patches. The beliefs and taboos associated with the Sylvan deities (Umanglais) in the forest patches are restricted to any sort of disturbance of flora and fauna. These social boundaries help to conserve the entire organism as a whole, which stand the concept of sacred groves. The pleasing of deities is performed every year by the Meiteis, a dominant community of Manipur, in honour of the deities and to gain their favour. Indigenous cultural and rituals practices of the local people in sacred groves serve as a tool for conserving biodiversity. Sacred groves are distributed over a wide ecosystem and help in conservation of rare and endemic species. Well-preserved sacred groves are store houses of valuable medicinal and other plants having high economic value, and serve as a refuge to threatened species. One hundred and sixty-six sacred groves were inventoried in Manipur valley that comprises Imphal east, Imphal west, Thoubal and Bishnupur districts of the state. Detailed studies were carried out in four selected sacred groves, to know the importance of biodiversity status and vegetation characteristics. A total of 173 plant species representing 145 genera under 70 families were recorded through baseline floristic survey. The species diversity indices were compared among the four studied groves. The vegetation composition and community characteristics were recorded. Ethnobotanical uses of species were examined, which reveal that 96% of the species were used as medicine for the treatment of various ailments. Utilization of herbal medicine by the Meiteis is closely related to the cultural and ritual practices. A few of the medicinal plants which have disappeared from the locality are now confined only to the groves. Socio-cultural aspects were investigated taking into account the attitudes of local people, which indicate social beliefs and taboo are eroding, simultaneously degrading the degree of protection of sacred groves. Therefore, conservation measures of sacred groves need to be formulated considering the factor of degradation and the basic necessities of the local people. Until and unless a viable option is provided to the local people (especially those who habitat nearby the adjoining areas) for sustaining their economic condition, no step for conservation of biodiversity will be successful.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K. Balasubramanyan N.C. Induchoodan (1996) ArticleTitlePlant diversity in sacred groves of Kerala Evergreen 36 3–4
R. Basu (2000) Studies on Sacred Groves and Taboos in Purulia District of West Bengal Indian Forester ␣ 1309–1317
R. Boojh P.S. Ramakrishan (1983) Sacred Groves and their Role in Environmental Conservation Strategies for Environmental Management Department of Science and Environmental of Uttar Pradesh Lucknow 6–8
K.T. Boraiah R. Vasudeva A.B. Shonil C.G. Kushalapa (2003) ArticleTitleDo informally managed sacred groves have higher richness and regeneration of medicinal plants than state-managed reserve forests? Current Science 84 804–808
D. Brandis (1897) Indian Forestry, Working Oriental Institute ␣
R.J.J. Burman (1992) ArticleTitleThe institution of sacred grove Journal of the Indian Anthropological Society 27 219–238
J.S. Denslow (1980) ArticleTitlePatterns of plant species diversity during succession under different disturbance regimes Oecologia 46 18–21 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00346960
S. Devi (2000) Sacred groves of Manipur AbstractNational workshop on community strategies on the Management of Natural Resources Bhopal, India
M. Gadgil V.D. Vartak (1975) ArticleTitleSacred groves of India – a plea of the continuous conservation Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 72 IssueID2 313–320
M. Gadgil V.D. Vartak (1976) ArticleTitleSacred groves of Western Ghats of India Economic Botany 30 152–160
P.K. Hajra (1975) Law Lyngdoh (sacred groves), Mawphlang Government of Meghalaya Shillong, India
K. Haridasan R.R. Rao (1985) Forest flora of Meghalaya Bishen Singh and Mahendrapal Singh Dehra Dun
Hughes D.J. and Chandran Subash M.D. 1997. Sacred Groves around the earth: an overview. Paper presented in the workshop on The role of sacred groves in conservation and management of Biological Resources, KFRI, Pechi.
S.K. Jain R.R. Rao (1977) A Handbook of Field and Herbarium Methods Today and tomorrow’s printers and publishers New Delhi
S.A. Jamir H.N. Pandey (2002) ArticleTitleStatus of biodiversity in the sacred groves of Jaintia Hills, Meghalaya Indian Forester 128 IssueID7 738–744
M.L. Khan S. Menon K.S. Bawa (1997) ArticleTitleEffectiveness of the protected area network in biodiversity conservation: a case study of Meghalaya state Biodiversity and Conservation 6 853–868 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BIOC.0000010406.35667.c0
Khiewtam R.S. 1986. Ecosystem function of protected forests of Cherrapunji and adjoining area. PhD thesis, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India.
R.S. Khiewtam P.S. Ramakrishnan (1989) ArticleTitleSocio-cultural studies of the sacred groves at Cherrapunji and adjoining areas in North-Eastern India Man in India 69 IssueID1 64–71
I.E.D. King-Oliver V. Chitra D. Narasimha (1997) ArticleTitleSacred groves: traditional ecological heritage International Journal of Ecological Environmental Science 23 463–470
D.D. Kosambi (1962) Myth and Reality Popular Press Bombay, India
Kumar M. and Swamy P.S. 2003. Tree diversity and regeneration status of six selected sacred groves in Tamil NaduSouth India. Paper presented in national seminar on Eco restoration, biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. 3–5 June 2003, Hostel Green Park, VisakhapatnamIndiap. 3.
Kumar O. 1990. Floristic study of Tamenglong districtManipur with ethnobotanical notes. PhD thesis, Manipur University, Imphal, Manipur.
C.G. Kushalapa S.A. Bhagwat K.A. Kushalapa (2001) Conservation and management of sacred groves of HodaguKarnatakaSouth India - a unique approach K.N. Ganeshaiah R. Shaanker Uma K.S. Bawa (Eds) Tropical Ecosystems: StructureDiversity and Human Welfare Oxford IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd New Delhi 565–569
MAB 1995. Sacred places and vernacular conservation. MAB 23. UNESCO, Man and Biosphere ProgrammeParis, pp. 20–21.
E.F. Menhinick (1964) ArticleTitleA comparison of some species diversity indices applied to samples of field insects Ecology 45 859–861
R. Misra (1968) Ecology Work Book Oxford and IBH publishing Company New Delhi
E.C. Pielou (1969) An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology Wiley New York
P.S. Ramakrishan (1996) ArticleTitleConserving the sacred: from species to Landscapes Nature Resources UNESCO 32 11–19
W.A. Rodgers (1994) ArticleTitleThe sacred groves of Meghalaya Man in India 74 339–348
C.I. Shannon W. Weiner (1963) The Mathematical Theory of Communication University of Illinois Press Urbana111. USA
E.M. Simpson (1949) ArticleTitleMeasurement of diversity Nature 163 688
E. Singh Nilakanta (1961) Lai Harouba in Marg 14 IssueID4 30–34
B.H. Singh (1996) ArticleTitlePlants used in medico-sexual purposes by the Meitei community in Manipur StateIndia Journal Economic Taxonomy of Botany Additional Series 12 364–366
Singh R.N. 2001. Biodiversity mapping of sacred groves of Manipur with special references to conservation of few endangered tree species. PhD thesis, International Institute of Ecology and EnvironmentNew Delhi.
H.B. Singh R.S. Singh J.S. Sandhu (2003) Herbal Medicine of Manipur A Colour Encyclopedia Daya publishing house New DelhiIndia
K.I. Singh P.K. Singh S.S. Singh (2002) ArticleTitleAn ethnobiological approach to the indigenous soaps and detergents of Meitei community of Manipur Journal Economic Taxonomy of Botany 25 IssueID3 547–552
Singh P.K. and Singh K.I. 2000. Traditional medicinal knowledge of Dog-Bite: need for documentation, conservation and research. Seminar on Ethnobotany Northeastern India: Pastpresent and future. Dept. of Forestry, North-Eastern Hill University, Mizoram Campus, pp. 6–17.
B. Sinha R.K. Maikhuri (1998) Conservation through ȁ8socio-cultural-religious practiceȁ9 in Garhwal Himalaya: a case study of Hariyali sacred groveȁ9 P.S. Ramakrishan K.G. Saxena U. Chandrasekhar (Eds) Conserving the Sacred: For Biodiversity Management UNESCO and Oxford IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd New Delhi 289–299
S.C. Sinha (1986) Ethnobotanical study of Manipur Manipur University Imphal, Manipur
T. Sorensen (1948) ArticleTitleA method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content Det. Kong. Danske Vidensk, Selsk Biology Skr (Copenhagen) 5 1–34
S. Sunitha R.P.B. Rao (1999) Sacred groves in Kurnool DistrictAndhra Pradesh M. Sivadasan Mathew Philip (Eds) Biodiversity, Taxonomy and Conservation of Flowering Plants Mentor books Calicut 367–373
B.K. Tiwari S.K. Barik R.S. Tripathi (1998) ArticleTitleBiodiversity valuestatus and strategies for conservation of sacred groves of Meghalaya India. Ecosystem Health 4 20–32 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1526-0992.1998.00068.x
B.K. Tiwari S.K. Barik R.S. Tripathi (1999) Sacred Forests of Meghalaya – Biological and Cultural Diversity. Regional CentreNational Afforestation and Ecodevelopment Board North-Eastern Hill University Shillong 120
N.G. Totey R.K. Verma (1996) ArticleTitleBiodiversity conservation Indian Forester 4 7–10
R.S. Tripathi (2001) Sacred groves: community biodiversity conservation model in north-east India K.N. Ganeshaiah R. Shaanker Uma K.S. Bawa (Eds) Tropical ecosystems structurediversity and human welfare (Supplement) Proceedings of the International Conference on Tropical Ecosystems ATREEBangalore 104–107
V.D. Vartak M. Gadgil (1973) ArticleTitleDev Rahati: an ethnobotanical study of the forests preserved on grounds of religious beliefs AbstractProceedings Indian Scientific Congress 60 341
S. Vedaja (1998) Manipur Geography and Regional Development Rajesh publications New Delhi 167
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Devi Khumbongmayum, A., Khan, M. & Tripathi, R.S. Sacred groves of Manipur, northeast India:biodiversity value, status and strategies for their conservation. Biodivers Conserv 14, 1541–1582 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0530-5
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0530-5