Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Grassland Butterfly Fauna under Traditional Animal Husbandry: Contrasts in Diversity in Mown Meadows and Grazed Pastures

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Semi-natural grasslands resulting from traditional land use practices (mowing and grazing) are severely endangered throughout Europe due to the intensification of agriculture. The ecological impact of mowing and grazing on grassland butterflies was studied in eight mown meadows and eight grazed pastures under traditional animal husbandry in NW Russia and adjacent Finland. Transect count data over 3 years (1997–1999) covered a total of 48 species and 5742 individuals. The butterfly fauna was rather similar under both management forms; species richness, diversity and total abundance did not differ significantly between meadows and pastures, yet meadows were preferred by more species. In both groups, the most abundant species were Aphantopus hyperantus, Pieris napi and Thymelicus lineola. Of 37 species observed as a minimum of five individuals, Polyommatus amandus, Ochlodes sylvanus and A. hyperantus showed a significant preference for mowing management. According to the ordination, butterfly communities were affected more by the origin and age of the grassland than the present management method. Landscape factors (meadow or pasture surrounded by forests or open environments), the abundance of nectar plants and the intensity of tilling were the most important factors differentiating older grasslands from the younger ones evolved from old Finnish hay fields cultivated prior to the 1940s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Ahti L. Hämet-Ahti J. Jalas (1968) ArticleTitleVegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe Ann. Bot. Fennici 5 169–211

    Google Scholar 

  2. O. Balmer A. Erhardt (2000) ArticleTitleConsequences of succession on extensively grazed grasslands for Central European butterfly communities: rethinking conservation practices Conserv. Biol. 14 746–757 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98612.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. N.A.D. Bourn J.A. Thomas (2002) ArticleTitleThe challenge of conserving grassland insects at the margins of their range in Europe Biol. Conserv. 104 285–292 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00193-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H.G. Britten L. Riley (1994) ArticleTitleNectar source diversity as an indicator of habitat suitability for the endangered uncomphagre fritillary, Boloria acrocnema (Nymphalidae) J. Lepidopterists' 9 Soc. 48 173–179

    Google Scholar 

  5. H.D. Clausen H.B. Holbeck J. Reddersen (2001) ArticleTitleFactors influencing abundance of butterflies and burnet moths in the uncultivated habitats of an organic farm in Denmark Biol. Conserv. 98 167–178 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00151-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Crofts R.G. Jefferson (Eds) (1999) The Lowland Grassland Management Handbook, 2nd ed English Nature/The Wildlife Trusts Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.C. Davison D.V. Hinkley (1997) Bootstrap Methods and their Application Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Dolek A. Geyer (1997) ArticleTitleInfluence of management on butterflies of rare grassland ecosystems in Germany J. Insect Conserv. 1 125–130 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1018443412153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Dolek A. Geyer (2002) ArticleTitleConserving biodiversity on calcareous grasslands in the Franconian Jura by grazing: a comprehensive approach Biol. Conserv. 104 351–360 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00200-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Dufrene P. Legendre (1997) ArticleTitleSpecies assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach Ecol. Monogr. 67 345–366

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Elligsen B. Beinlich H. Plachter (1997) ArticleTitleEffects of large-scale cattle grazing on populations of Coenonympha glycerionLasiommata megera (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) J. Insect Conserv. 1 13–23 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1018470723539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Erhardt (1985) ArticleTitleDiurnal Lepidoptera: sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland J. Appl. Ecol. 22 849–861

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Erhardt (1995) Ecology and conservation of alpine Lepidoptera A.S. Pullin (Eds) Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies Chapman & Hall London 258–276

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Erhardt J.A. Thomas (1991) Lepidoptera as indicators of change in the semi-natural grasslands of lowland and upland Europe N.M. Collins J.A. Thomas (Eds) The Conservation of Insects and their Habitats Academic Press London 213–236

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.E. Feber H. Smith D.W. MacDonald (1994) The effects of field margin restoration on the meadow brown butterfly (Maniola jurtina) N.D. Boatman (Eds) Field margins: Integrating Agriculture and Conservation British Crop Protection Council (BCPC) Monogr No. 58. BCPC, Farnham 295–300

    Google Scholar 

  16. L.C. Hayek M.A. Buzas (1996) Surveying Natural Populations Columbia University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. C.J. Hill (1992) ArticleTitleTemporal changes in abundance of two lycaenid butterflies (Lycaenidae) in relation to adult food resources J. Lepidopterists' 9 Soc. 46 174–181

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.O. Hill (1973) ArticleTitleReciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination J. Ecol. 61 237–249

    Google Scholar 

  19. K.D. Holl (1995) ArticleTitleNectar resources and their influence on butterfly communities on reclaimed coal surface mines Restor. Ecol. 3 76–85

    Google Scholar 

  20. G.A. Isachenko (1996) ArticleTitleLake Ladoga Region: human impacts and recent environmental changes Hydrobiologia 322 217–221 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00031830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Jantunen K. Saarinen (2002) ArticleTitleVegetation of uncultivated arable land under different management in Finnish and Russian Karelia Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 92 225–233 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00289-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jantunen J. and Saarinen K. 2003. A comparison of vegetation in semi-natural grasslands under different agricultural practices in Finnish and Russian Karelia. Nord. J. Bot., (in press).

  23. P. Kirby (1992) Habitat Management for Invertebrates: A Practical Handbook The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge Sandy, Bedfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Kotiranta P. Uotila S. Sulkava S.-L. Peltonen (Eds) (1998) Red Data Book of East Fennoscandia. Ministry of the Environment Finnish Environment Institute and Botanical MuseumFinnish Museum of Natural History Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  25. C.J. Krebs (1989) Ecological Methodology Harper & Row New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Kullberg A. Albrecht L. Kaila V. Varis (2002) ArticleTitleChecklist of Finnish Lepidoptera – Suomen perhosten luettelo Sahlbergia 6 45–190

    Google Scholar 

  27. M.H. Losvik (1988) ArticleTitlePhytosociology and ecology of old hay meadows in Hordalandin western Norway in relation to management Vegetatio 78 157–187 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00033425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A.E. Magurran (1988) Ecological Diversity and its Measurement Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  29. McCune B. and Mefford M.J. 1999. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, version 4.0. MjM Software Design. Gleneden Beach, Oregon.

  30. A. Moilanen I. Hanski (1998) ArticleTitleMetapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure Ecology 79 2503–2515

    Google Scholar 

  31. S.R. Mortimer J.A. Hollier V.K. Brown (1998) ArticleTitleInteractions between plant and insect diversity in the restoration of lowland calcareous grasslands in southern Britain Appl. Veg. Sci. 1 101–114

    Google Scholar 

  32. M.R. Oates (1995) Butterfly conservation within the management of grassland habitats A.S. Pullin (Eds) Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies Chapman & Hall London 98–112

    Google Scholar 

  33. G. Olsson (1984) Ekologi i hage och äng LTs Förlag Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  34. A.B.O. Orodho M.J. Trlica C.D. Bonham (1990) ArticleTitleLong-term heavy grazing effects on soil and vegetation in the Four Corners region Southwest. Nat. 35 9–14

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Pitkänen M. Kuussaari J. Pöyry (2001) Butterflies M. Pitkänen J. Tiainen (Eds) Biodiversity of Agricultural Landscapes in Finland BirdLife Finland Conservation Series (No.3) Helsinki 51–68

    Google Scholar 

  36. E. Pollard T.J. Yates (1993) Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. The British Butterfly Monitoring Scheme Chapman & Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  37. P. Poschlod M.F. WallisDeVries (2002) ArticleTitleThe historical and socioeconomic perspective of calcareous grasslands - lessons from the distant and recent past Biol. Conserv. 104 361–376 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00201-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. J. Pykälä (2001) Perinteinen karjatalous luonnon monimuotoisuuden ylläpitäjänä (Maintaining biodiversity through traditional animal husbandry). The Finnish Environment 495 Finnish Environment Institute Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  39. InstitutionalAuthorNameRegional Council of South Karelia (2000) Russian–Finnish Programme for the Reduction of Non-point Pollution and Improvement of Ecological State of the Bay of Vyborg Southeast Finland Regional Environment Centre Lappeenranta

    Google Scholar 

  40. K. Saarinen J. Jantunen (2002) ArticleTitleA comparison of the butterfly fauna of agricultural habitats under different management history in Finnish and Russian Karelia Ann. Zool. Fenn. 39 173–181

    Google Scholar 

  41. K. Saarinen J. Jantunen S. Saarnio K. Kuitunen O. Marttila (2001) ArticleTitleEffects of land use changes on the landscape composition: a comparison between Finnish and Russian Karelia Environ. Dev. Sustain. 3 265–274 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1020819118304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. C. Schneider G.L.A. Fry (2001) ArticleTitleThe influence of landscape grain size on butterfly diversity in grasslands J. Insect Conserv. 5 163–171 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1017932931192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. C.B. Schultz K.M. Dlugosch (1999) ArticleTitleNectar and hostplant scarcity limit populations of an endangered Oregon butterfly Oecologia 119 231–238 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004420050781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. B. Schwarzwälder M. Lörtcher A. Erhardt J. Zettel (1997) ArticleTitleHabitat utilization by the Heath fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia ssp. celadussa (Rott.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in montane grasslands of different management Biol. Conserv. 82 157–165 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00023-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. P.J. Smallidge D.J. Leopold (1997) ArticleTitleVegetation management for the maintenance and conservation of butterfly habitats in temperate human-dominated landscapes Landscape Urban Plan. 38 259–280 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00038-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. B. Söderström B. Svensson K. Vessby A. Glimskär (2001) ArticleTitlePlants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors Biodiv. Conserv. 10 1839–1863 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1013153427422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. T.H. Sparks J.O. Mountford T. Parish (1994) ArticleTitleOpportunities for conservation in the field boundaries of arable crops Aspects Appl. Biol. 40 461–468

    Google Scholar 

  48. C. Stoate N.D. Boatman R.J. Borralho C. Rio Carvalho Prefixde G.R. Snoo P. Eden (2001) ArticleTitleEcological impacts of arable land intensification in Europe J. Environ. Manage. 63 337–365 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.2001.0473 Occurrence Handle11826719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. A.B. Swengel (1998) ArticleTitleEffects of management on butterfly abundance in tallgrass prairie and pine barrens Biol. Conserv. 83 77–89 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00129-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tiainen J. 2001. The finnish agricultural environments. In: Pitka¨ nen M. and Tiainen J. (eds), Biodiversity of Agricultural Landscapes in Finland. BirdLife Finland Conservation Series (No. 3), Helsinki, pp. 9–12.

  51. C.A.M. van Swaay (2002) ArticleTitleThe importance of calcareous grasslands for butterflies in Europe Biol. Conserv. 104 315–318 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00196-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. C.A.M. van Swaay M.S. Warren (1999) Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera) Nature and Environment No. 99 Council of Europe Publishing Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  53. M.F. WallisDeVries I. Raemakers (2001) ArticleTitleDoes extensive grazing benefit butterflies in coastal dunes? Restor. Ecol. 9 179–188 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002179.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. M.F. WallisDeVries E.A. Laca M.W. Demment (1999) ArticleTitleThe importance of scale of patchiness for selectivity in grazing herbivores Oecologia 121 355–363 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004420050939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. M.F. WallisDeVries P. Poschlod J.H. Willems (2002) ArticleTitleChallenges for the conservation of calcareous grasslands in northwestern Europe: integrating the requirements of flora and fauna Biol. Conserv. 104 265–273 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00191-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimmo Saarinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saarinen, K., Jantunen, J. Grassland Butterfly Fauna under Traditional Animal Husbandry: Contrasts in Diversity in Mown Meadows and Grazed Pastures. Biodivers Conserv 14, 3201–3213 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0387-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0387-7

Keywords

Navigation