Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Scoring environmental and socioeconomic impacts of alien plants invasive in Europe

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The categorization of invasive alien species based on their impact is an important way of improving the management of biological invasions. The impact of 128 alien species of plants in Europe was evaluated using the Generic Impact Scoring System (GISS) originally developed for mammals. Based on information in the literature their environmental and socioeconomic impacts were assessed and assigned to one of six different categories. In each category, the impact was classified on a five-degree scale, which reflects the impact intensity. To identify species with the greatest impacts, we used the maximum score recorded in each category and their sums. Data from the whole invaded range were considered, which resulted in scoring the potential impact of each species, not necessarily currently realized in Europe. Environmental impacts are most often manifested via competition with native species (recorded for 83 % of the species), while socioeconomic impacts are associated mostly with human health (78 %). The sums of environmental and socioeconomic impacts were significantly correlated, which indicates that the same suite of species traits is associated with both types of impacts. In terms of plant life forms, annual plants have on average lower environmental impacts than perennial plants, and aquatic species have a higher socioeconomic impact than other life forms. Applying the GISS to plants, the most species-rich taxonomic group of alien organisms in Europe, is an important step towards providing managers and policymakers with a robust tool for identifying and prioritizing alien species with the highest impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barney JN, Tekiela DR, Dollete ES, Tomasek BJ (2013) What is the ‘real’ impact of invasive plant species? Front Ecol Environ 11:322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney JN, Tekiela DR, Barrios-Garcia MN, Dimarco RD, Hufbauer RA, Leipzig-Scott P, Nuñez MA, Pauchard A, Pyšek P, Vítková M, Maxwell BD (2015) Global Invader Impact Network (GIIN): towards standardized evaluation of the ecological impacts of invasive plants. Ecol Evol 5:2878–2889. doi:10.1002/ece3.1551

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwat SA, Breman E, Thekaekara T, Thornton TF, Willis KJ (2012) A Battle lost? Report on two centuries of invasion and management of Lantana camara L. in Australia, India and South Africa. PLoS ONE 7:e32407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Essl F, Evans T, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Kumschick S, Marková Z, Mrugała A, Nentwig W, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Ricciardi A, Richardson DM, Sendek A, Vilà M, Wilson JRU, Winter M, Genovesi P, Bacher S (2014) A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biol 12:e1001850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bossard CC, Randall JM, Hoshovsky MC (2000) Invasive plants of California’s wildlands. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CG (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth International Group, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer JS, Bailey WC (2014) Competitive effects of non-native plants are lowest in native plant communities that are most vulnerable to invasion. Plant Ecol 215:821–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundu G, Brock J, Camarda I, Child L, Wade M (eds) (2001) Plant invasions: species ecology and ecosystem management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers JE, Reichard S, Smith CS, Parker IM, Randall JM, Lonsdale WM, Atkinson IAE, Seasted T, Chornesky E, Hayes D, Williamson M (2002) Directing research to reduce the impacts of nonindigenous species. Conserv Biol 16:630–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daehler CC (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:183–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daehler CC, Carino D (2001) Hybridization between native and alien plants and its consequences. In: Lockwood JL, McKinney M (eds) Biotic homogenization. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishing, New York, pp 81–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DAISIE (2009) Handbook of alien species in Europe. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • De’ath G, Fabricius KE (2000) Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81:3178–3192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WK (2002) Freshwater ecology: concepts and environmental applications of limnology. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour-Dror J-M (2012) Alien invasive plants in Israel. The Middle East Nature Conservation Promotion Association, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  • Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W, Hulme PE, Hülber K, Jarošík V, Kleinbauer I, Krausmann F, Kühn I, Nentwig W, Vilà M, Genovesi P, Gherardi F, Desprez-Lousteau M-L, Roques A, Pyšek P (2011a) Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:203–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Essl F, Nehring S, Klingenstein F, Nowack C, Rabitsch W (2011b) Review of risk assessment systems of IAS in Europe and introducing the German–Austrian black list information system (GABLIS). J Nat Conserv 19:339–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried G (2012) Guide des plantes invasives. Belin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner M, Breeyen AD, Hui C, Richardson DM (2009) Impacts of alien plant invasions on species richness in Mediterranean-type ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Progr Phys Geogr 33:319–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner M, Biggs R, Te Beest M, Hui C, Molofsky J, Richardson DM (2014) Invasive plants as drivers of regime shifts: identifying high priority invaders that alter feedback relationships. Divers Distrib 20:733–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi P, Carboneras C, Vilà M, Walton P (2015) EU adopts innovative legislation on invasive species: a step towards a global response to biological invasions? Biol Invasions 17:1307–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood P, Kuhn NJ (2013) Does the invasive plant, Impatiens glandulifera, promote soil erosion along the riparian zone? An investigation on a small watercourse in Northwest Switzerland. J Soils Sedim 14:637–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins CL, Bacher S, Essl F, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Kumschick S, Nentwig W, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Richardson DM, Vilà M, Wilson JRU, Genovesi P, Blackburn TM (2015) Framework and guidelines for implementing the proposed IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT). Divers Distrib 21:1360–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hejda M (2013) Do species differ in their ability to coexist with the dominant alien Lupinus polyphyllus? A comparison between two distinct invaded ranges and a native range. NeoBiota 17:39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Nentwig W, Vilà M (2009) Will threat of biological invasions unite the European Union? Science 324:40–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Vilà M (2013) Bias and error in current knowledge of plant invasions impacts. Trends Ecol Evol 28:212–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Pergl J, Jarošík V, Schaffner U, Vilà M (2014) Greater focus needed on alien plant impacts in protected areas. Conserv Lett 7:459–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeschke J, Bacher B, Blackburn TM, Dick JTA, Essl F, Evans T, Gaertner M, Hulme PE, Kühn I, Mrugala A, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Ricciardi A, Richardson DM, Sendek A, Vilà M, Winter M, Kumschick S (2014) Defining the impact of non-native species: resolving disparity through greater clarity. Conserv Biol 28:1188–1194

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Pagad S, Starfinger U, ten Brink P, Shine C (2009) Technical support to EU strategy on Invasive Species (IAS): assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU (final module report for the European Commission). Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz S, Kühn I, Durka W (2002) BIOLFLOR: Eine Datenbank mit biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen zur Flora von Deutschland. Schriftenr Vegetationsk 38:1–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumschick S, Nentwig W (2010) Some alien birds have as severe an impact as the most effectual alien mammals in Europe. Biol Conserv 143:2757–2762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumschick S, Richardson DM (2013) Species-based risk assessments for biological invasions: advances and challenges. Divers Distrib 19:1095–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumschick S, Bacher S, Dawson W, Heikkilä J, Sendek A, Pluess T, Robinson TB, Kühn I (2012) A conceptual framework for prioritization of invasive alien species for management according to their impact. NeoBiota 15:69–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumschick S, Bacher S, Blackburn TM (2013) What determines the impact of alien birds and mammals in Europe? Biol Invasions 15:785–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumschick S, Bacher S, Evans T, Marková Z, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Vaes-Petignat S, van der Veer G, Vilà M, Nentwig W (2015a) Comparing impacts of alien plants and animals using a standard scoring system. J Appl Ecol 52:552–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumschick S, Gaertner M, Vilà M, Essl F, Jeschke JM, Pyšek P, Ricciardi A, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Dick JTA, Evans T, Hulme PE, Kühn I, Mrugała A, Pergl J, Rabitsch W, Richardson DM, Sendek A, Winter M (2015b) Ecological impacts of alien species: quantification, scope, caveats and recommendations. Bioscience 65:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamarque LJ, Delzon S, Sloan MH et al (2012) Biogeographical contrasts to assess local and regional patterns of invasion: a case study with two reciprocally introduced exotic maple trees. Ecography 35:803–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambdon PW, Pyšek P, Basnou C, Hejda M, Arianoutsou M, Essl F, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Winter M, Anastasiu P, Andriopoulos P, Bazos I, Brundu G, Celesti-Grapow L, Chassot P, Delipetrou P, Josefsson M, Kark S, Klotz S, Kokkoris Y, Kühn I, Marchante H, Perglová I, Pino J, Vilà M, Zikos A, Roy D, Hulme PE (2008) Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80:101–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung B, Roura-Pascual N, Bacher S, Heikkilä J, Brotons L, Burgman MA, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Essl F, Hulme PE, Richardson DM, Sol D, Vilà M, Rejmánek M (2012) TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: a framework for best practices. Ecol Lett 15:1475–1493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM, Vilà M, D’Antonio CM, Dukes JS, Grigulis K, Lavorel S (2003) Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:775–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao C, Peng R, Luo Y, Zhou X, Wu X, Fang C, Chen J, Li B (2008) Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 177:706–714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nentwig W, Kühnel E, Bacher S (2010) A generic impact-scoring system applied to alien mammals in Europe. Conserv Biol 24:302–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nentwig W, Bacher S, Pyšek P, Vilà M, Kumschick S (2016) The Generic Impact Scoring System (GISS): a standardized tool to quantify the impacts of alien species. Environ Monit Assess 188:315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oreska MPJ, Aldridge DC (2010) Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: a standardized approach to invasive species costing. Biol Invasions 13:305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker JD, Torchin ME, Hufbauer RA, Lemoine NP, Alba C, Blumenthal DM, Bossdorf O, Byers JE, Dunn AM, Heckman RW, Hejda M, Jarošík V, Kanarek AR, Martin LB, Perkins SE, Pyšek P, Schierenbeck K, Schlöder C, van Klinken R, Vaughn KJ, Williams W, Wolfe LM (2013) Do invasive species perform better in their new ranges? Ecology 94:985–994. doi:10.1890/12-1810.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pejchar L, Mooney HA (2009) Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol Evol 24:497–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pergl J, Nentwig W, Winter M, Bacher S, Essl F, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, Kühn I, Pyšek P, Roques A, Roy D, Vilà M, Roy H (2012) Progress on DAISIE: ALIEN species inventories in Europe updated. In: Abstracts, Neobiota 2012, 7th European conference on biological invasions, Pontevedra, Spain, 12–14 September 2012. GEIB Grupo Especialista en Invasiones Biológicas, Spain

  • Pergl J, Sádlo J, Petrusek A, Laštůvka Z, Musil J, Perglová I, Šanda R, Šefrová H, Šíma J, Vohralík V, Pyšek P (2016) Black, Grey and Watch Lists of alien species in the Czech Republic based on environmental impacts and management strategy. NeoBiota 28:1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pheloung PC, Williams PA, Halloy SR (1999) A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J Environ Manag 57:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell KI, Chase JM, Knight TM (2011) A synthesis of plant invasion effects on biodiversity across spatial scales. Am J Bot 98:539–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2010) Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annu Rev Environ Res 35:25–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, Webster G, Williamson M, Kirschner J (2004) Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Hejda M, Schaffner U, Vilà M (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob Change Biol 18:1725–1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Genovesi P, Pergl J, Monaco A, Wild J (2013) Plant invasions of protected areas in Europe: an old continent facing new problems. In: Foxcroft LC, Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Genovesi P (eds) Plant invasions in protected areas: patterns, problems and challenges. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 209–240

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP, Lockwood JL (2013) Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species. Ecol Monogr 83:263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy H (2014) Invasive alien species—framework for the identification of invasive alien species of EU concern (ENV.B.2/ETU/2013/0026)

  • Rückli R, Rusterholz H-P, Baur B (2013) Invasion of Impatiens glandulifera affects terrestrial gastropods by altering microclimate. Acta Oecol 47:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz-Elorza M, Dana ED, Sobrino E (2004) Atlas de las plantas alóctonas invasoras de España. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalera R, Genovesi P, Essl F, Rabitsch W (2012) The impacts of invasive alien species in Europe. EEA Technical report No 16/2012, EEA, Copenhagen

  • Skurski TC, Rew LJ, Maxwell BD (2014) Mechanisms underlying non-indigenous plant impacts: a review of recent experimental research. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 7:432–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg G, Colla P (1997) CART: classification and regression trees. Salford Systems, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg G, Golovnya M (2006) CART 6.0 user’s manual. Salford Systems, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaes-Petignat S, Nentwig W (2014) Environmental and economic impact of alien terrestrial arthropods in Europe. NeoBiota 22:23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Veer G, Nentwig W (2015) Environmental and economic impact assessment of alien and invasive fish species in Europe using the generic impact scoring system. Ecol Freshw Fish 24:646–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Essl F, Pergl J, Winter M, Weber E, Kreft H, Weigelt P, Kartesz J, Nishino M, Antonova LA, Barcelona JF, Cabezas FJ, Cárdenas D, Cárdenas-Toro J, Castaño N, Chacón E, Chatelain C, Ebel AL, Figueiredo E, Fuentes N, Groom QJ, Henderson L, Inderjit Kupriyanov A, Masciadri S, Meerman J, Morozova O, Moser D, Nickrent DL, Patzelt A, Pelser PB, Baptiste MP, Poopath M, Schulze M, Seebens H, Shu W, Thomas J, Velayos M, Wieringa JJ, Pyšek P (2015) Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525:100–103. doi:10.1038/nature14910)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vilà M, Weber E, D’Antonio CM (2000) Conservation implications of invasion by plant hybridization. Biol Invasions 2:207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilà M, Basnou C, Pyšek P, Josefsson M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Nentwig W, Olenin S, Roques A, Roy D, Hulme PE, DAISIE Partners (2010) How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Front Ecol Environ 8:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, Maron JL, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Sun Y, Pyšek P (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vilà M, Rohr RP, Espinar JL, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Le Roux J, Schaffner U, Pyšek P (2015) Explaining the variation in impacts of non-native plants on local-scale species richness: the role of phylogenetic relatedness. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:139–146. doi:10.1111/geb.12249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber E (2003) Invasive plant species of the world: a reference guide to environmental weeds. CAB International Publishing, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by Project No. 14-36079G Centre of Excellence PLADIAS (Czech Science Foundation), long-term research development project RVO 67985939 (The Czech Academy of Sciences), P504/11/1028 from the Czech Science Foundation, and Praemium Academiae award from The Czech Academy of Sciences to PP. MV was funded through the Severo Ochoa Program for Centers of Excellence in R + D + I (SEV-2012-0262). This study contributes to COST Action TD1209. We thank Tony Dixon and Christina Alba for improving our English. The editor of the paper and the anonymous reviewers are acknowledged for valuable comments to a previous version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Pergl.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rumlerová, Z., Vilà, M., Pergl, J. et al. Scoring environmental and socioeconomic impacts of alien plants invasive in Europe. Biol Invasions 18, 3697–3711 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1259-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1259-2

Keywords

Navigation