Skip to main content
Log in

Role of propagule pressure and priority effects on seedlings during invasion and restoration of shrub-steppe

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant invasion and restoration outcomes are largely driven by the timing and magnitude of seed dispersal, and by the performance of dispersed species in an environment. Because seed dispersal controls recruitment of newly arriving species and facilitates safe site occupation, assembly will differ depending on seed dispersal processes and variable environmental conditions. The objective of this study was to identify how annual and perennial grasses assembled when dispersal times, propagule pressure, and water availability were modified. To assess these effects, we conducted a field experiment in an annual grass invaded shrub-steppe ecosystem in eastern Oregon. We tested the effects of seeding annual and perennial grasses in autumn or delaying annual grass seeding until spring, adding water, and varying annual and perennial grass seeding rate by 150, 1,500, 2,500, or 3,500 seeds m−2 on perennial and annual grass seedling emergence through time and final density and biomass. Providing perennial grasses a priority effect by delaying annual grass seeding until spring initially facilitated perennial grass establishment, but this effect did not persist into the second growing season. We found that if annual grass propagule pressure exceeded 150 seeds m−2, perennial grass recruitment was limited. In addition, higher water availability increased perennial grass establishment, but was dependent upon annual grass propagule pressure. These findings suggest that seeding perennial grasses into annual grass dominated systems is more dependent upon the existing propagule pressure of annual grasses than the priority effects of perennial grasses, the propagule pressure of perennial grasses, or water availability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham JK, Corbin JD, D’Antonio CM (2009) California native and exotic perennial grasses differ in their response to soil nitrogen, exotic annual grass density, and order of emergence. Plant Ecol 201:445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adair C, Burke IC (2010) Plant phenology and life span influence soil pool dynamics: Bromus tectorum invasion of perennial C3–C4 grass communities. Plant Soil 335:255–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aicher RJ, Larios L, Suding KN (2011) Seed supply, recruitment, and assembly: quantifying relative seed and establishment limitation in a plant community context. Am Nat 178:464–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arredondo JT, Jones TA, Johnson DA (1998) Seedling growth of Intermountain perennial and weedy annual grasses. J Range Manage 51:584–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borer ET, Hosseini PR, Seabloom EW et al (2007) Pathogen-induced reversal of native dominance in a grassland community. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:5473–5478

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford JB, Lauenroth WK (2006) Controls over invasion of Bromus tectorum: the importance of climate, soil, disturbance and seed availability. J Veg Sci 17:693–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey PD, Watkinson AR (1993) The dispersal and fates of seeds of the winter annual Vulpia ciliata. J Ecol 81:759–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JC, Wisdom MJ (2009) Priority research and management issues for the imperiled Great Basin of the western United States. Restor Ecol 17:707–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark CJ, Poulsen JR, Levey DJ et al (2007) Are plant populations seed limited? A critique and meta-analysis of seed addition experiments. Am Nat 170:128–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley PH, Davis HM, Ensminger AL et al (2005) A general model of local competition for space. Ecol Lett 8:176–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Sheley RL (2011) Promoting native vegetation and diversity in exotic annual grass infestations. Restor Ecol 19:159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz S, Hodgson JG, Thompson K et al (2004) The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. J Veg Sci 15:295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiVittorio CT, Corbin JD, D’Antonio CM (2007) Spatial and temporal patterns of seed dispersal: an important determinant of grassland invasion. Ecol Appl 17:311–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JA (1991) Community-assembly mechanics and the structure of an experimental species ensemble. Am Nat 137:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan RP, Diez JM, Sullivan JJ et al (2009) Safe sites, seed supply, and the recruitment function in plant populations. Ecology 90:2129–2138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fargione J, Brown CS, Tilman D (2003) Community assembly and invasion: an experimental test of neutral versus niche processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8916–8920

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler NL (1988) What is a safe site—neighbor, litter, germination date, and patch effects. Ecology 69:947–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DR, Rice KJ (1993) Competitive effects of grassland annuals on soil water and blue oak (Quercus douglasii) seedlings. Ecology 74:68–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grman E, Suding KN (2010) Within-year soil legacies contribute to strong priority effects of exotics on native California grassland communities. Restor Ecol 18:664–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb PJ (1977) Maintenance of species-richness in plant communities—importance of regeneration niche. Biol Rev 52:107–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardegree SP, Flerchinger GN, Van Vactor SS (2003) Hydrothermal germination response and the development of probabilistic germination profiles. Ecol Model 167:305–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardegree SP, Moffet CA, Roundy BA et al (2010) A comparison of cumulative-germination response of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) and five perennial bunchgrass species to simulated field-temperature regimes. Environ Exp Bot 69:320–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HilleRisLambers J, Yelenik SG, Colman BP et al (2010) California annual grass invaders: the drivers or passengers of change? J Ecol 98:1147–1156

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James JJ, Svejcar TJ, Rinella MJ (2011) Demographic processes limiting seedling recruitment in arid grassland restoration. J Appl Ecol 48:961–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kira T, Ogawa H, Shinozaki K (1953) Intraspecific competition among higher plants. I. Competition-density-yield interrelationships in regularly dispersed populations. J Inst Polytech Osaka City Univ D 4: 1–16

  • Lavorel S, Lebreton JD (1992) Evidence for lottery recruitment in meditetteranean old fields. J Veg Sci 3:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leffler AJ, Monaco TA, James JJ (2011) Nitrogen acquisition by annual and perennial grass seedlings: testing the roles of performance and plasticity to explain plant invasion. Plant Ecol 212:1601–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leffler AJ, James JJ, Monaco TA (2013) Temperature and functional traits influence differences in nitrogen uptake capacity between native and invasive grasses. Oecologia 171:51–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie CJ, Turkington R (2002) The effect of initial seed density on the structure of a desert annual plant community. J Ecol 90:435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie CJ, Turkington R (2008) Species-specific positive effects in an annual plant community. Oikos 117:1511–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangla S, Sheley RL, James JJ et al (2011) Role of competition in restoring resource poor arid systems dominated by invasive grasses. J Arid Environ 75:487–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaco TA, MacKown CT, Johnson DA et al (2003) Nitrogen effects on seed germination and seedling growth. J Range Manage 56:646–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radosevich SR (1987) Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Technol 1:190–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray-Mukherjee J, Jones TA, Adler PB et al (2011) Immature seedling growth of two North American native perennial bunchgrasses and the invasive grass Bromus tectorum. Rangeland Ecol Manag 64:358–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite WH (2007) The importance of dispersal in determining seed versus safe site limitation of plant populations. Plant Ecol 193:113–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schabenberger O (2013) Introduction to SAS. In. http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/notes2/. Accessed 24 Sept 2013

  • Seastedt TR, Pyšek P (2011) Mechanisms of plant invasions of North American and European grasslands. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 42:133–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitters CJT (1983) An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. I. Estimation of competition effects. Neth J Agric Sci 31:1–11

  • Steers RJ, Funk JL, Allen EB (2011) Can resource-use traits predict native vs. exotic plant success in carbon amended soils? Ecol Appl 21:1211–1224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stella JC, Battles JJ, Orr BK et al (2006) Synchrony of seed dispersal, hydrology and local climate in a semi-arid river reach in California. Ecosystems 9:1200–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svejcar T (1990) Root length, leaf-area, and biomass of crested wheatgrass and cheatgrass seedlings. J Range Manage 43:18–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svejcar T, Sheley R (2001) Nitrogen dynamics in perennial and annual dominated arid rangeland. J Arid Environ 47:33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen MA, D’Antonio CM, Suttle KB et al (2006) Ecological resistance, seed density and their interactions determine patterns of invasion in a California coastal grassland. Ecol Lett 9:160–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tielborger K, Prasse R (2009) Do seeds sense each other? Testing for density-dependent germination in desert perennial plants. Oikos 118:792–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1997) Community invisibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titman D (1976) Ecological competition between algae: experimental confirmation of resource-based competition theory. Science 192:463–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright CE, Wolkovich EM, Cleland EE (2012) Seasonal priority effects: implications for invasion and restoration in a semi-arid system. J Appl Ecol 49:234–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson AR (1978) Demography of a sand dune annual—Vulpia fasciculata: dynamics of seed populations. J Ecol 66:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White TCR (2001) Opposing paradims: regulation or limitation of populations? Oikos 93:148–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WRCC (2013) Western Regional Climate Center. Juntura, Oregon Climate. wrcc.dri.edu. Accessed 14 July 2013. In. wrcc@dri.edu

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Brett Bingham and Anna Masterson for their extensive field and laboratory assistance. We are grateful to Dr. Michael Borman, Dr. Paul Doescher, and any anonymous reviewers for their comments. We are also greatly appreciative for the advice and assistance from Lori, Lacey, Jessica, D. J., Jarod, and Katie. This work was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service; Ecologically Based Invasive Plant Management research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merilynn C. Schantz.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 22 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 334 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schantz, M.C., Sheley, R.L. & James, J.J. Role of propagule pressure and priority effects on seedlings during invasion and restoration of shrub-steppe. Biol Invasions 17, 73–85 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0705-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0705-2

Keywords

Navigation