Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Macroecology meets invasion ecology: performance of Australian acacias and eucalypts around the world revealed by features of their native ranges

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Native geographical range extent has frequently emerged as a correlate of invasiveness, especially for plant species. We tested whether dimensions of the native range (measured by the area-of-occupancy and its scaling patterns) of 720 Australian eucalypts (genera Angophora, Eucalyptus and Corymbia) could explain introduction and invasion success. We also compared our results with a previous study on 979 Australian acacias (previously grouped in Acacia subgenus Phyllodineae) to investigate whether features of their native ranges explained the much higher invasion success in this group compared to eucalypts. From nine databases we found records that 373 eucalypts have been introduced to areas outside their native ranges; 82 of these have become naturalised, and eight are invasive. A similar proportion of Australian acacias have been introduced, but almost three times as many are invasive (384 species introduced, 71 of which are naturalized and 23 invasive). Eucalypts with large native ranges are more likely to have been introduced and subsequently naturalise, as is the case with acacias. Unlike acacias, however, the native range size of invasive eucalypts was not significantly greater than naturalised (but not invasive) species. Intriguingly, the human preference for introducing species with larger ranges was much greater for acacias than for eucalypts as the geometric mean range sizes of introduced, naturalised and invasive acacias are 2.04, 1.88 and 3.59 times those of eucalypts at the same stage. Moreover, the percolation exponent (i.e. the slope of occupancy scaling) becomes more extreme towards the end of the introduction–naturalization–invasion continuum, decreasing for acacias but increasing for eucalypts, with acacias, except for non-introduced species, having a lower exponent than eucalypts. The selection preference of acacias during introduction is thus for species that can rapidly expand their range; in contrast, slow-spreading eucalypts have been selected for dissemination. In other words, humans appear to have selected for highly invasive acacias but against introducing highly invasive eucalypts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S et al (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borregaard MK, Rahbek C (2006) Prevalence of intraspecific relationships between range size and abundance in Danish birds. Divers Distrib 12:417–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borregaard MK, Gotelli NJ, Rahbek C (2012) Are range size distributions consistent with species-level heritability? Evolution 66:2216–2226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1995) Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Lomolino MV (1998) Biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucharova A, van Kleunen M (2009) Introduction history and species characteristics partly explain naturalization success of North American woody species in Europe. J Ecol 97:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgman MA, Fox JC (2003) Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning. Anim Conserv 6:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro-Díez P, Godoy O, Saldaña A, Richardson DM (2011) Predicting invasiveness of Australian acacias on the basis of their native climatic affinities, life history traits and human use. Divers Distrib 17:934–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen J, Knees SG, Cubey HS (2011) The European garden flora flowering plants: a manual for the identification of plants cultivated in Europe, both out-of-doors and under glass, vol 4, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson W, Fischer M, van Kleunen M (2012) Common and rare plant species respond differently to fertilisation and competition, whether they are alien or native. Ecol Lett 15:873–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Essl F, Moser D, Dullinger S, Mang T, Hulme PE (2011) Macroecological drivers of alien conifer naturalizations worldwide. Ecography 34:1076–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freckleton RP (2002) On the misuse of residuals in ecology: regression of residuals vs. multiple regression. J Anim Ecol 71:542–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner M, Den Breeÿen A, Hui C, Richardson DM (2009) Impacts of alien plant invasions on species richness in Mediterranean-type ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Prog Phys Geogr 33:319–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher RV, Leishman MR, Miller JT et al (2011) Invasiveness in introduced Australian acacias: the role of species traits and genome size. Divers Distrib 17:884–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1999) Implications of interspecific and intraspecific abundance–occupancy relationships. Oikos 86:195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM (2000) Pattern and process in macroecology. Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Fuller RA (2009) The sizes of species’ geographic ranges. J Appl Ecol 46:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng Y, Wang Y, Liang C, Fang J, Baumann F, Kuhn P, Scholten T, He JS (2012) Effects of geographical range size on plant functional traits and the relationship between plant, soil and climate in Chinese grasslands. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:416–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson MR, Richardson DM, Marchante E et al (2011) Reproductive biology of Australian acacias: important mediator of invasiveness? Divers Distrib 17:911–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AR, Midgley SJ, Bush D, Cunningham PJ, Rinaudo AT (2011) Global uses of Australian acacias—recent trends and future prospects. Divers Distrib 17:837–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn B (2001) Australian tree seed centre operations manual. CSIRO, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes KR, Barry SC (2008) Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biol Invasions 10:483–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1992) Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62:447–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD (2003) On the evolutionary ecology of species’ ranges. Evol Ecol Res 5:159–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui C (2009) On the scaling pattern of species spatial distribution and association. J Theor Biol 261:481–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C (2011) Forecasting population trend from the scaling pattern of occupancy. Ecol Model 222:442–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C, McGeoch MA, Warren M (2006) A spatially explicit approach to estimating species occupancy and spatial correlation. J Anim Ecol 75:140–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C, McGeoch MA, Reyers B, Le Roux PC, Greve M, Chown SL (2009) Extrapolating population size from the occupancy–abundance relationship and the scaling pattern of occupancy. Ecol Appl 19:2038–2048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C, Veldtman R, McGeoch MA (2010) Measures, perceptions and scaling patterns of aggregated species distributions. Ecography 33:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C, Richardson DM, Robertson MP, Wilson JRU, Yates CJ (2011a) Macroecology meets invasion ecology: linking the native distributions of Australian acacias to invasiveness. Divers Distrib 17:872–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C, Foxcroft LC, Richardson DM, MacFadyen S (2011b) Defining optimal sampling effort for large-scale monitoring of invasive alien plants: a Bayesian method for estimating abundance and distribution. J Appl Ecol 48:768–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins C, Keller SR (2011) A phylogenetic comparative study of preadaptation for invasiveness in the genus Silene (Caryophyllaceae). Biol Invasions 13:1471–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Křivánek M, Pyšek P, Jarošik V (2006) Planting history and propagule pressure as predictors of invasion by woody species in a temperate region. Conserv Biol 20:1487–1498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1998) Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales. Science 281:1513–1515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laube I, Korntheuer H, Schwager M, Trautmann S, Rahbek C, Bohning-Gaese K (2013) Towards a more mechanistic understanding of traits and range sizes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie C, Shah MA, Bergeron A, Villeneuve P (2013) Explaining invasiveness from the extent of native range: new insights from plant atlases and herbarium specimens. Divers Distrib 19:98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Maitre DC, Gaertner M, Marchante E et al (2011) Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: implications for management and restoration. Divers Distrib 17:1015–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McClatchie AJ (1902) Eucalypts cultivated in the United States. USDA Bureau For Bull 35:1–106

    Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch MA, Spear D, Kleynhans EJ, Marais E (2012) Uncertainty in invasive alien species listing. Ecol Appl 22:959–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGill BJ (2010) Matters of scale. Science 328:575–576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JT, Murphy DJ, Brown GK, Richardson DM, González-Orozco CE (2011) The evolution and phylogenetic placement of invasive Australian Acacia species. Divers Distrib 17:848–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris TL, Esler KJ, Barger NN, Jacobs SM, Cramer MD (2011) Ecophysiological traits associated with the competitive ability of invasive Australian acacias. Divers Distrib 17:898–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndlovu J, Richardson DM, Wilson JRU, Le Roux JJ (2013) Co-invasion of South African ecosystems by an Australian legume-rhizobia symbiosis: the case of Acacia pycnantha. J Biogeogr 40:1240–1251. doi:10.1111/jbi.12091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poynton RJ (1979) Tree planting in Southern Africa, Vol. 2, the eucalypts. South African Department of Forestry, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Procheş S, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M (2012) Native and naturalized range size in Pinus: relative importance of biogeography, introduction effort and species traits. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:513–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J et al (2009a) The global invasion success of Central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and species traits. Divers Distrib 15:891–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Křivánek M, Jarošik V (2009b) Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species. Ecology 90:2734–2744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M (1996) A theory of seed plant invasiveness: the first sketch. Biol Conserv 78:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (2011) Eucalypts. In: Simberloff D, Rejmánek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 203–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Higgins SI, Pitcairn MJ, Grotkopp E (2005) Ecology of invasion plants—state of the art. In: Mooney HA, Mack RN, McNeely JA, Neville L, Schei PJ, Waage J (eds) Invasion alien species: a new synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 104–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Kluge RL (2008) Seed banks of invasive Australian Acacia species in South Africa: role in invasiveness and options for management. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 10:161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2012) Naturalization of introduced plants: ecological drivers of biogeographic patterns. New Phytol 196:383–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Rejmánek M (2011) Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species—a global review. Divers Distrib 17:788–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Rouget M, Ralston SJ et al (2005) Species richness of alien plants in South Africa: environmental correlates and the relationship with indigenous plant species richness. EcoScience 12:391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Carruthers J, Hui C et al (2011) Human-mediated introduction of Australian acacias—a global experiment in biogeography. Divers Distrib 17:771–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD (2006) The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Behav Ecol 17:688–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah MA, Reshi ZA, Lavoie C (2012) Predicting plant invasiveness from native range size: clues from the Kashmir Himalaya. J Plant Ecol UK 5:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA, NRCS (2013) The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC 27401-4901 USA. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed 5 Feb 2013

  • Van Kleunen M, Johnson SD, Fischer M (2007) Predicting naturalization of southern African Iridaceae in other regions. J Appl Ecol 44:594–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RJ, Thomas CD, Fox R, Roy DB, Kunin WE (2004) Spatial patterns in species distributions reveal biodiversity change. Nature 432:393–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JRU, Gairifo C, Gibson MR et al (2011) Risk assessment, eradication, and biological control: global efforts to limit Australian acacia invasions. Divers Distrib 17:1030–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JRU, Caplat P, Dickie IA et al (2013) A standardized set of metrics to assess and monitor tree invasions. Biol Invasions. doi:10.1007/s10530-013-0605-x

Download references

Acknowledgments

Data on Australian Eucalyptus species are used with permission of the Council of Heads of Australian Herbaria, the custodian of Australia’s Virtual Herbarium. Export data from the Australian Tree Seed Centre was made available by David Bush (CSIRO). This work was supported by DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology. C.H. and D.M.R. acknowledge additional funding from the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant 85417 to D.M.R.). C.H. acknowledges the support from the Elsevier Young Scientist Award; D.M.R. thanks the Hans Sigrist Foundation and the Oppenheimer Memorial Trust for support; and J.R.U.W. received funding from the South African Department of Environment Affairs Working for Water Programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany and Zoology, Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa

    Cang Hui, David M. Richardson, Vernon Visser & John R. U. Wilson

  2. Invasive Species Programme, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X7, Claremont, 7735, South Africa

    John R. U. Wilson

Authors
  1. Cang Hui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David M. Richardson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vernon Visser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John R. U. Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cang Hui.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLS 452 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hui, C., Richardson, D.M., Visser, V. et al. Macroecology meets invasion ecology: performance of Australian acacias and eucalypts around the world revealed by features of their native ranges. Biol Invasions 16, 565–576 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0599-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0599-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation