Abstract
The impact of biological invasions on local biodiversity is well established, but their impact on ecosystem functioning has only been sketchily documented. However, biological invasions may impede services provided by aquatic ecosystems, such as, for example, the decomposition of organic matter, a key process in most small streams. To address this question, we experimentally quantified the leaf litter breakdown activity of native and invasive amphipod species, which are keystone species in aquatic ecosystems. The breakdown rate of each species was used to estimate the potential leaf litter recycling in the Rhône and Meurthe Rivers in sites occupied solely by native species and sites dominated by invasive species. We found that invaders were not able to compensate for the activity of native species and that the replacement of native species led to a decrease of at least 66% in the rate of leaf litter recycling. Our approach provides empirical evidence of the functional impact of non-indigenous species on leaf litter recycling, using standard protocols and literature data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arsuffi TL, Suberkropp K (1989) Selective feeding by shredders on leaf-colonizing stream fungi: comparison of macroinvertebrate taxa. Oecologia 79:30–37
Bollache L, Dick JTA, Farnsworth KD, Montgomery WI (2007) Comparison of the functional responses of invasive and native amphipods. Biol Lett 4:166–169
Chauvet E, Jean-Louis AM (1988) Production de litière de la ripisylve de la Garonne et apport au fleuve. Acta Oecol 9:265–279
Dangles O, Malmqvist B (2004) Species richness-decomposition relationships depend on species dominance. Ecol Lett 7:395–402
Devin S, Beisel JN (2007) Biological and ecological characteristics of invasive species: a gammarid study. Biol Inv 9:13–24
Dick JTA (1996) Post-invasion amphipod communities of Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland: influences of habitat selection and mutual predation. J Anim Ecol 65:756–767
Dick JTA, Platvoet D (2000) Invading predatory crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus eliminates both native and exotic species. P R Soc Lond B 267:977–983
Dick JTA, Platvoet D, Kelly DW (2002) Predatory impact of the freshwater invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1078–1084
Dunn RJK, Welsh DT, Jordan MA, Teasdale TR, Lemckert CJ (2009) Influence of natural amphipod (Victoriopisa australensis) (Chilton, 1923) population densities on benthic metabolism, nutrient fluxes, denitrification and DNRA in sub-tropical estuarine sediment. Hydrobiologia 628:95–109
Friberg N, Jacobsen D (1994) Feeding plasticity of two detritivore-shredders. Freshwat Biol 32:133–142
Gergs R, Rothhaupt KO (2008) Feeding, rates, assimilation efficiencies and growth of two amphipod species on biodeposited material from zebra mussels. Freshwat Biol 53:2494–2503
Grabowski M, Konopacka A, Jazdzewski K, Janowska E (2006) Invasions of alien gammarid species and retreat of natives in the Vistula Lagoon (Baltic Sea, Poland). Helgol Mar Res 60:90–97
Graça MAS, Maltby L, Calow P (1993) Importance of fungi in the diet of Gammarus pulex and Asellus aquaticus. Oecologia 96:304–309
Graça MAS, Maltby L, Calow P (1994) Comparative ecology of Gammarus pulex (L.) and Asellus aquaticus (L.) II: fungal preferences. Hydrobiologia 281:163–170
Hall RO, Wallace JB, Eggert SL (2000) Organic matter flow in stream food webs with reduced detrital resource base. Ecology 81:3445–3463
Joyce P, Wotton RS (2008) Shredder faecal pellets as stores of allochtonous organic matter in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 27:521–528
Joyce P, Warren LL, Wotton RS (2007) Faecal pellets in streams: their binding, breakdown and utilization. Freshwat Biol 52:1868–1880
Kelly DW, Dick JTA (2005) Introduction of the non-indigenous amphipod Gammarus pulex alters population dynamics and diet of juvenile trout salmo trutta. Freshwat Biol 50:127–140
Kelly DW, Dick JTA, Montgomery WI, MacNeil C (2003) Differences in composition of macroinvertebrates communities with invasive and native Gammarus spp. (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Freshwat Biol 48:306–315
Kinzler W, Kley A, Mayer G, Waloszek D, Maier G (2009) Mutual predation between and cannibalism within several freshwater gammarids: Dikerogammarus villosus versus one native and three invasives. Aquat Ecol 43:457–464
Leppäkoski E, Olenin S (2001) The meltdown of biogeographical pecularities of the Baltic Sea: the interaction of natural and man-made processes. Ambio 30:202–209
Maazouzi C, Masson G, Izquierdo MS, Pihan JC (2007) Fatty acid composition of the amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus: feeding strategies and trophic links. Comp Biochem Physiol A 147:868–875
Maazouzi C, Piscart C, Pihan JC, Masson G (2009) Effect of habitat-related resources on fatty acid composition and body weight of the invasive Dikerogammarus villosus in an artificial reservoir. Fund Appl Limnol 156:221–226
MacNeil C, Dick JTA, Elwood RW (1997) The trophic ecology of freshwater Gammarus spp. (Crustacea: Amphipoda): problems and perspectives concerning the functional feeding group concept. Biol Rev 72:349–364
Mayer G, Maier G, Maas A, Waloszek D (2008) Mouthparts of the Ponto-Caspian invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Amphipoda: Pontogammaridae). J Crust Biol 28:1–15
Mérigoux S, Lamouroux N, Olivier JM, Doledec S (2009) Invertebrate hydraulic preferences and predicted impacts of changes in discharge in a large river. Freshwat Biol 54:1343–1356
Navel S, Mermillod-Blondin F, Montuelle B, Chauvet E, Simon L, Piscart C, Marmonier P (2010) Interactions between fauna and sediment control the breakdown of plant matter in river sediments. Freshwat Biol 55:753–766
Nilsson LM (1974) Energy budget of a laboratory population of Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda). Oikos 25:35–42
Orav-Kotta H, Kotta J, Herkül K, Kotta I, Paalme T (2009) Seasonal variability in the grazing potential of the invasive amphipod Gammarus tigrinus and the native amphipod Gammarus salinus (Amphipoda: Crustacea) in the northern Baltic Sea. Biol Inv 11:597–608
Paillex A, Dolédec S, Castella E, Mérigoux S (2009) Large river floodplain restoration: predicting species richness and trait responses to the restoration of hydrological connectivity. J Appl Ecol 46:250–258
Petersen RC, Cummins KW (1974) Leaf processing in a woodland stream. Freshwat Biol 4:343–368
Pinkster S, Smit H, Brandse-de Jong N (1977) The introduction of the alien amphipod Gammarus tigrinus Sexton, 1939, in the Netherlands and its competition with indigenous species. Crustaceana Suppl 4:91–105
Piscart C, Moreteau JC, Beisel JN (2005) Biodiversity and structure of macroinvertebrate communities along a small permanent salinity gradient (Meurthe River, France). Hydrobiologia 551:227–236
Piscart C, Manach A, Copp GH, Marmonier P (2007) Distribution and microhabitats of native and non-native gammarids (Amphipoda, Crustacea) in Brittany, with particular reference to the endangered endemic sub-species Gammarus duebeni celticus. J Biogeogr 34:524–533
Piscart C, Dick JTA, McCrisken D, MacNeil C (2009a) Environmental mediation of intraguild predation between the freshwater invader Gammarus pulex and the native G. duebeni celticus. Biol Inv 11:2141–2145
Piscart C, Genoel R, Dolédec S, Chauvet E, Marmonier P (2009b) Effects of intense agricultural practices on heterotrophic processes in streams. Environ Pollut 157:1011–1018
Piscart C, Bergerot B, Lafaille P, Marmonier P (2010) Are amphipod invaders a threat to regional biodiversity? Biol Inv 12:853–863
Piscart C, Roussel JM, Dick JTA, Grosbois G, Marmonier P (2011) Effects of coexistence on the habitat use and trophic ecology of interacting native and invasive amphipods. Freshwat Biol 56:325–334
Platvoet D, Dick JTA, Konijnendijk N, van der Velde G (2006) Feeding on micro-algae in the invasive Ponto-Caspian amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894). Aquat Ecol 40:237–245
Platvoet D, van der Velde G, Dick JTA, Li S (2009) Flexible omnivory in Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894) (Amphipoda)—amphipod pilot species project (AMPIS) report 5. Crustaceana 82:703–720
Ricciardi A (2007) Are modern biological invasions an unprecedented form of global change? Conserv Biol 21:329–336
Rong Q, Sridhar KR, Bärlocher F (1995) Food selection in three leaf-shredding stream invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 316:173–181
Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774
Suberkropp K, Chauvet E (1995) Regulation of leaf breakdown by fungi in streams: influences of water chemistry. Ecology 76:1433–1445
Tachet H, Richoux P, Bournaud M, Usseglio-Polatera P (2000) Invertébrés d’eau douce: Systématique, biologie et écologie. CNRS éditions, Paris
Van der Velde G, Leuven RSEW, Platvoet D, Bacela K, Huijbregts MAJ, Hendricks HWM, Kruijt D (2009) Environmental and morphological factors influencing predatory behaviour by invasive non-indigenous gammaridean species. Biol Inv 11:2043–2054
Wallace JB, Eggert SL, Meyer JL, Webster JR (1997) Multiple trophic levels of a forest stream linked to terrestrial litter inputs. Science 277:102–104
Webster JR, Meyer JL (1997) Stream organic matter budgets. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:3–13
Wetzel RG (1995) Death, detritus, and energy flow in aquatic ecosystems. Freshwat Biol 33:83–89
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the InBioProcess project (ANR-06-BDIV-007-InBioProcess 2007–2010) of the Biodiversity 2006 programme of the National Research Agency (Agence Nationale de la Recherche, ANR). We wish to thank Fabio Lepori for his interesting comments and Patricia Hulmes for linguistic corrections. We also greatly thank Ian Duggan and anonymous referees for helpful comments and advice concerning an earlier version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piscart, C., Mermillod-Blondin, F., Maazouzi, C. et al. Potential impact of invasive amphipods on leaf litter recycling in aquatic ecosystems. Biol Invasions 13, 2861–2868 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-9969-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-9969-y