Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interactions between invasive and native crustaceans: differential functional responses of intraguild predators towards juvenile hetero-specifics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intraguild predation (IGP) between invasive and native species can lead to species exclusions or co-existence, dependent on the direction and strength of the interaction. Recently, derivation of ‘functional responses’ has been identified as a means of comparing the community impacts of invasive and native species. Here, we employ a novel use of this functional response methodology to evaluate any IGP asymmetries between the invasive Ponto-Caspian amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus and the North American native Gammarus fasciatus. The direction and magnitude of intraguild predation of adult males on hetero-specific adult females has previously been shown to reverse across a water conductivity gradient. This partially explains field patterns, but does not predict the co-existence of the two species observed in many habitats and locations. Here, we compared intraguild predation by both species on each other’s juveniles in high- and low- conductivity water. G. fasciatus has a higher type II functional response towards E. ischnus juveniles compared to the reciprocal interaction. Conductivity did not influence the predation rate on juveniles of either E. ischnus or G. fasciatus. Thus, the male/female IGP advantage to the native G. fasciatus in low conductivity water is compounded by a juvenile IGP asymmetry, which also counteracts the male/female IGP advantage to E. ischnus in high conductivity waters, helping to explain field patterns of exclusion and co-existence. Thus, complex asymmetries in mutual IGP associated with inherent species differences, environmental modulation, and life-history effects can help us understand and predict the population and community level outcomes of species invasions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arim M, Marquet PA (2004) Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology. Ecol Lett 7:557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollache L, Dick JTA, Farnsworth KD, Montgomery WI (2008) Comparison of the functional responses of invasive and native amphipods. Biol Lett 4:166–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dermott R, Witt J, Um EM, Gonzalez M (1998) Distribution of the Ponto-Caspian amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus in the Great Lakes and replacement of native Gammarus fasciatus. J Great Lakes Res 24:442–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA (1996) Post-invasion amphipod communities of Lough Neagh, N. Ireland; influences of habitat selection and differential predation. J Anim Ecol 65:756–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA (2008) Role of behaviour in biological invasions and species distributions; lessons from interactions between the invasive Gammarus pulex and the native G. duebeni (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Contrib Zool 77:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA, Platvoet D (1996) Intraguild predation and species exclusions in amphipods: the interaction of behaviour, physiology and environment. Freshw Biol 36:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA, Platvoet D (2000) Invading predatory crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus eliminates both native and exotic species. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 267:977–983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA, Montgomery I, Elwood RW (1993) Replacement of the indigenous amphipod Gammarus duebeni celticus by the introduced G. pulex: differential cannibalism and mutual predation. J Anim Ecol 62:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA, Platvoet D, Kelly DW (2002) Predatory impact of the freshwater invader, Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1078–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA, Armstrong M, Clarke HC, Farnsworth KD, Hatcher MJ, Ennis M, Kelly A, Dunn AM (2010) Parasitism may enhance rather than reduce the predatory impact of an invader. Biol Lett. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0171

  • Hatcher MJ, Dick JTA, Dunn AM (2008) A keystone effect for parasites in intraguild predation? Biol Lett 4:534–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol 91:385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunte W, Myers RA (1984) Phototaxis and cannibalism in gammaridean amphipods. Mar Biol 81:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokela A, Ricciardi A (2008) Predicting zebra mussel fouling on native mussels from physicochemical variables. Freshw Biol 53:1845–1856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juliano SA (2001) Nonlinear curve fitting: predation and functional response. In: Gurevitch J, Scheiner M (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 178–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DW, Dick JTA (2005) Effects of environment and an introduced invertebrate species on the structure of benthic macroinvertebrate species at the catchment level. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 164:69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DW, Dick JTA, Montgomery WI (2002a) The functional role of Gammarus (Crustacea, Amphipoda): shredders, predators, or both? Hydrobiologia 485:199–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DW, Dick JTA, Montgomery I (2002b) Predation on mayfly nymph, Baetis rhodani, by native and introduced Gammarus: direct effects and the facilitation of predation by salmonids. Freshw Biol 47:1257–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DW, Dick JTA, Montgomery WI, MacNeil C (2003) Differences in composition of macroinvertebrate communities with invasive and native Gammarus spp. (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Freshw Biol 48:306–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DW, Bailey RJE, MacNeil C, Dick JTA, McDonald RA (2006) Invasion by the amphipod Gammarus pulex alters community composition of native freshwater macroinvertebrates. Divers Distrib 12:525–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kestrup ÅM, Ricciardi A (2009) Environmental heterogeneity limits the local dominance of an invasive freshwater crustacean. Biol Invasions 11:2095–2105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krisp H, Maier G (2005) Consumption of macroinvertebrates by invasive and native gammarids: a comparison. J Limnol 64:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Limen H, van Overdijk CDA, MacIsaac HJ (2005) Food partitioning between the amphipods Echinogammarus ischnus, Gammarus fasciatus, and Hyalella azteca as revealed by stable isotopes. J Great Lakes Res 31:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil C, Dick JTA, Hatcher MJ, Terry RS, Smith JE, Dunn AM (2003) Parasite mediated predation between native and invasive amphipods. Proc Royal Soc Lond B 270:1309–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil C, Prenter J, Briffa M, Fielding NJ, Dick JTA, Riddell GE, Hatcher MJ, Dunn AM (2004) The replacement of a native freshwater amphipod by an invader: roles for environmental degradation and intraguild predation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:1627–1635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melendre PM, Celada JD, Carral JM, Saez-Royuela M, Aguilera A (2006) Effectiveness of antifungal treatments during artificial incubation of the signal crayfish eggs (Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana. Astacidae). Aquaculture 257:257–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer ME, Ricciardi A (2004) Physical factors affecting the relative abundance of native and invasive amphipods in the St. Lawrence River. Can J Zool 82:1886–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piscart C, Dick JTA, McCriskin D, MacNeil C (2009) Environmental mediation of intraguild predation between the freshwater invader Gammarus pulex and the native G. duebeni celticus. Biol Invasions 11:2141–2145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platvoet D, van der Velde G, Dick JTA, Shuqiang L (2009) Flexible omnivory in Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894) (Amphipoda). Crustaceana 82:703–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Myers CA, Holt RD (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:297–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondeau B (1993) Qualité des eaux du fleuve Saint-Laurent (1985–1990). Tronçon Cornwall-Québec. Environment Canada, Conservation and Protection. Quebec Region, St. Lawrence Centre, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS Water Quality Watch (2009) US Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, http://waterwatch.usgs.gov/wqwatch/. Page last modified 2 April 2008. Accessed 27 Oct 2009

  • van Riel MC, van der Velde G, Rajagopal S, Marguillier S, Dehairs F, de Vaate AB (2006) Trophic relationships in the Rhine food web during invasion and after establishment of the Ponto-Caspian invader Dikerogammarus villosus. Hydrobiologia 565:39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (2009a) Annual calcium concentrations in Lake Champlain, 1992–2008, Lake Champlain Long-term Water Quality and Biological Monitoring Project. http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/waterq/lakes/htm/lp_longterm.htm. Last updated February 2009. Accessed 27 Oct 2009

  • Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (2009b) Annual conductivity in Lake Champlain, 1992–2008, Lake Champlain Long-term Water Quality and Biological Monitoring Project. http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/waterq/lakes/htm/lp_longterm.htm. Last updated February 2009. Accessed 27 Oct 2009

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank I. Hebert, K. O’Sullivan, N. Bayani, M. Lacharité, A. Hassan, K. Church and R. Kipp for assistance in the field. This work was funded by the Canadian Aquatic Invasive Species Network.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony Ricciardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kestrup, Å.M., Dick, J.T.A. & Ricciardi, A. Interactions between invasive and native crustaceans: differential functional responses of intraguild predators towards juvenile hetero-specifics. Biol Invasions 13, 731–737 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9863-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9863-z

Keywords

Navigation