Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting the potential distribution of the alien invasive American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) in Brazil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The non-native invasive anuran Lithobates catesbeianus is presently distributed in Brazil, especially in the Atlantic Rainforest biodiversity hotspot. Here, we use a maximum entropy ecological niche modeling algorithm (i) to model the North American native geographic distribution of this species and (ii) to project that model onto the whole of Brazil. After applying a threshold value that balances commission and omission errors, the projection results suggested high probabilities of occurrence mostly in southern and southeastern Brazil. We also present the first report on the species known distribution in Brazil, showing good agreement with model predictions. If the predictive map is interpreted as depicting invasiveness potential of L. catesbeianus, strategies to prevent further invasion in Brazil should be focused especially in the Atlantic Rainforest biodiversity hotspot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1996) Ecology: individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges-Martins M, Di-Bernardo M, Vinciprova G, Measey J (2002) Geographic distribution. Rana catesbeiana. Herpetol Rev 33:319

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruening S (2002) Rana catesbeiana. In: Animal diversity Web. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. Available at: http://www.animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Rana_catesbeiana.html. Cited 24 April 2007

  • Conte CE, Rossa-Feres DC (2006) Diversidade e ocorrência temporal da anurofauna (Amphibia, Anura) em São José dos Pinhais, Paraná, Brasil. Rev Bras Zool 23:162–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixo M, Verdade VK (2006) Leaf litter herpetofauna of the Reserva Florestal de Morro Grande, Cotia (SP). Biota Neotrop 6:0-0. On-line journal: http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v6n2/pt/abstract?article+bn00806022006

    Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Graham CH et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feix RD, Abdallah PR, Figueiredo MRC (2006) Resultado econômico da criação de rã em regiões de clima temperado, Brasil. Info Econ 36:70–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficetola GF, Thuiller W, Miaud C (2007) Prediction and validation of the potential global distribution of a problematic alien invasive species—the American bullfrog. Diversity Distrib 13:476–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Env Conserv 24:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontanello D, Ferreira CM (2007) Histórico da Ranicultura Nacional. http://www.aquicultura.br/. Cited 22 Apr 2007

  • GBIF—Global Biodiversity Information Facility (2007) Free and open access to biodiversity data. http://www.gbif.org/. Cited 21 Apr 2007

  • Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herpnet (2007) Specimens searching portal. http://www.herpnet.org/. Cited 2 Jul 2007

  • Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Rojas E (2002) DIVA-GIS. A geographic information system for the analysis of biodiversity data. Manual—International Potato Center, Lima

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Hórus (2007) Base de dados de espécies exóticas invasoras no Brasil. http://www.institutohorus.org.br/pr_trabalhos.htm. Cited 23 Apr 2007

  • Jeganathan P et al (2004) Modelling habitat selection and distribution of the critically endangered Jerdon’s courser Rhinoptilus bitorquatus in scrub jungle: an application of a new tracking method. J Appl Ecol 41:224–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesecker JM, Blaustein AR (1998) Effects of introduced bullfrog and smallmouth bass on microhabitat use, growth, and survival of native red-legged frogs (Rana aurora). Conserv Biol 12:776–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M (2000) 100 of the World’s worst invasive alien species a selection from the global invasive species database. The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG), Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Manel S, Williams HC, Ormerod SJ (2001) Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. J Appl Ecol 38:921–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB (1973) Effects of introduced bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana, on the native frogs of the San Joaquin Valley, California. Copeia 1:18–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papes M, Peterson AT (2003) Predicting the potential invasive distribution for Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng. in China. J Wuhan Bot Res 21:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT, Vieglais DA (2001) Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling: new approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem. BioScience 51:363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT, Scachetti-Pereira R, Kluza DA (2003) Assessment of invasive potential of Homalodisca coagulata in western North America and South America. Biota Neotrop 3:0-0:Online journal: http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v3n1/pt/abstract?article+BN00703012003

  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvano DL, Segalla MV (2005) Conservation of Brazilian amphibians. Conserv Biol 19:653–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Brotons L, Araújo MB, Lavorel S (2004) Effects of restricting environmental range of data to project current and future species distributions. Ecography 27:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young BE (ed) (2007) Distribución de las especies endémicas en la vertiente oriental de los Andes en Perú y Bolivia. NatureServe, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Young BE, Lips KR, Reaser JK et al (2001) Population declines and priorities for amphibian conservation in Latin América. Conserv Biol 15:1213–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Marinez Siqueira for discussion and suggestions on early versions of the manuscript and to Denise Rossa-Feres and Reuber Brandão for valuable information about bullfrog distribution in Brazil. J. G. R. Giovanelli was supported by NatureServe and CNPq (# 130315/2007-9) schorlarships. This work was supported by the FAPESP Research Grant # 05/52727-5 to J. Alexandrino, and CNPq and FAPESP (01/13341-3) research grants to C. F. B. Haddad.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Alexandrino.

  

  

Appendix 1 Occurrence points of Lithobates catesbeianus in Brazil based on field work, the literature, museum collections and personal communications (CFBH—Coleção de Anuros Célio F. B. Haddad, Unesp, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil; DZSJRP—Coleção do Departamento de Zoologia de São José do Rio Preto, Unesp, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giovanelli, J.G.R., Haddad, C.F.B. & Alexandrino, J. Predicting the potential distribution of the alien invasive American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) in Brazil. Biol Invasions 10, 585–590 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9154-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9154-5

Keywords

Navigation