Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An improved colony PCR procedure for genetic screening of Chlorella and related microalgae

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A colony PCR technique was applied for both genomic and chloroplast DNA in the green microalgae Chlorella. Of five different lysis buffers, Chelex-100 was superior for DNA extraction, PCR and DNA storage. It also was insensitive to variations in cell density. The conditions established for an improved PCR formulation are applicable for screening of genetically-engineered transformants as well as bioprospecting of natural microalgal isolates. Besides multiple Chlorella species, we also demonstrate the efficacy of Chelex-100 for colony PCR with a number of other microalgal strains, including Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Dunaliella salina, Nannochloropsis sp., Coccomyxa sp., and Thalassiosira pseudonana.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cao M, Fu Y, Guo Y, Pan J (2009) Chlamydomonas (Chlorophyceae) colony PCR. Protoplasma 235:107–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 25:294–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Görs M, Schumann R, Hepperle D, Karsten U (2010) Quality analysis of commercial Chlorella products used as dietary supplement in human nutrition. J Appl Phycol 22:265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann MA, Brian DA (1991) Sequencing PCR DNA amplified directly from a bacterial colony. Biotechniques 11:30–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang Y, Sarkany N, Cui Y (2009) Biomass and lipid productivities of Chlorella vulgaris under autotrophic, heterotrophic and mixotrophic growth conditions. Biotechnol Lett 31:1043–1049

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lv JM, Cheng LH, Xu XH, Zhang L, Chen HL (2010) Enhanced lipid production of Chlorella vulgaris by adjustment of cultivation conditions. Bioresour Technol 101:6797–6804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg JN, Oyler GA, Wilkinson L, Betenbaugh MJ (2008) A green light for engineered algae: redirecting metabolism to fuel a biotechnology revolution. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:430–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Zeijl CM, van de Kamp EH, Punt PJ, Selten GC, Hauer B, van Gorcom RF, van den Hondel CA (1998) An improved colony-PCR method for filamentous fungi for amplification of PCR-fragments of several kilobases. J Biotechnol 59:221–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma D, Daniell H (2007) Chloroplast vector systems for biotechnology applications. Plant Physiol 145:1129–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh P, Metzger D, Higuchi R (1991) Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10:506–513

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward AC (1992) Rapid analysis of yeast transformants using colony-PCR. Biotechniques 13:350

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann J, Wiemann S, Voss H, Schwager C, Ansorge W (1994) Improved fluorescent cycle sequencing protocol allows reading nearly 1000 bases. Biotechniques 17:302, 304, 306

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Chinese Natural Science Foundation For Distinguished Group (No. 50621063) and Graduate Innovation Project of Central South University (No. 2010bsxt05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Betenbaugh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wan, M., Rosenberg, J.N., Faruq, J. et al. An improved colony PCR procedure for genetic screening of Chlorella and related microalgae. Biotechnol Lett 33, 1615–1619 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-011-0596-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-011-0596-6

Keywords

Navigation