Skip to main content
Log in

The Hub of an External Fixation Device for Early Mobilization of the Wrist in the Treatment of Distal Radial Epimetaphyseal Fractures

  • Published:
Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope

A mobilization hub inserted into an external fixator was developed for the treatment of fractures of the distal epimetaphysis of the radius bone. The hub was designed in a three-dimensional solid-body modeling system. Experimental prototypes were made of ABS plastic by 3D printing. Cadaver experiments showed that with the device carrying the mobilization hub, the range of movements was not statistically significantly different from the range of passive movements in the intact joint. The X-ray-transparent material used for the hub provides unimpeded visualization of the fracture site and wrist joint. Single use of the hub is proposed, as it can be made using inexpensive plastic and 3D printing, while batch production is by pressure casting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Traumatology: National Guidelines [in Russian], G. P. Kotel’nikov and S. P. Mironov (eds.), GEOTAR-Media, Moscow (1980).

  2. Sharma, H. et al., “Outcomes and complications of fractures of distal radius (AO type B and C): Volar plating versus nonoperative treatment,” J. Orthop. Sci., 19, No. 4, 537-544 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wulf, C. A., Ackerman, D. B., and Rizzo, M., “Contemporary evaluation and treatment of distal radius fractures,” Hand Clin., 23, No. 2, 209-226 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Franko, O. I., Zurakowski D., and Day C. S., “Functional disability of the wrist: Direct correlation with decreased wrist motion,” J. Hand Surg. Am., 33, No. 4, 485-492 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kapandzhi, A. I., “The upper limb,” in: Joint Physiology [in Russian], Abelev, G. and Kishinevskii, E. (eds.), Eksmo, Moscow (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. An, K.-N., Berger, R. A., and Cooney, W. P., Biomechanics of the Wrist Joint, An, K.-N., Berger, R. A., and Cooney, W. P. (eds.), Springer, New York (1991).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Berger, R. A., “The anatomy and basic biomechanics of the wrist joint,” J. Hand Ther., 9, 84-93 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. The KUD-SAI-01 Rod Compression−Distraction Apparatus for Fixation of Small Tubular Bones [in Russian], http://cito-pro.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=170:kud-sai-01&catid=31:apparat&Itemid=55 (accessed: January 11, 2016).

  9. Golubev, G. Sh. and Petrov, K. V., An Apparatus for the Treatment of Distal Radius Metaepiphyseal Fractures: RF Patent No. 17278 U1 [in Russian], Byul. 21.

  10. Palmer, A. K. and Werner, F. W., “Biomechanics of the distal radioulnar joint,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., No. 187, 26-35 (1984).

  11. Agee, J. M. and King, F. C. Articulated Colles’ Fracture Splint: USA Patent No. 4611586 (1986).

  12. Drobetz, H. et al., “Volar locking distal radius plates show better short-term results than other treatment options: A prospective randomised controlled trial,” World J. Orthop., 7, No. 10, 687-694 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Song, J., Yu, A.-X., and Li, Z.-H., “Comparison of conservative and operative treatment for distal radius fracture: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med., 8, No. 10, 17,023-17,035 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Navarro, C. M., Pettersson, H. J., and Enocson, A., “Complications after distal radius fracture surgery,” J. Orthop. Trauma, 29, No. 2, e36-e42 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Satake, H. et al., “Complications of distal radius fractures treated by volar locking plate fixation,” Orthopedics, 39, No. 5, e893-e896 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thorninger, R. et al., “Complications of volar locking plating of distal radius fractures in 576 patients with 3.2 years follow-up,” Injury, 48, No. 6, 1104-1109 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shukla, R. et al., “External fixation versus volar locking plate for displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures: A prospective randomized comparative study of the functional outcomes,” J. Orthop. Traumatol., 15, No. 4, 265-270 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Sh. Golubev.

Additional information

Translated from Meditsinskaya Tekhnika, Vol. 52, No. 5, Sep.-Oct., 2018, pp. 24-27.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golubev, G.S., Petrov, K.V. The Hub of an External Fixation Device for Early Mobilization of the Wrist in the Treatment of Distal Radial Epimetaphyseal Fractures. Biomed Eng 52, 326–330 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-019-09840-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-019-09840-0

Navigation