Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic improvement of spinosad resistance in the biocontrol agent Orius laevigatus

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Augmentative biological control has experienced a remarkable success, particularly in protected crops. Yet integrated pest management (IPM) still requires corrective treatments to manage some pests, which may result in detrimental effects on biological control agents (BCAs). Hence, the choice of selective pesticides is crucial for an effective pest management. A complementary approach is the genetic improvement of BCAs resistant to some key pesticides, allowing their joint use in IPM. The predator Orius laevigatus (Fieber) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) is widely introduced in protected crops to supress thrips and other small pests. Spinosad is a naturally derived biopesticide and a key compound in both conventional and organic crops. However, spinosad has been reported as slightly to moderately harmful to O. laevigatus. Here we explored and exploited the intra-specific variation in spinosad susceptibility in wild and commercial populations of O. laevigatus to select a spinosad-resistant strain. We found a 48.8-fold variation in susceptibility to spinosad among 35 populations, obtaining a lethal concentration (LC50) of 166.3 mg l−1 for the baseline. A spinosad-resistant strain (SPI38) was successfully obtained (LC50 = 2110.0 mg l−1). The resistance was stable for ten generations without selection pressure and was expressed in all life stages, particularly from the 3rd nymphal instar to adult. SPI38 showed cross-resistance to spinetoram and inhibitors of the detoxification enzymes were not able to restore susceptibility, which suggest a target-site resistance mechanism. The resistance achieved may be sufficient to allow survival of adults and nymphs of O. laevigatus exposed to field applications of spinosad across the cropping season.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

References

  • Abbas N, Mansoor MM, Shad SA, Pathan AK, Waheed A, Ejaz M, Razaq M, Zulfiqar MA (2014) Fitness cost and realized heritability of resistance to spinosad in Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bull Entomol Res 104:707–715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott SW (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Agrobio (2021). Biological pest control and natural pollination—Side effects. https://www.agrobio.es/information/side-effects/?lang=en. Accessed 19 January 2021

  • Angeli G, Baldessari M, Maines R, Duso C (2005) Side-effects of pesticides on the predatory bug Orius laevigatus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) in the laboratory. Biocontrol Sci Techn 15:745–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balanza V, Mendoza JE, Bielza P (2019) Variation in susceptibility and selection for resistance to imidacloprid and thiamethoxam in Mediterranean populations of Orius laevigatus. Entomol Exp Appl 167:626–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balanza V, Mendoza JE, Cifuentes D, Bielza P (2021) Selection for resistance to pyrethroids in the predator Orius laevigatus. Pest Manag Sci 77:2539–2546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bielza P (2016) Insecticide resistance in natural enemies. In: Horowitz A, Ishaaya I (eds) Advances in insect control and resistance management. Springer, pp 313–339

  • Bielza P, Quinto V, Contreras J, Torné M, Martín A, Espinosa PJ (2007) Resistance to spinosad in the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), in greenhouses of south-eastern Spain. Pest Manag Sci 63:682–687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bielza P, Quinto V, Grávalos C, Fernández E, Abellán J, Contreras J (2008) Stability of spinosad resistance in Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) under laboratory conditions. Bull Entomol Res 98:355–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bielza P, Fernández E, Grávalos C, Izquierdo J (2009) Testing for non-target effects of spiromesifen on Eretmocerus mundus and Orius laevigatus under greenhouse conditions. BioControl 54:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielza P, Moreno I, Belando A, Grávalos C, Izquierdo J, Nauen R (2019) Spiromesifen and spirotetramat resistance in field populations of Bemisia tabaci Gennadius in Spain. Pest Manag Sci 75:45–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bielza P, Balanza V, Cifuentes D, Mendoza JE (2020) Challenges facing arthropod biological control: identifying traits for genetic improvement of predators in protected crops. Pest Manag Sci 76:3517–3526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biobest (2021) Side effect manual. https://www.biobestgroup.com/en/side-effect-manual. Accessed 19 January 2021

  • Biondi A, Desneux N, Siscaro G, Zappalà L (2012a) Using organic-certified rather than synthetic pesticides may not be safer for biological control agents: selectivity and side effects of 14 pesticides on the predator Orius laevigatus. Chemosphere 87:803–812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biondi A, Mommaerts V, Smagghe G, Viñuela E, Zappalà L, Desneux N (2012b) The non-target impact of spinosyns on beneficial arthropods. Pest Manag Sci 68:1523–1536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broughton S, Harrison J, Rahman T (2014) Effect of new and old pesticides on Orius armatus (Gross)—an Australian predator of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande). Pest Manag Sci 70:389–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campos MR, Silva TBM, Silva WM, Silva JE, Siqueira HAA (2015) Spinosyn resistance in the tomato borer Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J Pest Sci 88:405–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras J, Espinosa PJ, Quinto V, Abellán J, Grávalos C, Fernández E, Bielza P (2010) Life-stage variation in insecticide resistance of the western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J Econ Entomol 103:2164–2168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daglı F, Bahsi ŞÜ (2009) Topical and residual toxicity of six pesticides to Orius majusculus. Phytoparasitica 37:399–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq P, Mestdagh I, Degheele D (1998) Variation in susceptibility to pyriproxyfen in four laboratory strains of Podisus maculiventris (Say)(Het., Pentatomidae). J App Entomol 122:405–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPPO (2003) Environmental risk assessment scheme for plant protection products. Standard PP 3/9 of the European Plant Protection Organization. EPPO Bull 33:99–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guedes RNC, Roditakis E, Campos MR, Haddi K, Bielza P, Siqueira HAA, Tsagkarakou A, Vontas J, Nauen R (2019) Insecticide resistance in the tomato pinworm Tuta absoluta: patterns, spread, mechanisms, management and outlook. J Pest Sci 92:1329–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillem-Amat A, Sánchez L, López-Errasquín E, Ureña E, Hernández-Crespo P, Ortego F (2020) Field detection and predicted evolution of spinosad resistance in Ceratitis capitata. Pest Manag Sci 76:3702–3710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Guillén J, Bielza P (2013) Thiamethoxam acts as a target-site synergist of spinosad in resistant strains of Frankliniella occidentalis. Pest Manag Sci 69:188–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick NJ, Cloyd RA (2017) Direct and indirect effects of pesticides on the insidious flower bug (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) under laboratory conditions. J Econ Entomol 110:931–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper KR, Roush RT, Powell W (1993) Management of genetics of biological-control introductions. Ann Rev Entomol 38:27–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy MA (1986) Use of genetic improvement in biological control. Agric Ecosyst Environ 15:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IOBC-WPRS (2021a) Pesticides and beneficial organisms. https://www.iobc-wprs.org/expert_groups/01_wg_beneficial_organisms.html. Accessed 19 January 2021

  • IOBC-WPRS (2021b) IOBC-WPRS pesticide side effect database. https://www.iobc-wprs.org/ip_integrated_production/Pesticide_Side_Effect_Database.html. Accessed 19 January 2021

  • IRAC (2021) The IRAC mode of action classification online. https://irac-online.org/modes-of-action/. Accessed 19 January 2021

  • Jones T, Scott-Dupree C, Harris R, Shipp L, Harris B (2005) The efficacy of spinosad against the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, and its impact on associated biological control agents on greenhouse cucumbers in southern Ontario. Pest Manag Sci 61:179–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CM, Daniels M, Andrews M, Slater R, Lind RJ, Gorman K, Williamson MS, Denholm I (2011) Age-specific expression of a P450 monooxygenase (CYP6CM1) correlates with neonicotinoid resistance in Bemisia tabaci. Pesticide Biochem Physiol 101:53–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SY, Ahn HG, Ha PJ, Lim UT, Lee JH (2018) Toxicities of 26 pesticides against 10 biological control species. J Asia-Pacific Entomol 21:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppert (2021) Side effects. https://sideeffects.koppert.com/?L=28. Accessed 19 January 2021

  • Lima Neto JE, Amaral MHP, Siqueira HAA, Barros R, Silva PAF (2016) Resistance monitoring of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) to risk-reduced insecticides and cross resistance to spinetoram. Phytoparasitica 44:631–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandour NS (2009) Influence of spinosad on immature and adult stages of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). BioControl 54:93–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza JE, Balanza V, Cifuentes D, Bielza P (2020) Selection for larger body size in Orius laevigatus: intraspecific variability and effects on reproductive parameters. Biol Control 148:104310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza JE, Balanza V, Cifuentes D, Bielza P (2021) Genetic improvement of Orius laevigatus for better fitness feeding on pollen. J Pest Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-020-01291-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles M (2006) The effects of spinosad in beneficial insects and mites used in integrated pest management systems in greenhouses. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 29:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauen R, Bielza P, Denholm I, Gorman K (2008) Age-specific expression of resistance to a neonicotinoid insecticide in the whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Pest Manag Sci 64:1106–1110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson EB, Troczka BJ, Gutbrod O, Davies TGE, Nauen R (2020) Diamide resistance: 10 years of lessons from lepidopteran pests. J Pest Sci 93:911–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JL, Savin NE, Russell RM, Preisler HK (2007) Bioassays with arthropods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roditakis E, Vasakis E, García-Vidal L, Martínez-Aguirre MR, Rison JL, Haxaire-Lutun MO, Nauen R, Tsagkarakou A, Bielza P (2018) A four-year survey on insecticide resistance and likelihood of chemical control failure for tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta in the European/Asian region. J Pest Sci 91:421–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe RM, Young HP, Iwasa T, Wyss CF, Stumpf CF, Sparks TC, Watson GB, Sheets JJ, Thompson GD (2010) Mechanism of resistance to spinosyn in the tobacco budworm Heliothis virescens. Pesticide Biochem Physiology 96:8–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roush RT, Hoy CW, Ferro DN, Tingey WN (1990) Insecticide resistance in the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): influence of crop rotation and insecticide use. J Econ Entomol 83:315–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell RM, Robertson JL, Savin NE (1977) Polo: a new computer program for probit analysis. Bull Entomol Soc Am 23:209–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez JA, Alcázar A, Lacasa A, Llamas A, Bielza P, Albajes R, Sekeroglu E (2000) Integrated pest management strategies in sweet pepper plastic houses in the Southeast of Spain. Bulletin IOBC/WPRS 23:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Shono T, Scott JG (2003) Spinosad resistance in the housefly, Musca domestica, is due to a recessive factor on autosome I. Pesticide Biochem Physiology 75:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sterk G, Hassan SA, Baillod M, Bakker F, Bigler F, Blümel S, Bogenschütz H, Boller E, Bromand B, Brun J, Calis JNM, Coremans-Pelseneer J, Duso C, Garrido A, Grove A, Heimbach U, Hokkanen H, Jacas J, Lewis G, Moreth L, Polgar L, Rovesti L, Samsoe-Peterson L, Sauphanor B, Schaub L, Stäubli A, Tuset JJ, Vainio A, van de Veire M, Viggiani G, Viñuela E, Vogt H (1999) Results of seventh join pesticides testing programme carried out by the IOCB/WPRS Working Group Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms. BioControl 44:99–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Studebaker GE, Kring TJ (2003) Effects of insecticides on Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), measured by field, greenhouse and Petri dish bioassays. Florida Entomol 86:178–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson D, Dutton R, Sparks TC (2000) Spinosad, a case study: an example from a natural products discovery programme. Pest Manag Sci 56:696–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torres JB (2012) Insecticide resistance in natural enemies-seeking for integration of chemical and biological controls. J Biofert Biopest 3:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Veire M, Tirry L (2003) Side effects of pesticides on four species of beneficials used in IPM in glasshouse vegetable crops: ‘worst case’ laboratory tests. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 26:41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Veire M, Klein M, Tirry L (2002a) Residual activity of abamectin and spinosad against the predatory bug Orius laevigatus. Phytoparasitica 30:525–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Veire M, Sterk G, van der Staaij M, Ramakers PMJ, Tirry L (2002b) Sequential testing scheme for the assessment of the side-effects of plant protection products on the predatory bug Orius laevigatus. BioControl 47:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Lenteren JC, Alomar O, Ravensberg WJ, Urbaneja A (2020) Biological control agents for control of pests in greenhouses. In: Gullino M, Albajes R, Nicot P (eds) Integrated pest and disease management in greenhouse crops. Plant pathology in the 21st century, vol 9. Springer, Cham, pp 409–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Mo J, Cheng J, Zhung P, Tang Z (2006) Selection and characterization of spinosad resistance in Spodoptera exigua (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pesticide Biochem Physiology 84:180–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Qiu X, Ren X, Niu F, Wang K (2009) Resistance selection and biochemical characterization of spinosad resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pesticide Biochem Physiology 95:90–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams T, Valle J, Viñuela E (2003) Is the naturally derived insecticide spinosad compatible with insect natural enemies? Biocontrol Sci Techn 13:459–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JZ, Li YX, Collins HL, Gusukuma-Minuto L, Mau RFL, Thompson GD, Shelton AM (2002) Monitoring and characterization of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) resistance to spinosad. J Econ Entomol 95:430–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge anonymous referees for reviews and comments on the manuscript. This research has been supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (AGL2017-89600-R) and by the European FEDER funds. José Enrique Mendoza holds a grant from the MSIU (FPU14/02932).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ingeniería Agronómica, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain

    Virginia Balanza, José Enrique Mendoza, Dina Cifuentes & Pablo Bielza

  2. Instituto de Biotecnología Vegetal, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain

    Dina Cifuentes & Pablo Bielza

Authors
  1. Virginia Balanza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. José Enrique Mendoza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dina Cifuentes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pablo Bielza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Bielza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Josep Anton Jaques Miret.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balanza, V., Mendoza, J.E., Cifuentes, D. et al. Genetic improvement of spinosad resistance in the biocontrol agent Orius laevigatus. BioControl 66, 673–685 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-021-10093-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-021-10093-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation