Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of position within wheat field and adjacent habitats on the density and diversity of cereal aphids and their natural enemies

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spatial structure of agricultural landscapes can have a strong impact on the distribution and diversity of insects. Here we studied the effects of within-field position (edge or center) as well as adjacent habitats on the community structure of the natural enemies of cereal aphids. Twelve agricultural sites were included in the study, with two spring wheat fields selected for each site (one adjacent to an alfalfa field, the other adjacent to a corn field). We sampled two rows per field (1 and 20 m from the edge) using pitfall trapping for ground-dwelling predators, sweep netting for leaf-dwelling predators and hand collecting of aphid mummies for parasitoids. Adjacent alfalfa areas, as opposed to corn fields, can significantly increase the abundance and diversity of leaf-dwelling predators and parasitoids near the field edges. Abundance and diversity were found significantly higher near the edges than in the centers of fields adjacent to alfalfa areas. In contrast, no significant differences were found between edges and centers of fields adjacent to corn fields. Of the fifteen most abundant species, Aphidius avenae (Haliday), A. gifuensis (Ashmead), Hippodamia variegata (Goeze) and Chrysopa sinica (Tjeder) were significantly more abundant near the edge than in the center. Being adjacent to alfalfa habitats could enhance parasitism and predator/prey ratios of leaf-dwelling predators at the edges, but has no effects on ground-dwelling predators. In conclusion, the effect of within-field position and adjacent habitats on natural enemies of agricultural pests was species specific. This should be considered for designing efficient plans of biological control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anjum-Zubair M, Schmidt-Entling MH, Querner P, Frank T (2010) Influence of within-field position and adjoining habitat on carabid beetle assemblages in winter wheat. Agric For Entomol 12:301–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi FJJA, Schellhorn NA, Buckley YM, Possincham HP (2010) Spatial variability in ecosystem services: simple rules for predator-mediated pest suppression. Ecol Appl 20:2332–2333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhofer K, Scheu S, Wiegand T (2010) Assessing spatiotemporal predator-prey patterns in heterogeneous habitats. Basic Appl Ecol 11:486–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blitzer EJ, Dormann CF, Holzschuh A, Klein A, Rand T, Tscharntke T (2012) Spillover of functionally important organisms between managed and natural habitats. Agric Ecosyst Environ 146:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blüthgen N, Dormann CF, Prati DI, Alt F, Boch S, Gockel S, Hemp A, Klaus V, Kleinebecker T, Müller J, Nieschulze J, Renner SC, Schöning I, Schumacher U, Socher SA, Wells K, Birkhofer K, Buscot F, Hölzel N, Oelmann Y, Rothenwöhrer C, Scherber C, Tscharntke T, Weiner C, Fischer M, Kalko EKV, Linsenmair KE, Schulze E-D, Weisser WW (2012) A quantitative index of land-use intensity in grasslands: integrating mowing, grazing and fertilization. Basic Appl Ecol 13:207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer MJ, Elliott NC (2004) Biological control of cereal aphids in North America and mediating effects of host plant and habitat manipulation. Annu Rev Entomol 49:219–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer MJ, Goodell PB (2012) Approaches and incentives to implement integrated pest management that addresses regional and environmental issues. Annu Rev Entomol 57:41–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin-Kramer R, O’Rourke ME, Blitzer EJ, Kremen C (2011) A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity. Ecol Lett 14:922–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clough Y, Kruss A, Tscharnthe T (2007) Local and landscape factors in differently managed arable fields affect the insect herbivore community of a non-crop plant species. J Appl Ecol 44:22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobbold SM, MacMahon JA (2012) Guild mobility affects spider diversity: links between foraging behavior and sensitivity to adjacent vegetation structure. Basic Appl Ecol 13:597–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Alberto C, Hoffmann AA, Thomson LJ (2012) Limited benefits of non-crop vegetation on spiders in Australian vineyards: regional or crop differences? BioControl 57:542–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahms H, Mayr S, Birkhofer K, Chauvat M, Melnichnova E, Wolters V, Dauber J (2010) Contrasting diversity patterns of epigeic arthropods between grasslands of high and low agronomic potential. Basic Appl Ecol 11:6–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl E, Wolters V, Birkhofer K (2012) Arable weeds in organically managed wheat fields foster carabid beetles by resource- and structure-mediated effects. Arthropod-Plant Interact 6:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl E, Sereda E, Wolters V, Birkhofer K (2013) Effects of predator specialization, host plant and climate on biological control of aphids by natural enemies: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 50:262–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott NC, Kieckhefer RW, Michels GJ, Giles KL (2002) Predator abundance in alfalfa fields in relation to aphids, within-field vegetation, and landscape matrix. Environ Entomol 31:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank T, Aeschbacher S, Zaller J (2012) Habitat age affects beetle diversity in wildflower areas. Agric Ecosyst Environ 152:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Géneau CE, Wäckers FL, Luka H, Daniel C, Balmer O (2012) Selective flowers to enhance biological control of cabbage pests by parasitoids. Basic Appl Ecol 13:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, May RM (1986) Generalist natural enemies in insect predator-prey interactions. J Anim Ecol 55:923–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjältén J, Gibb H, Ball JP (2010) How will low-intensity burning after clear-felling affect mid-boreal insect assemblages? Basic Appl Ecol 11:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen A, Sabelis MW, Magalhs S, Montserrat M, van der Hammen T (2007) Habitat structure affects intraguild predation. Ecology 88:2713–2719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D, Sutherland WJ (2003) How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? J Appl Ecol 40:947–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingenberg MD, Lindgren BS, Gillingham MP, Aukema BH (2010) Management response to one insect pest may increase vulnerability to another. J Appl Ecol 47:566–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange M, Gossner MM, Weisser WW (2011) Effect of pitfall trap type and diameter on vertebrate by-catches and ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spider (Araneae) sampling. Methods Ecol Evol 2:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer A, Hance T (2004) Enhancing parasitism of wheat aphids through apparent competition: a tool for biological control. Agric Ecosyst Environ 102:205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie TW, Werf VD, Bianchi FJJA, Honĕk A (2009) Population dynamics of cereal aphids: influence of a shared predator and whether. Agric For Entomol 11:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundy MG, Buckley DJ, Boston ESM, Scott DD, Prodöhl PA, Marnell F, Teeling EC, Montgomery WI (2012) Behavioral context of multi-scale species distribution models assessed by radio-tracking. Basic Appl Ecol 13:188–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacFadyen S, Gibson R, Raso L, Sint D, Traugott M, Memmott J (2009) Parasitoids control of aphids in organic and conventional farming systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133:14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnychuk NA, Olfert O, Gillott C (2003) Abundance and diversity of Carabidae (Coleoptera) in different farming systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95:69–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messelink GJ, Bloemhard CMJ, Sabelis MW, Janssen A (2013) Biological control of aphids in the presence of thrips and their enemies. BioControl 58:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mody K, Spoerndli C, Dorn S (2011) Within-orchard variability of the ecosystem service ‘parasitism’: effects of cultivars, ants and tree location. Basic Appl Ecol 12:456–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opatovsky I, Pluess T, Schmidt-Entling MH, Gavish E, Lubin Y (2010) Are spider assemblages in fragmented, semi-desert habitat affected by increasing cover of agricultural crop? Agric Ecosyst Environ 135:233–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perdikis D, Fantinou A, Lykouressis D (2011) Enhancing pest control in annual crops by conservation of predatory Heteroptera. Biol Control 59:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poveda K, Martinez E, Kersch-Becker M, Bonilla MA, Tscharntke T (2012) Landscape simplification and altitude affect biodiversity, herbivory and Andean potato yield. J Appl Ecol 49:513–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purtauf T, Roschewitz I, Dauber J, Thies C, Tscharntke T, Wolters V (2005) Landscape context of organic and conventional farms: influences on carabid beetle diversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand TA, Tylianakis JM, Tscharntke T (2006) Spillover edge effects: the dispersal of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats. Ecol Lett 9:603–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2006) SAS User’s Guide: Version 9.1.2. SAS Institute, Cary, USA

  • Schmidt MH, Döbeli J (2009) Sown wildflower areas to enhance spiders in arable fields. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133:19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MH, Roschewitz I, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2005) Differential effects of landscape and management on diversity and density of ground-dwelling farmland spiders. J Appl Ecol 42:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thies C, Roschewitz I, Tscharntke T (2005) The landscape context of cereal aphid-parasitoid interactions. Proc Biol Sci 272:203–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thies C, Haenke S, Scherber C, Bengtsson L, Bommarco R, Clement LW, Ceryngler P, Dennis C, Emmerson M, Gagic V, Hawro V, Liira J, Weisser WW, Winqvist C, Tscharntke T (2011) The relationship between agricultural intensification and biological control: experimental tests across Europe. Ecol Appl 21:2187–2196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA, Didham RK, Fahrig L, Bätary P, Bengtsson J, Clough Y, Crist TO, Dormann CF, Ewers RW, Frund J, Holt RD, Holzschuh A, Klein AM, Kleijn D, Kremen C, Landis DA, Laurance W, Lindenmayer D, Scherber C, Sodhi N, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C, van der Putten WH, Westphal C (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes-eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87:661–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wäckers F, van Rijn PCJ, Heimpel GE (2008) Honeydew as a food source for natural enemies: making the best of a bad meal? Biol Control 45:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu DW, Ji Y, Emerson BC, Wang X, Ye C, Yang C, Ding Z (2012) Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring. Methods Ecol Evol 3:613–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaller JG, Moser D, Drapela T, Schmoger C, Frank T (2008) Effect of within-field and landscape factors on insect damage in winter oilseed rape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 123:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaller JG, Moser D, Drapela T, Schmöger C, Frank T (2012) Parasitism of stem weevils and pollen beetles in winter oilseed rape is differently affected by crop management and landscape characteristics. BioControl 54:505–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao ZH, He DH, Hui C (2012) From the inverse density-area relationship to the minimum patch size of a host-parasitoid system. Ecol Res 27:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao ZH, Hui C, Ouyang F, Liu JH, Guan XQ, He DH, Ge F (2013) Effects of inter-annual landscape change on interactions between cereal aphids and their natural enemies. Basic Appl Ecol. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2013.06.002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Eric Wajnberg, Arne Janssen, Abisheka Murugesan, and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments and thoughtful advice on an earlier draft, to Beverley Laniewski for English editing, and to many farmers for their facilitation during the field work. This work is partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (31260429; 31030012) and National Key Technology R & D Program (2012BAD19B05). CH also receives supports from the National Research Foundation and the Elsevier Young Scientist Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Ge.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Arne Janssen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, ZH., Hui, C., He, DH. et al. Effects of position within wheat field and adjacent habitats on the density and diversity of cereal aphids and their natural enemies. BioControl 58, 765–776 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-013-9536-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-013-9536-9

Keywords

Navigation