Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is the predatory mite Kampimodromus aberrans a candidate for the control of phytophagous mites in European apple orchards?

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most important biocontrol agents of phytophagous mites (mainly Tetranychidae) in European apple orchards are the predatory mites Amblyseius andersoni, Typhlodromus pyri and Euseius finlandicus (Phytoseiidae). A similar situation is found in Trentino (north-eastern Italy), an important apple production area in Europe. Another phytoseiid mite, Kampimodromus aberrans, can be dominant in neglected fruit orchards but is rare in commercial orchards because of its susceptibility to pesticides. However, pesticide resistant strains of K. aberrans have recently been found in vineyards. In the late 1990s, one of these resistant strains was successfully released on an experimental farm in Trentino. Kampimodromus aberrans spread to an apple orchard, despite the fact that it was colonized by T. pyri, A. andersoni and E. finlandicus, and became the dominant species. Since K. aberrans’ colonization appeared to be affected by apple cultivars, experiments were conducted on potted plants of three selected apple cultivars (Golden Delicious, Red Chief, Reinette du Canada). The results stressed the effect of cultivars on apple colonization by K. aberrans and suggested the role of leaf morphology in influencing this phenomenon. Field releases of K. aberrans were successfully performed in four commercial apple orchards. The incidence of K. aberrans in the total phytoseiid population increased over time and the predator became dominant in the season following its release in two orchards. Kampimodromus aberrans persists in these orchards as the dominant species. The adaptation of K. aberrans to varying environmental conditions, its tolerance to pesticides, and its competitiveness towards other phytoseiid species suggest a potential role of this species in the biological control of phytophagous mites in European apple orchards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis, Second edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Anber HAI, Overmeer WPJ (1988) Resistance to organophosphates and carbamates in the predacious mite Amblyseius potentillae (Garman) due to insensitive acetylcholinesterase. Pest Biochem Physiol 31:91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angeli G, Ioriatti C (1994) Susceptibility of two strains of Amblyseius andersoni Chant. (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to dithiocarbamate fungicides. Exp Appl Acarol 18:669–679

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angeli G, Forti D, Maines R (1997) Effetti collaterali di fitofarmaci di interesse fruttiviticolo verso gli acari fitoseidi. Inf Agr 14:74–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2006) La produzione di mele. Apot Inf 4:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillod M, Guignard E (1984) Resistance de Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten à l’azinphos et lutte biologique contre les acariens phytophages en arboriculture. Rev Suisse Vitic Arboric Hortic 16:155–160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baldessari M, Angeli G, Girolami V (2005) Effects of plant protection products on Kampimodromus aberrans (Oudemans): the dietary effect of airborne pollen. Bull OILB/SROP 28:151–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudry O, Brazier C, Breniaux D, Brun V, Fauvel G (1999) Les phytoséiides prédateurs d’acariens en vergers. Editions Ctifl, 118 pp

  • Blommers LHM, Overmeer WPJ (1986) On the fringes of natural spider mite control. IOBC/WPRS Bull 9:48–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Chant DA (1959) Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. Bionomics of seven species in southeastern England. Can Entomol 91(Suppl):5–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Collyer E (1958) Some insectary experiments with predacious mites to determine their effect on the development of Metatetranychus ulmi (Koch) populations. Entomol Exp Appl 1:138–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Corino L, Baillod M, Duvernay C (1986) Resistenza di Kampimodromus aberrans (Oudemans) al parathion e lotta biologica contro gli acari fitofagi in viticoltura. Vignevini 4:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Comelles J, Santamaria A, Garcia Mari F, Laborda R, Soto A (1990) Aplicacion del control integrado del acaro rojo Panonychus ulmi (Koch) en parceles comerciales de manzano. Bol Sanid Veg Plagas 16:317–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing RS, Moilliet TK (1967) Relative densities of predaceous and phytophagous mites on three varieties of apple trees. Can Entomol 99:738–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Duso C (1989) Role of Amblyseius aberrans (Oud.), Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten and Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) (Acari, Phytoseiidae) in vineyards. I. The effects of single or mixed phytoseiid population releases on spider mite densities (Acari, Tetranychidae). J Appl Entomol 107:474–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duso C (1992) Role of Amblyseius aberrans (Oud.), Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten and Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) in vineyards. III. Influence of variety characteristics on the success of A. aberrans and T. pyri releases. J Appl Entomol 114:455–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Duso C, Sbrissa F (1990) Gli Acari Fitoseidi (Acari Phytoseiidae) del melo nell’Italia settentrionale: distribuzione, biologia, ecologia ed importanza economica. Boll Zool Agr Bachic 22:53–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Duso C, Camporese P, Van der Geest LPS (1992) Toxicity of a number of pesticides to strains of Typhlodromus pyri and Amblyseius andersoni (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga 37:363–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duso C, Pasini M, Pellegrini M (2003) Distribution of the predatory mite Typhlodromus pyri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on different apple cultivars. Biocontrol Sci Technol 13:671–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Borolossy M, Fischer-Colbrie P (1989a) Untersuchungen zur Populationsdynamik von Raubmilbenarten am Beispiel der Art Amblyseius aberrans (Oudemans) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Pflanzenschutzberichte 50:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Borolossy M, Fischer-Colbrie P (1989b) Untersuchungen zum Artenspecktrum von raubmilben im osterreichischen obst- un wienbau. Pflanzenschutzberichte 50:49–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinha IG, Costa-Comelles J, Torres LM, Ferragut F (1995) Contribuicao para o conhecimento dos acaros fitoseideos associados a macieira no norte interior de Portugal. Bol Sanid Veg Plagas 21:223–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinha IG, Ferragut F, Pereira JA, Torres LM (1998) Acaros fitoseideos (Acari: Phytoseiidae) del cultivo de manzano en el nordeste de Portugal. Bol Sanid Veg Plagas 24:383–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauvel G, Gendrier JP (1992) Problems met in the establishment of phytoseiids in apple orchards of southeastern France. Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung 27:223–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Colbrie P, El-Borolossy M (1990) Unthersuchungen zum Einfluss des Klimas, der Pflanzenart und der Wirtstiere auf das Vorkommen verschiedener Raubmilbenarten im osterreichischen Obst- und Weinbau. Pflanzenschutzberichte 51:101–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald JD, Solomon MG (2002) Distribution of predatory phytoseiid mites in commercial cider apple orchards and unsprayed apple trees in the UK: implications for biocontrol of phytophagous mites. Int J Acarol 28:181–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald JD, Solomon MG, Pepper N (2003) Reduction of broad spectrum insecticide use in apple: implications for biocontrol of Panonychus ulmi. Bull IOBC/WPRS 26:37–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Forti D, Angeli G, Ioriatti C (2003) Carpocapsa: stato dell’arte su metodi tradizionali e nuove strategie di difesa. Inf Fitopatol 53:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisinghelli C, Delaiti L, Grando MS, Forti D, Vindimian E (2000) Cacopsylla costalis (Flor 1861), as a vector of apple proliferation in Trentino. J Phytopathol 148:425–431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Mari F, Costa-Comelles J, Ferragut F, Laborda R (1989) Lutte intégrée contre les acariens dans les vergers de pommiers de Lleida (Espagne). In: Proceedings of Colloque sur les acariens des cultures. Montpellier, 24–26 Octobre 1989, pp 501–518

  • Genini M, Klay A, Delucchi V, Baillod M, Baumgartner J (1983) Les especes de phytoseiides (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) dans les vergers de pommier en Suisse. Mitt Schweiz Entomol Ges 56:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Girolami V, Picotti P, Coiutti C (1992) Ruolo determinante del fitoseide Amblyseius aberrans (Oud.) nel controllo degli acari fitofagi. Inf Agr 48:65–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Grostal P, O’Dowd DJ (1994) Plants, mites and mutualism: leaf domatia and the abundance and reproduction of mites on Viburnum tinus (Caprifoliaceae). Oecologia 97:308–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioriatti C, Mattedi L (1988) Predatori del ragno rosso in Trentino: specie presenti, biologia, capacità di contenimento. Terra Trentina 24:28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioriatti C, Pellizzari G, Sacco M (1983) Prime esperienze sul controllo biologico di Panonychus ulmi Koch con acari fitoseidi in Trentino. Redia 66:295–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipe D (1987) Performing the Friedman test and the associated multiple comparison test using PROC GLM. In: Proceedings of the SAS users group international conference, vol 12. pp 1146–1148

  • Ivancich Gambaro P (1975) Selezione di popolazioni di Acari predatori resistenti ad alcuni insetticidi fosforati-organici. Inf Fitopatol 7:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Karg W (1972) Untersuchungen uber die korrelation zwischen dominierenden raubmilbenarten und ihrer moglichen Beute in apfelanlagen. Arch Pflanzenschutz 1:29–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasap I (2005) Life-history traits of the predaceous mite Kampimodromus aberrans (Oudemans) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on four different types of food. Biol Control 35:40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiter S, Tixier MS, Croft BA, Auger P, Barret D (2002) Plants and leaf characteristics influencing the predaceous mite Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in habitats surrounding vineyards. Environ Entomol 31:648–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoyiannaki-Printzioui D, Papaioannou-Souliotis P, Zeginis G, Giatropoulos C (2000) Observations on acarofauna in four apple orchards of Central Greece. I. Incidence of pedoclimatic conditions and agricultural techniques on phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia 41:109–126

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry JA, Huffaker CB, Van de Vrie M (1970) Ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural enemies: a review. 1. Tetranychid enemies, their biological characteristics and the impact of spray practices. Hilgardia 40:331–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Miedema E (1987) Survey of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in orchards and surrounding vegetation of northwestern Europe, especially in the Netherlands. Keys, descriptions and figures. Neth J Plant Pathol 93:1–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minãrro M, Dapena E, Ferragut F (2002) Acaros fitoseidos (Acari: Phytoseiidae) en plantaciones de manzano de Asturias. Bol Sanid Veg Plagas 28:287–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton AP, English-Loeb G, Belden E (2001) Host plant manipulation of natural enemies: leaf domatia protect beneficial mites from insect predators. Oecologia 126:535–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberhofer H, Waldner W (1985) Erfahrungen mit Nutzlingen gegenuber Spinnmilben im Sudtiroler Obstbau. Obstbau Weinbau 22:219–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozman-Sullivan SK (2006) Life history of Kampimodromus aberrans as a predator of Phytoptus avellanae (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Phytoptidae). Exp Appl Acarol 38:15–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posenato G (1994) Popolazioni di Amblyseius aberrans (Oud.) resistenti ad esteri fosforici e ditiocarbammati. Inf Agr 50:41–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Roda A, Nyrop J, Dicke M, English-Loeb G (2000) Trichomes and spider-mite webbing protect predatory mite eggs from intraguild predation. Oecologia 125:428–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roda A, Nyrop J, English-Loeb G, Dicke M (2001) Leaf pubescence and two-spotted spider mite webbing influence phytoseiid behaviour and population density. Oecologia 129:551–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Roda A, Nyrop J, English-Loeb G (2003) Leaf pubescence mediates the abundance of non-prey food and the density of the predatory mite Typhlodromus pyri. Exp Appl Acarol 29:193–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P (1991) Vergleichende untersuchungen zum lebensverlauf, die erstellung von lebenstafeln und die vermehrungskapazität von Amblyseius aberrans Oud. und Amblyseius finlandicus Oud. (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Pflanzenschutzberichte 52:53–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P (1992) Vergleichende untersuchungen über den einfluß unterschiedlicher nahrung auf die präimaginalentwicklung und die reproduktion von Amblyseius aberrans Oud. und Amblyseius finlandicus Oud. (Acarina, Phytoseiidae). J Appl Entomol 113:476–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P (1997) Inter- and intraspecific predation on immatures by adult females in Euseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodormus aberrans (Acarina, Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol 21:131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P (1998a) The influence of relative humidity on egg hatch in Euseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari, Phytoseiidae). J Appl Entomol 122:497–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P (1998b) Population growth and persistence when prey is diminishing in single-species and two-species systems of the predatory mites Euseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans. Exp Appl Acarol 88:275–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P (1999) Juvenile survival and development in Euseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari: Phytoseiidae) feeding on con- and heterospecific immatures. Exp Appl Acarol 23:297–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P, Croft BA (2000) Cannibalism and intraguild predation among phytoseiid mites: are aggressiveness and prey preference related to diet specialization? Exp Appl Acarol 24:709–725

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon MG, Cross JV, Fitz Gerald JD, Campbell CAM, Jolly RL, Olszak RW, Niemczyk E, Vogt H (2000) Biocontrol of pests of apples and pears in northern and central Europe—3 Predators. Biocontrol Sci Technol 10:91–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tixier MS, Kreiter S (2003) The dispersal of Kampimodromus aberrans between uncultivated areas and grape fields: does pesticide applications affect the settlement of migrants? Insect Sci Appl 23:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Tixier MS, Kreiter S, Croft BA, Auger P (2002) Colonization of vineyards by Kampimodromus aberrans (Oudemans) (Acari: Phytoseiidae): dispersal from surrounding plants as indicated by random amplified polymorphism DNA typing. Agric For Entomol 4:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuovinen T (1993) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Gamasina) in Finnish apple plantations with reference to integrated control of phytophagous mites. Agric Sci Finl Suppl 1:7–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Vettorello G, Girolami V (1992) Popolazioni di Amblyseius aberrans (Oud.) tolleranti ai ditiocarbammati. Inf Agr 38:111–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter DE (1996) Living on leaves: mites, tomenta and leaf domatia. Annu Rev Entomol 41:101–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank P. Schausberger (Univ. Nat. Resources & Appl. Life Science, Vienna, Austria) and F. Ferragut (Univ. Politecn., Dept. Ecosistemas Agroforestales, Inst. Agroforestal Mediterraneo, Valencia, Spain) for providing information about K. aberrans status in their countries. G. Posenato (AGREA, Verona, Italy) kindly provided the K. aberrans strain considered in the current study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Agronomy and Crop Science, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020, Legnaro, Padova, Italy

    Carlo Duso & Alberto Pozzebon

  2. Plant Protection and Agricultural Resources Department, IASMA Research Centre, via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all’Adige, TN, Italy

    Marco Fanti & Gino Angeli

Authors
  1. Carlo Duso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Fanti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alberto Pozzebon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gino Angeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Duso.

Additional information

Handling editor: Eric Lucas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duso, C., Fanti, M., Pozzebon, A. et al. Is the predatory mite Kampimodromus aberrans a candidate for the control of phytophagous mites in European apple orchards?. BioControl 54, 369–382 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-008-9177-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-008-9177-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation