Abstract
Feather pecking is a well known problem in flocks of laying hens. It is partially controlled by genetics. Fear is frequently reported to be related with feather pecking. The present study reports the result from a quantitative genetic analysis of feather pecking and three fear test traits in laying hens. Fear was recorded by the tonic immobility test, the open field activity and the emergence box test. These were recorded at a juvenile and adult age of the hens. The heritability of feather pecking was 0.16, and in the range between 0.07 and 0.14 for the fear test traits. Genetic correlations between fear measured in the juvenile and in the adult age point to different but correlated traits. Tonic immobility measured early in life was moderately correlated with feather pecking and might be used as a breeding criterion to reduce feather pecking.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnvall B, Jöngren M, Strandberg E, Jensen P (2012) Heritability and genetic correlations of fear-related behavior in red junglefowl-possible implications for early domestication. PLoS One 7:4
Albentosa MJ, Kjaer JB, Nicol CJ (2003) Strain and age differences in behavior, fear response and pecking tendency in laying hens. Br Poult Sci 44(3):333–344
Bennewitz J, Bögelein S, Stratz P, Rodehutscord M, Piepho HP, Kjaer JB, Bessei W (2014) Genetic parameters for feather pecking and aggressive behavior in a large F2-cross of laying hens using generalized linear mixed models. Poult Sci 93(4):810–817
Bessei W, Bauhaus H, Bögelein S (2013) The effect of selection for high and low feather pecking on aggression—related behaviors of laying hens. Arch Geflügelk 77(1):10–14
Bijma P (2013) The quantitative genetics of indirect genetic effects: a selective review of modeling issues. Heredity 112(1):61–69
Bijma P, Muir WM, van Arendonk JAM (2007a) Multilevel selection 1: quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175(1):277–288
Bijma P, Muir WM, Ellen ED, Wolf JB, van Arendonk JAM (2007b) Multilevel selection 2: estimating the genetic parameters determining inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175(1):289–299
Bilcík B, Keeling LJ (1999) Changes in feather condition in relation to feather pecking and aggressive behavior in laying hens. Br Poult Sci 40(4):444–451
Biscarini F, Bovenhuis H, van Arendonk JAM (2008) Estimation of variance components and prediction of breeding values using pooled data. J Anim Sci 86(11):2845–2852
Biscarini F, Bovenhuis H, van der Poel J, Rodenburg TB, Jungerius AP, van Arendonk JAM (2010) Across-line SNP association study for direct and associative effects on feather damage in laying hens. Behav Genet 40(5):715–727
Blokhuis HJ, Wiepkema PR (1998) Studies of feather pecking in poultry. Vet Quart 20(1):6–9
Bögelein S, Bennewitz J, Grashorn MA, Marenco-Hurtado D, Bessei W (2014) The phenotypic interrelationships between feather pecking, being feather pecked and fear criteria in White Leghorn lines selected for high and low severe feather pecking and their F2-cross. Europ Poult Sci 78:50
Brinker T, Bijma P, Visscher J, Rodenburg TB, Ellen ED (2014) Plumage condition in laying hens: genetic parameters for direct and indirect effects in two purebred layer lines. Genet Selec Evol 46(1):33
Campo JL, Carnicer C (1993) Realized heritability of tonic immobility in White Leghorn Hens: a replicated single generation test. Poult Sci 72(12):2193–2199
Ellen ED, Visscher J, van Arendonk JAM, Bijma P (2008) Survival of laying hens: genetic parameters for direct and associative effects in three purebred layer lines. Poult Sci 87(2):233–239
Falconer DS, MacKay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, London
Forkman B, Boissy A, Meunier-Salaün MC, Canali E, Jones RB (2007) A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiol Behav 92(3):340–374
Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2006) ASReml user guide release 2.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK
Hocking PM, Channing CE, Waddington D, Jones RB (2001) Age-related changes in fear, sociality and pecking behaviors in two strains of laying hen. Br Poult Sci 42(1–2):414–423
Jensen P, Keeling L, Schütz K, Andersson L, Mormède P, Brändström H, Forkmann B, Kerje S, Fredriksson R, Ohlsson C, Larsson S, Mallmin H, Kindmark A (2005) Feather pecking in chickens is genetically related to behavioral and developmental traits. Physiol Behav 86(1–2):52–60
Jones RB (1996) Fear and adaptability in poultry: insights, implications and imperatives. World Poultry Sci J 52(2):131–174
Jones RB, Mills D (1983) Estimation of fear in two lines of domestic chick: correlation between various methods. Behav Process 8(3):243–253
Jones RB, Blokhuis HJ, Beuving G (1995) Open-field and tonic immobility responses in domestic chicks of two genetic lines differing in their propensity to feather peck. Br Poult Sci 36(4):525–530
Kjaer JB, Sørensen P (1997) Feather pecking behavior in White Leghorns, a genetic study. Br Poult Sci 38(4):333–341
Kjaer JB, Sørensen P (2002) Feather pecking and cannibalism in free-range laying hens as affected by genotype, dietary level of methionine + cystine, light intensity during rearing and age at first access to the range area. Appl Anim Behav Sci 76(1):21–29
Kjaer JB, Sørensen P, Su G (2001) Divergent selection on feather pecking behavior in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Appl Anim Behav Sci 71(3):229–239
McKeegan DE, Savory C (1999) Feather eating in layer pullets and its possible role in the aetiology of feather pecking damage. Appl Anim Behav Sci 65(1):73–85
Recoquillay J, Leterrier C, Calandreau L, Bertin A, Pitel F, Gourichon D, Vignal A, Beaumont C, Le Bihan-Duval E, Arnould C (2013) Evidence of phenotypic and genetic relationships between sociality, emotional reactivity and production traits in Japanese quail. PLoS One 8:12
Rodenburg TB, Buitenhuis AJ, Ask B, Uitdehaag KA, Koene P, van der Poel JJ, Bovenhuis H (2003) Heritability of feather pecking and open-field response of laying hens at two different ages. Poul Sci 82(6):861–867
Rodenburg TB, van Hierden YM, Buitenhuis AJ, Riedstra B, Koene P, Korte SM, van der Poel JJ, Groothuis TGG, Bovenhuis HJ (2004) Genetic and phenotypic correlations between feather pecking and open-field response in laying hens at two different ages. Behav Genet 34:407–415
Rodenburg TB, Komen H, Ellen ED, Uitdehaag KA, van Arendonk JAM (2008) Selection method and early-life history affect behavioral development, feather pecking and cannibalism in laying hens: a review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 110(4):217–228
Siegel PB (1978) Some Thoughts on Poultry Behavior. In: Siegel PB, Bessei W, Grauvogel A (eds)Verhaltensmerkmale bei der Züchtung von Geflügel. Hohenheimer Arbeiten, 93:25–34
Savory CJ (1995) Feather pecking and cannibalism. World Poultry Sci J 51:215–219
Su G, Kjaer JB, Sørensen P (2005) Variance components and selection response for feather-pecking behavior in laying hens. Poult Sci 84(1):14–21
Vestergaard KS, Kruijt JP, Hogan JA (1993) Feather pecking and chronic fear in groups of red junglefowl: their realtions to dustbathing, rearing environment and social status. Anim Behav 45(6):1127–1140
Wysocki M, Bessei W, Kjaer JB, Bennewitz J (2010) Genetic and physiological factors influencing feather pecking in chickens. World Poultry Sci J 66(4):659–671
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a Grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG). The manuscript benefited from the critical and helpful comments of two anonymous reviewers.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Edited by Stephen Maxson.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grams, V., Bögelein, S., Grashorn, M.A. et al. Quantitative Genetic Analysis of Traits Related to Fear and Feather Pecking in Laying Hens. Behav Genet 45, 228–235 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-014-9695-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-014-9695-1