Skip to main content
Log in

Latent Classiness and Other Mixtures

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this article is to laud Lindon Eaves’ role in the development of mixture modeling in genetic studies. The specification of models for mixture distributions was very much in its infancy when Professor Eaves implemented it in his own FORTRAN programs, and extended it to data collected from relatives such as twins. It was his collaboration with the author of this article which led to the first implementation of mixture distribution modeling in a general-purpose structural equation modeling program, Mx, resulting in a 1996 article on linkage analysis in Behavior Genetics. Today, the popularity of these methods continues to grow, encompassing methods for genetic association, latent class analysis, growth curve mixture modeling, factor mixture modeling, regime switching, marginal maximum likelihood, genotype by environment interaction, variance component twin modeling in the absence of zygosity information, and many others. This primarily historical article concludes with some consideration of some possible future developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These probabilities are readily obtained with software such as Mplus or OpenMx.

References

  • Bauer DB, Curran PJ (2003) Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychol Methods 8:338–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benyamin B, Wilson V, Whalley LJ, Visscher PM, Deary IJ (2005) Large, consistent estimates of the heritability of cognitive ability in two entire populations of 11-year-old twins from Scottish mental surveys of 1932 and 1947. Behav Genet 35(5):525–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bock RD (1972) Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika 37:29–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boker S, Neale M, Maes H, Wilde M, Spiegel M, Brick T, Spies J, Estabrook R, Kenny S, Bates T, Mehta P, Fox J (2011) Openmx: an open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika 76(2):306–311

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caspi A, McClay J, Moffitt TE, Mill J, Martin J, Craig IW, Taylor A, Poulton R (2002) Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 297(5582):851–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curnow R, Smith C (1975) Multifactorial models for familial diseases in man. J R Stat Soc A 13:131–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaves LJ (1983) Errors of inference in the detection of major gene effects on psychological test scores. Am J Hum Genet 35(6):1179–1189

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eaves LJ (2006) Genotype × environment interaction in psychopathology: fact or artifact? Twin Res Hum Genet 9(1):1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eaves LJ, Silberg JL, Hewitt JK, Rutter M, Meyer JM, Neale MC, Pickles A (1993) Analyzing twin resemblance in multisymptom data: genetic applications of a latent class model for symptoms of conduct disorder in juvenile boys. Behav Genet 23(1):5–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eaves LJ, Silberg JL, Meyer JM, Maes HH, Simonoff E, Pickles A, Rutter M, Neale MC, Reynolds CA, Erikson MT, Heath AC, Loeber R, Truett KR, Hewitt JK (1997) Genetics and developmental psychopathology: 2. The main effects of genes and environment on behavioral problems in the virginia twin study of adolescent behavioral development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38(8):965–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eaves L Erkanli A (2003) Markov chain monte carlo approaches to analysis of genetic and environmental components of human developmental change and g × e interaction. Behav Genet 33(3):279–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Elston RC (1979) Major locus analysis for quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 31(6):655–661

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Everitt BS (1996) An introduction to finite mixture distributions. Stat Methods Med Res 5(2):107–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer D (1965) The inheritance of liability to certain diseases, estimated from the incidence among relatives. Ann Hum Genet 29:51–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulker DW, Cherny SS (1996) An improved multipoint sib-pair analysis of quantitative traits. Behav Genet 26:527–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Go RC, Elston RC, Kaplan EB (1978) Efficiency and robustness of pedigree segregation analysis. Am J Hum Genet 30(1):28–37

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haseman JK, Elston RC (1972) The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus. Behav Genet 2:3–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt JK, Silberg JL, Rutter M, Simonoff E, Meyer JM, Maes H, Pickles A, Neale MC, Loeber R, Erickson MT, Kendler KS, Heath AC, Truett KR, Reynolds CA, Eaves LJ (1997) Genetics and developmental psychopathology: 1. Phenotypic assessment in the Virginia twin study of adolescent behavioral development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38(8):943–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jinks JL, Fulker DW (1970) Comparison of the biometrical genetical, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior. Psychol Bull 73:311–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendler KS, Kessler RC, Heath AC, Neale MC, Eaves LJ (1991) Coping: a genetic epidemiological investigation. Psychol Med 21(2):337–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglyak L, Daly MJ, Reeve-Daly MP, Lander ES (1996) Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet 58(6):1347–1363

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld PF (1950) The logical and mathematical foundations of latent structure analysis. In S A Stouffer et al (eds). The American soldier: studies in social psychology in world war II, vol IV. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord FM, Novick MR, Birnbaum A (1968) Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubke GH, Muthen B (2005a) Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychol Methods 10(1):21–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubke GH, Muthén B (2005b) Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychol Methods 10(1):21–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubke G, Neale M (2008) Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors with categorical outcomes: class invariance of parameters of factor mixture models. Multivariate Behav Res 43(4):592–620

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan GJ, Peel D (2000) Finite mixture models. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Medland SE, Neale MC (2010) An integrated phenomic approach to multivariate allelic association. Eur J Hum Genet 18(2):233–239

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta PD, Neale MC, Flay BR (2004) Squeezing interval change from ordinal panel data: latent growth curves with ordinal outcomes. Psychol Methods 9(3):301–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Min HK, Moxley G, Neale MC, Schwartz LB (2004) Effect of sex and haplotype on plasma tryptase levels in healthy adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol 114(1):48–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar D, Dolan CV, Verhelst ND (2010) Testing and modelling non-normality within the one-factor model. Br J Math Stat Psychol 63(Pt 2):293–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar D, Sluis S, van der, Boomsma DI, Dolan CV (2012) Detecting specific genotype by environment interactions using marginal maximum likelihood estimation in the classical twin design. Behav Genet 42(3):483–499

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore GE (1965) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electron Mag 38(8):4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin A, Urban J, Adams PD, Foster I, Sali A, Baker D, Sliz P (2012) Research priorities. Shining light into black boxes. Science 336(6078):159–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morton NE, MacLean CJ (1974) Analysis of family resemblance. 3. Complex segregation of quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 26(4):489–503

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén B, Shedden K (1999) Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics 55(2):463–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neale MC (1997) Mx: statistical modeling, 4th edn. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale MC (2003) A finite mixture distribution model for data collected from twins. Twin Res 6(3):235–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neale MC, Cardon LR (1992) Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols R, Bilbro W (1966) The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genet 16:265–275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nylund KL, Asparoutiov T, Muthen BO (2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a monte carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Modeling 14(4):535–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K (1894) Contributions to the mathematical theory of evolution. II. Skew variation in homogeneous material. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 186:343–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rende RD, Plomin R, Vandenberg SG (1990) Who discovered the twin method? Behav Genet 20(2):277–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt JE, Mehta PD, Aggen SH, Kubarych TS, Neale MC (2006) Semi-nonparametric methods for detecting latent non-normality: a fusion of latent trait and ordered latent class modeling [Article]. Multivariate Behav Res 41(4):427–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sham PC, Rijsdijk FV, Knight J, Makoff A, North B, Curtis D (2004) Haplotype association analysis of discrete and continuous traits using mixture of regression models. Behav Genet 34(2):207–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger JH, Shapiro A, Browne MW (1985) On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square statistics. Psychometrika 50:253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluis S, van der, Dolan CV, Neale MC, Boomsma DI, Posthuma D (2006) Detecting genotype–environment interaction in monozygotic twin data: comparing Mixture Modeling 22 the Jinks and Fulker test and a new test based on marginal maximum likelihood estimation. Twin Res Hum Genet 9(3):377–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss V (1972) Empirische untersuchung zu einer hypothese über den autosomal-rezessiven erbgang der mathematisch-technischen begabung. Biol Zent Bl 91:429–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (2013) Commodore PET. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_pet. Accessed 18 Feb 2013

  • Witkiewitz K, Maisto SA, Donovan DM (2010) A comparison of methods for estimating change in drinking following alcohol treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 34(12):2116–2125

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for support by NIH grants DA-18673 and DA-26119. He would like to acknowledge the members of the Behavior Genetics Association Executive Committee for help in organizing the festschrift, and Dr. Timothy Bates for hosting the meeting in the Moray House, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael C. Neale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neale, M.C. Latent Classiness and Other Mixtures. Behav Genet 44, 205–211 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-013-9637-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-013-9637-3

Keywords

Navigation