Skip to main content
Log in

The Inclusion of Measured Covariates in the Neale and Kendler Model Fitting Approach

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neale and Kendler (1995, Am J Hum Genet 57:935–953) described 13 comorbidity models, providing the most comprehensive set of alternative hypotheses regarding the possible causes of comorbidity to date. This research note describes an extension of the Neale and Kendler model fitting approach that permits the inclusion of measured covariates. An example of 13 models examining the comorbidity between alcohol dependence and illicit drug dependence is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH (2002) Mx: statistical modeling, 6th edn. Virginia Commonwealth University Department of Psychiatry, Richmond, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale MC, Kendler KS (1995) Models of comorbidity for multifactorial disorders. Am J Hum Genet 57:935–953

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee SH, Hewitt JK, Young SE, Corley RP, Crowley TJ, Neale MC, Stallings MC (2006) Comorbidity between alcohol dependence and illicit drug dependence in adolescents with antisocial behavior and matched controls. Drug Alcohol Depen 84:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijsdijk FV, Cardno AG, Sham PC, McGuffin P (1999) Statistical aspects of genetic models of comorbidity of psychotic disorders in selected twin samples. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the international society of psychiatric Genetics, Monterey, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Young SE, Corley RP, Stallings MC, Rhee SH, Crowley TJ, Hewitt JK (2002) Substance use, abuse and dependence in adolescence: prevalence, symptom profiles and correlates. Drug Alcohol Depen 68:309–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIDA grants DA-13956, DA-05131, DA-11015, and DA-18673. Michael C. Neale was also supported by NIMH grant MH-65322.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soo Hyun Rhee.

Additional information

Edited by Pak Sham

Appendix

Appendix

Mx script for alternate forms model

G1 Alternate forms model

!

! If you are above threshold on L, you get disorder A with prob p

! If you are above threshold on L, you get disorder B with prob r

! Note: (q = 1-p and s = 1-r)

! If you are below threshold on L you are immune to A&B

! control group correlation matrix

DA CALC NG = 4

MATRICES

A Lo 1 1 Fixed

C Lo 1 1 Free

H fu 1 1

I id 1 1

begin algebra;

X = A*A′;

Y = C*C′;

end algebra;

COMPUTE I|H@X + Y_

H@X + Y|I;

Matrix H .5

Matrix A 0

Option RS SE

End

G2 CALCULATION GROUP clinical group correlation matrix

DA CALC

MATRICES

A Lo 1 1 = A1

C Lo 1 1 = C1

H fu 1 1

I id 1 1

begin algebra;

X = A*A′;

Y = C*C′;

end algebra;

COMPUTE I|H@X + Y_

H@X + Y|I;

Matrix H 0.5

Option RS

End

G3 Evaluate model control group

Data NI = 6

ordinal fi = control.rec

Labels age1 age2 sex1 sex2 type dummy

Definition_variables age1 age2 sex1 sex2 type/

Matrices

A Full 2 2 = %E1 ! corr between A factors

I Iden 1 1

P Full 1 1 free! probability of getting A if above threshold (p in Table 3)

R Full 1 1 free! probability of getting B if above threshold (r in Table 3)

H Full 1 2 ! matrix for age definition variable

Y Full 1 2 ! matrix for sex definition variable

L Full 1 2 ! estimated threshold for A

O Full 1 2 ! age difference in threshold

N Full 1 2 ! sex difference in threshold

M Full 1 1 ! mean of dummy variable

V Full 1 1 ! variance of dummy variable

J Full 4 1 ! for extracting right part of K

W Full 1 1 ! 0 + + These are to control integral type

Z Full 1 1 ! 1 − −

begin algebra;

T = L + (H.O) + (Y.N); ! Threshold = estimated threshold + (age × age difference in threshold) + (sex × sex difference in threshold)

D = \muln((A_T_T_Z|Z)) ; !lower/lower (siblings 1 and 2 are below ! threshold); (LL in Table 3)

E = \muln((A_T_T_Z|W)); !lower/upper (sibling 1 is below threshold and ! sibling 2 is above threshold) (LU in Table 3)

F = \muln((A_T_T_W|Z)); !upper/lower (sibling 1 is above threshold and ! sibling 2 is below threshold) (UL in Table 3)

G = \muln((A_T_T_W|W)); !upper/upper (siblings 1 and 2 are above ! threshold) (UU in Table 3)

Q = I-P; ! ((1-p) in Table 3)

S = I-R; ! ((1-r) in Table 3)

K = D + F.Q.S + E.Q.S + G.Q.Q.S.S_ ! 1 (expected probability of 0000)

F.R.Q + G.R.Q.Q.S_ ! 2 (expected probability of 0100)

E.R.Q + G.R.Q.Q.S_ ! 3 (expected probability of 0001)

F.P.S + G.P.Q.S.S_ ! 4 (expected probability of 1000)

E.P.S + G.P.Q.S.S_ ! 5 (expected probability of 0010)

F.P.R + G.P.R.Q.S_ ! 6 (expected probability of 1100)

E.P.R + G.P.R.Q.S_ ! 7 (expected probability of 0011)

G.R.R.Q.Q_ ! 8 (expected probability of 0101)

G.P.R.Q.S_ ! 9 (expected probability of 1001)

G.P.R.Q.S_ ! 10 (expected probability of 0110)

G.P.R.R.Q_ ! 11 (expected probability of 1101)

G.P.R.R.Q_ ! 12 (expected probability of 0111)

G.P.P.S.S_ ! 13 (expected probability of 1010)

G.P.P.R.S_ ! 14 (expected probability of 1110)

G.P.P.R.S_ ! 15 (expected probability of 1011)

G.P.P.R.R; ! 16 (expected probability of 1111)

end algebra;

Matrix J 1 1 1 1

Matrix M 0

Matrix V .159154943

Matrix P .5

Matrix R .5

Matrix W 0

Matrix Z 1

Specify L 100 100

Specify O 101 101

Specify N 102 102

Matrix L 1.5 1.5

SP H age1 age2;

SP Y sex1 sex2;

SP J -5 0 -5 0;

Means M;

Covariance V;

Weight (\part(K,J)) /

!Option user-defined RS

Option RS

End

G4 Evaluate model clinical group

Data NI = 6

ordinal fi = clinical.rec

Labels age1 age2 sex1 sex2 type dummy

Definition_variables age1 age2 sex1 sex2 type /

Matrices

A Full 2 2 = %E2 ! corr between A factors

I Iden 1 1

P Full 1 1 = P3! probability of getting A if above thresh (p in Table 3)

R Full 1 1 = R3! probability of getting B if above thresh (p in Table 3)

H Full 1 2 ! matrix for age definition variable

Y Full 1 2 ! matrix for sex definition variable

L Full 1 2 = L3! estimated threshold for A

O Full 1 2 = O3! age difference in threshold

N Full 1 2 = N3! sex difference in threshold

M Full 1 1 ! mean of dummy variable

V Full 1 1 ! variance of dummy variable

J Full 4 1 ! for extracting right part of K

W Full 1 1 ! 0 + + These are to control integral type

Z Full 1 1 ! 1 − −

b full 1 1 ! ascertainment parameter for illicit drug dependence

c full 1 1 free ! ascertainment parameter for alcohol dependence

begin algebra;

T = L + (H.O) + (Y.N);

D = \muln((A_T_T_Z|Z)); !lower/lower (LL in Table 3)

E = \muln((A_T_T_Z|W)); !lower/upper (LU in Table 3)

F = \muln((A_T_T_W|Z)); !upper/lower (UL in Table 3)

G = \muln((A_T_T_W|W)); !upper/upper (UU in Table 3)

Q = I-P; ! ((1-p) in Table 3)

S = I-R; ! ((1-r) in Table 3)

K = b.(F.R.Q + G.R.Q.Q.S)_ ! 2 (expected probability of 0100)

c.(F.P.S + G.P.Q.S.S)_ ! 4 (expected probability of 1000)

(c).(F.P.R + G.P.R.Q.S)_ ! 6 (expected probability of 1100)

b.(G.R.R.Q.Q)_ ! 8 (expected probability of 0101)

c.(G.P.R.Q.S)_ ! 9 (expected probability of 1001)

b.(G.P.R.Q.S)_ ! 10 (expected probability of 0110)

(c).(G.P.R.R.Q)_ ! 11 (expected probability of 1101)

b.(G.P.R.R.Q)_ ! 12 (expected probability of 0111)

c.(G.P.P.S.S)_ ! 13 (expected probability of 1010)

(c).(G.P.P.R.S)_ ! 14 (expected probability of 1110)

c.(G.P.P.R.S)_ ! 15 (expected probability of 1011)

(c).(G.P.P.R.R); ! 16 (expected probability of 1111)

end algebra;

Matrix J 1 1 1 1

Matrix M 0

Matrix V .159154943

Matrix W 0

Matrix Z 1

Matrix b 1

Matrix c .5

SP H age1 age2;

SP Y sex1 sex2;

SP J -5 0 -5 0;

Means M;

Covariance V;

Weight (\part(K@\sum(K)∼),J)/

Option RS

Option Th = -3

End

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rhee, S.H., Neale, M.C., Corley, R.C. et al. The Inclusion of Measured Covariates in the Neale and Kendler Model Fitting Approach. Behav Genet 37, 423–432 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-006-9130-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-006-9130-3

Keywords

Navigation