Many ideas about sexual selection and speciation have been stimulated by considering Hawaiian Drosophila. In turn, the ideas and models have stimulated research with the flies, particularly members of the planitibia group. This paper describes high points of some of the models and reviews data that are relevant to understanding sexual selection and speciation in this species group.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
J. N. Ahearn A. R. Templeton (1989) ArticleTitleInterspecific hybrids of Drosophila heteroneura and D. silvestris. I. Courtship success Evolution 43 347–361
M. Andersson (1994) Sexual selection Princeton University Press Princeton, N.J
Boake, C. R. B. (2000). Flying apart: mating behaviour and speciation. Bioscience, 50:501–508.
C. R. B. Boake D. K. Andreadis A. Witzel (2000) ArticleTitleBehavioural isolation between two closely related Hawaiian Drosophila species: the role of courtship Anim. Behav. 60 495–501
C. R. B. Boake M. DeAngelis D. Andreadis (1997) ArticleTitleIs sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? Mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 12442–12445
C. R. B. Boake A. Hoikkala (1995) ArticleTitleCourtship behaviour and mating success of wild-caught Drosophila silvestris males Anim. Behav. 49 1303–1313
C. R. B. Boake L. Konigsberg (1998) ArticleTitleInheritance of male courtship behavior, aggressive success, and body size in Drosophila silvestris Evolution 52 1487–1492
C. R. B. Boake D. K. Price D. K. Andreadis (1998) ArticleTitleInheritance of behavioural differences between two interfertile, sympatric species, Drosophila silvestris and D. heteroneura Heredity 80 642–650
H. L. Carson (1982) ArticleTitleEvolution of Drosophila on the newer Hawaiian volcanoes Heredity 48 3–25
H. L. Carson P. J. Bryant (1979) ArticleTitleGenetic variation in Hawaiian Drosophila. VI. Change in a secondary sexual character as evidence of incipient speciation in Drosophila Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 1929–1932
H. L. Carson K. Y. Kaneshiro F. C. Val (1989) ArticleTitleNatural hybridization between the sympatric Hawaiian species Drosophila silvestris and Drosophila heteroneura Evolution 43 190–203
H. L. Carson R. Lande (1984) ArticleTitleInheritance of a secondary sexual character in Drosophila silvestris Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81 6904–6907
H. L. Carson A. R. Templeton (1984) ArticleTitleGenetic revolutions in relation to speciation phenomena: the founding of new populations Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15 97–131
H. L. Carson F. C. Val C. M. Simon J. W. Archie (1982) ArticleTitleMorphometric evidence for incipient speciation in Drosophila silvestris from the island of Hawaii Evolution 36 132–140
Conant, P. (1978). Lek behavior and ecology of two sympatric homosequential Hawaiian Drosophila: Drosophila heteroneura and Drosophila silvestris. MS thesis, University of Hawaii.
J. A. Coyne H. A. Orr (2004) Speciation Sinauer Associates, Inc Sunderland, MA
E. M. Craddock (1974) ArticleTitleReproductive relationships between homosequential species of Hawaiian Drosophila Evolution 28 593–606
R. DeSalle A. V. Z. Brower (1997) ArticleTitleProcess partitions, congruence, and the independence of characters: inferring relationships among closely related Hawaiian Drosophila from multiple gene regions Syst. Biol. 46 751–764
D. C. Droney (1994) ArticleTitleTests of hypotheses for lek formation in a Hawaiian Drosophila Anim. Behav. 47 351–361
L. Ehrman M. Wasserman (1987) ArticleTitleThe significance of asymmetrical sexual isolation Evol. Biol. 21 1–20
R. A. Fisher (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection Dover New York
Foote, D., and Carson, H. L. (1995). Drosophila as monitors of change in Hawaiian ecosystems. In E.T. LaRoe, and US National Biological Service (eds.), Our living resources – Hawaii: a report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals, and ecosystems. Washington: U.S. Department of Interior, pp. 368–372.
I. Fraser C. R. B. Boake (1997) ArticleTitleBehavioral isolation, test designs, and Kaneshiro’s hypothesis Am. Nat. 149 527–539
S. Gavrilets C. R. B. Boake (1998) ArticleTitleOn the evolution of premating isolation after a founder event Am. Nat. 152 706–716
R. J. Hodosh J. M. Ringo F. T. McAndrew (1979) ArticleTitleDensity and Lek Displays in Drosophila-Grimshawi (Diptera, Drosophilidae) Z. Tierpsychol. (J. Comp. Ethol.) 49 164–172
A. Hoikkala K. Kaneshiro (1993) ArticleTitleChange in the signal–response sequence responsible for asymmetric isolation between Drosophila planitibia and Drosophila silvestris Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 5813–5817
A. Hoikkala P. Welbergen (1995) ArticleTitleSignals and responses of females and males in successful and unsuccessful courtships of three Hawaiian lek-mating Drosophila species Anim. Behav. 50 177–190
R. R. Hoy A. Hoikkala K. Y. Kaneshiro (1988) ArticleTitleHawaiian courtship songs: evolutionary innovation in communication signals of Drosophila Science 240 217–219
M. P. Kambysellis E. M. Craddock (1991) ArticleTitleInsemination patterns in Hawaiian Drosophila species (Diptera: Drosophilidae) correlate with ovarian development J. Insect Behav. 4 83–100
K. Y. Kaneshiro (1976) ArticleTitleEthological isolation and phylogeny in the Planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila Evolution 30 740–745
K. Y. Kaneshiro (1980) ArticleTitleSexual isolation, speciation, and the direction of evolution Evolution 34 437–444
K. Y. Kaneshiro L. V. Giddings (1987) ArticleTitleThe significance of asymmetrical sexual isolation and the formation of new species Evol. Biol. 21 29–43
K. Y. Kaneshiro J. S. Kurihara (1981) ArticleTitleSequential differentiation of sexual isolation in populations of Drosophila silvestris Pac. Sci. 35 177–183
R. Lande (1981) ArticleTitleModels of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78 3721–3725
T. A. Markow (1987) ArticleTitleBehavioral and sensory basis of courtship success in Drosophila melanogaster Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84 6200–6204
E. Mayr (1963) Animal species and evolution Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
R. J. H. Payne D. C. Krakauer (1997) ArticleTitleSexual selection, space, and speciation Evolution 51 1–9
D. K. Price C. R. B. Boake (1995) ArticleTitleBehavioral reproductive isolation in Drosophila silvestris, D. heteroneura, and their F1 hybrids (Diptera: Drosophilidae) J. Insect Behav. 8 595–616
J. M. Ringo (1977) ArticleTitleWhy 300 species of Hawaiian Drosophila? The sexual selection hypothesis Evolution 31 694–696
T. E. Shelly (1988) ArticleTitleLek behaviour of Drosophila cnecopleura in Hawaii Ecol. Entomol. 13 51–55
H. T. Spieth (1978) ArticleTitleCourtship patterns and evolution of the Drosophila adiastola and planitibia species subgroups Evolution 32 435–451
A. R. Templeton (1977) ArticleTitleAnalysis of head shape differences between two interfertile species of Hawaiian Drosophila Evolution 31 630–641
A. R. Templeton (1979) ArticleTitleOnce again, why 300 species of Hawaiian Drosophila? Evolution 33 513–517
A. R. Templeton (1980) ArticleTitleThe theory of speciation via the founder principle Genetics 94 1011–1038
L. Tompkins S. P. McRobert K. Y. Kaneshiro (1993) ArticleTitleChemical communication in Hawaiian Drosophila Evolution 47 1407–1419
G. F. Turner M. T. Burrows (1995) ArticleTitleA model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260 287–292
F. C. Val (1977) ArticleTitleGenetic analysis of the morphological differences between two interfertile species of Hawaiian Drosophila Evolution 31 611–629
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boake, C.R.B. Sexual Selection and Speciation in Hawaiian Drosophila. Behav Genet 35, 297–303 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-3221-4
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-3221-4