Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual Selection and Speciation in Hawaiian Drosophila

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Many ideas about sexual selection and speciation have been stimulated by considering Hawaiian Drosophila. In turn, the ideas and models have stimulated research with the flies, particularly members of the planitibia group. This paper describes high points of some of the models and reviews data that are relevant to understanding sexual selection and speciation in this species group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • J. N. Ahearn A. R. Templeton (1989) ArticleTitleInterspecific hybrids of Drosophila heteroneura and D. silvestris. I. Courtship success Evolution 43 347–361

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Andersson (1994) Sexual selection Princeton University Press Princeton, N.J

    Google Scholar 

  • Boake, C. R. B. (2000). Flying apart: mating behaviour and speciation. Bioscience, 50:501–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. R. B. Boake D. K. Andreadis A. Witzel (2000) ArticleTitleBehavioural isolation between two closely related Hawaiian Drosophila species: the role of courtship Anim. Behav. 60 495–501

    Google Scholar 

  • C. R. B. Boake M. DeAngelis D. Andreadis (1997) ArticleTitleIs sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? Mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 12442–12445

    Google Scholar 

  • C. R. B. Boake A. Hoikkala (1995) ArticleTitleCourtship behaviour and mating success of wild-caught Drosophila silvestris males Anim. Behav. 49 1303–1313

    Google Scholar 

  • C. R. B. Boake L. Konigsberg (1998) ArticleTitleInheritance of male courtship behavior, aggressive success, and body size in Drosophila silvestris Evolution 52 1487–1492

    Google Scholar 

  • C. R. B. Boake D. K. Price D. K. Andreadis (1998) ArticleTitleInheritance of behavioural differences between two interfertile, sympatric species, Drosophila silvestris and D. heteroneura Heredity 80 642–650

    Google Scholar 

  • H. L. Carson (1982) ArticleTitleEvolution of Drosophila on the newer Hawaiian volcanoes Heredity 48 3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • H. L. Carson P. J. Bryant (1979) ArticleTitleGenetic variation in Hawaiian Drosophila. VI. Change in a secondary sexual character as evidence of incipient speciation in Drosophila Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 1929–1932

    Google Scholar 

  • H. L. Carson K. Y. Kaneshiro F. C. Val (1989) ArticleTitleNatural hybridization between the sympatric Hawaiian species Drosophila silvestris and Drosophila heteroneura Evolution 43 190–203

    Google Scholar 

  • H. L. Carson R. Lande (1984) ArticleTitleInheritance of a secondary sexual character in Drosophila silvestris Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81 6904–6907

    Google Scholar 

  • H. L. Carson A. R. Templeton (1984) ArticleTitleGenetic revolutions in relation to speciation phenomena: the founding of new populations Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15 97–131

    Google Scholar 

  • H. L. Carson F. C. Val C. M. Simon J. W. Archie (1982) ArticleTitleMorphometric evidence for incipient speciation in Drosophila silvestris from the island of Hawaii Evolution 36 132–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, P. (1978). Lek behavior and ecology of two sympatric homosequential Hawaiian Drosophila: Drosophila heteroneura and Drosophila silvestris. MS thesis, University of Hawaii.

  • J. A. Coyne H. A. Orr (2004) Speciation Sinauer Associates, Inc Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • E. M. Craddock (1974) ArticleTitleReproductive relationships between homosequential species of Hawaiian Drosophila Evolution 28 593–606

    Google Scholar 

  • R. DeSalle A. V. Z. Brower (1997) ArticleTitleProcess partitions, congruence, and the independence of characters: inferring relationships among closely related Hawaiian Drosophila from multiple gene regions Syst. Biol. 46 751–764

    Google Scholar 

  • D. C. Droney (1994) ArticleTitleTests of hypotheses for lek formation in a Hawaiian Drosophila Anim. Behav. 47 351–361

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Ehrman M. Wasserman (1987) ArticleTitleThe significance of asymmetrical sexual isolation Evol. Biol. 21 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • R. A. Fisher (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection Dover New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, D., and Carson, H. L. (1995). Drosophila as monitors of change in Hawaiian ecosystems. In E.T. LaRoe, and US National Biological Service (eds.), Our living resources – Hawaii: a report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals, and ecosystems. Washington: U.S. Department of Interior, pp. 368–372.

  • I. Fraser C. R. B. Boake (1997) ArticleTitleBehavioral isolation, test designs, and Kaneshiro’s hypothesis Am. Nat. 149 527–539

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Gavrilets C. R. B. Boake (1998) ArticleTitleOn the evolution of premating isolation after a founder event Am. Nat. 152 706–716

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Hodosh J. M. Ringo F. T. McAndrew (1979) ArticleTitleDensity and Lek Displays in Drosophila-Grimshawi (Diptera, Drosophilidae) Z. Tierpsychol. (J. Comp. Ethol.) 49 164–172

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Hoikkala K. Kaneshiro (1993) ArticleTitleChange in the signal–response sequence responsible for asymmetric isolation between Drosophila planitibia and Drosophila silvestris Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 5813–5817

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Hoikkala P. Welbergen (1995) ArticleTitleSignals and responses of females and males in successful and unsuccessful courtships of three Hawaiian lek-mating Drosophila species Anim. Behav. 50 177–190

    Google Scholar 

  • R. R. Hoy A. Hoikkala K. Y. Kaneshiro (1988) ArticleTitleHawaiian courtship songs: evolutionary innovation in communication signals of Drosophila Science 240 217–219

    Google Scholar 

  • M. P. Kambysellis E. M. Craddock (1991) ArticleTitleInsemination patterns in Hawaiian Drosophila species (Diptera: Drosophilidae) correlate with ovarian development J. Insect Behav. 4 83–100

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Y. Kaneshiro (1976) ArticleTitleEthological isolation and phylogeny in the Planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila Evolution 30 740–745

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Y. Kaneshiro (1980) ArticleTitleSexual isolation, speciation, and the direction of evolution Evolution 34 437–444

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Y. Kaneshiro L. V. Giddings (1987) ArticleTitleThe significance of asymmetrical sexual isolation and the formation of new species Evol. Biol. 21 29–43

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Y. Kaneshiro J. S. Kurihara (1981) ArticleTitleSequential differentiation of sexual isolation in populations of Drosophila silvestris Pac. Sci. 35 177–183

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Lande (1981) ArticleTitleModels of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78 3721–3725

    Google Scholar 

  • T. A. Markow (1987) ArticleTitleBehavioral and sensory basis of courtship success in Drosophila melanogaster Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84 6200–6204

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Mayr (1963) Animal species and evolution Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. H. Payne D. C. Krakauer (1997) ArticleTitleSexual selection, space, and speciation Evolution 51 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • D. K. Price C. R. B. Boake (1995) ArticleTitleBehavioral reproductive isolation in Drosophila silvestris, D. heteroneura, and their F1 hybrids (Diptera: Drosophilidae) J. Insect Behav. 8 595–616

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Ringo (1977) ArticleTitleWhy 300 species of Hawaiian Drosophila? The sexual selection hypothesis Evolution 31 694–696

    Google Scholar 

  • T. E. Shelly (1988) ArticleTitleLek behaviour of Drosophila cnecopleura in Hawaii Ecol. Entomol. 13 51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • H. T. Spieth (1978) ArticleTitleCourtship patterns and evolution of the Drosophila adiastola and planitibia species subgroups Evolution 32 435–451

    Google Scholar 

  • A. R. Templeton (1977) ArticleTitleAnalysis of head shape differences between two interfertile species of Hawaiian Drosophila Evolution 31 630–641

    Google Scholar 

  • A. R. Templeton (1979) ArticleTitleOnce again, why 300 species of Hawaiian Drosophila? Evolution 33 513–517

    Google Scholar 

  • A. R. Templeton (1980) ArticleTitleThe theory of speciation via the founder principle Genetics 94 1011–1038

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Tompkins S. P. McRobert K. Y. Kaneshiro (1993) ArticleTitleChemical communication in Hawaiian Drosophila Evolution 47 1407–1419

    Google Scholar 

  • G. F. Turner M. T. Burrows (1995) ArticleTitleA model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260 287–292

    Google Scholar 

  • F. C. Val (1977) ArticleTitleGenetic analysis of the morphological differences between two interfertile species of Hawaiian Drosophila Evolution 31 611–629

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine R. B. Boake.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boake, C.R.B. Sexual Selection and Speciation in Hawaiian Drosophila. Behav Genet 35, 297–303 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-3221-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-3221-4

KEY WORDS:

Navigation