Courtship song serves as a sexual signal and may contribute to reproductive isolation between closely related species. Using lines of Drosophila pseudoobscura experimentally selected under different sexual selection regimes, we tested whether increased promiscuity and enforced monogamy led to evolutionary changes in courtship song elements. In D. pseudoobscura, males produce both a low and high rate repetition song. We found that both song types diverged after selection and that the direction of changes was consistent with ordered hypotheses of predicted directions of change under the different mating system structures. In particular, latency to the initiation of song and duration of the interpulse interval (IPI) decreased in highly promiscuous lines and increased in monogamous lines. These results suggest that courtship song may rapidly evolve under different mating system structures, representing either functional evolution of more stimulatory song under conditions of strong sexual selection, or might result from increased courtship vigor, or represent correlated evolution. Some speciation theory predicts that increased sexual selection should result in increased variance of traits between allopatric populations, facilitating reproductive isolation. We also found that courtship song elements were not equally variable between replicate lines.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. W. Anderson (1974) ArticleTitleFrequent multiple insemination in a natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura Am. Nat 108 709–711
M. Andersson (1994) Sexual Selection Princeton University Press Princeton
J. Aspi A. Hoikkala (1993) ArticleTitleLaboratory and natural heritabilities of male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana and D. littoralis Heredity 70 400–406
J. Aspi A. Hoikkala (1995) ArticleTitleMale mating success and survival in the field with respect to size and courtship song characters in Drosophila littoralis and D. montana (Diptera: Drosophilidae) J. Insect. Behav. 8 v67–87
H. C. Bennet-Clark A. W. Ewing (1969) ArticleTitlePulse interval as a critical parameter in the courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster Anim. Behav. 17 755–759
T. R. Birkhead A. P. Møller (1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection Academic Press New York
C. R. B. Boake A. Hoikkala (1995) ArticleTitleCourtship behaviour and mating success of wild-caught Drosophila silvestris males Anim. Behav. 49 1303–1313
C. R. B. Boake T. Poulsen (1997) ArticleTitleCorrelates versus predictors of courtship success: courtship song in Drosophila silvestris and D. heteroneura Anim. Behav. 54 699–704
B. Burnet K. Connolly L. Dennis (1971) ArticleTitleThe function and processing of auditory information in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster Anim. Behav. 19 409–415
R. K. Butlin M. G. Ritchie (1994) Mating behaviour and speciation P. J. B. Slater T. R. Halliday (Eds) Behaviour and Evolution Cambridge University Press Cambridge 43–79
N. Colegrave H. Hollocher K. Hinton M. G. Ritchie (2000) ArticleTitleThe courtship song of African Drosophila melanogaster J. Evol. Biol. 13 143–150
D. E. Cowling B. Burnet (1981) ArticleTitleCourtship song and genetic control of their acoustic characteristics in sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup Anim. Behav. 29 924–935
Crudgington, H. S., Beckerman, A. P., Brüstle, L., Green, K., and Snook, R. R. (accepted). Experimental removal and elevation of sexual selection: Does sexual selection generate manipulative males and resistant females? Am. Nat.
C. Darwin (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex J. Murray London
Colegrave, N., Hollocher, H., Hinton, K., and Ritchie, M. G. (2000). The courtship song of African Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 13:143–150.
Cowling, D. E., and Burnet, B. (1981). Courtship song and genetic control of their acoustic characteristics in sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Anim. Behav. 29:924–935.
Crudgington, H. S., Beckerman, A. P., Brüstle, L., Green, K., and Snook, R. R. (Accepted) Experimental removal and elevation of sexual selection: Does sexual selection generate manipulative males and resistant females? Am. Nat.
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: J. Murray.
Eberhard, W. G. (1996). Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice, Princeton University Press.
A. W. Ewing (1964) ArticleTitleThe influence of wing area on the courtship behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster Anim. Behav. 12 316–320
A. W. Ewing (1969) ArticleTitleThe genetic basis of sound production in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis Anim. Behav. 17 555–560
A. W. Ewing H. C. Bennet-Clark (1968) ArticleTitleThe courtship songs of Drosophila Behaviour 31 288–301
S. Gavrilets (2000) ArticleTitleRapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict Nature 403 886–889
J. M. Gleason M. G. Ritchie (1998) ArticleTitleEvolution of courtship song and reproductive isolation in the Drosophila willistoni complex: do sexual signals diverge the most quickly? Evolution 52 1493–1500
M. Greenacre M. G. Ritchie B. C. Byrne C. P. Kyriacou (1993) ArticleTitleFemale song preference and the period gene of Drosophila melanogaster Behav. Genet. 23 85–90
M. Gorczyca J. C. Hall (1987) ArticleTitleThe Insectavox, an integrated device for recording and amplifying courtship songs of Drosophila Dros. Inf. Serv. 66 157–160
C. S. Henry (1994) ArticleTitleSinging and cryptic speciation in insects Trends Ecol. Evol. 9 388–392
A. Hoikkala (1985) ArticleTitleGenetic variation in the male courtship sound of D. littoralis Behav. Genet. 15 135–142
A. Hoikkala J. Aspi (1993) ArticleTitleCriteria of female mate choice in Drosophila littoralis, D. montana and D. ezoana Evolution 47 768–777
A. Hoikkala P. Welbergen (1995) ArticleTitleSignals and responses of females and males in successful and unsuccessful courtship of three Hawaiian lek-mating Drosophila species Anim. Behav. 50 177–190
A. Hoikkala L. Suvanto (1999) ArticleTitleMale courtship song frequency as an indicator of male mating success in Drosophila montana J. Insect Behav. 12 599–609
A. Hoikkala J. Aspi L. Suvanto (1998) ArticleTitleMale courtship song frequency as an indicator of male genetic quality in an insect species, Drosophila montana Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265 503–508
B. Holland W. R. Rice (1999) ArticleTitleExperimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 5083–5088
H. Hollocher C.-T. Ting F. Pollack C.-I. Wu (1997) ArticleTitleIncipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: variation in mating preference and correlation between the sexes Evolution 51 1175–1181
D. J. Hosken T. W. J. Garner P. I. Ward (2001) ArticleTitleSexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters Curr. Biol. 11 489–493
H. Ikeda O. Maruo (1982) ArticleTitleDirectional selection for pulse repetition rate of the courtship sound and correlated responses occurring in several characters in Drosophila mercatorum Jap. J. Genet. 57 241–258
A. G. Jones J. R. Arguello S. J. Arnold (2002) ArticleTitleValidation of Bateman’s principles: a genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269 2533–2539
A. G. Jones J. R. Arguello S. J. Arnold (2004) ArticleTitleMolecular parentage analysis in experimental newt populations: the response of mating system measures to variation in the operational sex ratio Am. Nat. 164 444–456
C. P. Kyriacou J. C. Hall (1982) ArticleTitleThe function of courtship song rhythms in Drosophila Anim. Behav. 30 794–801
J. Liimatainen A. Hoikkala J. Aspi P. Welbergen (1992) ArticleTitleCourtship in Drosophila montana: the effects of male auditory signals on the behaviour of flies Anim. Behav. 43 35–48
O. Y. Martin D. J. Hosken (2003a) ArticleTitleCosts and benefits of evolving under experimentally enforced polyandry or monogamy Evolution 57 2765–2772
O. Y. Martin D. J. Hosken (2003b) ArticleTitleThe evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict Nature 423 979–982
M. A. F. Noor C. F. Aquadro (1998) ArticleTitleCourtship songs of D.␣pseudoobscura and D. persimilis: analysis of variation Anim. Behav. 56 115–125
M. A. F. Noor M. A. Williams D. Alvarez M. Ruiz-Garcia (2000) ArticleTitleLack of evolutionary divergence in courtship song of Drosophila pseudoobscura subspecies J. Insect Behav. 13 255–262
G. A. Parker (1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict M. S. Blum N. A. Blum (Eds) Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects Academic Press New York 123–166
Partridge, L. and Parker, G. A. (1999). Sexual conflict and speciation. In Magurran, A. E. and May R. M. (eds.), Evolution of Biological Diversity. Oxford University Press, pp. 130–159.
S. Pitnick M. T. Miller J. Reagan B. Holland (2001a) ArticleTitleMales’ evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268 1071–1080
S. Pitnick W. D. Brown G. T. Miller (2001b) ArticleTitleEvolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268 557–563
W. R. Rice (1996) ArticleTitleSexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution Nature 381 232–234
Rice, W. R. (1998). Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. In Howard, D. J. and Berlocker, S. H. (eds.), Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. Oxford University Press, pp. 261–270.
W. Rice S. D. Gaines (1994) ArticleTitleExtending non-directional heterogeneity tests to evaluate simply ordered alternative hypotheses Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91 225–226
W. R. Rice B. Holland (1997) ArticleTitleThe enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41 1–10
M. G. Ritchie J. M. Gleason (1995) ArticleTitleRapid evolution of courtship song pattern in Drosophila willistoni sibling species J. Evol. Biol. 8 463–479
M. G. Ritchie C. P. Kyriacou (1996) ArticleTitleArtificial selection for a courtship signal in Drosophila melanogaster Anim. Behav. 52 603–611
M. G. Ritchie V. H. Yate C. P. Kyriacou (1994) ArticleTitleGenetic variability of the interpulse interval of courtship song among some European populations of Drosophila melanogaster Heredity 72 459–464
M. G. Ritchie R. M. Townhill A. Hoikkala (1998) ArticleTitleFemale preference for fly song: playback experiments confirm the targets of sexual selection Anim. Behav. 56 713–717
M. G. Ritchie E. J. Halsey J. M. Gleason (1999) ArticleTitleDrosophila song as a species-specific mating signal and the behavioural importance of Kyriacou and Hall cycles in D.␣melanogaster song Anim. Behav. 58 649–657
M. G. Ritchie M. Saarikettu S. Livingstone A. Hoikkala (2001) ArticleTitleCharacterisation of female preference functions for a sexually selected acoustic signal in D. montana, and a test of the “temperature coupling” hypothesis Evolution 55 721–727
Rowe, L., Cameron, E, and Day, T. (accepted). Escalation, retreat and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution. Am. Nat.
M. J. Ryan A. S. Rand (1995) ArticleTitleFemale responses to ancestral advertisement calls in tungara frogs Science 269 390–392
Simmons, L.W. (2001). Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects, Princeton University Press.
R. R. Snook (2001) ArticleTitleSexual selection: conflict, kindness, and chicanery Curr. Biol. 11 R337–341
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry, 2nd edition. W.H. Freeman and Co.
M. Tomaru M. Doi H. Higuchi Y. Oguma (2000) ArticleTitleCourtship song recognition in the Drosophila melanogaster complex: heterospecific songs make females receptive in D. melanogaster but not D. sechellia Evolution 54 1286–1294
I. Waldron (1964) ArticleTitleCourtship sound production in two sympatric sibling Drosophila species Science 144 191–193
S. Wigby T. Chapman (2004) ArticleTitleFemale resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict Evolution 58 1028–1037
G. S. Wilkinson (1987) ArticleTitleEquilibrium analysis of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster Evolution 41 11–21
M. A. Williams A. G. Blouin M. A. F. Noor (2001) ArticleTitleCourtship songs of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. II. Genetics of species differences Heredity 86 68–77
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Snook, R.R., Robertson, A., Crudgington, H.S. et al. Experimental Manipulation of Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Courtship Song in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Behav Genet 35, 245–255 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-3217-0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-3217-0