Skip to main content
Log in

2-D and 3-D basin site effects in Izmir-Bayrakli during the October 30, 2020 Mw7.0 Samos earthquake

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the October 30, 2020 Mw7.0 Samos Earthquake, the Turkiye-Izmir-Bayrakli district was affected the most due to the geometry and the deep-soft alluvial nature of the basin, although the district is approximately 70 km away from the epicenter. In this study, the seismic response of the Bayrakli basin, and the role of the soil stratigraphy and basin geometry on the recorded amplifications and prolonging of seismic shakings are investigated by using 1-, 2- and 3-D non-linear finite element-based dynamic response analyses. The assessment results are presented in the form of spectral amplification ratios, \(A\left(T\right)\). The highest \(A(T)\) values were estimated at spectral periods T = 0.85 and 1 s. They exceed five in both the east–west and the north–south directions, more pronounced in the latter one. \(A\left(T\right)\) was decomposed into the product of two independent amplification factors, namely rock to soil amplifications, \({A}_{Soil}(T)\), and 1-D soil column to 3-D soil basin amplifications, \({A}_{Basin}(T)\). \({A}_{Basin}(T)\) values for T = 0.85 and 1 s are estimated as high as 1.4 and 1.6, in the east–west and the north–south directions, respectively. These values suggest that the 3-D geometry of the Bayrakli basin amplifies the spectral accelerations by 40–60% at T = 0.85 and 1 s. The unique combination of a deep-soft alluvial site with 3-D basin geometry, and overlying 7–9 story residential buildings, consistently favors and amplifies the seismic energy in the spectral period range of 0.7–1.0 s. This multi-fold increased seismic demand, combined with poor structural design and construction details, lead to localized structural damage and over 117 life losses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and models analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Akgun A (2012) A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at Izmir, Turkey. Landslides 9:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgun M, Ozyalin S, Pamukcu O, Gonenc T, Ersay EY (2011) The geophysical methods applied in alluvial basin (A case study in Izmir). Int Multidiscip Sci Geoconf EXPO Mod Manag Mine Prod Geol Environ Prot SGEM 2:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Amorosi A, Boldini D, Elia G (2010) Parametric study on seismic ground response by finite element modelling. Comput Geotech 37:515–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin KO, Papadimitriou AG, Altun S, Pelekis P, Unutmaz B, Rovithis E et al (2021) The role of site effects on elevated seismic demands and corollary structural damage during the October 30, 2020, M70 Samos Island (Agean Sea) Earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01265-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin KO, Altun S, Askan A, Akgün M, Sezer A, Kıncal C et al (2022) The site effects in Izmir Bay of october 30 2020, M7.0 Samos earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 152:107051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.10705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin KO, Mylonakis G, Stewart JP (2020) Seismological and engineering effects of the M 7.0 Samos Island (Aegean Sea) Earthquake. Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance Association: Report GEER-069.

  • Cetin KO, Cakir E, Zarzour M (2023) Historical and futuristic perspectives on seismic site effects in Turkiye-Izmir-Bayrakli basin. Submitted to Bull Earthq Eng.

  • Hashash YMA, Musgrove MI, Harmon JA, Ilhan O, Xing G, Numanoglu O (2020) DEEPSOIL V7.0, User manual. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana

  • Joyner WB, Chen ATF (1975) Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:1315–1336

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincal C, Akgun A, Koca MY (2009) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Izmir (West Anatolia, Turkey) city center and its near vicinity by the logistic regression method. Environ Earth Sci 59:745–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiratzi A, Papazachos C, Özacar A, Pinar A, Kkallas C, Sopaci E (2021) Characteristics of the 2020 Samos earthquake (Aegean Sea) using seismic data. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01239-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlemeyer RL, Lysmer J (1973) Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. J Soil Mech Found Div 99(5):421–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • METU EERC (2020) The October 30, 2020 Izmir-Seferihisar Offshore (Samos) Earthquake (Mw=6.6) Reconnaissance observations and findings. Middle East Technical University Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Ankara

  • Ozdag OC, Gonenc T, Akgun M (2015) Dynamic amplification factor concept of soil layers: a case study in İzmir (Western Anatolia). Arab J Geosci 8:10093–10104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamuk E, Akgun M, Ozdag OC, Gonenc T (2017) 2D soil and engineering-seismic bedrock modeling of eastern part of Izmir inner bay/Turkey. J Appl Geophys 137:104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamuk E, Özdağ ÖC, Akgün M (2018a) Soil characterization of Bornova Plain (Izmir, Turkey) and its surroundings using a combined survey of MASW and ReMi methods and Nakamura’s (HVSR) technique. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:3023–3035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1293-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamuk E, Gonenc T, Ozdag OC, Akgun M (2018b) 3D Bedrock structure of Bornova Plain and its surroundings (İzmir/Western Turkey). Pure Appl Geophys 175:325–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaxis (2021) Plaxis 2D software reference manual

  • Riga E, Makra K, Pitilakis K (2016) Aggravation factors for seismic response of sedimentary basins: a code-oriented parametric study. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 91:116–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Plata R, Ozcebe AG, Smerzini C, Lai CG (2021) Aggravation factors for 2D site effects in sedimentary basins: the case of Norcia, central Italy. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 149:106854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schanz T, Vermeer PA, Bonnier PG (1999) The hardening soil model: formulation and verification. Beyond 2000 in computational geotechnics. In: Ten Years of PLAXIS International. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Amsterdam, March 1999 281–296

  • Schnabel PB, Seed HB (1973) Accelerations in rock for earthquakes in the western United States. Bull Seismol Soc Am 63(2):501–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB and Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center. University of California, Berkeley

  • Smerzini C, Paolucci R, Stupazzini M (2011) Comparison of 3D, 2D and 1D numerical approaches to predict long period earthquake ground motion in the Gubbio plain, Central Italy. Bull Earthq Eng 9:2007–2029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9289-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng 117(1):89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakut A, Sucuoğlu H, Binici B, Canbay E, Dönmez C, İlki A, Caner A, Celik OC, Ay BÖ (2021) Performance of structures in Izmir after the Samos island earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01226-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kemal Onder Cetin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 298 KB)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 2792 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cetin, K.O., Zarzour, M., Cakir, E. et al. 2-D and 3-D basin site effects in Izmir-Bayrakli during the October 30, 2020 Mw7.0 Samos earthquake. Bull Earthquake Eng 21, 5419–5442 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01738-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01738-3

Keywords

Navigation