Skip to main content
Log in

Fragility analysis of bridge pier supported on rocking shallow foundation under earthquake loading

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rocking shallow foundation (RSF) allows seismic protection of the superstructure by guiding the plastic hinge onto the soil. Fragility curves are probabilistic measures to estimate the likelihood that a structure and/or its components exceed a particular damage state for a given intensity measure. In this study, the fragility analysis of the bridge pier-RSF system is carried out to quantify the seismic damage in a probabilistic framework. The deterministic finite element model of the bridge pier-RSF system is created using BNWF modelling approach and is implemented in OpenSees platform. Five broadband and five pulse-type ground motions are selected from the PEER ground motion database and are modified to generate sixty more ground motions for the response analysis of the system. The probabilities of failure are evaluated using the Monte Carlo simulation technique considering four engineering design parameters, four model configurations and seventy ground motions for the three performance levels. Results of the analyses showed that the bridge pier-RSF system is more vulnerable in the case of pulse-type ground motions compared to the broadband-type. This study is an initial attempt to develop the fragility curves which will be helpful in the seismic vulnerability assessment of the bridge pier-RSF systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G, Loli M, Apostolou M, Gerolymos N (2010) Soil failure can be used for seismic protection of structures. Bull Earthq Eng 8(2):309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9145-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonellis G (2015) Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Bridges with Columns Supported on Rocking Foundations. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, USA

  • Boulanger RW, Curras CJ, Kutter BL, Wilson DW, Abghari A (1999) Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng ASCE 125(9):750–759. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:9(750)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW (2000) The PySimple1, QzSimple1, and TzSimple1 material documentation, Document for the OpenSees platform, http://opensees.berkeley.edu

  • Bozozuk L (1978) Bridge Foundation Move. Transportation Research Record No. 678, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 17–21

  • Deng L, Kutter BL, Kunnath SK (2012) Centrifuge modeling of bridge systems designed for rocking foundations. J Geotech GeoEnviron Eng 138(3):335–344. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng L, Kutter BL (2012) Characterization of rocking shallow foundations using centrifuge model tests. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 41:1043–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deviprasad BS, Dodagoudar GR (2020) Seismic response of bridge pier supported on rocking shallow foundation. Geomech Eng 21(1):73–84. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.21.1.073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deviprasad BS, Saseendran R, Dodagoudar GR (2021) Reliability Analysis of Bridge Pier Supported on Rocking Shallow Foundation Under Earthquake Loading. Int J Geomech ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz SA, Pujades LG, Barbat AH, Hidalgo-Leiva DA, Vargus-Alzate YF (2018) Capacity, damage and fragility models for steel buildings: a probabilistic approach. Bull Earthq Eng 16:1209–1243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0237-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elnashai A, Borzi B, Vlachos S (2004) Deformation-based vulnerability functions for RC bridges. Struct Eng Mech 17(2):215–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC8 (2003) Design of structures for Earthquake Engineering Resistance, Part 3: Strengthening and Repair of Buildings, EN, 1998–3 European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

  • FEMA 356 (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerolymos N, Giannakou A, Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G (2008) Evidence of beneficial role of inclined piles: observations and numerical results. Bull Earthq Eng 6(4):705–722 Special Issue: Integrated approach to fault rupture- and soil-foundation interaction

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerolymos N, Drosos V, Gazetas G(2009) Seismic response of single-column bent on pile: evidence of beneficial role of pile and soil inelasticity. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 7(2), 547–573, Special Issue: Earthquake Protection of Bridges, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9111-z

  • Giordano N, De Luca F, Sextos A (2021) Analytical fragility curves for masonry school building portfolios in Nepal. Bull Earthq Eng 19:1121–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00989-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herdrich B(2015) Parametric study of rocking shallow foundations under seismic excitation. M.S project report, Portland state university, Portland, USA

  • Hwang H, Jernigan J, Lin Y (2000) Evaluation of seismic damage to Memphis bridges and highway systems. J Bridge Eng ASCE 5(4):322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS 1893 (2016) Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong S, Elnashai A (2007) Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities. Eng Struct 29(6):1238–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SH, Feng MQ (2003) Fragility analysis of bridges under ground motion with spatial variation. Int J Non-Linear Mech 38:705–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7462(01)00128-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutter BL, Martin GR, Hutchinson T, Harden C, Gajan S, Phalen J (2006) Workshop on modeling of nonlinear cyclic load-deformation behavior of shallow foundations. PEER workshop Report No. 2005/14. University of California Berkeley, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu LL, Cheng YM (2020) System reliability analysis of soil slopes using an advanced kriging metamodel and quasi–Monte Carlo Simulation. Int J Geomech ASCE 06018019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001209

  • Mackie KR, Stojadinovic B (2005) Fragility basis for California Highway Overpass Bridge Seismic Decision Making. PEER, Report 2005/02. University of California Berkeley, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni P, Mangalathu S, Liu K (2020) Enhanced fragility analysis of buried pipelines through lasso regression. Acta Geotech 15(2):471–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0719-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni P, Mangalathu S, Yi Y (2018) Fragility analysis of continuous pipelines subjected to transverse permanent ground deformation. Soils Found 58(6):1400–1413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielson BG(2005) Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones. Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

  • Paolucci R (1997) Simplified evaluation of earthquake-induced permanent displacement of shallow foundations. J Earthquake Eng 1(3):563–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469708962378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecker A(2003) Aseismic foundation design process, lessons learned from two major projects: the Vascode Gama and the Rion Antirion bridges. ACI International Conference on Seismic Bridge Design and Retrofit, University of California, San Diego, USA

  • Pelekis I, McKenna F, Madabhushi GSP (2021) Finite element modeling of buildings with structural and foundation rocking on dry sand. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 50(12):3093–3115. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radu A, Grigoriu M (2018) An earthquake-source-based metric for seismic fragility analysis. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3771–3789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0341-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raychowdhury P(2008) Nonlinear Winkler-based shallow foundation model for performance assessment of seismically loaded structures. Ph.D Thesis, University of California, San Diego, USA

  • SDC 1.6 (2010) Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria version 1.6. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozuka M, Feng M, Lee J, Naganuma T (2000) Statistical Analysis of Fragility Curves. J Eng Mech ASCE 126(12):1224–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakut A, Solmaz T(2012) Performance based displacement limits for reinforced concrete columns under flexure. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 2012

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author thankfully acknowledges the scholarship for doctoral studies received from the Ministry of Education, Govt. of India.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [B S Deviprasad]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [B S Deviprasad] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. S. Deviprasad.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deviprasad, B.S., Saseendran, R. & Dodagoudar, G.R. Fragility analysis of bridge pier supported on rocking shallow foundation under earthquake loading. Bull Earthquake Eng 20, 6901–6917 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01463-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01463-3

Keywords

Navigation