Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Frequency versus Time Domain enhanced technique for response-only modal dynamic identification under seismic excitation

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, response-only system identification is explored towards estimating modal dynamic properties of buildings under earthquake excitation. Seismic structural response signals are adopted with two different implemented Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) techniques, namely a refined Frequency Domain Decomposition algorithm and an improved data-driven Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI-DATA) procedure, working in the Frequency Domain and in the Time Domain, respectively. These algorithms are specifically conceived to operate with seismic structural responses and at simultaneous heavy damping (in terms of identification challenge), towards achieving consistent estimations of natural frequencies, mode shapes and modal damping ratios. Classical OMA assumptions shall not contemplate short-duration, non-stationary earthquake-induced response signals. Nevertheless, the present enhanced output-only algorithms allow for estimating all strong ground motion modal parameters. First, a linear three-storey frame structure under ten selected earthquake base-excitations is considered, in order to assess the two OMA techniques at synthetic seismic response input. Comprehensive results are presented, by comparing the two developed methods, between achieved modal estimates and sought target values. Second, an existing instrumented building (CESMD database) is analyzed, by adopting real seismic response signals, reaching again effective modal estimates and corroborating the previous necessary condition analysis. According to this investigation, best up-to-date, re-interpreted, output-only techniques may effectively be used for potential Structural Health Monitoring purposes in the Earthquake Engineering range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bendat J, Piersol A (1986) Random data, analysis and measurements procedures. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindi D, Petrovic B, Karapetrou S, Manakou M, Boxberger T, Raptakis D, Pitilakis KD, Parolai S (2015) Seismic response of an 8-story RC-building from ambient vibration analysis. Bull Earthq Eng 13:2095–2120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2001) Modal identification of output-only systems using Frequency Domain Decomposition. Smart Mater Struct 10(3):441–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cara FJ, Juan J, Alarcon E, Reynders E, De Roeck G (2013) Modal contribution and state space order selection in Operational Modal Analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 38(2):276–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celebi M (1996) Comparison of damping in buildings under low-amplitude and strong motions. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 59(2):309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CESMD Database (2016) Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data (CESMD), a cooperative database effort from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), California Geological Survey (CGS) and Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS). http://www.strongmotioncenter.org. Accessed 30 June 2016

  • Ghahari SF, Abazarsa F, Ghannad MA, Taciroglu E (2013) Response-only modal identification of structures using strong motion data. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42(11):1221–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouache T, Morlier J, Michon G, Coulange B (2013), Operational Modal Analysis with non stationary inputs. In: Proceedings of the 5th international modal analysis conference (IOMAC-2013), vol 1, 13–15 May 2013, Guimaraes, Portugal, pp 1527–1534

  • Heylen W, Lammens S, Sas P (2006) Modal analysis theory and testing. Katholieke Universteit Leuven, Departement Werktuigkunde, Leuven, Belgium

  • Kun Z, Law S, Zhongdong D (2009) Condition assessment of structures under unknown support excitation. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 8(1):103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C, Hong L, Ueng Y, Wu K, Wang C (2005) Parametric identification of asymmetric buildings from earthquake response records. Smart Mater Struct 14(4):850–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoudabadi M, Ghafory-Ashtiany M, Hosseini M (2007) Identification of modal parameters of non-classically damped linear structures under multi-component earthquake loading. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(6):765–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall RD, Phan LT, Celebi M (1992) Measurement of structural response characteristics of full-scale buildings: comparison of results from strong-motion and ambient vibration records. US Department of Commerce—National Institute of Standards and Technology, Report No. NISTIR 4884 (online)

  • Michel C, Guéguen P, El Arem S, Mazars J, Panagiotis K (2010) Full-scale dynamic response of an RC building under weak seismic motions using earthquake recordings, ambient vibrations and modelling. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39(4):419–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Ntotsios E, Karakostas C, Lekidis V, Panetsos P, Nikolaou I, Papadimitriou C, Salonikos T (2009) Structural identification of Egnatia Odos bridges based on ambient and earthquake induced vibrations. Bull Earthq Eng 7:485–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pansieri S (2016) Time domain output-only modal dynamic Stochastic Subspace Identification algorithm for seismic applications, M.Sc. Thesis in Building Engineering, Advisor E. Rizzi, Co-advisor F. Pioldi, Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Scuola di Ingegneria, 29 March 2016, p 203

  • Peeters B (2000) System identification and damage detection in civil engineering. Ph.D. Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Departement Burgerlijke Bouwkunde, Leuven, Belgium

  • Peeters B, De Roeck G (1999) Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 13(6):855–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pioldi F, Rizzi E (2016a) A Full Dynamic Compound Inverse Method for output-only element-level system identification and input estimation from earthquake response signals. Comput Mech 58(2):307–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-016-1292-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pioldi F, Rizzi E (2016b) Full Dynamic Compound Inverse method: extension to general and Rayleigh damping. Comput Mech 59(4):539–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-016-1347-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pioldi F, Rizzi E (2017) A refined Frequency Domain Decomposition tool for structural modal monitoring in earthquake engineering. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 16(3):627–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-017-0394-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pioldi F, Ferrari R, Rizzi E (2015a) Output-only modal dynamic identification of frames by a refined FDD algorithm at seismic input and high damping. Mech Syst Signal Process 68–69(February 2016):265–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.07.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Pioldi F, Ferrari R, Rizzi E (2015b) Earthquake structural modal estimates of multi-storey frames by a refined FDD algorithm. J Vib Control 23(13):2037–2063. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546315608557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pioldi F, Salvi J, Rizzi E (2016) Refined FDD modal dynamic identification from earthquake responses with soil-structure interaction. Int J Mech Sci 127(July 2017):47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.10.032

    Google Scholar 

  • Pioldi F, Ferrari R, Rizzi E (2017) Seismic FDD modal identification and monitoring of building properties from real strong-motion structural response signals. Struct Control Health Monit e1982:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1982

  • Pridham B, Wilson J (2004) Identification of base-excited structures using output-only parameter estimation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(1):133–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainieri C, Fabbrocino G (2014) Operational Modal Analysis of civil engineering structures. An introduction and guide for applications. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynders E (2012) System identification methods for (Operational) Modal Analysis: review and comparison. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19(1):51–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevim B, Atamturktur S, Altunisik AC, Bayraktar A (2016) Ambient vibration testing and seismic behavior of historical arch bridges under near and far fault ground motions. Bull Earthq Eng 14:241–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger R, Feltrin G, Weber F, Nerbano S, Motavalli M (2016) Experimental modal analysis of a multi-storey light-frame timber building. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9828-9

  • Van Overschee P, De Moor B (1996) Subspace identification for linear systems—theory, implementation, applications. Kluwer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura CE, Brincker R, Andersen P (2005) Dynamic properties of the Painter Street Overpass at different levels of vibration. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on structural dynamics (EURODYN), vol 1. Paris, France, pp 167–172

  • Wang T, Zhang L, Tamura Y (2005) An operational modal analysis method in frequency and spatial domain. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 4(2):295–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by public research support from “Fondi di Ricerca d’Ateneo ex 60%” and a ministerial doctoral grant and funds at the ISA Doctoral School, University of Bergamo, Department of Engineering and Applied Sciences (Dalmine).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Egidio Rizzi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pioldi, F., Rizzi, E. Assessment of Frequency versus Time Domain enhanced technique for response-only modal dynamic identification under seismic excitation. Bull Earthquake Eng 16, 1547–1570 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0259-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0259-7

Keywords

Navigation