Skip to main content
Log in

An improved response spectrum method for non-classically damped systems

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A complex modal truncation augmentation method is proposed in the present study for the non-classically damped systems. Compared to the traditional mode displacement superposition approach, this method considers the contributions from the high vibration modes and can therefore increase the prediction accuracy of the structural responses. It can be regarded as an improvement of the traditional method. Based on this method, the conventional CCQC (Complex Complete Quadratic Combination) modal combination rule for the non-classically damped systems is extended to take into account the contributions of the truncated high vibration modes and the effects of narrow-band inputs on the modal cross-correlation coefficients. Moreover, a practical method is developed to estimate the velocity response spectrum that is required in the CCQC rule utilizing the commonly used displacement response spectrum based on the random vibration theory. Numerical results show that the extended CCQC rule can result in more accurate structural response estimations especially when the contributions from the high vibration modes to the structural responses cannot be neglected or when the structure is subjected to the seismic inputs with narrow band widths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clough RW, Penzien J (1991) Dynamics of structures. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell RE, Craig RR, Johnston CP (1983) On the application of the mode acceleration method to structural dynamics problems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 11:679–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport AG (1964) Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading. Proc Inst Civ Eng 28(2):187–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A (1980) Structural response to stationary excitation. J Eng Mech Div 106:1195–1213

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A (1981) A response spectrum method for random vibration analysis of MDF systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 9:419–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A, Nakamura Y (1993) CQC modal combination rule for high-frequency modes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 22:943–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhillep M, Bose PR (2008) A comparative study of “missing” correction methods for response spectrum method of seismic analysis. Comput Struct 86:2087–2094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens JM, Pool KV (1992) Modal truncation vectors and periodic time domain analysis applied to a cyclic symmetry structure. Comput Struct 45(4):685–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens JM, Nakagawa JM, Wittbrodt MJ (1997) A critique of mode acceleration and modal truncation augmentation methods for modal response analysis. Comput Struct 62(6):985–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elishakaff I, Lyon RH (1986) Random vibration-status recent developments. Elsvier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss FK (1958) Co-ordinates which uncouple the linear dynamic systems. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 24:361–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK, Jaw JW (1986) Response spectrum method for non-classically damped systems. Nuclear Eng Des 91:161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK, Hassan T, Gupta A (1996) Correlation coefficients for modal response combination of non-classically damped systems. Nuclear Eng Des 165:67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansteen OE, Bell K (1979) On the accuracy of mode superposition analysis in structural dynamics. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 7:405–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igusa T, Kiureghian AD, Sackman JL (1984) Modal decomposition method for stationary response of non-classically damped systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 12:121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaul MK (1978) Stochastic characterization of earthquakes through their response spectrum. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 6:497–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado GO, Singh MP (1991) An improved response spectrum method for calculating seismic design response. Part 2: non-classically damped structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 20:637–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekcan G, Mander JB, Chen SS (1999) Design and retrofit methodology for building structures with supplemental energy dissipation systems. In: Report Nos. 99-0021. MCEER, Buffalo

  • Ramirez OM, Constantinou MC, Kircher CA, Whittaker AS, Johnson MW, Gomez JD, Chrysostomou CZ (2000) Evaluation of simplified methods of analysis of yielding structures with damping systems. In: Report Nos. 00-0010. MCEER, Buffalo

  • Ruiz P, Penzien J (1969) Probabilistic study of behavior of structures during earthquakes. In: Report of Earthquake Engineering Research Center, No. EERC 69-3. University of California, Berkeley

  • Singh MP (1980) Seismic response by SRSS for non-proportional damping. J Eng Mech Div (ASCE) 106(6):1405–1419

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh MP, McCown BE (1986) Mode acceleration-based response spectrum approach for non-classically damped structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 5(3):226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song J, Chu Y, Liang Z, Lee GC (2007) Estimation of peak relative velocity and peak absolute acceleration of linear SDOF systems. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 6(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traill-Nash RW (1950) An analysis of the response of a damped dynamical system subjected to impress forces. Australian Department Supply, Aeronautica Research Laboratory, Report SM.151

  • Traill-Nash RW (1981) Modal methods in the dynamics of systems with non-classical damping. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 9:153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanmarcke EH (1972) Properties of spectral moments with applications to random vibration. J Eng Mech 98:425–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Veletsos AS, Ventura CE (1986) Modal analysis of non-classically damped linear systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 14:217–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villaverde R (1988) Rosenblueth’s modal combination rule for systems with non-classical damping. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16:315–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton GB, Soni SR (1977) Errors in response calculations for non-classically damped structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 5(4):365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Yu R, Dong D (2004) Complex mode superposition algorithm for seismic responses of non-classically damped linear MDOF system. J Earthq Eng 8(4):597–641

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of China (No. IRT13057). Special thanks to Professors Hong Hao and Kaiming Bi from the School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at Curtin University for their help in English language and valuable suggestions. The authors also wish to thank Professor Lingyun Peng from the College of Architecture and Civil Engineering at Beijing University of Technology for his help to check the formulas in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huating Chen.

Appendix

Appendix

The first n modal dynamic equations of Eq. (2) can be written in the form of matrix as follows

$${\dot{\mathbf{Z}}}_{L} (t) - {\varvec{\Lambda}}_{L} {\mathbf{Z}}_{L} (t) = - {\mathbf{a}}_{L}^{ - 1} {\varvec{\Psi}}_{L}^{\text{T}} {\mathbf{A}}{\varvec{\upiota}}\ddot{u}_{g} (t)$$
(32)

in which \({\mathbf{Z}}_{L} (t)\) is the modal coordinate vector and the subscript “L” denotes low modes. \({\varvec{\Lambda}}_{L}\) and \({\varvec{\Psi}}_{L}\) are spectrum matrix and the corresponding eigenvector matrix of the first n modes, respectively. \({\mathbf{a}}_{L} = {\varvec{\Psi}}_{L}^{\text{T}} {\mathbf{A}}{\varvec{\Psi}}_{L}\) is the diagonal matrix due to the orthogonality conditions of eigenvectors with respect to \({\mathbf{A}}\). Utilizing the eigenvalue equations, i.e. \({\mathbf{B}}{\varvec{\Psi}}_{L} = - {\mathbf{A}}{\varvec{\Psi}}_{L} {\varvec{\Lambda}}_{L}\), the premultiplication of Eq. (32) by \({\mathbf{A}}{\varvec{\Psi}}_{L}\) yields

$${\mathbf{A}}{\dot{\mathbf{v}}}_{L} + {\mathbf{Bv}}_{L} = - {\mathbf{A}}{\varvec{\Psi}}_{L} {\mathbf{a}}_{L}^{ - 1} {\varvec{\Psi}}_{L}^{\text{T}} {\mathbf{A}}{\varvec{\upiota}}\ddot{u}_{g} (t)$$
(33)

The above equations of motion are associated with the first n modes, and its distribution vector to the seismic input is \({\mathbf{f}}_{L} { = }{\mathbf{A}}{\varvec{\Psi}}_{L} {\mathbf{a}}_{L}^{ - 1} {\varvec{\Psi}}_{L}^{\text{T}} {\mathbf{A}}{\varvec{\upiota}}\). Thus, the spatial distribution vector of earthquake loading corresponding to the high vibration modes can be expressed by

$${\mathbf{f}}_{H} = \left( {{\mathbf{I}} - {\mathbf{A}}{\varvec{\Psi}}_{L} {\mathbf{a}}_{L}^{ - 1} {\varvec{\Psi}}_{L}^{\text{T}} } \right){\mathbf{A}}{\varvec{\upiota}}$$
(34)

or

$${\mathbf{f}}_{H} = \left[ {{\mathbf{I}} - {\mathbf{A}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {\frac{{{\varvec{\uppsi}}_{i} {\varvec{\uppsi}}_{i}^{\text{T}} }}{{a_{i} }} + \frac{{{\bar{\varvec{\uppsi}}}_{i} {\bar{\varvec{\uppsi}}}_{i}^{\text{T}} }}{{\bar{a}_{i} }}} \right)} } \right]{\mathbf{A}}{\varvec{\upiota}}$$
(35)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Tan, P. & Zhou, F. An improved response spectrum method for non-classically damped systems. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 4375–4397 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0144-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0144-4

Keywords

Navigation