Skip to main content
Log in

On the variability of concrete strength as a source of irregularity in elevation for existing RC buildings: a case study

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A proper assumption of the concrete strength is essential to model existing RC structures; their seismic performance, in fact, can be affected by the poor quality of materials, both in terms of low strength and high variability. This paper considers the effects of the variability of concrete strength within buildings. Due to the high variability of concrete strength, in fact, buildings can experience irregular seismic responses, both in plan and in elevation. This research investigates the effects of irregularity in elevation due to the strength variability of concrete in a case study, namely a four-storey RC framed building, designed for vertical loads only. The variability of the concrete strength has been evaluated on the basis of an extensive survey carried out by the REGIONE TOSCANA (Tuscany Regional Government) on a large sample of RC framed buildings. Special attention has been paid to the adequacy of current codes provisions (Eurocodes, FEMA) on how to quantify concrete strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cosenza E, Monti G (2009) Assessment and reduction of the vulnerability of existing reinforced concrete buildings. Atti Convegno finale ReLuis, pp 51–110

  • Cristofaro MT (2009) Metodi di valutazione della resistenza a compressione del calcestruzzo di strutture in c.a. esistenti. PhD dissertation, Università di Firenze

  • D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano M, Tanganelli M (2008a) Analisi della risposta sismica di edifici esistenti irregolari: un caso di studio. In: Cosenza E, Manfredi G, Monti G (eds) Proceedings of Reluis2Rm08 “Valutazione e riduzione della vulnerabilità sismica di edifici esistenti in c.a”, Rome, 29–30 May 2008. Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher. ISBN 978-88-7699-129-5, pp 299–306

  • D’Ambrisi A, Cristofaro MT, De Stefano M (2008b) Modelli previsionali della resistenza a compressione del calcestruzzo in strutture esistenti. In: Cosenza E, Manfredi G, Monti G (eds) Proceedings of Reluis2Rm08 “Valutazione e riduzione della vulnerabilità sismica di edifici esistenti in c.a”, Rome, 29–30 May 2008. Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher. ISBN: 978-88-7699-129-5, pp 73–80

  • D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano M, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2010) Seismic performance of irregular 3D RC existing frames. In: Proceedings of 14th ECEE, Ohrid, 30/08-03/09

  • D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano M, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2013a) Sensitivity of seismic performance of existing framed RC structures to irregular mechanical properties. In: Lavan O, De Stefano M (eds) Seismic behaviour and design of irregular and complex civil structures. Geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering, vol 24. ISBN: 978-94-007-5377-8

  • D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano M, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2013b) The effect of common irregularities on the seismic performance of existing RC framed buildings. In: Lavan O, De Stefano M (eds) Seismic behaviour and design of irregular and complex civil structures. Geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering, vol 24. ISBN 978-94-007-5377-8

  • De Stefano M, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2012) Effect of the variability in plan of concrete mechanical properties on the seismic response of existing RC framed structures. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-012-9412-5

  • EC 8-3 (2005) Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 3: strengthening and repair of buildings. European standard EN 1998-3. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels

  • Fardis MN (2009) Seismic design, assessment and retrofitting of concrete buildings: based on EN-Eurocode 8. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 356, American Society of Civil Engineering (2000) Prestandard for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Reston, Virginia

  • Franchin P, Pinto PE, Rajeev P (2007) Confidence factor? J Earthq Engi 14(7):989–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franchin P, Pinto PE, Rajeev P (2009) Confidence in the confidence factor. In: Proceedings of Eurocode 8 perspectives from the Italian standpoint workshop, pp 25–38, Naples, Italy

  • Itaca (2008) Database of the Italian strong motions data. http://itaca.mi.ingv.it

  • Jalayer F, Elefante L, Iervolino I, Manfredi G (2009) Confidence factors and structural reliability. In: Proceedings of Eurocode 8 perspectives from the Italian standpoint workshop, pp 25–38, Naples, Italy

  • Jalayer F, Iervolino I, Manfredi G (2010) Structural modeling: uncertainties and their influence on seismic assessment of existing RC structures. Struct Saf 32:220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliulo G, Maddaloni G, Cosenza E (2007) Comparison between non linear dynamic analysis performed according to EC8 and elastic and non linear static analyses. Eng Struct 29:2893–2900. doi:10.1002/j.engstruct.2007.01.027

    Google Scholar 

  • Magliulo G, Capozzi V, Ramasco R (2012) Seismic performance of R/C frames with overstrength discontinuities in elevation. Bull Earthq Eng 10(2):679–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Div ASCE 114:1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marano GC, Quaranta G, Mezzina M (2008) Hybrid technique for partial safety factors calibration. In: Cosenza E, Manfredi G, Monti G (eds) Proceedings of Reluis2Rm08 “Valutazione e riduzione della vulnerabilità sismica di edifici esistenti in c.a”, Rome, 29–30 May 2008. Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher. ISBN: 978-88-7699-129-5, pp 109–120

  • Masi A, Vona M (2009) Estimation of the in-situ concrete strength: provisions of the European and Italian seismic codes and possible improvements. In: Proceedings of Eurocode 8 perspectives from the Italian standpoint workshop, pp 67–77, Naples, Italy

  • Masi A, Vona M, Manfredi V (2008) A parametric study on RC existing buildings to compare different analysis methods considered in the European seismic code (EC8-3). In: Proceedings of 14 WCEE, Beijing, China

  • Monti G, Alessandri S, Goretti A (2007) Livelli di conoscenza e fattori di confidenza. XII Convegno ANIDIS, L’ingegneria sismica in Italia. Pisa, 10–14 June 2007

  • OPCM 3274/03 (2003) Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica, Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, n. 105 del 8 Maggio 2003. Suppl. Ordinario n. 72, Roma

  • Rajeev P, Franchin P, Pinto PE (2010) Review of confidence factor in EC8-Part 3: a European code for seismic assessment of existing buildings. In: Proceedings of international conference on sustainable built environment ICSBE 2010. Kandy, Sri Lanka

  • Seismosoft (2004) Seismostruct—a computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures (online). Available from http://seismosoft.com, v. 5.2.1 released 2011

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the project DPC-ReLUIS 2010/2013 Task 1.1.2. “Strutture in cemento armato ordinarie e prefabbricate”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Viti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Stefano, M., Tanganelli, M. & Viti, S. On the variability of concrete strength as a source of irregularity in elevation for existing RC buildings: a case study. Bull Earthquake Eng 11, 1711–1726 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9463-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9463-2

Keywords

Navigation