Skip to main content
Log in

Ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian strong motion database

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a set of ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) derived for the geometrical mean of the horizontal components and the vertical, considering the latest release of the strong motion database for Italy. The regressions are performed over the magnitude range 4–6.9 and considering distances up to 200 km. The equations are derived for peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV) and 5%-damped spectral acceleration at periods between 0.04 and 2 s. The total standard deviation (sigma) varies between 0.34 and 0.38 log10 unit, confirming the large variability of ground shaking parameters when regional data sets containing small to moderate magnitude events (M < 6) are used. The between-stations variability provides the largest values for periods shorter than 0.2 s while, for longer periods, the between-events and between-stations distributions of error provide similar contribution to the total variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA, Youngs RR (1992) A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82: 505–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2010) Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region and the Middle East. Seismol Res Lett 81: 195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S, Çagnan Z, Yenier E, Sandıkkaya A, Sandıkkaya A, Gülkan P (2010) The recently compiled Turkish strong motion database: preliminary investigation for seismological parameters. J Seismol 14: 457– 479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S, Cagnan Z (2010) A local ground-motion predictive model for Turkey and its comparison with other regional and global ground-motion models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100: 2978–2995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Atik L, Abrahamson N, Bommer JJ, Scherbaum F, Cotton F, Kuehn N (2010) The variability of ground-motion prediction models and its components. Seismol Res Lett 81: 794–801. doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.5.794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ameri G, Massa M, Bindi D, D’Alema E, Gorini A, Luzi L, Marzorati S, Pacor F, Paolucci R, Puglia R, Smerzini C (2009) The 6 April 2009 Mw 6.3 L’Aquila (Central Italy) Earthquake: strong-motion observations. Seismol Res Lett 80: 951–966. doi:10.1785/gssrl.80.6.951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer K, Bommer JJ (2006) Relationships between median values and between aleatory variabilities for different definitions of the horizontal component of motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96: 1512–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bindi D, Luzi L, Pacor F, Franceschina G, Castro RR (2006) Ground-motion prediction from empirical attenuation relationships versus recorded data: the case of the 1997–1998 Umbria-Marches, Central Italy, strong motion data set. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(3): 984–1002. doi:10.1785/0120050102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bindi D, Luzi L, Pacor F (2009) Interevent and interstation variability computed for the Italian accelerometric archive (ITACA). Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(4): 2471–2488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bindi D, Luzi L, Massa M, Pacor F (2010) Horizontal and vertical ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian accelerometric archive (ITACA). Bull Earthq Eng 8: 1209–1230. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9130-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-Motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 100 s. Earthq Spectra 24: 99–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro RR, Pacor F, Bindi D, Franceschina G, Luzi L (2004) Site response of strong motion stations in the Umbria Region, Central Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94: 576–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (2003) prEN 1998-1- Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Draft No 6, Doc CEN/TC250/SC8/N335, January 2003, Brussels

  • Douglas J (2007) On the regional dependence of earthquake response spectra: ISET. J Earthq Technol 44(1): 471–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, ISBN 978-0412042317, 456 pp

  • Foti S, Parolai S, Bergamo P, Di Giulio G, Maraschini M, Milana G, Picozzi M, Puglia R (2011) Surface wave surveys for seismic site characterization of accelerometric stations in ITACA. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-011-9306-y

  • Luzi L, Bindi D, Franceschina G, Pacor F, Castro RR (2005) Geotechnical site characterisation in the Umbria Marche area and evaluation of earthquake site-response. Pure Appl Geoph 162: 2133–2161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luzi L, Sabetta F, Hailemikael S, Bindi D, Pacor F, Mele F (2008) ITACA (ITalian ACcelerometric Archive): a web portal for the dissemination of Italian strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 79(5): 717–723. doi:10.1785/gssrl.79.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menke W (1989) Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory. In: Dmowska R, Holton JR (Eds) Int Geophys Series, vol 45. Academic Press, New York, 289 pp

  • Pacor F, Paolucci R, Ameri G, Massa M, Puglia R (2011) Italian strong motion records in ITACA: overview and record processing, Bull Earth Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-011-9295-x

  • Paolucci R, Pacor F, Puglia R, Ameri G, Cauzzi C, Massa M (2011) Record processing in ITACA, the new Italian strong-motion database. In: Akkar S, Gulkan P, Van Eck T (eds) Earthquake data in engineering seismology. Predictive models, data management and networks. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering series, Vol. 14, Chapter 8. Springer, pp 99–113

  • Rovelli A, Caserta A, Marra F, Ruggiero V (2002) Can seismic waves be trapped inside an inactive fault zone? The case study of Nocera Umbra, Central Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92: 2217–2232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovelli A, Scognamiglio L, Marra F, Caserta A (2001) Edge diffracted 1-sec surface waves observed in a small-size intramountain basin (Colfiorito, central Italy). Bull Seismol Soc Am 91: 1851–1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of non-stationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(2): 337–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessel P, Smith WHF (1991) Free software helps map and display data. Eos Trans AGU 72(41): 445–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoback ML (1992) First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: the world stress map project. J Geophys Res 97(B8): 11,703–11,728

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Bindi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bindi, D., Pacor, F., Luzi, L. et al. Ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian strong motion database. Bull Earthquake Eng 9, 1899–1920 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9313-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9313-z

Keywords

Navigation