Skip to main content
Log in

Earthquake induced ground strains in the presence of strong lateral soil heterogeneities

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transient ground strains are recognized to govern the response of buried elongated structures, such as pipelines and tunnels, under seismic wave propagation. Since a direct measure of ground strains is not generally available, simplified formulas relating peak ground strain to peak ground velocity, and based on 1D wave propagation theory in homogeneous media, are typically used for seismic design. Although they are adopted by most of the available technical guidelines, the use of these formulas may be questionable in complex realistic situations as either in the presence of strong lateral discontinuities, or in the epicentral area of large earthquakes, or in sites where relevant site amplification effects and spatial incoherency of ground motion are expected. To provide a contribution to overcome the previous limitations, a simplified formula relating peak ground longitudinal strain to peak ground velocity is proposed in this paper, as a function of the geometrical and dynamic parameters which have the major influence on strain evaluation. The formula has been obtained under small-strain assumptions, so that it can reasonably be applied under linear or moderately non-linear soil behaviour. The adequacy of this formula in the most common case of vertically propagating S-waves has been checked against 2D numerical solutions by Spectral Elements (SE) for representative geological cross-sections in Parkway Valley (New Zealand) and in the cities of Catania (Italy) and Thessaloniki (Greece). The shear strain and the longitudinal strain variability with depth is also investigated, through some qualitative examples and comparisons with analytical formulas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA (2003) Model for strains for transient ground motion. Proceedings of the workshop on the effects of earthquake-induced transient ground surface deformations at-grade improvements. CUREE. N. EDA-04, Oakland, CA, USA. curee.org/projects/EDA/docs/CUREE-EDA04.pdf

  • AFPS/AFTES (2001) Guidelines on earthquake design and protection of underground structures. Working group of the French Association for Seismic Engineering (AFPS) and French Tunneling Association (AFTES), Version 1, May 2001

  • ALA (American Lifelines Alliance) (2001) Guidelines for design of buried steel pipe. ASCE-FEMA

  • Ameri G, Pacor F, Cultrera G, Franceschina G (2008) Deterministic ground-motion scenarios for engineering applications: the case of Thessaloniki, Greece. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98: 1289–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasiadis A (2006) Personal communication, AUTH, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

  • Bodin P, Gomberg J, Singh SK, Santoyo MA (1997) Dynamic deformations of shallow sediments in the Valley of Mexico, Part I: three-dimensional strains and rotations recorded on a seismic array. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87: 528–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauzzi C (2002) Studio delle deformazioni indotte sulle condotte interrate in terremoti violenti nel territorio comunale di Catania. Thesis for the degree of environmental engineer, Department of Structural Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Italy

  • Chávez-García FJ, Stephenson WR, Rodríguez M (1999) Lateral propagation effects observed at Parkway, New Zealand. A case of history to compare 1D versus 2D site effects. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(3): 718–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Chávez García FJ, Castillo J, Stephenson WR (2002) 3D site effects: a thorough analysis of a high-quality dataset. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92(5): 1941–1951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2006) Eurocode 8—design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 4: Silos, tanks and pipelines, Final draft, prEN 1998-4, January 2006, Comité Européen de normalisation, Brussels

  • Faccioli E, Maggio F, Paolucci R, Quarteroni A (1997) 2D and 3D elastic wave propagation by a pseudo-spectral domain decomposition method. J Seismol 1: 237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccioli E, Pessina V (1999) The Catania Project. Earthquake damage scenarios for a high risk area in the Mediterranean, Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti, CNR, Rome, 225 pp

  • Fletcher JB, Spudich P, Baker LM (2006) Rupture propagation of the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake from observations at the UPSAR. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96: 129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashash YMA, Hook JJ, Schmidt B, Yao JI-C (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunnel Undergr Technol 16: 247–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1967) Problems in wave propagation in soil and rocks. Proceedings of the international symposium on wave propagation and dynamic properties of earth materials, University of New Mexico Press, 7–26

  • O’Rourke MJ, Deyoe E (2004) Seismic damage to segmented buried pipe. Earthquake Spectra 20(4): 1167–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke MJ, Liu X (1999) Response of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake effects. Monograph series MCEER

  • Paolucci R, Pitilakis KD (2007) Seismic risk assessment of underground structures under transient ground deformations. In: Pitilakis KD (eds) Earthquake geotechnical engineering. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 433–459

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci R, Smerzini C (2008) Earthquake induced ground strains from dense seismic networks. Earthquake Spectra 23(2): 453–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raptakis D, Makpa K, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K (2004) Complex site effects in Thessaloniki (Greece): I. soil structure and comparison of observations with 1D analysis. Bull Earthquake Eng 2: 271–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. John CM, Zarah TF (1987) A seismic design of underground structures. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol 2: 165–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takada S, Hassani L, Fukuda K (2002) Damage directivity in buried pipelines of Kobe city during the 1995 earthquake. J Earthquake Eng 6(1): 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trifunac MD, Todorovska MI (1997) Northridge, California, earthquake of 1994: density of pipe breaks and surface strains. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 16: 193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh GCK (1974) Seismic analysis of slender buried beams. Bull Seismol Soc Am 64: (5), 1551–1562

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Haines J (2003) The choice of reference sites for seismic ground amplification analysis: case study at Parkway, New Zealand. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(2): 713–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerva A (2003) Transient seismic ground strains: estimation, modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of the workshop on the effect of earthquake-induced transient ground surface deformations on at grade improvements, CUREE publication N. EDA-04, http://curee.org/projects/EDA/docs/CUREE-EDA04.pdf, Oakland, California

  • Zerva A, Harada T (1997) Effect of surface layer stochasticity on seismic ground motion coherence and strain estimate. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 16: 445–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Scandella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scandella, L., Paolucci, R. Earthquake induced ground strains in the presence of strong lateral soil heterogeneities. Bull Earthquake Eng 8, 1527–1546 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9186-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9186-6

Keywords

Navigation