Skip to main content
Log in

Equilibrium in safe strategies

  • Modeling of Behavior and Intelligence
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interaction of many participants dividing among themselves a resource located on a certain set is investigated. For the problem stated, the Mash equilibrium does not exist in most of the cases, but at the same time there is an intuitively perceived stable rational behavior of participants, which relies on the reflexive accounting of mutual threats. For the description of such a behavior, the definition is set up of an equilibrium in safe strategies (ESS’s), which coincides with the strict Nash equilibrium where it is available and exists for those situations in the stated problem where it is unavailable. Using the introduced definition, the initial problem is examined. The introduced equilibrium is also illustrated by examples of bimatrix games, a competitive system of stimulation, and a game in which the ESS’s does not exist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Aleskerov, F.T. and Orteshuk, P., Vybory. Golosovanie. Partii (Elections, Voting, Parties), Moscow: Akademiya, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Downs, A., An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper and Row, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mas-Collel, A., Whinston, M.D., and Green, G.R., Microeconomic Theory, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brams, S.J. and Taylor, A.D., Win-Win Solution Guaranteeing Fair Shares to Everybody, NewYork: W.W. Norton and Co., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sandak, N.N., Competitive Systems, in Aktivnye sistemy, no. 2 “Problemy i metody upravleniya v aktivnykh sistemakh” (Active Systems. Collection of Articles no. 2 “Problems and Methods of Control in Active Systems,”) Moscow: Inst. Probl. Upravlen., 1974, pp. 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smol’yakov, E.R., An Extended Basic System of Equilibria and the Technique of a Solution of Noncooperative Games, Avtom. Telemekh., 2001, no. 11, pp. 145–153.

  7. Novikov, D.A. and Chkhartishvili, A.G., Refleksivnye igry, Seria “Upravlenie organizatsionnymi sistemami” (Reflexive Games. Series “Control of Organizational Systems”), Moscow: SINTEG, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Novikov, D.A. and Tsvetkov, A.V., Mekhanizmy stimulirovaniya v mnogoelementnykh organizatsionnykh sistemakh (Stimulation Mechanisms in Multicomponent Organizational Systems), Moscow: Apostrof, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vasil’ev, D.K., Zalozhnev, A.Yu., Novikov, D.A., and Tsvetkov, A.V., Tipovye resheniya v upravlenii proektami (Typical Solutions in Control of Projects), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Upravlen., 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tsyganov, V.V., Adaptivnye mekhanizmy v otraslevom upravlenii (Adaptive Mechanisms in Branch Control), Moscow: Nauka, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smol’yakov, E.R., Heuristic Procedures of Search for Equilibria in Noncooperative and Two-Person Zero-Sum Games, Avtom. Telemekh., 1996, no. 3, pp. 18–28.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, No. 3, 2005, pp. 139–153.

Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 by Iskakov.

This paper was recommended for publication by D.A. Novikov, a member of the Editorial Board

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iskakov, M.B. Equilibrium in safe strategies. Autom Remote Control 66, 465–478 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10513-005-0076-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10513-005-0076-3

Keywords

Navigation