References
Athens, L. (2015). Naturalistic inquiry. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 3161–3163). New York, NY: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosn006.pub2.
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234.
Campbell, R., Goodman-Williams, R., & Javorka, M. (2019). A trauma-informed approach to sexual violence research ethics and open science. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(23–24), 4765–4793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519871530.
Chauvette, A., Schick-Makaroff, K., & Molzahn, A. E. (2019). Open data in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406918823863. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918823863.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
Fonow, M. M., & Cook, J. A. (1991). Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147.
Johansson, E. E., Risberg, G., & Hamberg, K. (2003). Is qualitative research scientific, or merely relevant? Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 21(1), 10–14.
Lorenz, T. K. (2020). Reproducibility and registration in sexuality research [Guest Editorial]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(2), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01650-w.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. New York, NY: Wiley.
Perrier, L., Blondal, E., & MacDonald, H. (2020). The views, perspectives, and experiences of academic researchers with data sharing and reuse: A meta-synthesis. PLoS ONE, 15(2), e0229182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229182.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(11), 1451–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004.
Project MUSE. (2017). Open access for whom? Equity in open knowledge. Retrieved August 20, 2020, from https://about.muse.jhu.edu/muse/open-access-bibliography/.
Sakaluk, J. K. (2020). Getting serious about the assessment and promotion of replicable sexual science: A commentary on Wisman and Shrira (2020) and Lorenz (2020) [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01795-8.
Shuval, K., Harker, K., Roudsari, B., Groce, N. E., Mills, B., Siddiqi, Z., et al. (2011). Is qualitative research second class science? A quantitative longitudinal examination of qualitative research in medical journals. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016937.
Vicente-Saez, R., & Martinez-Fuentes, C. (2018). 2018/07/01/). Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, 88, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043.
Wisman, A., & Shrira, I. (2020). Sexual chemosignals: Evidence that men process olfactory signals of women’s sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 1505–1516.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article is a work of synthesis and thus does not involve research with human or animal participants.
Informed Consent
Informed consent is not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lorenz, T.K., Holland, K.J. Response to Sakaluk (2020): Let’s Get Serious About Including Qualitative Researchers in the Open Science Conversation. Arch Sex Behav 49, 2761–2763 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01851-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01851-3