Skip to main content
Log in

Response to Commentaries: Meta-Analysis of Probability Samples and Other New Evidence

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 12 June 2017

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. As defined in the target article, OBOR = (homosexuals’ older brothers ÷ homosexuals’ other siblings) ÷ (heterosexuals’ older brothers ÷ heterosexuals’ other siblings), where other siblings = older sisters + younger brothers + younger sisters. An OBOR of 1.00 represents no effect of sexual orientation; values over 1.00 are positive evidence for the fraternal birth order effect.

References

  • Bailey, J. M. (2017). The fraternal birth order effect is robust and important [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1115-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. M., Vasey, P. L., Diamond, L. M., Breedlove, S. M., Vilain, E., & Epprecht, M. (2016). Sexual orientation, controversy, and science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, 45–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, N. T., & Hurd, P. L. (2017). Fraternal birth order effects on personality: Will reasonable claims require extraordinary evidence? [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1109-z.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bearman, P. S., & Brückner, H. (2002). Opposite-sex twins and adolescent same-sex attraction. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1179–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R. (1997). Birth order and sibling sex ratio in homosexual versus heterosexual males and females. Annual Review of Sex Research, 8, 27–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R. (2004). Quantitative and theoretical analyses of the relation between older brothers and homosexuality in men. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 230, 173–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R. (2007). Older-sibling and younger-sibling sex ratios in Frisch and Hviid’s (2006) national cohort study of two million Danes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 860–863.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R. (2017). Fraternal birth order, family size, and male homosexuality: Meta-analysis of studies spanning 25 years. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1007-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R., & Bogaert, A. F. (1996). Homosexuality in men and number of older brothers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 27–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R., & Bogaert, A. F. (2004). Proportion of homosexual men who owe their sexual orientation to fraternal birth order: An estimate based on two national probability samples. American Journal of Human Biology, 16, 151–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2015). Commentary on Kishida and Rahman (2015), including a meta-analysis of relevant studies on fraternal birth order and sexual orientation in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1503–1509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. F. (2005). Sibling sex ratio and sexual orientation in men and women: New tests in two national probability samples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 111–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. F. (2010). Physical development and sexual orientation in men and women: An analysis of NATSAL-2000. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 110–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. F., Skorska, M. N., Wang, C., Gabrie, J., MacNeil, A. J., Hoffarth, M. R., VanderLaan, D. P., Zucker, K. J., & Blanchard, R. (2017). Male homosexuality and maternal immune responsivity to the Y-linked protein NLGN4Y. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1705895114

  • Breedlove, S. M. (2017). Prenatal influences on human sexual orientation: Expectations versus data. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1583–1592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R., Paterson, A. D., & Bogaert, A. F. (2002). How many gay men owe their sexual orientation to fraternal birth order? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 63–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deeks, J. J., Higgins, J. P. T., & Altman, D. G. (Eds.). (2011). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In J. P. T. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from http://handbook.cochrane.org/.

  • Erens, B., McManus, S., Field, J., Korovessis, C., Johnson, A., Fenton, K., & Wellings, K. (2001). National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles II: Technical Report. London: National Centre for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, A. M. (2008). Family and sexual orientation: The family-demographic correlates of homosexuality in men and women. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 371–377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, M., & Hviid, A. (2006). Childhood family correlates of heterosexual and homosexual marriages: A national cohort study of two million Danes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 533–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, M., & Hviid, A. (2007). Reply to Blanchard’s (2007) “Older-Sibling and Younger-Sibling Sex Ratios in Frisch and Hviid’s (2006) National Cohort Study of Two Million Danes”. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 864–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilets, S., Friberg, U., & Rice, W. R. (2017). Understanding homosexuality: Moving on from patterns to mechanisms [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1092-4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. M. (2009). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994–1996; Wave III, 2001–2002; Wave IV, 2007–2009 [Machine-readable data file and documentation]. Chapel Hill: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. https://doi.org/10.3886/icpsr27021.v9.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. H., & Grech, V. (2017). Homosexual sons and the fraternal birth order effect: The role of elevated maternal intrauterine testosterone [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1113-3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. A. (2017). Why in utero and postnatal birth order effects may have different patterns [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1069-3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skorska, M. N., & Bogaert, A. F. (2017, July). The fraternal birth order effect and sibling sex ratio related to men’s sexual orientation in the Add Health data: A re-analysis and extended findings. Poster presented at the meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Charleston, SC.

  • Swift-Gallant, A., & Breedlove, S. M. (2017). O gay new world: Ramifications of the maternal immune hypothesis [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1118-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. R. (2003). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994–1996; Wave III, 2001–2002 [machine-readable data file and documentation]. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, C. H. (2017). Volvivity, femininity, fraternity: Breaching the sexual orientation fortress [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1101-7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wellings, K., Field, J., Johnson, A., & Wadsworth, J. (1994). Sexual behaviour in Britain: The National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, N. E. (2007). An antiboy antibody? Re-examination of the maternal immune hypothesis. Journal of Biological Science, 39, 905–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zietsch, B. P. (2017). Reasons for caution about the fraternal birth order effect [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1086-2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zietsch, B. P., Verweij, K. J. H., Heath, A. C., Madden, P. A. F., Martin, N. G., Nelson, E. C., & Lynskey, M. T. (2012). Do shared etiological factors contribute to the relationship between sexual orientation and depression? Psychological Medicine, 42, 521–532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ray Blanchard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blanchard, R. Response to Commentaries: Meta-Analysis of Probability Samples and Other New Evidence. Arch Sex Behav 47, 49–57 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1134-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1134-y

Keywords

Navigation