Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Partner Beauty on Opposite-Sex Attractiveness Judgments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies show mate choice copying effects on mate preferences in non-human species in which individuals follow or copy the mate choices of same-sex conspecifics. Recent studies suggest that social learning also influences mate preferences in humans. Studies on heterosexual humans have focused on rating the attractiveness of potential mates (targets) presented alongside individuals of the opposite sex to the target (models). Here, we examined several different types of pairing to examine how specific social learning is to mate preferences. In Study 1, we replicated a previous effect whereby target faces of the opposite sex to the subject were rated as more attractive when paired with attractive than unattractive partner models of the same sex as the subject. Using the same paired stimuli, Study 2 demonstrated no effect of a paired model if subjects were asked to rate targets who were the same sex as themselves. In Study 3, we used pairs of the same sex, stating the pair were friends, and subjects rated targets of the opposite sex to themselves. Attractive models decreased targets’ attractiveness, opposite to the effect in Study 1. Finally, Study 4 examined if attractive versus unattractive non-face stimuli might influence attraction. Unlike in Study 1, pairing with attractive stimuli either had no effect or decreased the attractiveness of paired target face images. These data suggest that social transmission of preferences via pairing with attractive/unattractive images is relatively specific to learning about mate preferences but does not influence attractiveness judgments more generally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, G. R., & Fawcett, T. W. (2005). Sexual selection: Copycat mating in birds. Current Biology, 15, R626–R628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin, L. A. (2000). The imitation factor: Evolution beyond the gene. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin, L. A., & Godin, J. G. J. (1992). Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia-Reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 249, 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin, L. A., & Godin, J. G. J. (1993). Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia-Reticulata)—age-dependent effects. Behavioral Ecology, 4, 289–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., & Wood, T. J. (2006). Are all the taken men good? An indirect examination of mate-choice copying in humans. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 175, 1573–1574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galef, B. G., & Laland, K. N. (2005). Social learning in animals: Empirical studies and theoretical models. BioScience, 55, 489–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galef, B. G., & White, D. J. (1998). Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica. Animal Behaviour, 55, 545–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman, R. E., Haight, N. A., & Kimata, L. G. (1984). Context effects on the perceived physical attractiveness of faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin, J. G. J., Herdman, E. J. E., & Dugatkin, L. A. (2005). Social influences on female mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata: Generalized and repeatable trait-copying behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 69, 999–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. E., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: Opposite effects for men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 635–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoglund, J., Alatalo, R. V., Gibson, R. M., & Lundberg, A. (1995). Mate-choice copying in black grouse. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1627–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., & Feinberg, D. R. (2007). Social transmission of face preferences among humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 274, 899–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Watkins, C. D., & Feinberg, D. R. (2011). ‘Eavesdropping’ and perceived male dominance rank in humans. Animal Behaviour, 81, 1203–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallamm, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Caldwell, C. A. (2008). Social influence in human face preference: Men and women are influenced more for long-term than short-term attractiveness decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 268, 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Caldwell, C. A. (2011). Social learning and human mate preferences: A potential mechanism for generating and maintaining between-population diversity in attraction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 366, 366–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., & Mannion, H. (2006). Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex individuals changes self-rated attractiveness and face preferences in women. Animal Behaviour, 72, 981–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., et al. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741–742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D. R., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2010). Humans show mate copying after observing real mate choices. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 320–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, D. A., & Perrett, D. I. (1995). Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 15, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlupp, I., & Ryan, M. J. (1997). Male sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) copy the mate choice of other males. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 104–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigall, H., & Landy, D. (1973). Radiating beauty: Effects of having a physically attractive partner on person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 218–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaddle, J. P., Cathey, M. G., Correll, M., & Hodkinson, B. P. (2005). Socially transmitted mate preferences in a monogamous bird: A non-genetic mechanism of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 272, 1053–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Prototyping and transforming facial texture for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21, 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uller, T., & Johansson, L. C. (2003). Human mate choice and the wedding ring effect: Are married men more attractive? Human Nature, 14, 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, S. G. (1972). Assortative mating or who marries whom? Behavior Genetics, 2, 127–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waynforth, D. (2007). Mate choice copying in humans. Human Nature, 18, 264–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, D. H., Parducci, A., & Geiselman, R. E. (1987). A formal analysis of ratings of physical attractiveness: Successive contrast and simultaneous assimilation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 230–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, D. J. (2004). Influences of social learning on mate-choice decisions. Learning & Behavior, 32, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, D. J., & Galef, B. G. (2000). ‘Culture’ in quail: Social influences on mate choices of female Coturnix japonica. Animal Behaviour, 59, 975–979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witte, K., & Ryan, M. J. (2002). Mate choice copying in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna, in the wild. Animal Behaviour, 63, 943–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Anthony Little is supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony C. Little.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Little, A.C., Caldwell, C.A., Jones, B.C. et al. Effects of Partner Beauty on Opposite-Sex Attractiveness Judgments. Arch Sex Behav 40, 1119–1127 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9806-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9806-5

Keywords

Navigation