Abstract
Many studies show mate choice copying effects on mate preferences in non-human species in which individuals follow or copy the mate choices of same-sex conspecifics. Recent studies suggest that social learning also influences mate preferences in humans. Studies on heterosexual humans have focused on rating the attractiveness of potential mates (targets) presented alongside individuals of the opposite sex to the target (models). Here, we examined several different types of pairing to examine how specific social learning is to mate preferences. In Study 1, we replicated a previous effect whereby target faces of the opposite sex to the subject were rated as more attractive when paired with attractive than unattractive partner models of the same sex as the subject. Using the same paired stimuli, Study 2 demonstrated no effect of a paired model if subjects were asked to rate targets who were the same sex as themselves. In Study 3, we used pairs of the same sex, stating the pair were friends, and subjects rated targets of the opposite sex to themselves. Attractive models decreased targets’ attractiveness, opposite to the effect in Study 1. Finally, Study 4 examined if attractive versus unattractive non-face stimuli might influence attraction. Unlike in Study 1, pairing with attractive stimuli either had no effect or decreased the attractiveness of paired target face images. These data suggest that social transmission of preferences via pairing with attractive/unattractive images is relatively specific to learning about mate preferences but does not influence attractiveness judgments more generally.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, G. R., & Fawcett, T. W. (2005). Sexual selection: Copycat mating in birds. Current Biology, 15, R626–R628.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
Dugatkin, L. A. (2000). The imitation factor: Evolution beyond the gene. New York: Free Press.
Dugatkin, L. A., & Godin, J. G. J. (1992). Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia-Reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 249, 179–184.
Dugatkin, L. A., & Godin, J. G. J. (1993). Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia-Reticulata)—age-dependent effects. Behavioral Ecology, 4, 289–292.
Eva, K. W., & Wood, T. J. (2006). Are all the taken men good? An indirect examination of mate-choice copying in humans. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 175, 1573–1574.
Galef, B. G., & Laland, K. N. (2005). Social learning in animals: Empirical studies and theoretical models. BioScience, 55, 489–499.
Galef, B. G., & White, D. J. (1998). Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica. Animal Behaviour, 55, 545–552.
Geiselman, R. E., Haight, N. A., & Kimata, L. G. (1984). Context effects on the perceived physical attractiveness of faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 409–424.
Godin, J. G. J., Herdman, E. J. E., & Dugatkin, L. A. (2005). Social influences on female mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata: Generalized and repeatable trait-copying behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 69, 999–1005.
Hill, S. E., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: Opposite effects for men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 635–647.
Hoglund, J., Alatalo, R. V., Gibson, R. M., & Lundberg, A. (1995). Mate-choice copying in black grouse. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1627–1633.
Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., & Feinberg, D. R. (2007). Social transmission of face preferences among humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 274, 899–903.
Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Watkins, C. D., & Feinberg, D. R. (2011). ‘Eavesdropping’ and perceived male dominance rank in humans. Animal Behaviour, 81, 1203–1208.
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallamm, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.
Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Caldwell, C. A. (2008). Social influence in human face preference: Men and women are influenced more for long-term than short-term attractiveness decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 140–146.
Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 268, 39–44.
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Caldwell, C. A. (2011). Social learning and human mate preferences: A potential mechanism for generating and maintaining between-population diversity in attraction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 366, 366–375.
Little, A. C., & Mannion, H. (2006). Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex individuals changes self-rated attractiveness and face preferences in women. Animal Behaviour, 72, 981–987.
Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., et al. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741–742.
Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D. R., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.
Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2010). Humans show mate copying after observing real mate choices. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 320–325.
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rowland, D. A., & Perrett, D. I. (1995). Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 15, 70–76.
Schlupp, I., & Ryan, M. J. (1997). Male sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) copy the mate choice of other males. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 104–107.
Sigall, H., & Landy, D. (1973). Radiating beauty: Effects of having a physically attractive partner on person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 218–224.
Swaddle, J. P., Cathey, M. G., Correll, M., & Hodkinson, B. P. (2005). Socially transmitted mate preferences in a monogamous bird: A non-genetic mechanism of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 272, 1053–1058.
Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Prototyping and transforming facial texture for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21, 42–50.
Uller, T., & Johansson, L. C. (2003). Human mate choice and the wedding ring effect: Are married men more attractive? Human Nature, 14, 267–276.
Vandenberg, S. G. (1972). Assortative mating or who marries whom? Behavior Genetics, 2, 127–157.
Waynforth, D. (2007). Mate choice copying in humans. Human Nature, 18, 264–271.
Wedell, D. H., Parducci, A., & Geiselman, R. E. (1987). A formal analysis of ratings of physical attractiveness: Successive contrast and simultaneous assimilation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 230–249.
White, D. J. (2004). Influences of social learning on mate-choice decisions. Learning & Behavior, 32, 105–113.
White, D. J., & Galef, B. G. (2000). ‘Culture’ in quail: Social influences on mate choices of female Coturnix japonica. Animal Behaviour, 59, 975–979.
Witte, K., & Ryan, M. J. (2002). Mate choice copying in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna, in the wild. Animal Behaviour, 63, 943–949.
Acknowledgment
Anthony Little is supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Little, A.C., Caldwell, C.A., Jones, B.C. et al. Effects of Partner Beauty on Opposite-Sex Attractiveness Judgments. Arch Sex Behav 40, 1119–1127 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9806-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9806-5