Skip to main content
Log in

Individual Differences in Women’s Rape Avoidance Behaviors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rape can exact severe psychological, physical, and reproductive costs on women, and likely was a recurrent adaptive problem over human evolutionary history. Therefore, women may have evolved psychological mechanisms that motivate rape avoidance behaviors. Guided heuristically by an evolutionary perspective, we tested the hypothesis that women’s rape avoidance behaviors would vary with several individual difference variables. Specifically, we predicted that rape avoidance behaviors would covary positively with (1) women’s attractiveness, (2) women’s involvement in a committed romantic relationship, and (3) the number of family members living nearby. We also predicted that women’s rape avoidance behaviors would covary negatively with age. We administered the Rape Avoidance Inventory (McKibbin et al., Pers Indiv Differ 39:336–340, 2009) and a demographic survey to a sample of women (n = 144). The results of correlational and regression analyses were consistent with the predictions, with the exception that women’s rape avoidance behaviors did not covary with women’s age. Discussion highlighted limitations of the current research and directions for future research on women’s rape avoidance psychology and behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bröder, A., & Hohmann, N. (2003). Variations in risk-taking behavior over the menstrual cycle: An improved replication. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chavanne, T. J., & Gallup, G. G. (1998). Variation in risk taking behavior among female college students as a function of the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R., & Krohn, M. (1990). Motives for rape. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 222–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueredo, A. J., Corral-Verdugob, V., Frías-Armentab, M., Bacharc, K. J., Whited, J., McNeilla, P. L., et al. (2001). Blood, solidarity, status, and honor: The sexual balance of power and spousal abuse in Sonora, Mexico. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 195–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiglieri, M. P. (2000). The dark side of man: Tracing the origins of male violence. New York: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, L. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, D., Edmunds, C., & Seymour, A. (1992). Rape in America: A report to the nation. Arlington, VA: National Victim Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalumiére, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in male propensity for sexual aggression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibbin, W. F., Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., Bates, V., Starratt, V. G., & Miner, E. (2009). Development and initial validation of the Rape Avoidance Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 336–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibbin, W. F., Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Starratt, V. G. (2008). Why do men rape? An evolutionary psychological perspective. Review of General Psychology, 12, 86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, N. M., & Udry, J. R. (1970). Variations in pedometer activity during the menstrual cycle. Sensory Processing, 2, 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, N. M., & Udry, J. R. (1982). Epidemiological patterns of sexual behavior in the menstrual cycle. In R. C. Friedman (Ed.), Behavior and the menstrual cycle (pp. 129–153). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perilloux, C., Fleischman, D. S., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The daughter-guarding hypothesis: Parental influence on, and emotional reactions to, offspring’s mating behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, C., & Klaus, P. (1996). Criminal victimization 1994. National crime victimization survey. Bulletin. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

  • Perkins, C., Klaus, P., Bastian, L., & Cohen, R. (1996). Criminal victimization in the United States, 1993. National crime victimization survey report. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, N. (1996). Psychological adaptation to sexual coercion in victims and offenders. In D. M. Buss & N. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict (pp. 90–104). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. P. (2000). A natural history of rape. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. (1983). Human rape: An evolutionary analysis. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 137–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, N., & Thornhill, R. (1990). Evolutionary analysis of psychological pain of rape victims. I. The effects of victim’s age and marital status. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. (1992). The evolutionary psychology of men’s coercive sexuality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 363–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D. B., Weinberg, C. R., Trussell, J., & Baird, D. D. (2001). Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: Providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives. Contraception, 63, 211–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., & Mesnick, S. L. (1997). An empirical test of the bodyguard hypothesis. In P. A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology (pp. 505–511). New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William F. McKibbin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKibbin, W.F., Shackelford, T.K., Miner, E.J. et al. Individual Differences in Women’s Rape Avoidance Behaviors. Arch Sex Behav 40, 343–349 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9627-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9627-y

Keywords

Navigation