Abstract
The analysis of age of coital debut is central to a description of sexual behavior. Age of coital debut data typically shares some characteristics that make analysis difficult. For one, age is reported in whole years and, furthermore, some subjects do not report debut. We aimed to find a regression model that fits this type of data well and gives simple and interpretable results. We studied age of debut in four cross-sectional surveys (1987–2002) for a total of 18,000 subjects from the adult Norwegian population. We compared a Cox-model with a linear parametric survival model. Survival methods are natural tools for analyzing age of coital debut. The debut ages did not follow the proportional hazard model well and an additive parametric survival model was the better regression model for the Norwegian data set. Furthermore, the additive model was easier to interpret. The analysis showed a substantial change in age of debut in the cohorts born 1927–1984, with a drop of 1 year for men and 2.3 years for women. Women in the oldest cohorts reported their debut 0.8 years later and in the youngest cohorts 0.5 years earlier than did men. A parametric survival model gives results that are easier to interpret and fits the Norwegian data better than the Cox-model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bozon, M., & Kontula, O. (1998). Sexual initiation and gender in Europe: A cross-cultural analysis of trends in the twentieth century. In M. Hubert, N. Bajos, & T. Sandfort (Eds.), Sexual behavior and HIV/AIDS in Europe (pp. 37–67). London: UCL Press.
Buckley, J., & James, I. (1979). Linear regression with censored data. Biometrika, 66, 429–436.
Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 34, 187–220.
Edgarth, K., Lewin, B., & Nilsson, R. (1999). Sexual experiences and behaviour as reported by 17-year-old girls and boys in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Sexology, 2, 41–60.
Grambsch, P. M., & Therneau, T. M. (1995). Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika, 82, 668.
Helmius, G. (1990). Mogen för sex?! Det sexuellt restriktiviserande samhället och ungdomars heterosexuella glädje [Mature enough for sex?! The sexually restrictive society and adolescents’ heterosexual joy]. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (1999). Applied survival analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Johnson, A. M., Wadsworth, J., Wellings, K., & Field, J. (1994). Sexual attitudes and lifestyles. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric-estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457–481.
Kleinbaum, D. G. (1997). Survival analysis: A self-learning text. New York: Springer.
Kontula, O. (2003). Trends in teenage sexual behaviour, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections and HIV infections in Europe. In Council of Europe (Ed.), Reproductive health behaviour of young Europeans (pp. 77–137). Strassbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Kontula, O., & Haavio-Mannila, E. (1995). Sexual pleasures: Enhancement of sex life in Finland, 1971–1992. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company.
Kontula, O., Rimpela, M., & Ojanlatva, A. (1992). Sexual knowledge, attitudes, fears and behaviors of adolescents in Finland (the KISS study). Health Education Research, 7, 69–77.
Kraft, P. (1991). Age at first experience of intercourse among Norwegian adolescents: A lifestyle perspective. Social Science and Medicine, 33, 207–213.
Lewin, B. (1990). Potentials for change. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 69(Suppl.), 199–205.
Pedersen, W., Samuelsen, S. O., & Wichstrom, L. (2003). Intercourse debut age: Poor resources, problem behavior, or romantic appeal? A population-based longitudinal study. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 333–345.
Samuelsen, S. O., Wisløff, F., & Skrondal, A. (2005). A simple correction for ties when censoring times depend on covariates. Statistics in Medicine, 24, 3111–3121.
Schmidt, G., Klusman, D., Dekker, A., & Matthiesen, S. (1998). Changes in students’ sexual behaviour: 1966–1981–1996. A first report on a longitudinal study in West Germany. Scandinavian Journal of Sexology, 1, 157–173.
Schoenfeld, D. (1982). Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression mode. Biometrika, 69, 239–241.
S-Plus. (2001). S-Plus 6 for windows guide to statistics (Vol. 2). Seattle: Insightful Corporation.
Stigum, H., Magnus, P., & Bakketeig, L. S. (1997). Frequency of sexual partner change in a Norwegian population. Data distribution and covariates. American Journal of Epidemiology, 145, 636–643.
Stigum, H., Magnus, P., Veierød, M., & Bakketeig, L. S. (1995). Impact on STD spread of increased condom use by young females, 1987–1992. International Journal of Epidemiology, 24, 813–820.
Sundet, J. M., Magnus, P., Kvalem, I. L., Samuelsen, S. O., & Bakketeig, L. S. (1992). Secular trends and sociodemographic regularities of coital debut age in Norway. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21, 241–252.
Teitler, J. (2002). Trends in youth sexual initiation and fertility in developed countries: 1960–1995. Annals AAPSS, 580, 134–152.
Traeen, B. (1993). Norwegian adolescents’ sexuality in the era of AIDS. Empirical studies on heterosexual behavior. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Tsiatis, A. A. (1990). Estimating regression parameters using linear rank-tests for censored-data. Annals of statistics, 18, 354–372.
Wielandt, H., & Boldsen, J. (1989). Age at first intercourse. Journal of Biosocial Science, 21, 169–177.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stigum, H., Samuelsen, SO. & Traeen, B. Analysis of First Coitus. Arch Sex Behav 39, 907–914 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9494-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9494-6