Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Cognitive Analysis of College Students’ Explanations for Engaging in Unprotected Sexual Intercourse

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Young adults, including college students, engage in high levels of unprotected sexual activity despite relatively high rates of HIV/STI and pregnancy-related knowledge. Little is known about the cognitive strategies that young people use to explain this inconsistency. The current study examined young people’s explanations for engaging in unprotected sexual activity in their committed relationships. A total of 63 young adults (32 women and 31 men) completed daily diaries over a 3-week period, providing a total of 1,284 daily reports tracking their condom use and non-use during intercourse. Diary collection was followed by in-depth interviews designed to explore participants’ decision-making regarding their participation in sexual intercourse unprotected against infection or unwanted pregnancy. Less than a quarter of the sample used condoms or oral contraceptives consistently. Participants primarily viewed condoms as a means of preventing pregnancy; few described disease prevention as a main motivation for their use. Analysis of the cognitions underlying explanations for condom and contraception non-use were classified as (1) general biased risk evaluation, (2) biased evidence evaluation, (3) endorsement of poor alternatives, (4) focus on spurious justifications, (5) dismissing risk, and (6) ignoring risk. Prevention interventions should incorporate methods to challenge young people to acknowledge personal risk and commit themselves to taking steps to reduce this risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These interviews revealed that two of these participants did use condoms consistently, but put condoms on after engaging in a few minutes of unprotected intercourse (thus reporting both protected and unprotected intercourse for each sexual occasion in their diary data). The third participant insisted that his non-use on the one occasion was highly unusual, a one-time occasion, and would offer no further explanation. Thus, their data could not be included in the following analyses.

References

  • Aalsma, M. C., Fortenberry, J. D., Sayegh, M. A., & Orr, D. P. (2006). Family and friend closeness to adolescent sexual partners in relationship to condom use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 173–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alan Guttmacher Institute. (2008). Contraceptive use in the United States. www.guttmacher.org/in-the-know/prevention.html. Accessed February 11, 2009.

  • Anderson, J. E. (2003). Condom use and HIV risk among US adults. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 912–914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. E., Wilson, R., Doll, L., Jones, T. S., & Barker, P. (1999). Condom use and HIV risk behaviors among US adults: Data from a national survey. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 24–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1994). Thinking and deciding (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barta, W. D., & Kiene, S. M. (2005). Motivations for infidelity in heterosexual dating couples: The roles of gender, personality differences, and sociosexual orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 339–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 680–740). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazargan, M., Kelly, E. M., Stein, J. A., Husaini, B. A., & Bazargan, S. H. (2000). Correlates of HIV risk-taking behaviors among African-American college students: The effect of HIV knowledge, motivation, and behavioral skills. Journal of the National Medical Association, 92, 391–404.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative research methods. Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradner, C. H., Ku, L., & Lindberg, L. D. (2000). Older, but not wiser: How men get information about AIDS and sexually transmitted diseases after high school. Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 33–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, K., & Thomas, V. G. (2001). HIV/AIDS knowledge, attitudes, and risk behaviors among African-American and Caribbean college women. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 23, 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (1995). Youth risk behavior surveillance: National college health risk behavior survey. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 46(SS-6), 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2007a). The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) 2007: National, state, and local data. www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs/slides/yrbs07_sexual_risk_behaviors.ppt. Accessed June 1, 2008.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2007b). STD surveillance 2006: Trends in reportable sexually transmitted diseases in the United States, 2006. http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/trends2006.htm. Accessed June 1, 2008.

  • Civic, D. (1999). The association between characteristics of dating relationships and condom use among heterosexual young adults. AIDS Education and Prevention, 11, 343–352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Civic, D. (2000). College students’ reasons for nonuse of condoms within dating relationships. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 95–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107, 261–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. L., Agocha, V. B., & Powers, A. M. (1999). Motivations for condom use: Do pregnancy prevention goals undermine disease prevention among heterosexual adults? Health Psychology, 18, 464–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, R., DiClemente, R. J., Yarber, W. L., Snow, G., & Troutman, A. (2008). An event-specific analysis of condom breakage among African American men at risk of HIV acquisition. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 35, 174–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, R. A., Graham, C. A., Yarber, W. L., & Sanders, S. A. (2004). If the condom fits, wear it: A qualitative study of young African-American men. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 80, 306–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damer, T. E. (2008). Attacking faulty reasoning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Visser, R., & Smith, A. (2001). Relationship between sexual partners influences rates and correlations of condom use. AIDS Education and Prevention, 13, 413–427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, B. (2004). Sexually transmissible infections other than HIV. Lancet, 363, 545–556.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, C., Harrison, M. G., Toldson, I. A., Malaka, D., & Sithole, S. (2005). Social stigma, HIV/AIDS knowledge, and sexual risk: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 10, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elders, M. J. (2008). Contraceptive availability to adolescents: Do American values violate our most vulnerable? Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 84, 741–745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenaughty, A. M., & Namyniuk, L. (2004). “Here’s what I do…”: Condom promotion strategies proposed by high-risk women in Anchorage, Alaska. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 23–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2007). The rationality of informal argumentation: A Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies. Psychological Review, 114, 704–732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., & Stevens, P. (1991). Rigor in feminist research. Advances in Nursing Science, 13, 16–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, K. D., O’Sullivan, L. F., El-Bassel, N., & Gilbert, L. (2005). Intimate partner violence and monogamy among women in methadone treatment. AIDS and Behavior, 9, 177–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hensel, D., Fortenberry, J., Harezlak, J., Anderson, J., & Orr, D. (2003). A daily diary analysis of vaginal bleeding and coitus among adolescent women. Journal of Adolescent Health, 34, 391–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. K., Darroch, J. E., & Henshaw, S. K. (2002). Patterns in the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions in 2000–2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34, 226–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser Family Foundation. (1998). Sexually transmitted diseases in America: How many cases and at what costs? Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation and American Social Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lance, L. M. (2001). HIV/AIDS perceptions and knowledge of heterosexual college students within the context of sexual activity: Suggestions for the future. College Student Journal, 35, 401–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, L. M., & Girard, C. (1999). Risky sexual behaviors among substance-abusing adolescents: Assessing the effect of decision-making and avoidance motives. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 7, 327–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, B. C., Vanslyke, J. G., Hoppe, M. J., Rainey, D. T., Morrison, D. M., & Gillmore, M. R. (2008). Drinking and condom use: Results from an event-based daily diary. AIDS and Behavior, 12, 104–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mantell, J. E., Hoffman, S., Exner, T. M., Stein, Z. A., & Atkins, K. (1999). Family planning providers’ perspectives on dual protection. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35, 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, A. (2006). Chlamydia screening programs: A review of the literature. Part 1: Issues in the promotion of chlamydia testing of youth by primary care physicians. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 15, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. (1998). Cognitive optimism: Self-deception or memory-based processing heuristics? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 100–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. M., Leigh, B. C., & Gillmore, M. R. (1999). Daily data collection: A comparison of three methods. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustanski, B. S. (2007). Are sexual partners met online associated with HIV/STI risk behaviours? Retrospective and daily diary in conflict. AIDS Care, 19, 822–827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • New York City Department of Health HIV/AIDS Surveillance Program. (2001). AIDS New York City: Fourth quarter, 2000. New York: NYC Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opt, S. K., & Loffredo, D. A. (2004). College students and HIV/AIDS: More insights on knowledge, testing, and sexual practices. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 138, 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, L. F. (2008). Challenging our assumptions regarding the validity of self-report measures: The special case of sexual behavior [Editorial]. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 207–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, L. F., Udell, W., & Patel, V. L. (2006). Young urban adults’ heterosexual risk encounters and perceived risk and safety: A structured diary study. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 343–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197–1208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poulin, C., & Graham, L. (2001). The association between substance use, unplanned sexual intercourse and other sexual behaviors among adolescent students. Addiction, 96, 607–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, A., & Bernard, A. L. (1998). Sexual behaviors and safer sex practices of college students on a commuter campus. Journal of American College Health, 47, 11–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. T., & Kennedy, B. L. (2006). Why are young college women not using condoms? Their perceived risk, drug use, and developmental vulnerability may provide important clues to sexual risk. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 20, 32–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 27–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. J., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). The self-serving bias in relational context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 378–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, C. D., Morisky, D. E., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Ebin, V., Malotte, C. K., Lyde, M., et al. (2001). ‘Don’t know’ and ‘didn’t think of it’: Condom use at first intercourse by Latino adolescents. AIDS Care, 13, 303–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., Lerner, J. S., Sherman, D. K., Sage, R. M., & McDowell, N. K. (2003). Are self-enhancing cognitions associated with healthy or unhealthy biological profiles? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 605–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. C., Kyle, D., Osgood, A., Quist, R. M., Phillips, D. J., & McClure, M. (2004). Illusory control and motives for control: The role of connection and intentionality. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 21, 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Empelen, P., & Kok, G. (2006). Condom use in steady and casual sexual relationships: Planning, preparation and willingness to take risks among adolescents. Psychology and Health, 21, 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Empelen, P., & Kok, G. (2008). Action-specific cognitions of planned and preparatory behaviors of condom use among Dutch adolescents. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 626–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, S. J., Abma, J. C., Mosher, W. D., & Henshaw, S. K. (2008). Estimated pregnancy rates by outcome for the United States 1990–2004. National Vital Statistics Report, 56, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, M. J. A., & Enzle, M. E. (2002). The deployment of personal luck: Sympathetic magic and illusory control in games of pure chance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1388–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, S. E., & Maisto, S. A. (2008). Gender differences in condom use behavior? The role of power and partner-type. Sex Roles, 58, 689–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarber, W. L., Graham, C. A., Sanders, S. A., Crosby, R. A., Butler, S. M., & Hartzell, R. M. (2007). ‘Do you know what you’re doing?’ College students’ experiences with male condoms. American Journal of Health Education, 38, 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenilman, J. M., Weisman, C. S., Rompalo, A. M., Ellish, N., Upchurch, D. M., Hook, E. W., et al. (1995). Condom use to prevent incident STDs: The validity of self reported condom use. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 22, 15–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge research support from NICHD Grant R01-HD41721 to Lucia F. O’Sullivan, Ph.D. The authors thank the students for their participation in the project and Giovanna Rodriguez for coordinating data collection and entry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucia F. O’Sullivan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Sullivan, L.F., Udell, W., Montrose, V.A. et al. A Cognitive Analysis of College Students’ Explanations for Engaging in Unprotected Sexual Intercourse. Arch Sex Behav 39, 1121–1131 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9493-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9493-7

Keywords

Navigation