Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Perception of Facial Resemblance in Humans

  • ORIGINAL PAPER: MINOT SPECIAL ISSUE
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two lines of reasoning predict that highly social species will have mechanisms to influence behavior toward individuals depending on their degree of relatedness. First, inclusive fitness theory leads to the prediction that organisms will preferentially help closely related kin over more distantly related individuals. Second, evaluation of the relative costs and potential benefits of inbreeding suggests that the degree of kinship should also be considered when choosing a mate. In order to behaviorally discriminate between individuals with different levels of relatedness, organisms must be able to discriminate cues of kinship. Facial resemblance is one such potential cue in humans. Computer-graphic manipulation of face images has made it possible to experimentally test hypotheses about human kin recognition by facial phenotype matching. We review recent experimental evidence that humans respond to facial resemblance in ways consistent with inclusive fitness theory and considerations of the costs of inbreeding, namely by increasing prosocial behavior and positive attributions toward self-resembling images and selectively tempering attributions of attractiveness to other-sex faces in the context of a sexual relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberts, S. C. (1999). Paternal kin discrimination in wild baboons. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 1501–1506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W., & McGinn, N. C. (1977). Sex differences in choice of distribution rules. Journal of Personality, 45, 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailenson, J. N., Garland, P., Iyengar, S., & Yee, N. (2006). Transformed facial similarity as a political cue: A preliminary investigation. Political Psychology, 27, 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, P. (1980). Optimal outbreeding and the development of sexual preferences in Japanese quail. Zietschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 53, 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, P. (1983). Optimal outbreeding. In P. Bateson (Ed.), Mate choice (pp. 257–278). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereczkei, T., Gyuris, P., Koves, P., & Bernath, L. (2002). Homogamy, genetic similarity, and imprinting; parental influence on mate choice preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 677–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S. J., & Wynne-Edwards, K. (2001). Changes in testosterone, cortisol, and estradiol levels in men becoming fathers. Mayo Clinical Proceedings, 76, 582–592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bittles, A. H. (2001). Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clinical Genetics, 60, 89–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bittles, A. H., Grant, J. C., Sullivan, S. G., & Hussain, R. (2002). Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility? Annals of Human Biology, 29, 111–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist, D., Andersson, M., Küpper, C., Cuthill, I. C., Kis, J., Lanctotk, R. B., et al. (2002). Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three species of shorebirds. Nature, 419, 613–615.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brédart, S., & French, R. M. (1999). Do babies resemble their fathers more than their mothers? A failure to replicate Christenfeld and Hill (1995). Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressan, P. (2002). Why babies look like their daddies: Paternity uncertainty and the evolution of self-deception in evaluating family resemblance. Acta Ethologica, 4, 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressan, P., & Grassi, M. (2004). Parental resemblance in one-year-olds and the Gaussian curve. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressan, P., & Martello, M. F. D. (2002). Talis pater, talis filius: Perceived resemblance and the belief in genetic relatedness. Psychological Science, 13, 213–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bressan, P., Bertamini, M., Nalli, A., & Zanutto, A. (submitted). Effect of self-resemblance in child faces on hypothetical parental investment choices in men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior.

  • Buckingham, G., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Welling, L. L. M., Conway, C. A., Tiddeman, B. P., et al. (2006). Visual adaptation to masculine and feminine faces influences generalized preferences and perceptions of trustworthiness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukacinski, D., Bukacinski, M., & Lubjuhn, T. (2000). Adoption of chicks and the level of relatedness in common gull, Larus canus, colonies. Animal Behaviour, 59, 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burley, N. (1983). The meaning of assortative mating. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 773–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byard, P. J., Poosha, D. V., Satyanarayana, M., & Rao, D. C. (1985a). Family resemblance for components of craniofacial size and shape. Journal of Craniofacial Genetic Developmental Biology, 5, 229–238.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byard, P. J., Poosha, D. V., Satyanarayana, M., Rao, D. C., & Russell, J. M. (1985b). Path analysis of family resemblance for cranio-facial traits in Andhra Pradesh nuclear families and twins. Annals of Human Biology, 12, 305–314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christenfeld, N. J. S., & Hill, E. A. (1995). Whose baby are you? Nature, 378, 669.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1982). Whom are newborn babies said to resemble? Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1984). A sociobiological analysis of human infanticide. In G. Hausfater & S. Hrdy (Eds.), Infanticide: Comparative and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 487–502). New York: Aldine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine, L. M. (2002). Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 1307–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine, L. M. (2004a). Facial resemblance increases the attractiveness of same-sex faces more than other-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 2085–2090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine, L. M. (2004b). Resemblance to self increases the appeal of child faces to both men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 142–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine, L. M. (2005). Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: Context-specific effects of facial resemblance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 919–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Women’s attractiveness judgments of self-resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 47, 379–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E., & Guttman, R. (1982). Mate selection in man: Evidence, theory, and outcome. Social Biology, 31, 243–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euler, H. A., & Weitzel, B. (1999). Grandparental caregiving and intergenerational relations reflect reproductive strategies. In J. M. van der Dennen, D. Smillie, & D. R. Wilson (Eds.), The Darwinian heritage and sociobiology: Human evolution, behavior, and intelligence (pp. 243–252). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, K. (1993). Development of visual preference for closely related species by infant and juvenile macaques with restricted social experience. Primates, 34, 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J., & Schlegel, A. (1980). Paternal confidence and paternal investment: A cross cultural test of a sociobiological hypothesis. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1, 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., McBurney, D. H., & Wartell, S. L. B. (1997). Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles: A consequence and measure of paternity uncertainty. Human Nature, 8, 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. (1979). Genetic component of bee odor in kin recognition. Science, 206, 1095–1097.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A. S., & West, S. A. (2003). Kin discrimination and the benefit of helping in cooperatively breeding vertebrates. Science, 302, 634–636.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R., & Kunz, P. (1973). Assortative mating: A study of physiognomic homogamy. Social Biology, 20, 448–453.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R. (1987). Relatedness and garden labor exchange among the Ye’kwana. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. N., Vess, T. J., Hammond, J. I., & Lindermuth, C. J. (2003). Context-dependent kin discrimination in larval four-toed salamanders Hemidactylium scutatum (Caudata Plethodontidae). Herpetologica, 59, 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber, M. E., & Sherman, P. W. (1998). Nepotism and marmot alarm calling. Animal Behaviour, 53, 1049–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heth, G., Todrank, J., Busquet, N., & Baudoin, C. (2003). Genetic relatedness assessment through individual odour similarities in mice. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society, 78, 595–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1976). Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinsz, V. B. (1989). Facial resemblance in engaged and married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, W. G., & Sherman, P. W. (1982). The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. American Zoologist, 22, 491–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irons, W. (1986). Incest: Why all the fuss? Paper presented at the Evolution and Human Behavior meeting, University of Michigan.

  • Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R., & Law Smith, M. J. (2008). Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9268y.

  • Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., DeBruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., Law Smith, M. J., et al. (2005a). Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones and Behavior, 48, 283–290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., Cornwell, R. E., Feinberg, D. R., et al. (2005b). Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 272, 347–354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A., O’Leary, V. E., Krulewitz, J. E., & Lamm, H. (1980). Equity and equality: Male and female means to a just end. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 173–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, K. M. (2000). Oxytocin, motherhood and bonding. Experimental Physiology, 85, 111S–124S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, K. M., Hinton, M. R., & Atkins, K. (1998). Mothers determine sexual preferences. Nature, 395, 229–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krupp, D. B., DeBruine, L. M., & Barclay, P. (in press). A cue of kinship promotes cooperation for the public good. Evolution and Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.08.002.

  • Langlois, J., & Roggman, L. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2003). Does morality have a biological basis? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 819–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007). The architecture of human kin detection. Nature, 225, 727–731.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2005). Sex-contingent face aftereffects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 2283–2287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2003). Investigating an imprinting-like phenomenon in humans: Partners and opposite-sex parents have similar hair and eye colour. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2006). Assortative mating for perceived facial personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 973–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, L. T., & Dal Martello, M. F. (2006). Kin recognition and the perceived facial similarity of children. Journal of Vision, 6, 1047–1056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLain, D. K., Setters, D., Moulton, M. P., & Pratt, A. E. (2000). Ascription of resemblance of newborns by parents and nonrelatives. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesse, R. M., Silverman, A., & Bortz, A. (1990). Sex differences in ability to recognize family resemblance. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oda, R., Matsumoto-Oda, A., & Kurashima, O. (2002). Facial resemblance of Japanese children to their parents. Journal of Ethology, 20, 81–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsén, H. (1999). Present knowledge of kin discrimination in salmonids. Genetica, 104, 295–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, M. (1997). Desperately concealing father: A theory of parent-infant resemblance. Animal Behaviour, 53, 973–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, D., & Potts, W. (1998). MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 1299–1306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., & Peirce, J. W. (1999). Computer graphic studies of the role of facial similarity in judgments of attractiveness. Current Psychology, 18, 104–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741–742.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, D. I., Penton-Voak, I. S., Little, A. C., Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M., Schmidt, N., et al. (2002). Facial attractiveness judgments reflect learning of parental age characteristics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 873–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfennig, D. W., Sherman, P. W., & Collins, J. P. (1994). Kin recognition and cannibalism in polyphenic salamanders. Behavioral Ecology, 5, 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platek, S. M. (2002). Unconscious reactions to children’s faces: The effect of resemblance. Evolution and Cognition, 8, 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platek, S. M., Burch, R. L., Panyavin, I. S., Wasserman, B. H., & Gallup, G. G. (2002). Reactions to children’s faces: Resemblance affects males more than females. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platek, S. M., Critton, S. R., Burch, R. L., Frederick, D. A., Meyers, T. E., & Gallup, G. G. (2003). How much paternal resemblance is enough? Sex differences in hypothetical investment decisions but not in the detection of resemblance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platek, S. M., Raines, D. M., Gallup, G. G. Jr., Mohamed, F. B., Thomson, J. W., Myers, T. E., et al. (2004). Reactions to children’s faces: Males are more affected by resemblance than females are, and so are their brains. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 394–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poosha, D. V., Byard, P. J., Satyanarayana, M., Rice, J. P., & Rao, D. C. (1984). Family resemblance for cranio-facial measurements in Velanti Brahmins from Andhra Pradesh, India. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 65, 15–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R. H., Cernoch, J. M., & Balogh, R. D. (1984). Recognition of neonates by facial-visual characteristics. Pediatrics, 74, 501–504.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regalski, J. M., & Gaulin, S. J. (1993). Whom are Mexican infants said to resemble? Monitoring and fostering paternal confidence in the Yucatan. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, D., & Perrett, D. I. (1995). Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 15, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J. P. (1988). Genetic similarity, mate choice, and fecundity in humans. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 329–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J. P., & Nicholson, I. R. (1988). Genetic similarity theory, intelligence, and human mate choice. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepher, J. (1971). Mate selection among second generation Kibbutz adolescents and adults: Incest avoidance and negative imprinting. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1, 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, P. (1977). Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. Science, 197, 1246–1253.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silk, J. B. (2002). Kin selection in primate groups. International Journal of Primatology, 23, 849–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoon, T. R., Millam, J. R., & Owings, D. H. (2006). The importance of mate behavioural compatabilty in parenting and reproductive success by cockatiels, Nymphicus hollandicus. Animal Behaviour, 71, 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, A. E., Walsh, C., Quinton, R., & Wynne-Edwards, K. (2000). Hormonal correlates of paternal responsiveness in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 79–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, D., & Gregg, B. (1980). Human assortative mating and genetic equilibrium: An evolutionary perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1, 111–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiddeman, B. P., Perrett, D. I., & Burt, D. M. (2001). Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Research, 21, 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todrank, J., & Heth, G. (2001). Rethinking cross-fostering designs for studying kin recognition mechanisms. Animal Behaviour, 61, 503–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Jeugd, H., van der Veen, I. T., & Larsson, K. (2002). Kin clustering in barnacle geese: Familiarity or phenotype matching? Behavioral Ecology, 13, 786–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volk, A., & Quinsey, V. L. (2002). The influence of infant facial cues on adoption preferences. Human Nature, 13, 437–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos, D. R. (1995). Sexual imprinting in zebra-finch females: Do females develop a preference for males that look like their father? Ethology, 99, 252–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, E. A. (1921). The history of human marriage (5th ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. D., & Barrett, P. T. (1987). Parental characteristics and partner choice: Some evidence for Oedipal imprinting. Journal of Biosocial Science, 19, 157–161.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A. P. (1993). Westermarck redivivus. Annual Review of Anthropology, 22, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A. P. (1995). Sexual attraction and childhood association: A Chinese brief for Edward Westermarck. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B., Adelmann, P. K., Murphy, S. T., & Niendenthal, P. M. (1987). Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zei, G., Astolfi, P., & Jayakar, S. D. (1983). Correlation between father’s age and husband’s age: A case of imprinting. Journal of Biosocial Science, 15, 116–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 2UB, UK

    Lisa M. DeBruine & Benedict C. Jones

  2. School of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK

    Anthony C. Little

  3. School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, UK

    David I. Perrett

Authors
  1. Lisa M. DeBruine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benedict C. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anthony C. Little
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David I. Perrett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa M. DeBruine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeBruine, L.M., Jones, B.C., Little, A.C. et al. Social Perception of Facial Resemblance in Humans. Arch Sex Behav 37, 64–77 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9266-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9266-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation