Abstract
Few, if any, scientific inquiries are conducted against a background of complete knowledge, a background in which inquirers are in possession of the ‘full facts’ that relate to a particular question or issue. More often than not, scientists are compelled to conduct their deliberations in contexts of epistemic uncertainty, in which partial knowledge or even a total absence of knowledge characterise inquiry. Nowhere is this epistemic uncertainty more evident, or indeed more successfully controlled, than in the branch of scientific inquiry called epidemiology. In this paper, I examine how epidemiologists overcome the unique challenges to inquiry that are posed by epistemic uncertainty. In specific terms, I contend that epidemiologists employ analogical reasoning strategies in an attempt to advance their inquiries in situations that are epistemically uncertain. The context for my claims will be the early inquiries that were conducted into the emergence of HIV/AIDS in the United States. I argue that early scientific work in relation to HIV/AIDS was directly premised upon epidemiological investigations in which analogical reasoning with hepatitis B had featured significantly. I conclude that epidemiological investigations of AIDS exemplify the capacity of analogical reasoning to advance inquiry under conditions of epistemic uncertainty. To this extent, analogical reasoning should be a concern both to those who address practical problems of uncertainty management and to those who pursue theoretical debates within argumentation studies and epistemology.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aristotle (350 B.C.), Prior Analytics. Translated by A. J. Jenkinson in The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton University Press.
Berridge, V.: 1996, AIDS in the U.K.: The Making of Policy 1981–94, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cummings, L.: 2000, ‘Petitio Principii: The Case for Non-Fallaciousness’, Informal Logic 20(1), 1–18.
Cummings, L.: 2002, ‘Reasoning under Uncertainty: The Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific Inquiry’, Informal Logic 22(2), 113–136.
Fauci, A. S.: 1983, ‘The Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome: The Ever-Broadening Clinical Spectrum’, Journal of the American Medical Association 249, 2375–2376.
Gallo, R. C.: 1987, ‘The AIDS Virus’, Scientific American 256, 47.
Levi, D. S.: 1994, ‘Begging What is at Issue in the Argument’, Argumentation 8, 265–282.
Merry, U.: 1995, Coping with Uncertainty: Insights from the New Sciences of Chaos, Self-Organization and Complexity. Praeger Publishers.
Muraskin, W.: 1993, ‘Hepatitis B as a Model (and Anti-Model) for AIDS’, in V. Berridge and P. Strong (eds.), AIDS and Contemporary History, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Oleske, J., A. Minnefor, R. Cooper, K. Thomas, A. de la Cruz, H. Ahdieh, I. Guerrero, V. V. Joshi and F. Desposito: 1983, ‘Immune Deficiency Syndrome in Children’, Journal of the American Medical Association 249, 2347–2348.
Oppenheimer, G. M.: 1988, ‘In the Eye of the Storm: The Epidemiological Construction of AIDS’, in E. Fee and D. M. Fox (eds.), AIDS: The Burdens of History, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Rescher, N.: 1977, Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Walton, D. N.: 1985, ‘Are Circular Arguments Necessarily Vicious?’, American Philosophical Quarterly 22(4) (October), 263–274.
Walton, D. N.: 1989, Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Walton, D. N.: 1991, Begging the Question: Circular Reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation, Greenwood Press, Connecticut.
Walton, D. N.: 1995, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cummings, L. Analogical reasoning as a tool of epidemiological investigation. Argumentation 18, 427–444 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-6862-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-6862-9