Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pathways to low-cost aquaponic systems for sustainable livelihoods and economic development in poor communities: defining critical success factors

  • Published:
Aquaculture International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The combined effects of anthropogenic and climate change factors have severely impacted the yield from the traditional food production system resulting in food insecurity and other socio-economic problems. The predominant food production systems have been reviewed as unsustainable and environmentally unfriendly; therefore, there is a need to adopt innovative and sustainable food production systems locally and globally. This article addresses traditional food production challenges by exploring low-cost aquaponics to attain food security and socio-economic development, notably in poor communities. A low-cost aquaponic system was first developed conceptually using the reflective practice approach. Its applicability to sustainable livelihoods and economic development is explored. Subsequently, the critical success factors of low-cost aquaponics were identified. These include infrastructure design, microclimatic environment, human ecology, and sociocultural dynamics. Due to its integrative and multiple application scenarios ranging from low-tech to high-tech, aquaponics is a complex and unconventional food production system. The reverse scalability to a small scale, the low-cost set-up makes it sustainable in achieving food security and socio-economic development in poor communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Adams B, Boyer T, Albrecht M, Ranglack DH, Bickford N (2020) Micro-system aquaponics: testing designs for increased productivity. J Appl Aquac 32(2):95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adeleke, BA (2020). Bioeconomic feasibility of aquaponics in South Africa: leapfrogging for sustainable development of freshwater aquaculture. (Doctoral Dissertation)

  • Azz T (2018) Report on consumers perception and attitude on consuming aquaponic products. Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiola M, Mendiola D, Bostock J (2012) Recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) analysis: main issues on management and future challenges. Aquacult Eng 51:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey DS, Rakocy JE, Cole WM, Shultz KA,  St Croix U (1997). Economic analysis of a commercial-scale aquaponic system for the production of tilapia and lettuce. Tilapia aquaculture: proceedings of the fourth international symposium on Tilapia in aquaculture, Orlando, Florida,

  • Baker, A. A. C. (2010). t [Honolulu]:[University of Hawaii at Manoa],[December 2010]].

  • Bandi A-C, Cristea V, Dediu L, Petrea SM, Cretu M, Rahoveanu AT, Zugravu AG, Turek MM, Rahoveanu DNM, Soare I (2016) The review of existing and in-progress technologies of the different subsystems required for the structural and functional elements of the model of multi-purpose aquaponic production system. Rom Biotechnol Lett 21(4):11621

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao W, Zhu S, Jin G, Ye Z (2019) Generation, characterization, perniciousness, removal and reutilization of solids in aquaculture water: a review from the whole process perspective. Rev Aquac 11(4):1342–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blidariu F, Grozea A (2011) Increasing the economical efficiency and sustainability of indoor fish farming by means of aquaponics-review. Scientific Papers Anim Sci Biotechnol 44(2):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolorunduro P, Abdullah A (1996) Water quality management in fish culture. Fisheries Series 3(98):36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma RH, Lacambra L, Landstra Y, Perini C, Poulie J, Schwaner MJ, Yin Y (2017) The financial feasibility of producing fish and vegetables through aquaponics. Aquacult Eng 78:146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britz, P., & Venter, S. (2016). Aquaculture review: South Africa. World Aquaculture 47, no. 4 (2016): 19–28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311733646_Aquaculture_Review_South_Africa. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311733646_Aquaculture_Review_South_Africa

  • Brodt, S., Six, J., Feenstra, G., Ingels, C., & Campbell, D. (2011). Sustainable agriculture. Nat. Educ. Knowl, 3(1).

  • Chatani, R., Demeneghi, G., Hoxha, R., Kumykov, K., & Rieger, B. (2015). Designing an aquaponic greenhouse for an urban food security initiative–extended report.

  • DAFF. (2018). Nile and Mozambique Tilapia Feasibility Study. Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. https://www.nda.agric.za/doaDev/sideMenu/fisheries/03_areasofwork/Aquaculture/economics/Final%20Nile%20and%20Mossambicus%20Tilapia%20Feasibility%20Study%202018_Formatted.pdf

  • Darko FA, Quagrainie KK, Chenyambuga S (2016) Consumer preferences for farmed tilapia in Tanzania: a choice experiment analysis. J Appl Aquac 28(3):131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos MJPL (2018) Nowcasting and forecasting aquaponics by Google Trends in European countries. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 134:178–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, C. R. (2016). Economics of aquaponics.

  • English, L. A. (2015). Economic feasibility of aquaponics in Arkansas.

  • Fang Y, Hu Z, Zou Y, Fan J, Wang Q, Zhu Z (2017) Increasing economic and environmental benefits of media-based aquaponics through optimizing aeration pattern. J Clean Prod 162:1111–1117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Food Security Information Network 2019. Global report on food crises: joint analysis for better decision making. GRFC. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  • Gebrezgabher, S. A., Amewu, S., & Amoah, P. (2015). Consumer preference and willingness to pay for fish farmed in treated wastewater in Ghana.

  • Gott, J., Morgenstern, R., & Turnšek, M. (2019). Aquaponics for the Anthropocene: towards a ‘sustainability first’ agenda. In Aquaponics food production systems (pp. 393–432). Springer, Cham.

  • Graber A, Junge R (2009) Aquaponic systems: nutrient recycling from fish wastewater by vegetable production. Desalination 246(1–3):147–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld A, Becker N, McIlwain J, Fotedar R, Bornman JF (2019) Economically viable aquaponics? Identifying the gap between potential and current uncertainties. Rev Aquac 11(3):848–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld A, Becker N, Bornman JF, Dos Santos MJ, Angel D (2020) Consumer preferences for aquaponics: a comparative analysis of Australia and Israel. J Environ Manage 257:109979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart ER, Webb JB, Danylchuk AJ (2013) Implementation of aquaponics in education: an assessment of challenges and solutions. Sci Educ Int 24(4):460–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley AH (1986) Human ecology: a theoretical essay. University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliman, J. B., Adrian, J., & Chappell, J. (2008). Integration of hydroponic tomato and indoor recirculating aquacultural production systems: an economic analysis.

  • Jena AK, Biswas P, Saha H (2016) Aquaponics-a step towards urban agriculture. Innovative Farming 1(4):163–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffre OM, Klerkx L, Dickson M, Verdegem M (2017) How is innovation in aquaculture conceptualized and managed? A systematic literature review and reflection framework to inform analysis and action. Aquaculture 470:129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson B (2011) Towards a practice theory of entrepreneuring. Small Bus Econ 36(2):135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junge R, König B, Villarroel M, Komives T, HaïssamJijakli M (2017) Strategic points in aquaponics. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, In.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Junge, R, B König, M Villarroel, T Komives, and MH Jijakli. 2017a. "Strategic points in aquaponics. Water 9: 182." In.

  • König B, Junge R, Bittsanszky A, Villarroel M, Kőmíves T (2016) On the sustainability of aquaponics. Ecocycles 2(1):26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König B, Janker J, Reinhardt T, Villarroel M, Junge R (2018) Analysis of aquaponics as an emerging technological innovation system. J Clean Prod 180:232–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotzen, B., Emerenciano, M. G. C., Moheimani, N., & Burnell, G. M. (2019). Aquaponics: alternative types and approaches. In Aquaponics food production systems (pp. 301–330). Springer, Cham.

  • Lapere P (2010) A techno-economic feasibility study into aquaponics in South Africa MS thesis. University of Stellenbosch, Department of Industrial Engineering, Stellenbosch, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekang, O.-I. (2007). Aquaculture engineering. Wiley Online Library.

  • Lennard, W. (2017). Commercial aquaponic systems: integrating recirculating fish culture with hydroponic plant production. Wilson Lennard.

  • Lennard, W., & Goddek, S. (2019). Aquaponics: the basics. In Aquaponics food production systems (pp. 113–143). Springer.

  • Lobillo-Eguíbar J, Fernández-Cabanás VM, Bermejo LA, Pérez-Urrestarazu L (2020) Economic sustainability of small-scale aquaponic systems for food self-production. Agronomy 10(10):1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love DC, Fry JP, Li X, Hill ES, Genello L, Semmens K, Thompson RE (2015) Commercial aquaponics production and profitability: findings from an international survey. Aquaculture 435:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love DC, Genello L, Li X, Thompson RE, Fry JP (2015) Production and consumption of homegrown produce and fish by noncommercial aquaponics gardeners. J Agric Food Syst Community Dev 6(1):161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maucieri C, Forchino AA, Nicoletto C, Junge R, Pastres R, Sambo P, Borin M (2018) Life cycle assessment of a micro aquaponic system for educational purposes built using recovered material. J Clean Prod 172:3119–3127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mchunu N, Lagerwall G, Senzanje A (2018) Aquaponics in South Africa: results of a national survey. Aquaculture Reports 12:12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miličić V, Thorarinsdottir R, Santos MD, Hančič MT (2017) Commercial aquaponics approaching the European market: to consumers’ perceptions of aquaponics products in Europe. Water 9(2):80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palm HW, Knaus U, Appelbaum S, Goddek S, Strauch SM, Vermeulen T, Jijakli MH, Kotzen B (2018) Towards commercial aquaponics: a review of systems, designs, scales and nomenclature. Aquacult Int 26(3):813–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proksch, G., Ianchenko, A., & Kotzen, B. (2019). Aquaponics in the built environment. In Aquaponics food production systems (pp. 523–558). Springer, Cham.

  • Quagrainie KK, Flores RMV, Kim H-J, McClain V (2018) Economic analysis of aquaponics and hydroponics production in the US Midwest. J Appl Aquac 30(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffestin C, Lawrence R (1990) An ecological perspective on housing, health and well-being. J Soc & Soc Welfare 17:143

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. A., & Amin, M. R. (2016). Aquaponics: a potential integrated farming system for sustainable agriculture and aquaculture.

  • Rakocy JE (2012) Aquaponics: integrating fish and plant culture. Aquac Prod Syst 1:343–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakocy, J. E., Bailey, D. S., Shultz, R. C., & Danaher, J. J. (2011). A commercial-scale aquaponic system developed at the University of the Virgin Islands.

  • Rayhan, M. Z., Rahman, M. A., Hossain, M. A., Akter, T., & Akter, T. (2018). Effect of stocking density on growth performance of monosex tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) with Indian spinach (Basella alba) in a recirculating aquaponic system. Inl J Environ Agric Biotechnol, 3(2).

  • Riche, M., & Garling, D. (2003). Feeding tilapia in intensive recirculating systems.

  • Rizal, A., Dhahiyat, Y., Andriani, Y., Handaka, A., & Sahidin, A. (2018). The economic and social benefits of an aquaponic system for the integrated production of fish and water plants. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,

  • Salam M, Jahan N, Hashem S, Rana K (2014) Feasibility of tomato production in aquaponic system using different substrates. Progress Agric 25:54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savidov, N., & Brooks, A. (2004). Evaluation and development of aquaponics production and product market capabilities in Alberta. Crop Diversification Centre South, Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural

  • Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: practice theory. The practice turn in contemporary theory.

  • Schmidt, K. (2018). Practice theory”: a critique. Socio-informatics: a practice-based perspective on the design and use of IT artifacts, 105–137.

  • Short G, Yue C, Anderson N, Russell C, Phelps N (2017) Consumer perceptions of aquaponic systems. HortTechnology 27(3):358–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, C., & Ferrand, C. (2013). Aquaponics in Gaza. Field exchange 46: special focus on urban food security & nutrition, 15.

  • Somerville, C., Cohen, M., Pantanella, E., Stankus, A., & Lovatelli, A. (2014). Small-scale aquaponic food production: integrated fish and plant farming. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper(589), I.

  • Specht K, Weith T, Swoboda K, Siebert R (2016) Socially acceptable urban agriculture businesses. Agron Sustain Dev 36(1):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, McNeill J (2011) The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Phil Trans R Soc A 369(1938):842–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tamin M, Harun A, Estim A, Saufie S, Obong S (2015) Consumer acceptance towards aquaponic products. IOSR J Business Manage (IOSR-JBM) 17(8):49–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokunaga K, Tamaru C, Ako H, Leung P (2015) Economics of small-scale commercial aquaponics in Hawai ‘i. J World Aquaculture Soc 46(1):20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson L (2017) Indoor aquaponics in abandoned buildings: a potential solution to food deserts. Sustainable Development Law & Policy 16(1):5

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnšek M, Morgenstern R, Schröter I, Mergenthaler M, Hüttel S, Leyer M (2019) Commercial aquaponics: a long road ahead. Aquaponics Food Production Systems 18:453–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gorcum B, Goddek S, Keesman KJ (2019) Gaining market insights for aquaponically produced vegetables in Kenya. Aquacult Int 27(5):1231–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villarroel M, Junge R, Komives T, König B, Plaza I, Bittsánszky A, Joly A (2016) Survey of aquaponics in europe. Water 8(10):468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Bormann, T. (2019). Agri-food systems: facts and futures: how South Africa.

  • Watten BJ, Busch RL (1984) Tropical production of tilapia (Sarotherodon aurea) and tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) in a small-scale recirculating water system. Aquaculture 41(3):271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Sage.

  • Yavuzcan Yildiz H, Robaina L, Pirhonen J, Mente E, Domínguez D, Parisi G (2017) Fish welfare in aquaponic systems: its relation to water quality with an emphasis on feed and faeces—a review. Water 9(1):13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yep B, Zheng Y (2019) Aquaponic trends and challenges–a review. J Clean Prod 228:1586–1599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zugravu A, Rahoveanu M, Adrian T.-R, Khalel M S, Ibrahim MAR (2016) The perception of aquaponics products in Romania. ternational Conference “Risk in Contemporary Economy” ISSN-L,

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babatunde Adeleke.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Gavin Burnell

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adeleke, B., Cassim, S. & Taylor, S. Pathways to low-cost aquaponic systems for sustainable livelihoods and economic development in poor communities: defining critical success factors. Aquacult Int 30, 1575–1591 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-022-00865-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-022-00865-z

Keywords

Navigation